Rolling Country 2006 Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2098 of them)
oh, and I picked up Rednecks and Bluenecks last night at Barnes & Noble and read the first 30 pages or so - v. good stuff that just confirms some of the things I've been feeling lately, which were reiterated in another great book I just finished recently, don't know if anyone else here as read it, called Sunday Money, about NASCAR. I share with both authors (and I know it's not a novel idea but just one I've been really considering lately) the sense of how the Democratic Party has completely lost its connection to working-class people, to Southerners and Midwesterners and the people who listen to country music and follow NASCAR. that until the Dems shed this label of snooty uppercrust elitism they don't stand a chance of becoming a viable presence in American politics anytime soon.

the guy who wrote Sunday Money, Jeff MacGregor, spelled this out explicitly in a great piece on Salon last week, about how the Dems needed not only to court the NASCAR fanbase but maybe also needed an infusion of some of that populist larger-than-life spirit. of course, a healthy number of the commenters called him an idiot and continued to assert that the Dems shouldn't cater to a bunch of redneck trash.

Josh Love (screamapillar), Sunday, 26 February 2006 16:21 (twenty years ago)

xp: you should have checked last year's thread, Josh!

re Shannon Brown (xp):
(The first few songs of whose album sound really really good by the way. An "Okee From Muskogee" update about how we don't lock our doors and nobody burns flags on the courthouse lawn and there's only country stations out here and we don't keep anybody who lives out here out whatever the heck that means, a funkier one about she's a little woman who needs a big man not a mack-daddy pimp like you {I think she answers somebody who calls her a "ho" in it, too}, a song about people are wrong to say Garth and Shania aren't country 'cause that's what they used to say about Johnny Cash but she likes Steve Miller and Sheryl Crow and Kid Rock too and isn't it great how Kenny Chesney's laughing all the way to the bank so why don't we all get along -- all rocking country with fiddles in the groove, and yeah, lots of dumbass pandering in the words but what else is new? Now I'm on "Can I Get an Amen" which sounds EXACTLY like some big '70s rock song -- "Listen to the Music" by the Doobie Brothers, maybe? Then it turns into something by BTO, I think, "Roll On Down the Highway," maybe?; whatever it is, it definitely outrocks the Doobie Brothers, and then it winds down to more fiddles then handclap gospel acapella.)

--xhuxk, (xedd,,), November 23, 2005

(Fiddle break in Shannon Brown's "Corn Fed" quotes Black Dog riff...
-- Sang Freud (jstrell...), November 24th, 2005.

"Good Ole Days" (track #8 on the Shannon Brown album) = the most over-the-top 1979 disco on any country album, maybe ever (or at least since, like, 1980 or so).
-- xhuxk (xedd...), November 24th, 2005.

> over-the-top 1979 disco<
Or 1976 disco. Or somewhere in there. (Do your own callibrations at will.)

-- xhuxk (xedd...), November 25th, 2005.

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 16:23 (twenty years ago)

also:

Shannon Brown, "Corn Fed." A good solid "Gloria"/"Sister Ray"–three-chorder, lite style, though marred by the usual lying xenophobic, chauvinist lyrics about the innocence and safety of the rural heartland. Someone should prevail upon Shannon to record "Sister Ray," or Shooter's "Daddy's Farm," or that Darryl Worley song from a couple years back about the heartland drug town.
-- Frank Kogan (edcasua...), December 27th, 2005.

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 16:26 (twenty years ago)

damn, I'm three months behind y'all's curve (though technically still a few days ahead of THE curve since the album doesn't come out 'til next week).

Josh Love (screamapillar), Sunday, 26 February 2006 16:39 (twenty years ago)

there's a decent piece on Jessi in the current No Depression. she's still pretty good-lookin', too.

one of the points that Willman makes in "Rednecks & Bluenecks," Anthony, is that the '70s Outlaw movement was perhaps the last time in Nashville that country music and "liberalism" really joined hands. one of the virtues of this book, if you ask me, is the way he presents a lot of different viewpoints, so you come away feeling, as I think you should, not so damned sure of yourself when you think about someone like Garth Brooks. if you think as I do, you like a lot of Garth's music but dislike his image, like the way he took on Nashville's power brokers but dislike the obsession and confusion about what to do with that power. I can't say this or repeat it enough, and some of you have heard me say this before so forgive me, but what happens in Nashville is uniquely deforming of the process of making and marketing and thinking about music. the city itself is exploding--becoming a world-class town, finally, the only southern city to compete with Atlanta in that regard. when I moved away in 1991, it was still pretty relaxed and you could get from east Nashville to Belle Meade in twenty minutes. no more of that. and as my pal Marky St. James pointed out last night, Nashville's full of people like the Swedish guitar-teacher-virtuoso-ph.D. who got on a plane to come live here and play Telecaster--it's what New York and L.A. have been in the past, as music center (altho NYC will always be the capital of jazz in the world...) I think someone's gonna come along here and do something as big as what Garth did, in perhaps a different area of "country music," seems inevitable to me...

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Sunday, 26 February 2006 17:19 (twenty years ago)

i really need to read the Willman book. Almost bought it back in November, and decided to ask for a copy of Xmas instead, but no dice. That NASCAR book sounds really interesting, too -- Last fall, the Times Book Review ran a really good NASCAR essay, revolving around two new books on the subject, but as usual I never got around to getting ahold of copies.

>what happens in Nashville is uniquely deforming of the process of making and marketing and thinking about music<

Not sure I get what you're saying here, Edd; how is it more deforming etc than the rest of the music biz (including indie labels, for that matter)? Assuming the biz is deforming at all, which I'm not entirely convinced about (although there's plenty of evidence to the contrary in the book I HAVE been reading -- Jen Trynin's *Everything I'm Cracked Up to Me,* which is hilarious and I highly recommend, and I say that as somebody with very little use of '90s alt-rock and very little time to read books about music, especially rock biographys. I wonder if the Commander Cody or Babes in Toyland books were this good). Most evidence I've seen in the past couple years suggests that Nashville has a pretty good knack for leaving great music intact, or at least no less a knack than anybody else has. Though maybe that's beside your point; I'm really not sure. (Also not sure what it is about Garth's image you dislike, unless you just mean his larger than life hubris, which at this point seems sillier and sillier as he proves not nearly as big as he used to be or he thought he was, in which case your dislike makes perfect sense. Plus, I just remembered that I've still yet to get around to playing his new CD, so, uh, maybe I hate what he stands for, too.)

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 17:47 (twenty years ago)

>obsession and confusion about what to do with that power. <

actually, i guess you do kind of explain what bothers you about Garth here...

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)

I just re-listened to Garth's "The Hits" and holy crap is about 3/4 of that record just amazingly wonderful.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Sunday, 26 February 2006 17:50 (twenty years ago)

>evidence to the contrary<

= evidence that the biz IS deforming (which I usually assume it isn't, really, all that much.) On other other hand, as charming as Trynin is, she often sounds like she's just whining. And I'm still stumped why bizzers ever figured she'd be big in the first place. But maybe it's just that I've always noticed so much great music coming out of the biz *despite* its machinations that I just assume those machinations are, in the long run, basically inept.

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 17:59 (twenty years ago)

(and I say all that as somebody whose current listening is, as this thread suggests, fairly well dominated by cdbaby.com acts who the biz {again, meaning indie labels as well as major labels} completely ignores. so right, i'm contradicting myself all over the place.)

xhuxk, Sunday, 26 February 2006 18:04 (twenty years ago)

edd

yeah, the book does that, very well, its deconstructive in a way that is genorous in its critique...but i do think there is something about making the outlaw/hippie powwow much larger then it really was.

how much of it charted, for example, and how well it charted (i think, and i may be wrong, and i have been wrong, the only song that charted is the redneck/hippie romance tune by bobby bare, and that didnt break the top 50)

the only problem i had with the entire book, in fact, and its a meme that has been annoying me in general, adn it was really kind of underplayed in the book anyways

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 03:32 (twenty years ago)

I guess my prejudice (I wouldn't really know how to test it) is that when indies have a chance to hit big, this is not only better for the mainstream - makes it more flexible - but better for the indies, since it makes them more insular, less stuck on playing only to a specialty audience. (But I have little understanding of the biz, and almost none of the country music biz.

My other prejudice is that when middle budget product disappears (you either have things with a lot of money and advertising and cross marketing behind it, or things with very little), that this isn't good. (But I'm thinking of movies here, not so sure how to apply it to records.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 27 February 2006 05:49 (twenty years ago)

makes them more insular

should be "makes them LESS insular"

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 27 February 2006 05:50 (twenty years ago)

"Rush" is a 2005 song to my daughter and her friends, Frank!

Yeah, well that's because little girls constitute the sociocultural vanguard. Followers and fellow travelers like me are always playing catchup. I was in 1966, and I still am. (But the "Rush" video wasn't until this year, and that automatically qualifies the song for 2006.)

the greatest Fairport Convention Celtic drone-rock I've heard from the '00s is the verse to Aly & AJ's "Rush"

My use of "Celtic" - probably anyone's use of "Celtic" in regard to music - is probably wrong here, since I doubt very much that Celtic origins have anything to do with why the music sounds the way it does. But my ideas here are based completely on what I remember from Peter van der Merwe's brief discussion of the origins of modern European music, which I read several years ago. Van der Merwe's idea (he presented it as if this was the standard belief among music historians, which it may well be) was that European music 1,000 years ago had basically derived from the Middle East, but that it was subsequently supplanted in urban centers by the do-re-mi scale, which then spread to most of the continental countryside but didn't spread to rural Britain and Ireland. So rural Irish, Scottish, Welsh music didn't sound the way it did because it was Celtic, but just because it was rural, and if you were rural and Anglo-Saxon your music would sound like that too.

And what's interesting here is that some similarities between Northern and Western African music and Scots-Irish music aren't just coincidence, but because those musics have at least some elements that originated in the Middle East. When those musics started running up against each other in the U.S. South, there were natural affinities already there.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 27 February 2006 06:07 (twenty years ago)

Hmmm, not sure if I'm clear above. My point isn't that "Rush" in particular isn't Celtic, but that no music is Celtic, incl. Fairport Convention. But as shorthand for a particular sound, I suppose "Celtic" will have to do.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 27 February 2006 06:12 (twenty years ago)

Finally heard last year's Sheryl Crow album. She now sounds as thin as she looks, which I suppose is deliberate but it's a terrible choice. Ethereal, all sass is gone, leaving not much of anything. There are three good songs, especially "Chances Are," where the thin voice intermingles effectively with a guitar drone. Her lyrics now waft vaguely in the direction of something or other, or something. "Swimming through the saline, I looked at you and you breathed in. That's the way it's always been. It all comes down to creating time. You don't always have to make it right. We'll all drive by in our hybrid lives." I wouldn't say she was ever an intellectual, and she seemed inordinately proud of her sex, rock, and dysfunctional relationships persona, old songs like "My Favorite Mistake," "Difficult Kind," etc. were riveting, both musically and lyrically ("If you could only see/What love has made of me/Then I would no longer be in your mind/The difficult kind/'Cause babe I've changed." But I didn't believe it for a second. But I guess she has changed now, made herself negligible, or happy, or something. I wish she'd change back.)

John Shanks produced and played on about half of the songs, but didn't write any of them, and his half aren't any better than the other. He ought to be forbidden to work with any performer older than 25 years, since they dull him out.

(Shanks had nothing to do with that great AJ & Aly song, but it follows a pattern that he and Michelle Branch created in 2001.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 27 February 2006 06:34 (twenty years ago)

thanks for the arabic/irish/north african work. frank, ive been trying to figure it out in my head, and it hadnt clicked.

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 11:14 (twenty years ago)

>making the outlaw/hippie powwow much larger then it really was...how much of it charted, for example, and how well it charted (i think, and i may be wrong, and i have been wrong, the only song that charted is the redneck/hippie romance tune by bobby bare,<

er, didn't willie nelson have a hit or two? (and commader cody, and asleep at the wheel, and lots of others any of us could name if we took the time, not to mention "longhaired redneck" by david allen coe and "longhaired country boy" by charlie daniels, and a whole bunch of southern rock bands?) or am i totally missing the point about the powwow in question?

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 14:00 (twenty years ago)

no im thinking out loud, were they huge hits? the ones youve mentioned, and what happened to it, if they were

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 14:58 (twenty years ago)

alright, questions about the 70s in country music, answer if you want, but its mostly to be clear about what im asking...maybe there is an essay here

how long did the outlaw movement last, from when to when
who were t he outlaws
how long did the countrypolitan movement last, from when to when
who were the countrypolitian

how large, in terms of sales were outlaw
how large in terms of sales were countrypolitan
how large in terms of radio play were outlaw
how large in terms of radio play were countrypolitan
ditto for concert revenue, and media concentration

how much of a cross over (songwriters, perormers, etc) were between various kinds of country music,

how does the folk revival impact these numbers irt the hippie qoutient.

why, amongst certain cultural critics, has the outlaw movement become such a peice of nostalgia.
is there an equal amount of nostalgia amongst current nashville perfomers (ie Paisley or Keith) (Rednecks and Bluenecks hints at the Keith connections, but rarely mentions Paisley, who I think may be a key to this)

how legitmate is the idea that outlaw country worked in musical and geographic oppostion to music row (ie Austin vs Nashville)

how does Johnny Cash fit into all of this?

What about Bakersfield.

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)

and how direct is the line b/w outlaw, and alt country

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)

xp" wait, you mean on the pop charts?? or country charts? or on rock stations? what counts as a huge hit in your book, anthony? because, yeah, a lot of this stuff and the allman brothers were pretty tough to ignore (hell, the ozark mountain daredevils' "jackie blue" went #3 pop!); i guess i'm missing how this wouldn't be completely obvious.

when i went to new-student orientation for the university of missouri before my sophomore college year 1979, i asked some kids i met what kinda music they liked, and they said "progressive country," which i *think* mainly meant outlaw music and southern rock. i wonder if that genre name was ever commonly used, and if so where, and for how long.


>how direct is the line b/w outlaw, and alt country <

Didn't we talk about this for a while on that No Depression thread?

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 15:33 (twenty years ago)

>how legitmate is the idea that outlaw country worked in musical and geographic oppostion to music row<

This is actually a really good question, though, I think. I kind of get the idea that the "opposition" might be more myth than reality.

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 15:35 (twenty years ago)

search "outlaw" here, anthony - there's a lot there, i think:

No Depression Top 40 of 2005

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 15:47 (twenty years ago)

i think its a lot more obvious to folks yr age, then folks my age chuck. im a good 20 years younger then you.

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 27 February 2006 16:03 (twenty years ago)

ever been to a show where people yelled for "free bird"? (just asking.) (though i guess it's possible skynyrd don't count as hippie rednecks. i'm still not sure what the definition is supposed to be.)

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

Apropos of nothing, really: at the Klezmatics show last week someone yelled for "Smoke on the Water" and Frank London said "We're more of an 'In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida' sort of band," but then they didn't play either one, dammit.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 27 February 2006 16:54 (twenty years ago)

If they were Brave Combo (who I've never really liked much as much as I wish I did) they *would* have done "Inna-Gadda-Da-Vida." As a polka!

xhuxk, Monday, 27 February 2006 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Fuck but I haven't had any time to keep up with this great thread. I don't know how you all do it. Maybe I'll have time to post after I finish a few projects this week.

Dunno if it's on the racks yet, but the new No Depression features Edd's fine speculative essay on pop and country, so don't miss it. (The title, which I assume wasn't the author's idea, is kinda huh?) Also David Cantwell on a bunch of Haggard two-fers. However, Don McLeese, who I like and respect, is just wrong about the new Van Morrison.

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Monday, 27 February 2006 17:46 (twenty years ago)

Been listening more to Lee Roy Parnell's *Back to the Well,* which I mentioned earlier (maybe toward the end of the '05 thread) in passing, but which finally comes out, I believe, today. So maybe now other people can help me with it. For one thing, I have no memory of Lee Roy's earlier stuff -- I gather he apparently had some actual country hits in the early '90s (unless I misheard somebody), which enables me to listen to this new album as a T. Graham Brown album more than a John Hiatt album, which helps. (Why am I always giving John Hiatt shit? Why is he always my poster boy for "boring old white guys trying to be soulful and coming out sounding really oily?" I honestly don't hate him! Or at least I didn't hate his new wave era stuff, up to 1983 or so. So it is unfair, but he just the best example I can think of.) Anyway, the soul-country stuff (ie Something Out of Nothing, Breaking the Chain, Just Lucky That Way) on the Parnell album is good, but the Van Morrison (usually circa 1978/79 Wavelength/Into the Music I guess -- which is to say: catchy!) sounding stuff (Old Soul -- see also Lil Wayne!, Daddies and Daughters which has very Catholic lyrics mentioning Mary Full of Grace
but like all daddies and daughters songs is pretty mushy anyway, That's All There Is with guitar I can't decide whether it's slide or slack key, Saving Grace) is even better, not to mention better than Van's own boring new "country" album. (If and when Parnell had country hits, has he always done Van-ish type stuff? Or soul stuff in general? What did his hits sound like? Because NOTHING on this record is MORE country than soul or blues, that's clear to me. Did he change? Either way, how come nobody talks about him?) Best of all are maybe the two tracks that verge toward jazz fusion -- the gambler's funk anthem You Can't Lose Them All, hooked on a really cool chord change, and maybe (or maybe not...okay, probably not one of the best tracks but I still really like it) the instrumental closer Cool Breeze. And really the whole album is sort of a cool breeze--no, more like a WARM breeze, but with some quiet storm in it the soul-country cuts, especially Something Out of Nothing. Only track, oddly enough, that sounds really heavy handed and STODGY in the pool-hall/beer-commercial (damn I always overuse THOSE metaphors, too; they're even tireder than using John Hiatt!) sense, is the opening and title track Back to the Well, which gets kinda minstrely in both its blues vocal affectations and its gospel backup, though the boogieing rhythm section does hold its own in it, I admit. As it also does elsewhere. Oddly, though, as much as I like the SOUND of this record, outside of You Can't Lose 'Em All, hardly any of it is hitting me as songs. I like the sound and feel of Lee Roy's voice a LOT, yet I'm not sure he's putting the songs over. Maybe 'cause the words are so pat and boilerplate and heard-it-before? Maybe. Though they don't bug me, all the same. Anyway, that's what I'm thinking. What about everybody else?

xhuxk, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 15:39 (twenty years ago)

Oops, I think the release date is actually TOMORROW, March 1. (I switched over my wall calendar already; I guess that's what confused me.) And I left out "Don't Water It Down," which actually funks and rolls and boogies better than the opening track, sounds like to me.

Roy: So did McLeese like the Van Morrison album? Do you? And if so, why? Struck me as a pointless snoozefest; did I miss something?

xhuxk, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Don loves the new Van--pretty much everything about it. I don't. The arrangements feel pro forma and Van both over and under sings badly. There's also very little country soul on the record, which may be the point, since he's already proven a master of that. But whatever the point was, beyond some dumb Van-celebrates-country-music-history, I don't feel it.

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 16:43 (twenty years ago)

I've got pretty mixed feelings about the new Jessi Colter album, I've decided. It cooks for the first few tracks, through track four maybe (the climax of track #3 "Starman" rocks the most I think; "You Can Pick 'Em" and "The Phoenix Rises" are also good, though I'm not buying the Stones theory Matt posited above anymore, I don't think -- Sheryl Crow has done way more Stonesy stuff). But then, starting with the boring Waylon/Tony Joe White track, it gets pretty staid and a little stilted and very loungey and adult-contemporary, like Don Was wanted her to do something along the lines of Jack White's Loretta Lynn record, but without Jack's songs. I guess some of the swirling piano atmosphere is supposed to have some windmills of the *Dusty in Memphis* mind in it maybe? I dunno. Shooter should've helped her out on a a rocker not a ballad, though their track picks up OK musically when they both stop singing. Her voice is okay throughout, I suppose; no complaints. But I can't say it's especially grabbing me, either.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

suggest for me some Gene Watson. Old Gene Watson, I've heard his latest one

I haven't heard the old Gene Watson, but I think Gene Watson ...Sings, the album that came out a couple years ago, is far superior to the latest one: stronger songs, stronger lyrics that go from hilarious to heart-wrenching. His steady big-but-casual voice keeps everything on an even keel; much beauty in the singing, but not in a way that shouts "BEAUTY" at you. If his back catalog has enough good material, this guy may be a major artist who's been generally overlooked - possibly because his style isn't the type that's thought of as "major."

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 20:37 (twenty years ago)

This week's issue of Billboard says there's a collaboration album between a couple surviving Pantera guys (including Dimebag Darrell's drummer brother Big Vin) and David Allen Coe coming out in May. Given that Coe's collaborations with Kid Rock a couple years ago (I still have a demo EP of tracks around here somewhere) weren't that great, plus the fact that Pantera kinda sucked, I wouldn't expect that much out of it. Still, intriguing news.

Also, Chris Cagle's new single which just hit the country chart at #56 is "Walmart Parking Lot," which I remember liking on his album, so maybe I should pull his album back out.

My favorite album in the world this week is Bruce Springsteen & the E Street Band's *Hammersmith Odeon, London '75.* No kidding. I forgot how much he used to love Mitch Ryder! And about time somebody acknowledged "Come A Little Bit Closer" by Jay and the Americans (missing link between "El Paso" and "Gimme Three Steps," as everyone knows.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)

Quick thoughts about Sara Evans and Brad Paisley, whose 2005 albums were due at the library before I could listen a second time (and I only really gave them background attention): Sara Evans seems kind of NPR, maybe not NPR country in the way we've been using it on this thread, but still somehow... I don't know, post-Emmy Lou supper club, even though her styles are basically mainstream. And nothing on this one hit my like "Suds in the Bucket," but this all might be owing to my inattention.

Paisley: the music is pleasant enough, with a nice little stroll to it, but it's the lyrics that make him interesting (to the extent he is interesting). The ones that popped into my head were the dead flowers one. Marry me or I will kill this flower!

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 00:40 (twenty years ago)

Also surprising about that live Springsteen album: How prog rock it is! (In a good way!)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 00:55 (twenty years ago)

So I pulled out the Cagle and Dierks Bentley albums because I wanted to hear "Wal-mart Parking Lot" (which contains some good high school social geography i.e. names of cliques stuff by the way) and Dierks's "Settle for a Slowdown" and "Come a Little Closer" separately as singles rather than album tracks (which I never have, since I never hear country radio or see CMT anymore these days), and that's the order in which I liked them. All three are pretty good, though I'm kind of confused about why, after "Lot of Leavin Left to Do" was so big, Capitol went for slower songs for the ladies (okay, duh, I'm not confused, I'm not that dumb) for Dierks singles rather than, say, "Cab of My Truck" or whatever. Guess they wanna play down his ramblin man aspects and play up his lothario aspects? "Down on Easy Street" and "Modern Day Drifter" totally kick those second and third singles' butts, too -- I totally object to the marketing plan!

(And speaking of marketing plans, nobody ever answered my Sugarland conspiracy theory up above. Does that mean everybody thinks I'm nuts?)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 14:32 (twenty years ago)

That would be a shame if the overweight Sugarlander was forced out - I mean, it's not like country fans can't accept a bigger lady, just look at Wynonna.

Josh Love (screamapillar), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 15:42 (twenty years ago)

its not that shes bigger, its that shes butch.

heard a song called a six pack from perfect on the radio today, i made a joke about country being the soundtrack to functional alocholism(sp)but the song was great--does anyone know who did it.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:18 (twenty years ago)

>its not that shes bigger, its that shes butch>

Might be both, actually. But yeah, butch is what I had in mind.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:42 (twenty years ago)

How many women singers over forty in country music have major label contracts? (I suspect that her age was one factor in Arista's decision to give Deana the boot.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:10 (twenty years ago)

Speaking of outlaw nostalgia, "Willie" is now the name of a radio format, which I presume he's getting paid to endorse, since his picture's on the billboard. It also shows a young regular-sized (not model-thin, that is) brunette in regular clothing (neither trashy nor business) dancing with arms above her head. The text says, "release your inner redneck."

Willie 92.5. Wide Open Country

So, a friend of mine is driving me home, and she puts on Willie and the first song we hear is "Kerosene." Then some sentimental slow songs I don't recognize.

The playlist seems to be modern country and old tracks in a mix, perhaps leaning towards the rock end of each, maybe keeping an ear to what the satellite stations are doing. According to their Website (they stream their signal, if you're interested), these are the last five tracks they played:

DESPERADO
Clint Black

THE LUCKY ONE
Faith Hill

A THOUSAND MILES FROM NOWHERE
Dwight Yoakam

MY BABY LOVES ME
McBride, Martina

THAT AIN'T MY TRUCK
Rhet Akins

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:30 (twenty years ago)

(Didn't mean to imply that anyone in Sugarland was over forty, just that in general the country mainstream has trouble with women who are not in their heterosexual prime.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:48 (twenty years ago)

I go away for a few days--a zillion posts...

xp, chuck, my ramblin' above about "deforming aspects of Nashville biz." well, it seems to me that since N-ville is all about song publishing--that's the engine that drives it--that right there is a "deforming aspect" of the biz. the constant need to feed singers with songs that might or might not fit their persona? and I think that the other big thing is the notorious practice here of using those studio musicians, which I am not saying is by definition a bad thing, since they're the best in the world.

the other big thing is the *oppositional* quality that arises here, with anyone who doesn't fit into the machine, as they say...which seems to me *needlessly* oppositional. I can't tell you how many times I've been embroiled in some ridiculous conversation about how some big country act of another spells the end of musical civilization...plus, any *rock* or, name yr. genre that ain't country, act that tries to make it in Nashville has a hard time, because of that machinery, and because they define themselves in *opposition* to it instead of going with it, or ignoring it , or whatever.

but that's changing a little bit, seems to me.

and too, I wrote that in response to the book I was reading, the "Rednecks &" book, which is good, but which is also a bit dizzying--you come away even more unsure of all the political-social relationships here. I suppose all music-biz encourgages cynicism in those who are part of it, but I would say that there's a kind of *genteel cynicism* in Nashville that's unique, and maybe that's all I was trying to express. Because I never want to be one of those people who rails against the "music biz" and all that. and I think you're right Chuck--Nashville does leave good music "intact." I think it's the "gestalt" if you will, the *attitude* the town has toward itself, the world, and so forth, that is "uniquely deforming," you get the sense that they oughta concentrate more on music and less on mythologizing itself, but then where would the fun lie in that? and which ties into Garth Brooks. and I know that for a large part of the musical community here, country music is something they wish would go away.

this is what happens when I read books...

so has anybody heard the Tres Chicas record that ND writes about? any comments about the Kristofferson piece by Friskics-Warren in the current issue? I talked to Bill at length about this record, and don't agree with him at all--but think it's a fine piece/defense of a record I find just *not there*. as for that title for the ND essay, Roy--yeah, that was Mr. Alden. nice photo of Sara Evans, though, that photogenic little thang...

multiple xps---back to this Shawn Camp record....

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:51 (twenty years ago)

re: Frank on country's aversion to over-40 females:

Well, country doesn't look so bad in that area when compared to hip-hop, or mainstream rock, or metal, or indie (see: asinine reactions to Liz Phair still having a sex drive), or teenpop, or certain other genres to be named later. (Though basically, I still agree with you.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:52 (twenty years ago)

I mean, how many major label r&b or rock women are over 40 these days? My guess is that country would have at least as many, though many I'm wrong. (Where over 40s *are* respected, I guess, is in the adult alternative realm. Which I have little respect for. Go figure.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:56 (twenty years ago)

so has anybody heard the Tres Chicas record that ND writes about?

I excoriated it above. I over-stated the case, I think, but I was right about ND going for it. Musically it's got more texture than I allowed, but no heft. And the original songs are mostly pretty bad, even if you have more tolerance for mixed metaphors than I do.

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I complained in my Deana Carter piece about the dearth of over-40 females in teenpop.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 2 March 2006 06:38 (twenty years ago)

When I posted above about Sheryl Crow I hadn't heard she'd just undergone surgery for breast cancer (she's told the press that she expects to recover fine). Not that the cancer has anything to do with the thin sound of the album, but I'll feel vaguely guilty in the future whenever I describe her new sound as "anemic." But it is. Listening again to the album, I think the thin-blood is great for "Chances Are" and "Wildflower," which speak with a quiet insistence and are worth a special effort to hear. The rest is OK and you shouldn't make a special effort to avoid it, except I feel that even when I'm listening attentively, it's making an effort to avoid me, the sound so deliberately anorexic as to almost vanish. Some aesthetic choices I just don't understand.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 3 March 2006 06:45 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.