what next for Chris ott?

i feel like the "end of messageboard" thing is kinda funny given that Reddit is basically just messageboards with an upvoting mechanism

big lolz

TOO OTT

OTT DAMN!

CALL THE POLICE AND THE FIREMAN

Stoked for the Lord Custos interview on Buzzfeed.

Can't beat "I predict a wry-Ott"

i'd say "don't start a wry ott" beats it

Quiet! Wry Ott

its most formative years

subsequent years slightly less formative

you might even call them in-formative

does this guy get any attention at all? he seems like a million other macho indie-music blowhards.

He does, for sure, but he WROTE FOR PITCHFORK.

― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, July 2, 2015 4:41 PM (Yesterday)Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Boy I fucked up that post.

this calls for a poll

wait, jaymc, are you mobilizing one of my old posts to respond to my new one? i'm confused.

Boy I fucked up that post.

PROFIT

http://s13.postimg.org/fhw9nl5p3/Screen_Shot_2015_10_14_at_10_30_07_AM.png

Good thing he waited until they had Conde Nast's legal team in place to sort that out.

*in Conde Nast's boardroom*

"So who is this orc guy? Some cosplayer?"

"guys he's saying if we keep his shit online he's going to sue the shit out of us"
"how long will it take to get his stuff offline until we figure out what we wanna do?"
"did that already, it took about thirty seconds"
"so if it's offline now how much of a case does he have?"
"none"
"can the site survive without his work?"
*blink*
*ten minutes of laughter*

I don't think they're gonna take down the year end lists, since those are clearly valued for longtail traffic, available via one hover and click from the current pitchfork homepage

let him have his empty boasting, dude obviously isn't going to sue anyone, saying nasty things about pitchfork is just his hobby

"empty threatening," i meant, don't know why i wrote boasting

"oh shit, what about the year-end lists"
"can one of the new kids rewrite any of his contributions?"
"by close of business, probably"
"...Ott on the line. says we also can't use the points he allocated to any albums he voted for in the polls, those count as speech and he wants to be paid for the point allocation"
*blink*
*fifteen minutes of lawyers falling all over each other laughing*

It's not about the money. He has that, and bennies.

can;t we consolidate the Chris Ott threads?

and then just call it 'itt ott'

itt ott orc

that means I love yoooou

fwiw ott apparently got what he wanted:

http://pitchfork.com/staff/chris-ott/

reviews appear to be taken down as well, for example:

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/8969-slanted-enchanted-luxe-reduxe/

Amazing

And just like that, the fly buzzing at the window has been let out of the house.

written ott of history

the commottsar vanishes

dude is really mad about this latest development

written ott of history

― Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:15 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lolz

totally bullied them into erasing his written legacy, masterfully played

lol a true mastermind

http://media1.fdncms.com/portmerc/imager/mad-men-recap-cris-a-tunity/u/original/9280137/1367862477-oqnzqr3.gif

I know it looks like he's just one overconfident guy foolishly poking at a giant but let me remind you of the story of David. David vs the ATF.

musta otta gotta lotta

omg anthony

"reviews appear to be taken down as well"

removed by fi-ott

ott 1: spectre

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/329121_o.gif

trottsky

He got a pitchfork
That made his ears burn

A+ negotiating skills

"Oh no! Unfortunately, we can't find the page you're looking for — believe us, we really tried."

First time the Pitchfork 404 message has seemed viciously sarcastic

itt ott orc

― Evan, Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:24 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that means I love yoooou

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:59 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

belly lol

This is genuinely wonderful. What a preposterous clown.

http://tktk.gawker.com/pitchfork-deletes-its-harshest-critic-1736804618

Pitchfork, the music website that was purchased by Condé Nast this week, has a tormenter. His name is Chris Ott, and he wrote for the site at an earlier point in its history, though you can’t read any of his reviews anymore because on Wednesday Pitchfork decided to completely erase him from its site.

Ott is a notorious crank who uses his Twitter feed to decry the commodification of the independent arts. At his best he can be a necessary check on the capitalist impulses of the music industry and the publications that cover it. At his worst he can be a straight-up asshole who uses his modest platform to hammer away at personal grudges, many of which seem to end up involving women who make and/or write about indie rock. To some he is an anti-hero, to others he is simply a verbal harasser.

Pitchfork (where I have previously written, and whose staff I am friendly with) often finds itself in Ott’s crosshairs. This is partly because the site has for some time been the foremost arbiter of indie music, in the process growing itself from a ragtag quasi-blog (in the days when Ott wrote for it) into a full-blown company that does big boy website things like packaging major features alongside brands such as Converse and Apple. But Ott also picks on Pitchfork because of his personal history with the site and its founder Ryan Schreiber.