Bands where a member leaves, and BOTH that member and the band become more successful as a result

The Housemartins -> The Beautiful South / Fatboy Slim.

Tin Tin Duffy/Duran Duran

I was thinking of that one earlier as I headed out. Think it took a while before Stephen Duffy became popular or was that just became credible. Was Tin Tin a teenybop popstar who became more underground with the Lilac Time?

He was massive in smash hits for a whole month in 198~

Fleetwood Mac / Bob Welch (his leaving the band led to Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham joining).

Did Welch become more successful after leaving the Mac, though?

he had a successful jelly line iirc

I'd say yeah. Mac with Welch had some medium selling albums and a bunch of non-charting singles; French Kiss went #12 on the Billboard chart and spawned 3 hit singles.

Jam & Lewis/The Time

When did they quit The Time? They play on "Pandemonium", the band's most popular album, so it doesn't seem like they'd fit this thread's premise.

I mean, Jam & Lewis are certainly now better known outside The Time, but The Time didn't become more popular without them.

Klaus schulze / tangerine dream ?

Jay Farrar / Uncle Tupelo (which became Wilco after he left)

Michael Rother / kraftwerk

When did they quit The Time? They play on "Pandemonium", the band's most popular album, so it doesn't seem like they'd fit this thread's premise.

they quit prior to Purple Rain & Ice Cream Castle. Ice Cream Castle has the band's biggest hits on it.

Jonathan Donahue (Mercury Rev) / Flaming Lips

Jerry Butler / The Impressions

Ben E. King / Drifters

^ That's the one I was trying to think of, but I got sidetracked thinking of Clyde McPhatter, who had pop hits post-Drifters while The Drifters were having pop hits as well (1960s) but it's not the same because the '60s Drifters were a completely different group from the '50s Drifters

Syd Barrett + Pink Floyd

Yeah, Syd's astonishing run of platinum solo albums was something no one could have predicted.

Chevy Chase leaving the band he had with Fagen/Becker

Strawbs / Sandy Denny, sort of

Madonna / The Breakfast Club

rod stewart / ron wood / jeff beck group (maybe)

Then you've got Ry Cooder quitting Captain Beefheart and the Magic Band after their first record. Sort of thing seems to happen a lot in certain scenes... Van Dyke Parks was a member of the Mothers of Invention around the same time...

Somehow I'd gotten this far in life without ever knowing either of these things. Wow.

Humble Pie/Peter Frampton?
Frampton went solo and had success with Show Me the Way, Comes Alive etc but were Humble Pie passing their peak or was that their greatest success point?
I like the Frampton era stuff anyway and think Clempson was pretty good elsewhere too.

Buffalo Springfield.
Neil Young and Stephen Stills. Richie Furay and Jim Messina too, actually.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 12:10 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Oh wait, never mind on Buffalo Springfield. Read the thread title wrong.
- kornrulez6969, Tuesday, January 10, 2017 12:10 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You could make a case for Poco and Jim Messina though

Somehow I'd gotten this far in life without ever knowing either of these things. Wow.

― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever)

vdp's involvement in the mothers is not very well-known - he's not on any of their recordings - but cooder plays guitar on the first magic band album _safe as milk_ and that record is fabulous.

D.J. Bonebrake was apparently in the Germs in 1978, before X. Depends how you define "successful."

How about Skip Spence starting a bunch of bands then leaving them to, well, make it? Jefferson Airplane, Moby Grape and The Doobie Brothers..

Didn't Moby Grape fall off the map after their first three (Spence) albums, though? I know they made more albums.

I don't think this one really fits, but how about Michael Steele leaving The Runaways in 1976 before they recorded their first album, then joining the Bangles 8 years later.

(Random Wikipedia fact: Michael Steele briefly played bass for Snakefinger.)

Hard to know what would've become of Genesis had Gabriel not left but I highly doubt it could have resulted in something like Invisible Touch. Phil was definitely more of a hitmaker than Peter was, and I don't think Peter could've done the things he wanted to within the band.

In an alternative universe, "In Your Eyes" would have probably sounded almost same and just been called a Genesis song. And stuff like "In Too Deep" would have been saved for solo Phil Collins because it sounds way more like his solo stuff than full band.

maybe not but Kim Deal/Pixies of the 90s? she left and within 2 years the Breeders had a bigger hit than the Pixies ever did.

might be hard to make the case for now financially but imo creatively the Breeders are still way more successful whereas Pixies have kind of lost their magic and turned into a generic bar band.

Eh? That is almost completely wrong afaik. Kim didn't leave, the band broke up, the same year as the Breeders had their big hit. I suppose the same year is within 2 years, so not quite completely wrong.

But how do you figure Kim "leaving" the Pixies made them more successful when the Pixies were then defunct for 10 years?

can't believe we're this deep in with no mention of van halen

Van Halen's apex was 1984, no? so they wouldn't qualify

No way, Van Hagar sold waaaaaaay more records.

. Also the rare instance, along with Genesis, of both the original singer and the replacement singer having successful solo careers of their own. Though I don't know if Hagar counts, because he was successful pre-VH.

Well, actually it's complicated, re: VH.

http://www.guitarplayer.com/news/1024/roths-van-halen-sales-trounce-sammy-hagars-hold-on-there-dave/52326

solo Roth was big, but did he ever equal 1984 sales?

Yeah I don't buy that re: Van Hagar. The whole thing about Roth taking seven records to sell what Hagar did in four... well, yeah. Hagar joined after VH's best-selling album ever. the thing about the Hagar albums hitting #1 is useless imo, only sales matter.

I thiiiiiiink Van Hagar made more $$$, if I recall Hagar's memoir "Red" correctly, but yeah, established brand.

There were a lot of factors at work re: Van Halen vs Van Hagar. Van Hagar were building on Van Halen's established rep, and the industry around them was changing, too - they'd started out a bar band, served a couple of years as an opening act, and only in their last few years (say, 1981-84) headlined. Meanwhile, rock shows were themselves getting bigger, so VH circa '85 was able to play stadiums rather than arenas, which wasn't an option for Roth-era VH until close to the end of their run.

On the flip side, think how much Hagar lost paying speeding tickets.

I guess Fairport Convention shedding members in 69 to begat solo Sandy Denny and Steeleye Span and a little later solo Richard Thompson doesn't count? Not sure how popular Fairport Convention remained at the time. Maybe it does though, could be when they were closest to being a popular band. Certainly meant a lot of great music came out. The Albion Band or whatever variation thereon was also great.

The Commodores only Grammy winning single "Nightshift" was released after the departure of Lionel Richie.

hard to argue that they were more successful overall after he left, considering that was their last hit and lionel became one of the biggest stars of the 80s

I know but I was listening to that song this morning and was like wow that was the only Grammy they won (& not for "Easy" nor "3x a Lady" nor "Lady" nor lol "Brick House" etc.)

it's a good song

Did we mention Massive Attack and Tricky?