So I looked around and for OSX users there's a desktop app called Soundcast
https://github.com/andresgottlieb/soundcast
which will send iTunes audio, and audio from a browser, to ChromeCast--
seems to work!
― Swag Heathen (theStalePrince), Friday, 13 November 2015 04:58 (ten years ago)
okay back on topic, Sennheiser's new $55,000 headphones!
http://www.engadget.com/2015/11/03/sennheiser-new-orpheus-headphones/
"As you can imagine, there are numerous design improvements that work to stamp out any audiophile kryptonite -- such as building amps into the ear cups to avoid any noise introduced by cabling, and eight DACs in total with a sampling rate of up to 384 kHz."
― Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 14 December 2015 22:19 (ten years ago)
So if the amps are built into the ear cups, what is that marble tube amp thing?
― schwantz, Monday, 14 December 2015 22:34 (ten years ago)
that marble will tickle your eyeballs at hundreds of THz
― Sufjan Grafton, Monday, 14 December 2015 22:35 (ten years ago)
xp good question. anyway, by using crazy electrostatic headphones, you are forced to move away from small signal design in an area where you usually don't have to, so you can no longer leverage amazing and cheap op-amps. that is quite a trade off.
― Sufjan Grafton, Monday, 14 December 2015 22:47 (ten years ago)
Fuck Everything, We're Doing Five Blades
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 14 December 2015 22:59 (ten years ago)
Do these weirdos ever actually enjoy listening to music qua music or are they constantly listening for impurities/imperfections. Sounds maddening
― lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 14 December 2015 22:59 (ten years ago)
I don't really understand why you need 8 discreet dacs??
― Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 00:00 (ten years ago)
7 wasn't enough in the lab
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 December 2015 00:06 (ten years ago)
they first tried 7, but their digital signals were analog and their analog signals were digital. so they added one more.
― Sufjan Grafton, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 00:49 (ten years ago)
(it was shingy's idea)
― Sufjan Grafton, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 00:52 (ten years ago)
24 bit signal, no more than three bits per DAC, otherwise the electron orbitals clash and there's some kind of gravitational interaction. Got to keep those bits as far apart as possible until they combine in the ear. They're triode valve DACs of course, one bit per ode.
If I keep this up I might get hired to write their promos.
― MatthewK, Tuesday, 15 December 2015 00:55 (ten years ago)
I thought this was really funny:
http://www.lampizator.eu/LAMPIZATOR/REFERENCES/THETA%20Universal/theta.html
― los blue jeans, Sunday, 28 February 2016 18:56 (ten years ago)
that is utterly great
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 28 February 2016 19:08 (ten years ago)
lol, when the first paragraph described the size of the Theta, I thought to myself "that's bigger than a laserdisc player", and then I scrolled down...
― bored at work (snoball), Sunday, 28 February 2016 19:14 (ten years ago)
Amazing
― robbie ca$hflo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 28 February 2016 20:08 (ten years ago)
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--IEHpDUxc--/18s3sd0a10tf3jpg.jpg
― nomar, Sunday, 28 February 2016 20:18 (ten years ago)
amazing story
― goole, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:11 (ten years ago)
looking at this and reviews of diff components online, they all read exactly the same -- "better definition in bass, greater depth and openness in the soundstage, increased separation in treble." i just read a review of a damn turntable mat that had that language
― goole, Monday, 29 February 2016 21:22 (ten years ago)
Definition, schmefition, here's the REAL test: Listening to Caetano Veloso Foreign Sound is a hallucinogenic experience with the Theta. My brain is immediately fooled that I am inside a vibrating cloud of sound, and Mr. Veloso is too real and too close for my heterosexual comfort.
― Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Monday, 29 February 2016 21:29 (ten years ago)
I currently only listen to streamed music on my iphone earbuds and I gotta say the bass soundstage is spread wide open
― petulant dick master (silby), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:29 (ten years ago)
This isn't snake oil, but pretty cool:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CE_zmpHcWQ
― schwantz, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:31 (ten years ago)
Excellent. I watched it all waiting for him to mention Nakamichi, and he did right at the end!
― Michael Jones, Monday, 29 February 2016 22:43 (ten years ago)
Wow!
― Mongolian Cow Yoghurt Supergirl (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 29 February 2016 22:52 (ten years ago)
That is totally nuts.
I saw one of those Nakamichis in a stereo store in the '80s; it was ridiculously expensive for its time, and for the fact that cassettes were never going to be anywhere close to a serious audiophile format (iirc, it was around $500, while decent consumer-grade decks went for $80 and up).
Also, I thought the main appeal of auto-reverse was for recording; if a piece is longer than the length of a side of tape, in theory, if the auto-reverse was quick enough, you could continue recording onto the next side missing far less music than if you had to flip the tape yourself (particularly if you're taping a concert or something off the radio). The quickness of the reverse was a spec often touted by manufacturers (I seem to remember one deck changed direction in .02 seconds).
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:16 (ten years ago)
I thought I was seeing something exotic when one of these came in to the store recently:
http://i66.tinypic.com/20uubue.jpg
― Mongolian Cow Yoghurt Supergirl (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 00:57 (ten years ago)
that is so cool! a tape duplicator, yeah?
― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 03:59 (ten years ago)
'theta' is a very apt name for snake-oil high-end audio b/c it reminds me of scientology, and the guys who write about this stuff make about as much sense as l. ron hubbard.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 04:04 (ten years ago)
xp It's actually just a dubbing deck but you can load seven cassettes into the playback deck; maybe if you just want to make a comp of cassingles? Heh.
― Mongolian Cow Yoghurt Supergirl (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 1 March 2016 08:43 (ten years ago)
http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/03/15/high-definition-vinyl-will-soon-become-a-reality/
― Cosmic Slop, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:15 (ten years ago)
Interesting idea. Not totally into the idea of new HD turntables, would be interested to see how these sounded on older ones.
― bearded flack trickster god (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:28 (ten years ago)
lol HD vinyl you have to be kidding me.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:37 (ten years ago)
All in, Rebeat and Joanneum estimate that stamper-related costs will be reduced by 50 percent, while the time required to produce a new piece of vinyl slashed by 60 percent.
on the minus side a new copy of "Thriller" will cost the end consumer $100+
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:40 (ten years ago)
that's actually really interesting and makes a lot of sense, why bother with lacquer or electroplating when you can just burn the grooves with a laser?
Rebeat and Joanneum estimate that stamper-related costs will be reduced by 50 percent, while the time required to produce a new piece of vinyl slashed by 60 percent.
― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:41 (ten years ago)
i don't think the "gigantic production bottleneck" nowadays is necessarily from the stampers taking too long to produce, but from the flood of repressings, which a new HD VINYL product would just add to.
the wording is kind of ambiguous and probably tweaked in their favor. i don't see how shortening the time to make a master plate will slash total production time by 60 percent. it seems in this case they consider production time to be from making the master to printing the first vinyl record ("a new piece of vinyl").
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:51 (ten years ago)
like you're still going to have to wait in line until they finish printing RSD gimmick records and another million copies of "Abbey Road" (now in HD!).
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:56 (ten years ago)
anyone else have this:
http://www.audioquest.com/usb_digital_analog_converter/dragonfly-dac
― Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:57 (ten years ago)
"Buy your music again, again!"
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:57 (ten years ago)
xp yes and I love it
― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:19 (ten years ago)
if u search by post, there is a bunch of talk abt those on some thread
― the 'major tom guy' (sleeve), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:20 (ten years ago)
new version coming soon, let's you hook it up to mobile devices too
― niels, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:24 (ten years ago)
mobile devices already have awesome DACs
― Toof Seteltha (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 19:38 (ten years ago)
(but perhaps you were referring to hooking up to the amplifier section)
― Toof Seteltha (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 20:36 (ten years ago)
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:37 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I know right? Might as well wait for blu-ray
― Evan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:19 (ten years ago)
what DAC is in an iPhone? maybe as good as the Dragonfly, if so I did not realize
will come in handy if the iPhone 7 has no headphone jack though
― niels, Thursday, 17 March 2016 07:02 (ten years ago)
Apple uses cirrus logic components for audio, iirc. They used to do more direct to market stuff years ago but are pretty much exclusively a supplier of chip designs now.
― μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 17 March 2016 12:55 (ten years ago)
Everything I've read speaks highly to the DAC of the iPhone.
But I think the DAC on my late 2009 iMac is noticeably worse than what the Dragonfly offers. I'm really happy with the Dragonfly's performance BUT I MIGHT BE HEARING THINGS, etc.
― Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 17 March 2016 13:53 (ten years ago)
One of my audiophile colleagues doesn't think much of the iPhone 5 DAC compared to new d-fly but I'll try it out when we get one in the shop
― niels, Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:42 (ten years ago)
allegedly the DAC in the iPhone 6 was a major upgrade
― Thomas H. Handy (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 17 March 2016 16:01 (ten years ago)
The DAC is fine, but the noise floor in a phone isn't great. Plus, they don't output 24/96 audio, so they can't get that much dynamic range out of it.
― schwantz, Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:09 (ten years ago)