pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

homie, matter fact...

I don't know exactly why it bugs me so much but I could do without ever seeing another album described as a victory lap.

Would prefer an album declared a band's walk of shame.

One for the h8ers... P4k's original review of Pet Sounds.

http://i.imgur.com/stbtNTV.png

I'm glad Failblog.org finally got a music vertical

you do have to give Pet Sounds credit for inspiring Weezer, thanks Pet Sounds

is that a real pitchfork review?

yep

he rated the X-ecutioners slightly higher, lol http://web.archive.org/web/20011126210118/http://pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/x/x-ecutioners/x-pressions.shtml

misread that as "few people have come close to penning sweater melodies".

'dark side' > 'pet sounds' > 'ok computer' > 'loveless'

those are definitely four albums

failblog.edu

still kind of astonishing that pitchfork is what it is today despite shit like that, like how did they do it, how did they become respectable

i mean that was from schreiber himself not some dumb college freelancer

it just wasn't made for these times

i mean that was from schreiber himself not some dumb college freelancer

Ryan realized early on (thankfully) that he was no writer.

Pitchfork succeeding despite its founder's biases and deficiencies as a writer is less surprising if you've ever read the work of Jann s wenner or bob guccione jr

I almost wish ryan was prone to more "I'm still here" goddess-in-the-doorway moments

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v472/birdnestsoup/isley.jpg

individual scores for all the individual isleys reissues makes them look like crazies imo

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/goddess-in-the-doorway-20011206

when was the last schreiber review? Last thing that comes to mind was him scoffing at cleavage and bad photoshop in a worst covers of the year list and that coulda been in the 00s

tbf, Wenner was a decent interviewer early on (by "early" I mean no later than 1968). Was always a shitty critic, though.

That wasn't really Wenner. A ghostwriter wrote it and Wenner signed off on it.

def can't rep for schreiber as an interviewer as all i remember is him making an affirmative action joke at interpol in like 02

his last album review appears to be a best new music for a grizzly bear EP in 2007. That shows amazing restraint, really. he's done some news blurbs since, though

So A$AP Rocky just posted a video for his Buddy Holly-referencing new track "Purple Kisses", which might actually qualify as SFW if you happen to work in a porn studio. (Or, at Pitchfork.)

that last bit is pretty lol if you remember how hot-n-heavy fork reviews could get in the early days

that's from 2012 - which is when he did his last track review and only video interview, as well. (fyi this is all on his contributor page, i'm not deep google-digging here).

xp the isley brothers thing is so wtf

the average of the individual Isleys scores is 7.4, not 8.5. the median is even a bit lower. why not just a score for the whole package when there's clearly no correlation?

I like the review though.

me too. always happy to see Erlewine show up in unexpected places.

my favorite isleys record changes every few months so I found the scoring interesting

Morrissey, meanwhile, isn’t overly fussed with convincing the non-believers. When the lights dim, he marches up to the microphone and begins an acapella rendition of Willie Nelson’s "Always on My Mind".

*sigh* if we're just going to throw accuracy out the window why not The Pet Shop Boys "Always on My Mind"

Pitchfork is never gonna acknowledge professional songwriters when talking about country. Though to give them some credit, if you're gonna pick a version to cite, that's the one - Elvis's only hit #20 in the US, but Nelson's hit #5.

Elvis's was the bigger hit in Britain though (Elvis #9, Willie #49). PSB version went to number one.

Apparently it was a single in the UK but a B-side over here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Always_on_My_Mind#Elvis_Presley_version

Nelson's version is neither the original - since he didn't write it - nor is it the first. Calling it his song is weird.

I mean sure it's the most famous but why is that relevant

I totally agree, btw. I hate when people (OK, marketing people) claim that an artist has recorded an album of "Elvis covers" or "Frank Sinatra covers." Elvis never wrote a song in his life. Frank Sinatra, either.

especially in reference to Morrissey - who I would suspect was more familiar with other versions more popular in the UK than Nelson's

xp

Morrissey's probably really into the Brenda Lee version or something

elvis was on the cover of shoplifters btw

Dropping obscure terminology and hyperlinking to its wikipedia page.

people should never write about music

http://pitchfork.com/thepitch/910-the-masterful-mockery-of-father-john-mistys-1989-jibes/

Highlights from that column include:

Tillman’s interpretations were less homage than tongue-in-cheek criticism, serving up wry commentary about the imbalance between surface and substance in endeavors like Adams’...

"My reinterpretation of the classic Ryan Adams album 1989," he wrote, his tone practically dripping with sarcasm, the word "classic" a jesting arrow aimed at Adams...

Under Tillman’s thumb, "Welcome to New York" became a palimpsest, barely recognizable as the original Swift song save for the lyrics, thanks to his and his band’s uncanny ability to play it in the style of the Velvet Underground...

Leave it to Tillman, then, to one up Adams’ attempt to mine the musical past by showing off his killer Lou Reed impression. It’s a Shakespearean move à la "I do bite my thumb, sir," though intended more for comedic effect than dramatic...

Whether listeners interpret Tillman’s "Blank Space" and "Welcome to New York" as mean-spirited or comical depends upon the ear, but they are deeper reimaginings of what it means to perform a cover, and what that cover can actually say within the greater cultural melee. It’s a reminder that not all that glitters is gold.

Crazy stuff. Anyway, is this Tillman a bit of an idiot too?

The headline should probably be included too, if highlights be polled... "masterful mockery", v good

Or maybe the whole piece is meant to ridicule Tillman by mimicking his self important tone?

It’s a reminder that not all that glitters is gold.

why didn't I think of this?

The FJM dream post itself has to be up there w the most hackneyed cliched indie rock writings of all time. Anything responding to or taking that seriously is doomed to be poisoned tripe.

it's up there w worst music writing of all time. It makes Amanda Palmer seem restrained, unpretentious, and selfless by comparison.

You haven't got a great ear for humour have you?

some incredible point-missing going on here