Simon Reynolds - C or D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1473 of them)
Ellis isn't white but whatever. And he's not trolling, he's just playing the Mad ILMer.

Also I realized the lyrics I copypasted are wrong, it's "they ass be real fat when they goin through that phase."

deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

dude, a few words mistakenly cut and pasted doesnt matter really. whats important is that the essence of that line came through properly, and it did. and its important that we all recognise and realise that yes, their asses DO get real fat when theyre going through that phase. diddy, we salute you for all of this. on behalf of reynolds, he salutes you too (but in a hyper theorised kind of salute)

okok, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

how about a new board, I Love Bad Boy, to confine the Bad Boy Records street team to? all in favor say "uh huh, yeah."

TROLLOLLI$, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

Questions for mos of the people who posted on the 7th:

1. Do any of you really think rappers can become superstars without a massive white audience?

2. Raise your hand if you listen to your favorite hip-hop acts in seclusion (be it in your bedroom in your mom's basement, or on your iPod she bought you for your birthday).

3. Raise your hand (don't worry, nobody can actually see you raising it!) if you touch your naughty places when looking at the oiled up shirtless poster of Tupac hanging on your wall next to your bed.

recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

AGAIN, I HEAR MY NAME!!!
DO THEY MEAN ME? SURELY THEY DO!!!


I FEEL LIKE EMINEM WHEN HE GOT ATTACKED AND DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD FOR SAYING THE N WORD. YES I SAID SIMON FRITH WAS MY NIGGA FOR LIFE BUT THATS COS HE IS - WHEN WE GET TOGETHER WE GIVE EACH OTHER A POUND, GIVE EACH OTHER MAN HUGS, SLAP EACH OTHER FIVES, TALK A BIT OF JIVE, EXCHANGE THE LATEST STREET SLANG AND THEN WE PUT ON OUR BANDANAS, GET IN OUR LEX AND DRIVE OFF INTO THE SUNSET LISTENING TO THE LATEST DIPLOMATS MIXTAPE! AND ANYWAY AS THE RESPONSES MAKE OBVIOUS, IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT RACIAL EPITHETS I USE, I RUN TINGS ON ILM, I RUN TINGS ON DISSENSUS, WOEBOT LATCHES ON TO EVERY SINGLE THING I SAY, HAS MEMORISED MY ENTIRE BLOG WORD FOR WORD AND MENTALLY CATALOGUED ALL MY ENTRIES, AND MAN LIKE MARTIN CLARK STAY TRYING TO IMPRESS ME. I AM TOO BIG! SO CALM DOWN BLUDS AND BLUDESSES, RUDEBOYS AND RUDEGALS (YES I AM ALLOWED TO USE THOSE WORDS WITHOUT FEAR OF BEING ATTACKED AS A WIGGA, AS I SAID A LITTLE EARLIER, I AM TOO BIG! MY GHETTO PASS IS FOR LIFE RUDEBOY!). ANYWAY EVEN THOUGH I HAVE A FETISH FOR THE STREET SHIT (WHICH I KNOW ALL ABOUT BECAUSE AS YOU MIGHT KNOW, I AM PART COCKNEY, AND I AM NOT TOTALY WHITE EITHER, I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ASIAN CULTURE BUT I AM PART INDIAN SO THERE! MY ETHNIC PASS IS INTACT YALL!) BUT I GOT NO BEEF WIV ANY OF YOUS PLAYA HATAZ LOL WE SHOULD ALL GO SEE A SCREENING OF PRACTICE HOURS 2 SOON, AND WE CAN DRINK AND SMOKE TOGETHER AS BREDRENS, EMAIL ME IF YOU ARE ALL COOL FOR THIS COS THAT WOULD BE MASSIVE. BIG UP TO MARCUS NASTY AND ALL MY MANS IN LOCKDOWN, BIG UP TO ALL BLOGGERS DRIVEN OUT OF CYBERSPACE, STAY STRONG IN THE BLOGOSTRUGGLE, SHOUT OUT TO ALL CADBURYS CREME EGG MASSIVE, EAT YOUR YOLK AND LICK FROM INSIDE, BIGGLE!

YOURS, GRIMEY 'ENDZ 4 LIFE' SIMEY

grimeysimey, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

1. i notice mention of meltzer on welk, upthread. what can this be? it is a pity sinker is absent

2. i dont understand the implication that only 'street teamers' would like bad boy records. it seems to be a recurring theme on the internet, that posters dont really like popular music, that it is somehow a stance, somehow faux, as though ordinary people somehow don't use the internet. this is not limited to just this board. it is also interesting how bad boy records somehow came to stand for 'commercial nonsense' (whatever that is), in the eyes of 'purists' (whoever they are), and, perhaps more predictably, non hip-hop fans

3. i am impressed by the depth of knowledge grimeysimey displays about reynolds. but i think we are missing something crucial here, his (on the down low) love for mid80s butthole surfers

terry lennox. (gareth), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

oh, i notice this thread also mentions julie tippetts. a thread with both julie tippetts and ma$e on, surely cannot be all bad?

terry lennox. (gareth), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

okok, it's a ma$e quote. And an awesome song. Also, you are boring.

deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

can someone photoshop a pic of spock looking at a phonebooth?

'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

AGAIN, I HEAR MY NAME!!!, etc etc etc.

Roffle. Well done.

xero (xero), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

Questions for mos of the people who posted on the 7th:
1. Do any of you really think rappers can become superstars without a massive white audience?

2. Raise your hand if you listen to your favorite hip-hop acts in seclusion (be it in your bedroom in your mom's basement, or on your iPod she bought you for your birthday).

3. Raise your hand (don't worry, nobody can actually see you raising it!) if you touch your naughty places when looking at the oiled up shirtless poster of Tupac hanging on your wall next to your bed.

I call bullshit on that. Once again, my offer to take you to East Oakland and to Sweet Jimmy's stands. Your mouth's writing checks your ass can't cash.

metal shows
Harumph.

viborgu, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)

I don't really get your point, hoss. I'm not trying to say that I'm some kind of real thug from the streets or anything. I just get a kick out of internet hip hop fans. I don't even listen to hip hop that much anymore. The last hip hop album I loved was Soundbombing 2 if that tells you anything. I don't understand the whole 'let's go to East Oakland and get beat up by black people angle' either. What exactly are you trying to express with that? That the residents of East Oakland would "stomp" me simply because I'm white? I used to live by the Coliseum and spend about half of my time in Fruitvale, and I've never had a problem with anybody. Maybe these places aren't as scary as rumors say they are?

recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

deej, you are thoroughly mediocre. come back when you have something resembling an opinion.

okok, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

(xxxpost, again: On further consideration that is actually pretty fucking low and I now feel bad for laughing. But I did.)

xero (xero), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

2. i dont understand the implication that only 'street teamers' would like bad boy records.

long live the American/Brit humo(u)r divide!

TROLLI$, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

(And I'd agree with Reynolds upthread that the initial poster seems suspiciously like a sock puppet created by someone with a huge personal ax to grind. None of which has anything to do with whatever you people are talking about. Carry on.)

xero (xero), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

everyone stop fighting for a second and go vote in my Jay Z vs. BDP poll- it's a good question

then return and continue to rip throats

thanks

jsoulja (jsoulja), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

jsoulja shut up, your name is jsoulja

kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

i heart grimey simey

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

r.meltzer on l.welk is to be found in the meltzer collection A WHORE LIKE ALL THE REST

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:05 (twenty years ago)

only $2.99 at Wal-Mart. Always low prices. Always.

latebloomer: Deutsch Bag (latebloomer), Friday, 16 December 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
not sure how the bee got there, his views on the bee, or what he intends to do about it, but reynolds has a bee in his bonnet about something or another.

i don't know whoever said that popism had won; and why would the p&j poll reflect this anyway? fuck knows who chooses who votes, and, given i don't even live in new york, i could care less.

but the key line is "And as I say, not talking here about the merits or demerits of these works (few of which I’ve actually heard), just purely about the value scheme that enfolds them."

OKAY THEN THANKS FOR THAT.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 11:56 (twenty years ago)

anyway it's a dispirited and dispiriting post, kind of lashing out.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:00 (twenty years ago)

Did anyone ever explain what "nu-rockism" means? I haven't been paying attention, but I am interested in what they're getting at.

None of this stuff "mean[s] diddly outside the crit-bubbleworld", does it?

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:19 (twenty years ago)

unlike, you know, ariel pink and grime.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:23 (twenty years ago)

nu-rockism is a bit like old rockism, but newer and without the hang-ups about the dance music, i think.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:24 (twenty years ago)

My singles only ballot was mostly down to not having listened to many albums last year, and none as soup-to-nuts album albums, I got into the habit of just putting all the tracks on my PC/ipod and gradually deleting the ones I got bored of. Obviously I also hoped it would be taken as a sly gesture of protest, and simultaneously felt a bit lame for thinking this (it's hardly a new thing - I think it's Scott Woods who always only votes singles).

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:27 (twenty years ago)

Art-rock Vs Lit Rock

"looking at the grand decades-spanning scheme of American critical consensus, there’s a sense in which even art-rock is marginalized (the relatively low presence and this year and every year of instrumental or mostly-intrumental abstraction--prog, fusion, ambient, industrial and the more abstract forms of postpunk, post-rock, experimental electronics; the abiding suspicion of artifice in re. glam or New Pop). See, rather than art-rock, what the critically esteemed stuff really is, most of it, it's lit-rock: music as dramatic backdrop to words. "

has Simon been reading my blog for conceptual ideas ? ;-)

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 2 February 2006 12:29 (twenty years ago)

His anti-rockism sounds like it is championing a certain kind of purism (ironically). (No mmixing of literary and "sonic" values! No mixing of single artifacts with a larger narrative about the artist(s) involved! Etc.)

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:06 (twenty years ago)

None of this stuff "mean[s] diddly outside the crit-bubbleworld", does it?

And I think that outside the crit-bubbleworld, music with rockist virutes means a whole lot to a lot of people. Certainly it has broader appeal than whatever it is that Reynolds is pushing.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:08 (twenty years ago)

Sorry R_S, I meant none of these arguments mean anything outside crit-bubbleworld.

Plenty of people love "music with rockist virtues" for non-rockist reasons though, wouldn't you say? It's just that only in crit-bubbleworld do we spend our time second-guessing those reasons and making pronouncements on their merit.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:14 (twenty years ago)

are we in crit-bubbleworld?

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:16 (twenty years ago)

See, rather than art-rock, what the critically esteemed stuff really is, most of it, it's lit-rock: music as dramatic backdrop to words."

Naw, if anything, if there's any "serious" non-musical cultural form that rockwrite draws on, it's probably the cinema. Where do you think all that stuff about "the auteur" comes from? Who gets read more by rock critics: Clement Greenberg, Edmund Wilson or Pauline Kael? Does anybody really believe in rock-as-poetry anymore, even unconsciously?

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:22 (twenty years ago)

i think simon lost me a few years ago:/

i dont understand the concept of nu-rockism really. it seems to just involves picking up on things that old-rockism forgot. but, this doesnt make sense! rockism is an attitude is it not? deciding that some things fit into the schema, when they didnt before, isnt a new form of rockism, its just the same thing. the taste of 'a rockist' is tangential

i'm puzzled by the desire to, somehow, 'defeat' rockism. it is merely an attitude, i'm not sure it should be defeated. perhaps, it is perceived to have too great a power in the media. this may or may not be true, i dont know. but one look at the charts says...its not that powerful really! and 'rockists about pop', isnt that just another name for 'hi! i'm in the blogosphere!" ;)

terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:22 (twenty years ago)

NRQ: yes, I think so.

Gareth: I agree.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:32 (twenty years ago)

I ecently recovered a bunch of indie fanzines from the 80s and it struck me as I leafed through them that there's a thick strain of vanguardist language in the music writing of that time, lots of the thinking about music is stated in the imperative. It assumes a common cause and (builds) a common enemy.

I think I stopped trying to map taste onto political progressiveness some time ago, and so that tone of "we should be listening [to this] / [in this way]" strikes me as odd, now, and it's still about. I don't think there's a battle to be fought anymore, I think there's a conversation to be had. That's likely because I'm OLD and IN THE WAY.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:39 (twenty years ago)

You should do a bit of scanning, Tim.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:40 (twenty years ago)

That would involve (a) one pooter (b) one scanner (c) me being bothered.

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:41 (twenty years ago)

if we are in the crit-bubblesphere, so are the kids texting for the scroller thing on music stations.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:43 (twenty years ago)

I don't know anything about any scroller things, but do they really include talk about critical approaches (like this)?

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:46 (twenty years ago)

new interview:

Perfect Sound Forever - Simon Reynolds on post-punk
http://www.furious.com/perfect/simonreynolds3.html

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:46 (twenty years ago)

I find that spending time analysing WHY I like something is only useful in that it might help me move in an interesting direction next. I don't bother thinking about whether the reasons are 'correct', 'defeating anything', 'rockist', 'non-rockist', 'post-rockist', 'popist', 'reynoldsian' blah blah. Life's too short and I am 44.

All the debate about rockism over the years on ILM has made me realise that I haven't got a clue what it's all about anymore now the whole things has had several lifecycles. All I can conclude is that any notion of the pop/rock or popist/rockist divide is kind of redundant now and has been for years. I think it had a purpose back in 81/82 when people were trying to set up a context for nu-pop. Even then I think it was the punkist idea of having to be 'against' something that spawned rockism. Of course all the writers and nu-pop class of 81/82 were all punks in in 1977, so that's natural.

Dr.C (Dr.C), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:52 (twenty years ago)

tim, "regular people" (aka non-ilxors) talk about reviews that they've read, they just don't mention x-brand critical theorists.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure that's true, in so far as "regular people" exist, but places where we/they do talk about x-brand critical theory surely *are* crit-bubbleworld, if any sensible definition of crit-bubbleworld exists?

Tim (Tim), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

I am reading rip it up... at the moment. it's very enjoyable and illuminating in parts, a shame that I'd as good as seen the cab voltaire part already on the village voice's website. the enthusiasm level seems to waver in the writing though - the chapter on scritti in the first half is so vivid; some of the other stuff seems flat in comparison that you can tell they're an obvious favourite. I wish he'd been as "on" in the other chapters.

the blog screeds... I dunno, seems more like the urge to document ("here I am comin' atcha straight from the grime trenches at their realest") takes over from rational thought. complaining about the presence of "long-form Works that take effort and perseverance and time to unlock their depth and detail" on a BEST ALBUMS list, good god.

rez one-bagger (haitch), Thursday, 2 February 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

i think by the 'bubbleworld' zing reynolds means its solely inhabited by rock critics and their blogosphere fluffers.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 2 February 2006 14:03 (twenty years ago)

Crit-bubbleworld sounds like some terrifying lavatorial experiment.

I quite like the use of imperatives! and exclamation marks! in fanzines!

It is sweet that you kept them, Tim.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 2 February 2006 14:04 (twenty years ago)

given what it's surrounded with--several records I voted for included--who, precisely, thinks that M.I.A. got to no. 2 on the plastic-fun vote?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 14:28 (twenty years ago)

anyway, the comparison isn't to King of America (which meant plenty outside the crit-bubble, especially to folks for whom it was a bridge from college rock to rootsier stuff) or Arrested Development (who I don't recall discussing terrorism)--it's Everything Is Wrong, no. 3 in 1995, and a similar bite-sized consolidation of all those weird beat musics the kids were dancing to but older (not old, just older--30, say) rock critics didn't quite get outside their contexts. Moby went on to a successful career, M.I.A. might or might not, but strictly in album terms that's how I see it.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 14:32 (twenty years ago)

Arrested Development vs. M.I.A. = granola vs. grenades

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 14:35 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.