― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:22 (twenty-two years ago)
Okay, does anyone here actually find nothing at all remotely disturbing about these tracks? Yes the record is in some sense quite beautiful, but god how some of those sound worlds get under my skin! Maybe it's good I've never done acid...
― Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Yes. I listened to SAWII while shrooming one time. Everyone went to some godawful bar to celebrate someone's birthday so I was all alone. I eventually had to turn it off because it was 'giving me bad vibes, maaan.' I do wish there were more hauntingly beautiful tracks on there, such as the one Clarke just mentioned (Disc 1, Track 3--which to me isn't lonesome, but instead evokes the feeling of lying in bed in the arms of a lover)(but it does have that 'all is right w/the world, too bad I'll eventually die' mood too)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:22 (twenty-two years ago)
Clarke B's story about his dad and Disc 1, Track 3, aka One Of the Most Beautiful Songs Ever = genius.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)
"Selected Ambient Works 85-92, 2x12" (R&S)Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Distance)Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)"
i dont remember it ever being on warp either.the warp site shows the 'on' ep to be the first aphex record out on warp, 15.11.93
― ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 17 July 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
Call me old-fashioned, but I like my beats to have at least a minimal sense of rhythm.
― Ben Williams, Thursday, 17 July 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 17 July 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)
SAW1 makes me immensely happy and brings make too many good memories of being in London and my conversion from serious student to clubber; SAW2 is rewarding, but not immediate in the same way as SAW1.
I listened to both this week, and SAW1 wins.
― Nik (Nik), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― don, Friday, 9 April 2004 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 9 April 2004 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Strangely that sentiment also neatly describes how I feel about Nirvana's Nevermind and In Utero.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 10 April 2004 02:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 10 April 2004 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)
I never found out when the songs were recorded but Xtal gives the impression of being quite old, doesn't it?
I'm going to play this now.
― A Rush of Cold Blood To The Head (Bimble...), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
I know, I know ILM. Hold your breath.
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― A Rush of Cold Blood To The Head (Bimble...), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)
Tha always makes me feel like I'm in my high school gym. Not cause I played it in there either...
― A Rush of Cold Blood To The Head (Bimble...), Sunday, 5 November 2006 20:44 (nineteen years ago)
Anyways, Killian Murphy was OTM in his initial remark that the first two tracks were the best thing on the album.
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 5 November 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Disco Nihilist (mjt), Monday, 6 November 2006 00:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 6 November 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer: none of th movies make scence but they r good. (latebloomer), Monday, 6 November 2006 04:37 (nineteen years ago)
― All The Furniture Is In The Garage (Bimble...), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:01 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 8 November 2006 06:05 (nineteen years ago)
― pipecock (pipecock), Thursday, 9 November 2006 02:41 (nineteen years ago)
Finally got 'Ambient Works 85-92'. Absolutely loving it. Need Volume II as soon as possible.
― krakow, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
SAW2 is soul-ambient
― pipecock (pipecock), Wednesday, November 8, 2006 9:41 PM
*cringe*
― ♖♕♖ (am0n), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
haha
― won't you be my GAPDY / come and make it rain down on NME (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 17:41 (sixteen years ago)
soulbient
― randomized what nots (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.lastfm.es/music/100dBs/_/Poppa+Large+In+The+US
Loving this mashup of IZ-US against the Ultramagnetic's Poppa Large.
― Moka, Tuesday, 26 January 2010 21:51 (sixteen years ago)
Selected Ambient Works II > Selected Ambient Works 85-92
Even though Selected Ambient Works II is twice as long, I find it a far more engaging listen than Selected Ambient Works 85-92. I particularly like the track that sounds like snake charmer music, which sounds to me like a track Robert Smith could have come up with in 1984 or something if he had to come up with an ambient B-side for a Cure single.
― The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:02 (nine years ago)
Richard D. James Album > Selected Ambient Works II > Selected Ambient Works 85-92
― Handsome Bookor, Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:23 (nine years ago)
probably about equal
― a but (brimstead), Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:37 (nine years ago)
Drukqs > Selected Ambient Works II > Richard D. James Album > Selected Ambient Works 85-92 > Syro > ...I Care Because You Do.
― The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:50 (nine years ago)
I have a hard time rating SAW II. It's a tough album to compare to anything, really. Either you want to hear 2.5 hours of dreamy surreal synth stuff or you don't.
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:52 (nine years ago)
funny, nobody rated Drukqs back then.. do people still think it's a bad album?
― braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:59 (nine years ago)
I particularly like the track that sounds like snake charmer music,
This one gave me a serious full-on audio-sensory nightmare once upon a time.
― Lennon, Elvis, Hendrix etc (dog latin), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:00 (nine years ago)
xp Druqks is a bad album with some outstanding tracks. It's basically four different mini-albums on shuffle, innit? But yeah, I have trouble with it and always have.
― Lennon, Elvis, Hendrix etc (dog latin), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:01 (nine years ago)
I remember when Drukqs came out it wasn't well received by some, but I reckon that was mostly down to people thinking it was just thrown together or something, which of course it wasn't. For me, it's about the sprawl and the experience and the way the acoustic piano tracks rub up against the more frantic beat-driven stuff. His best album, IMO.
― The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:06 (nine years ago)
no
― Lennon, Elvis, Hendrix etc (dog latin), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:14 (nine years ago)
yes
― The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:22 (nine years ago)