New display name, yo!
― You've been Spotified! (paul santa cruz), Monday, 8 February 2016 19:49 (ten years ago)
ILM Inc should just non-exclusively license lists compiled on the board to different services, any curatorial fees are split between whoever hunts through the service for the right versions of songs and server maintenance fees
I'm assuming listmakers on Spotify or any other service make about the price of a cup of coffee per list, though
brb sending forks half a coffee via postal mail, pouring the other half directly into the server
― μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 8 February 2016 20:01 (ten years ago)
https://sketchbloom.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/coffeebutton.jpg
― Evan, Monday, 8 February 2016 20:06 (ten years ago)
curatorial fees are split
that sort of talk will get you called a lowlife
― mookieproof, Monday, 8 February 2016 20:18 (ten years ago)
it's important to remind ourselves that posters with garbage opinions don't actually have to make a meaningful difference in how we enjoy music
― example (crüt), Monday, 8 February 2016 21:35 (ten years ago)
Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.
― System, Sunday, 28 February 2016 00:01 (ten years ago)
at last
― glandular lansbury (sic), Sunday, 28 February 2016 00:17 (ten years ago)
v. excited
― mookieproof, Sunday, 28 February 2016 01:12 (ten years ago)
Should have had this end on Super Tuesday
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 28 February 2016 01:17 (ten years ago)
Works for me
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Sunday, 28 February 2016 01:43 (ten years ago)
this thread is kind of like hunter thompson's "high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." except with urine and a subway seat
― somewhere btwn Gabriel Garcia Marquez and early Evel Knievel guy (contenderizer), Sunday, 28 February 2016 04:16 (ten years ago)
this thread is amazing, i love this thread
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 28 February 2016 04:18 (ten years ago)
tbh i'm not cool with you loving this thread without permission
― mookieproof, Sunday, 28 February 2016 04:31 (ten years ago)
fair
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 28 February 2016 04:34 (ten years ago)
lol i had forgotten about this thread, simpler times
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Sunday, 28 February 2016 05:09 (ten years ago)
Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.
― System, Monday, 29 February 2016 00:01 (ten years ago)
😎
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:02 (ten years ago)
Forks gets the nomination.
― Thomas of Britain (Tom D.), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:05 (ten years ago)
http://remarkableleader.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/sally-field-oscar.jpg
― i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:16 (ten years ago)
Not cool with system collating and distributing these results on ilx
― Soon all logins will look like this (darraghmac), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:17 (ten years ago)
thread vmic
― • (sleepingbag), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:23 (ten years ago)
turnout extremely high - way to get out the vote!
― you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:24 (ten years ago)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/5c/ff/89/5cff89b028729c46f0c8a1d8ba7590fe.jpg
― The Kidd With The Erasable Borad (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 29 February 2016 00:45 (ten years ago)
high-5 other 27!
― Jeff, Monday, 29 February 2016 01:22 (ten years ago)
Actually one of the 28 was me as a joke vote. I'm cool with it too forks.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Monday, 29 February 2016 01:35 (ten years ago)
Ilx to straight-edge fussbudget: get stuffed.
― hardcore dilettante, Monday, 29 February 2016 02:15 (ten years ago)
ILX establishment cannot contain forks, he's a maverick
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 29 February 2016 02:30 (ten years ago)
I only voted not because like most I assumed it was a joke thread at first
― space prophet wogan (ultros ultros-ghali), Monday, 29 February 2016 11:38 (ten years ago)
yeah I voted "not" on accident because I didn't understand the question
― frogbs, Monday, 29 February 2016 13:52 (ten years ago)
But what if everyone who voted 'Yes' also voted so because they thought it was a joke and they thought 'Not' would be the obvious answer? We need a re-poll.
― moans and feedback (Dinsdale), Monday, 29 February 2016 13:57 (ten years ago)
Seriously. And we need to let it run longer this time so we have time to properly consider all sides of the issue and the potential ramifications of forks doing things without our permission. Let's set the new poll to end three years from today, and I'll start putting together a committee so that we can get formal hearings underway as soon as possible. This is not a joke, people. This is our lives.
― Lisa Welchel's Madcap Macrame Adventure for Windows 2000 (Old Lunch), Monday, 29 February 2016 14:01 (ten years ago)
Trump next.
― Mark G, Monday, 29 February 2016 15:12 (ten years ago)
wow 181 ppl regularly contributing to rolling threads... ilm is in rude health
― r|t|c, Monday, 29 February 2016 15:49 (ten years ago)
As I patrol all of those threads, I can say that number seems just about right as an aggregate!
― ulysses, Monday, 29 February 2016 15:57 (ten years ago)
maybe a LITTLE heavy... say about 150 total. And DJ Martian counts as eight.
― ulysses, Monday, 29 February 2016 15:58 (ten years ago)
are you calling DJ Martian fat
― you are no man. take the balls. (Neanderthal), Monday, 29 February 2016 16:00 (ten years ago)
fat with recommendations
― ulysses, Monday, 29 February 2016 16:04 (ten years ago)
Are you cool with forks patrolling every rolling thread without permission?
― Ad h (onimo), Monday, 29 February 2016 16:28 (ten years ago)
lol Neanderthal
― lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:42 (ten years ago)
a simpler, more innocent time
― mookieproof, Friday, 3 February 2017 20:13 (nine years ago)
more pertinent question is are you a bad enough dude to take down the president
― A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Friday, 3 February 2017 20:16 (nine years ago)
The idea of someone who would potentially contribute to a thread skipping that because of a playlist is to me absurd and I don't believe it's ever applied to anyone.
― abcfsk, Thursday, 4 February 2016 11:07 Bookmark
:)
― r|t|c, Friday, 3 February 2017 20:42 (nine years ago)
tbf, you are absurd
― A big shout out goes to the lamb chops, thos lamb chops (ulysses), Friday, 3 February 2017 20:47 (nine years ago)
s/o to all the practical rational enthusiasts
― r|t|c, Friday, 3 February 2017 21:18 (nine years ago)
the weirdest thing about this thread was not seeing the consideration of some people who actually *did* buy the album many moons ago and/or lost it in a move, damaged it, etc decide to use Spotify to listen to it now.
I p much buy everything digitally now (love Bandcamp) but my physical media took a beating over many years and I never ripped it all, so often times I go to Spotify to listen to those albums, rather than buy em at full price a second time.
i do get the legit concerns for people who don't use Spotify that way tho - my scene is one that requires financial support so wouldn't think of not paying for the albums.
― Neanderthal, Friday, 3 February 2017 22:08 (nine years ago)
god this bonkers thread
― stein beck ii: the wrath of grapes (Doctor Casino), Friday, 3 February 2017 22:45 (nine years ago)
ooh I probably said some dumb bullshit in this thread. I take it all back. Namaste.
― a but (brimstead), Saturday, 4 February 2017 00:13 (nine years ago)
Was tempted to leave in iPhone autocorrecting namaste to "mama ate"
― a but (brimstead), Saturday, 4 February 2017 00:14 (nine years ago)
Spotify playlists of rolling threads make rolling threads 100x better for me. All the Spotify hate here is baffling.
― brotherlovesdub, Saturday, 4 February 2017 00:30 (nine years ago)
bonkers and baffling...unless you're an artist I guess
― Wimmels, Saturday, 4 February 2017 00:40 (nine years ago)