― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 16 May 2005 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― ZionTrain (ZionTrain), Monday, 16 May 2005 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Monday, 16 May 2005 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Monday, 16 May 2005 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Monday, 16 May 2005 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Monday, 16 May 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― kenneth jnr, Monday, 16 May 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― stew!, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― James, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:51 (twenty years ago)
― James, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:00 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)
― rapid eyes, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)
i'll only excuse this comment under two circumstances: (1) you've never heard the song; or (2) you've never seen the movie. if neither of these apply, you're only other excuse is a complete lack of taste.
― i am a grammar boy. as such, i am fierce! (grammaboy), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:32 (twenty years ago)
― i am a grammar boy. as such, i am fierce! (grammaboy), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:37 (twenty years ago)
I think the surprising thing is how many of the songs on Monster I love, given the "different" nature of the album.
"Kenneth" has to be a classic. It's so straight-ahead, so rock-n-roll, but it's not plain. And that groove! Mike Mills rocks the melodic bass. And it's a song where Berry's work proves that drummers can be artists.
And another thing: ever notice how every single one of R.E.M.'s albums is both widely hated and widely loved? Seriously, for every Fables lover or Up apologist or OOT devotee, there is another person saying it's crap. Same for Monster. Is it like that for other artists whom I don't follow as closely?
― Justin, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:55 (twenty years ago)
Dude, he proved that on Murmur! (and so did Ringo, in 1963)
And another thing: ever notice how every single one of R.E.M.'s albums is both widely hated and widely loved? Seriously, for every Fables lover or Up apologist or OOT devotee, there is another person saying it's crap. Same for Monster.
R.E.M. are overrated and underrated. Their last few albums would force the haters to claim the former.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:59 (twenty years ago)
Well, I said it's *a* song. Not *the* song.
R.E.M. are overrated and underrated.
Is there another band comparable to R.E.M.'s under/overratedness?
Or is that a too-broad and dumb question? I can never tell on here.
― Justin, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:04 (twenty years ago)
― PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)
― GW, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:02 (twenty years ago)
― someteenpartying (someteenpartying), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
http://product.ebay.com/Monster_UPC_093624574026_W0QQfvcsZ1226QQsoprZ3162438QQssPageNameZFavMerch_SO:BACK
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 15 June 2006 20:37 (twenty years ago)
― jonviachicago (jonviachicago), Thursday, 15 June 2006 21:15 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 15 June 2006 21:42 (twenty years ago)
Even though it's officially tied with Out of Time and Automatic for the People as R.E.M.'s best-selling U.S. title.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 15 June 2006 22:52 (twenty years ago)
― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Thursday, 15 June 2006 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Thursday, 15 June 2006 23:54 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 16 June 2006 00:03 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 00:07 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Friday, 16 June 2006 00:17 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 16 June 2006 00:42 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 01:18 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 02:32 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 02:40 (twenty years ago)
― Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Friday, 16 June 2006 05:42 (twenty years ago)
― marbles (marbles), Friday, 16 June 2006 14:27 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 16 June 2006 14:33 (twenty years ago)
they've gone to shit lately, tho.
― PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:00 (twenty years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:18 (twenty years ago)
This is the part of the thread where Tim will try to convince us of the greatness of Around the Sun.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:24 (twenty years ago)
From what I understand, there were just a ton of these pressed and it didn't end up selling that well.Even though it's officially tied with Out of Time and Automatic for the People as R.E.M.'s best-selling U.S. title.― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:52 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban PermalinkNot to mention the fact that it's a far better album than either of those two.― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:06 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark
Not to mention the fact that it's a far better album than either of those two.― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:06 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark
It's definitely their best 90's album.. I agree that it's aged well.
I pretty sure this album did continue to sell over the course of the following year, as there were at least 6 MTV videos / radio singles pulled.. record companies don't usually do this unless there's good sales momentum to begin with. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the order was Kenneth, Bang And Blame, Star 69, Crush With Eyeliner, Strange Currencies.. and I'm almost positive Tongue was a single, but I'm not sure when it would have been released.. Strange Currencies was promoted over summer 95 which was nearly a year after Monster's release date)
― billstevejim, Monday, 1 December 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
I think it's one of the biggest used bin fillers of all time in part because it did sell pretty well, people just didn't like it much once they bought it for the most part.
Also I'd say this is at most their 3rd or 4th best 90's album, and I don't even hate it.
― dumb pseud (some dude), Monday, 1 December 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
i liked it a lot at the time, and still like it now, but 4th best is about right. Star 69 wasn't a single. i bought all the singles from this album for some reason. i think this was maybe the album where all of the b-sides were designed to be put together to form a live album? REM were always a shitty band for b-sides.
― Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 1 December 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
I remember laughing out loud, literally, when I read the title of this album for the first time (it was in a British weekly). It just seemed like so goofy, totally out of character.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 1 December 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)