The Avalanches' Darren Seltmann Has Left the GroupThey're now a two pieceBy Jeremy Gordon on June 29, 2015 at 1:41 p.m. EDT
Back in February 2014, Seltmann's wife, singer-songwriter Sally Seltmann, told Melbourne's Herald Sun that he'd left the Avalanches. The news was confirmed by the band's label, Modular, who said: "Yep, Darren hasn't been in the band for a while
― let no-one live rent free in your butt (sic), Friday, 3 July 2015 09:12 (ten years ago)
nb: said confirmation is also from February 2014
― let no-one live rent free in your butt (sic), Friday, 3 July 2015 09:15 (ten years ago)
What's the point of a round table when the consensus is suffocating?
The point is to establish the suffocating consensus.
― the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 3 July 2015 12:13 (ten years ago)
^ a+
― sean gramophone, Friday, 3 July 2015 13:52 (ten years ago)
no idea what internet you are on where the consensus about this video is "suffocating"
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Friday, 3 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)
he didn't say the internet, he said a specific roundtable piece and provided a link.
the piece may be a corrective to various thinkpieces that went unnamed in the roundtable, and "suffocating" is a bit much, but it is fairly monotone in terms of opinion for a "roundtable" of 8 writers
― da croupier, Friday, 3 July 2015 17:02 (ten years ago)
7, rather
in general there seems to be a problem now where writers proudly, and with swagger, refute anti-[whatever] "thinkpieces" that don't actually exist, or exist so far on the margins of discussion that orienting discussion around them is very limiting, and, imo, draining
― J0rdan S., Friday, 3 July 2015 17:18 (ten years ago)
takes on takes on takes
― lil dork (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 July 2015 17:21 (ten years ago)
creating strawpeople is not a new thing. but it's not even that I don't think the thinkpieces exist (they might!), i just want names! though i guess i also get annoyed when people accuse the "internet" of something and then cite five rando-rubes on twitter.
― da croupier, Friday, 3 July 2015 17:21 (ten years ago)
type "Rihanna" into google news, you don't even need to specify the video; this shit is not difficult to find nor to predict
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Friday, 3 July 2015 18:08 (ten years ago)
typed "rihanna" into google news, Who cares if Rihanna's BBHMM video is feminist or not? She's the one with the power was the top headline, had to click "explore in depth" to find more obviously opinionated headlines on the video. they were:
Rihanna's success is inspiring - but her new video is violently misogynist (New Statesman)
Rihanna's '#BBHMM' Video Is Brilliant, Terrifying, Complicated (HuffPo)
Rihanna's “Bitch Better Have My Money” Video Is Very Literal, Very Cinematic (Slate)
Stop Saying Rihanna's "Bitch Better Have My Money" Video Is Anti-Feminist (Papermag)
RIHANNA IS THE BAD BITCH WE NEED AND HER TARANTINO-STYLE REVENGE PORN FOR "BBHMM" PROVES IT (Noisey)
so yeah, i see a clearly critical one. but it's weird to ask people to look up the thinkpieces you're saying suck. if you're going to reference them, link to one! if they're easy to find, the person being paid to write about them can put in the effort.
― da croupier, Friday, 3 July 2015 22:04 (ten years ago)
I mean I could have clicked them but then I would be part of the problem
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Friday, 3 July 2015 22:16 (ten years ago)
All you need to really do is check to see if the National Feminist Review Board has rubber-stamped their seal of approval.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 3 July 2015 22:17 (ten years ago)
Safy's blurb in that piece was good
― supreme problematics (D-40), Friday, 3 July 2015 23:32 (ten years ago)
xp katherine, I'm talking about the format not the video. When you have a video that's divisive elsewhere then why convene seven writers who all have the same opinion? Why not just have one review if there's not going to be any debate? And like da croupier says, at least link to the hostile reviews to give some context.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Saturday, 4 July 2015 10:28 (ten years ago)
what's with the blackface-style language some of the writers are using to talk about this?
― sarahell, Sunday, 5 July 2015 04:20 (ten years ago)
that's just how they roll.
that video is stupid. in my internet opinion. that song got pretty old for me too once i heard it like 3 times though.
― scott seward, Sunday, 5 July 2015 06:28 (ten years ago)
― sarahell, Sunday, July 5, 2015 12:20 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
is there a godwin's law for this
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Sunday, 5 July 2015 06:33 (ten years ago)
Meaghan Garvey: There’s a very simple A$AP Yams tweet that’s stuck with me for years.
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 5 July 2015 06:44 (ten years ago)
the tweet is 'Never vocalise the vision.' it's from august 2013
isnt there like one white writer in the entire group
― supreme problematics (D-40), Sunday, 5 July 2015 06:57 (ten years ago)
not to cape for played out slang useage in music journalism or anything but uhh
― supreme problematics (D-40), Sunday, 5 July 2015 06:58 (ten years ago)
feel like the thing i quoted is p dumb regardless of ethnicity
idk i don't really have a handle on what pitchfork is 'like' anymore
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 5 July 2015 12:04 (ten years ago)
neither does pitchfork
― j., Sunday, 5 July 2015 14:35 (ten years ago)
that pitchfork roundtable on rihanna makes me feel really uncomfortable somehow. like it doubles down on the pure celebration of violence and thinks that because of who is doing this that it has some extended political significance. reminds me of the unmitigated celebrations of gangsta rap in the early 90s. as a reaction to the scolds it makes sense, but it feel like it doesn't really think through what's going on. like the politics of endorsing the video seem a lot more shallow and less realized than the video itself.
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Monday, 6 July 2015 01:58 (ten years ago)
there was also a roundtable for the song itself that had some of the same participants and same overall super positive tone, although there was at least one dissenter:http://pitchfork.com/thepitch/715-bitch-better-have-my-roundtable-rihannas-bbhmm/
― some dude, Monday, 6 July 2015 02:07 (ten years ago)
oh right. "Newports, not just blunts" -- how could i forget
― got bent (mild cheezed off vibes) (s.clover), Monday, 6 July 2015 02:33 (ten years ago)
it doesn't think through as much as it could because all of the participants had less than 24 hours to churn their opinions out
― lex pretend, Monday, 6 July 2015 06:20 (ten years ago)
I was gonna say the elephant in the room was that the roundtables that made it to this thread (they've done others) were the ones that dealt with race, but given that someone's dropped blackface into the discussion I don't think that is really applicable anymore
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Monday, 6 July 2015 11:45 (ten years ago)
No I'm not having that. It might be about race but it caught my eye because everybody agrees as loudly as possible. Maybe that's the norm for P4k round tables, idk, but if it is then they should rethink the whole format.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 6 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)
Can mods just change the name of this thread to "I@n C0hen is dumb?"
There's more care and nuance put into the drum filtering on "Let It Happen" than most bands manage in an entire career of recording
Right, because you know
Parker is...somehow the best and most underrated rock bassist of the 21st century, and it’s not even close on either front
srsly?
― Wimmels, Monday, 13 July 2015 13:38 (ten years ago)
I feel like for some people audible bass playing = good bass playing.
― 29 facepalms, Monday, 13 July 2015 13:56 (ten years ago)
otm
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Monday, 13 July 2015 13:58 (ten years ago)
what is "drum filtering"
― Joan Crawford Loves Chachi, Monday, 13 July 2015 14:03 (ten years ago)
It's when you use the snare strainer to make coffee.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 July 2015 14:05 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/0HZMqzm.gif
― example (crüt), Monday, 13 July 2015 14:05 (ten years ago)
― 29 facepalms, Monday, July 13, 2015 1:56 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
^^^^^
― Wimmels, Monday, 13 July 2015 14:06 (ten years ago)
crut I lol'd really hard, ty
― Joan Crawford Loves Chachi, Monday, 13 July 2015 14:09 (ten years ago)
Currents could be called a "transitional album," but what Parker seems to realize is that all albums should be so named, because life is transitional.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 13 July 2015 15:39 (ten years ago)
jesus christ
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 13 July 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)
Noted Marxist-Leninist mouthpiece the FT on implications for the Eurozone: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e38a452e-26f2-11e5-bd83-71cb60e8f08c.html#axzz3fm5E3Q9P
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Monday, 13 July 2015 15:48 (ten years ago)
lol rong thread sorry guys
― Keith Moom (Neil S), Monday, 13 July 2015 15:49 (ten years ago)
not really
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 July 2015 15:50 (ten years ago)
Forknancial Times
― like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Monday, 13 July 2015 17:44 (ten years ago)
he's just talking about the dj-esque part of the single where there's a low pass filter on the drums.
ian cohen also responsible for this infamously terrible review: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/17136-mumps-etc/
― lil urbane (Jordan), Monday, 13 July 2015 18:03 (ten years ago)
Page Not Found (404)
― nose, Monday, 13 July 2015 18:09 (ten years ago)
they're on the festival bill
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 July 2015 18:10 (ten years ago)
copy and paste the url. ilx doesn't put the final "/" in the link and so it doesn't work
― Rave Van Donk (jim in glasgow), Monday, 13 July 2015 18:11 (ten years ago)
I don't really care about IC as a writer but he reviews so much nu-emo/pop-punk stuff that is reviving sounds I didn't care much about the first time around that I basically skip anything with his byline.
― Immediate Follower (NA), Monday, 13 July 2015 19:24 (ten years ago)