The new disc -- Lust Lust Lust -- appeared on eMusic today. I'm very curious based on the review, which says it's better than 'Psychocandy'.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
^^ rong obv
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
Probably so, but the favorable comparison still speaks well of the disc. Others upthread seem to like it, too. Is it just a JAMC knockoff?
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:30 (eighteen years ago)
goddamn, two days after i buy a copy and FP finally fucking get off their ass to put it on emusic. typical. anyway it's a very fun record, if not up to the standards of the last two
― electricsound, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:42 (eighteen years ago)
evidently i can't access it on emusic so no harm done
― electricsound, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:45 (eighteen years ago)
I am happy with the recent JAMC-type indie releases - Raveonettes, A Place To Bury Strangers, Magnetic Fields, etc. It's a very welcome return of sonic depth to iPod-quality indiepop.
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:45 (eighteen years ago)
Man that APTBS disc is good. The way a record oughta be.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:48 (eighteen years ago)
I'll probably be crucified for saying it, but Lust Lust Lust is exactly what I was hoping to get from the disappointing Magnetic Fields album.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:41 (eighteen years ago)
i haven't heard distortion but i'm sure that's entirely fair
― electricsound, Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:03 (eighteen years ago)
The Black Tamborine comment is very astute ... it has a strong Aislers Set feel to it. It sounds like it belongs on Slumberland, not Vice. Extremely strong album, but will it be remembered at the end of the year?
― zaxxon25, Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:42 (eighteen years ago)
It's getting only fair reviews (72 METASCORE on about 17 reviews), so chances are it won't be remembered in many Year-End Polls.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:48 (eighteen years ago)
i'm digging lust lust lust. plenty of fuzz on the guitars, but very pretty soundscapes nonetheless. nice, dreamy songs
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:52 (eighteen years ago)
Lust Lust Lust is great, I like it better than the previous records (which were good, but kinda samey very quickly).
Seems like there's more of a groove to the songs this time around.
― milo z, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
i'll have to check this out
― The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
My favorite rock disc of the year, so far.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:37 (eighteen years ago)
Great!
― I know, right?, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:39 (eighteen years ago)
Two follow-ups. First, the disc really does have a sonic imprint similar to Psychocandy, tho I'm by no means saying it's as good (some have, however, e.g., the eMusic review). I mention it because L3 is one of the more strongly nostalgic discs I've heard since the 80s revival began this decade, and so it touches certain nerves with me. Second, L3 is, to me, a nice companion piece to the growing indie noise rock sound I've been enjoying more and more over the past few years. I think of it and two other discs as three sides of the nu-Indie Noise Rock: L3 representing darkly romantic noise rock; A Place To Bury Strangers' self-titled debut last year representing angry, industrial-type noise rock; and TNV's new disc representing light-hearted, raucous noise rock. I'm sure I've missed a lot of other equally worthy noise rock discs, but there it is. Anyway, L3 is a very, very good disc.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:59 (eighteen years ago)
see also: asobi seksu
― electricsound, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:07 (eighteen years ago)
Brilliant show tonight. Loved their cover of Stereolab's "French Disko" too.
― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 08:36 (eighteen years ago)
I kinda regret being so drunk when I saw them, I can't remember much about the gig, and lots of people are saying they were great live!
― Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 11:24 (eighteen years ago)
Eh, this is okay. The way they use vocals to balance the mood/sound out strikes me as an improvement on JAMC, but some of these songs (and it's a relatively short album) aren't holding my attention.
― _Rockist__Scientist_, Sunday, 16 March 2008 22:13 (eighteen years ago)
Best album of the year, so far.
― stephen, Monday, 17 March 2008 00:41 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ Agreed.
it's a relatively short album . . . (but some of the songs) aren't holding my attention.
I'd say it's economical and compact. And the high points -- e.g., Aly Walk With Me, Dead Sound, You Want The Candy, Sad Transmission -- are very, very high.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 March 2008 01:30 (eighteen years ago)
wow, i didn't realise they were my favourites until you just said it. well done.
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 03:58 (eighteen years ago)
^^that reads as sarcasm but it isn't I swear
'you want the candy' is taking the whole j and m chain thing a little too far, for mine.
best of the year would be a big call. i'll settle on a pleasing set of songs for now
― Charlie Howard, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:01 (eighteen years ago)
i like how every interview with them I've read has included a list of their very obvious influences VU ronnettes buddy holly mbv jamc shangrilas etc
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:03 (eighteen years ago)
haha totally. if ever a band's influences are gonna speak for themselves it's these guys
― Charlie Howard, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:07 (eighteen years ago)
x-post
Talk about telegraphing an already obvious influence. However, in all honesty I do like that song. I would also add "Hallucinations" to Daniel's list of the best songs on the album (with which I otherwise agree), even though I don't like any of it as much as he does.
― _Rockist__Scientist_, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:09 (eighteen years ago)
its actually the beauty of them. Simulacrum I think; I might not have really understood that Baudrillard book.
i think this albums cover art has been overlooked, as a band who have always had really bad design this is a great cover and probably one of the best there will be this year.
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:11 (eighteen years ago)
while i like this album i do think it's their weakest since the debut
― electricsound, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:13 (eighteen years ago)
yep rockist, i acknowledge it as an already obvious, given influence. just that that particular song annoys me a tad with its even-more-overt-than-usual nod to the jamc oeuvre :)
agreed on cover art
― Charlie Howard, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:14 (eighteen years ago)
you mean you think whip it on is weak!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?
what about bowels of the beast or cops on our tail or attack of the ghost riders or beat city. They are fucking brilliant. Minor works for minor works.
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:17 (eighteen years ago)
it's all relative 8)
― electricsound, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:21 (eighteen years ago)
relavitism is the enemy of human rights!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this is a question of ethics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fuck you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yes i suppose its only an opinion.
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:26 (eighteen years ago)
"aly walk with me" = sexy fuzzy jam of the year.
― Emily Bjurnhjam, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:31 (eighteen years ago)
that song's a goodo
― Charlie Howard, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:34 (eighteen years ago)
Opener ‘Aly Walk With Me’ merges hip-hop beats and Velvet Underground guitars
nme have never eard ip hop
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:39 (eighteen years ago)
raveonettes = noise rockers?
nme have never heard noise music
Q. nme writers = my little sister?
My little sister has heard public enemy and Free Kitten
A. No
― I know, right?, Monday, 17 March 2008 04:46 (eighteen years ago)
Raveonettes basically denied belonging to any particular music scene when I talked to them at SXSW, which I thought was kinda weird/stupid.
― fukasaku tollbooth, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:39 (eighteen years ago)
hahah!
i saw them twice at sxsw, both times great but one was just exceptionally well done, way awesome show.
― stephen, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 01:50 (eighteen years ago)
one of my fav songs = "My Heartbeat's Dying", the first bonus track on the US version. so so so good.
Video for 'You Want The Candy'. Really good (quick, jagged cuts; scuzzy; exciting). One of my favorite songs of the year, no matter how obviously derivative it is.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 22 March 2008 23:54 (eighteen years ago)
he shouldn't do that thing with his hair
― I know, right?, Saturday, 22 March 2008 23:59 (eighteen years ago)
I like about half the songs on this album but "You Want the Candy" is boring shit
― Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 23 March 2008 00:31 (eighteen years ago)
Candy is one of my favorites, but I love a lot of stuff on this disc.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 March 2008 00:42 (eighteen years ago)
they don't strike me as an indie-burlesque-friendly sound
― milo z, Sunday, 23 March 2008 01:32 (eighteen years ago)
lust lust lust is pretty great. obv. the JAMC references are huge on the record, but it works cuz the songs are good....also i was suprised by a few moments (like aly walk w.me) that go into actual hellish noise not just "indie noisy-ish guitars".....
in a way they are sort of doing the same thing times new viking is doing for a different set of historical references (JAMC/Kitchens of Distinction vs. GBV/Stiltbreeze shit)
― M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
It's all about "Blitzed" these days
― milo z, Sunday, 22 June 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
Why did I ignore this band for so long?
― Tape Store, Sunday, 22 June 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)