The XX

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1465 of them)

Worth a mention for the "Gosh" video, which is a whole sight better than it has any need to be. Superb direction by Erik Wernquist reprising the style of his Wanderers short i.e. extensive use of NASA/Goddard Center etc images with overlaid VFX, this thing really is beautiful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjNssEVlB6M

that mustardless plate (Bill A), Friday, 5 June 2015 09:07 (eleven years ago)

too easy for idiots to set up a false pop v snob binary and to position themselves on the correct pop side.

I don't think that's what's happening. The snobbery runs through the reviews like lettering in a stick of rock but that doesn't mean there's only one "correct" answer. You could write a vicious takedown of this album's aesthetic and production without resorting to tired cliches about lifestyle music.

Continue your brooding monologue (Re-Make/Re-Model), Friday, 5 June 2015 11:36 (eleven years ago)

too easy for idiots to set up a false pop v snob binary and to position themselves on the correct pop side.

nu borad description?!?

the late great, Friday, 5 June 2015 13:53 (eleven years ago)

Oh my god, shut up.

austinato (Austin), Saturday, 6 June 2015 00:00 (eleven years ago)

too many critics desperate to either tie the record into the 'nuum, or strawman against it, are building their arguments pretty heavily on those pirate rado samples from 'gosh' (and on the single from last year that's not on here), because it's not a very rave-y record as matt says. didn't four tet stop doing interviews because everyone did the same thing re the samples on his last record and would ask him about literally nothing else?

I like this. the xx never did anything for me - texture thing, I guess.

the rites of spring reverb (haitch), Thursday, 11 June 2015 03:23 (ten years ago)

two weeks pass...

The album's OK. I don't know how this is compared to other club music; if anything, this is something to play after leaving the clubs. This is way too downtrodden to dance to, unless one has just ingested mescaline.

Rod Steel (musicfanatic), Sunday, 28 June 2015 00:21 (ten years ago)

two weeks pass...

I like this album. The vinyl version is very low output / volume though - wonder if this is an audiophile choice for less compression more dynamics or a pressing mistake?

niels, Thursday, 16 July 2015 17:34 (ten years ago)

The vinyl is abnormally quiet. So much so that I thought something was wrong with my stereo the first time I played it.

austinato (Austin), Friday, 17 July 2015 01:09 (ten years ago)

This thread covers same topic http://www.reddit.com/r/vinyl/comments/3bbj0k/in_colour_by_jamie_xx_has_anyone_else_had_issues/

This review too (although on 3lp version (wtf)) http://www.amazon.com/review/R2V0SFWOIDFIMN/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00V9MQZRK&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=5174&store=music

Young Turks records responded to me and said the plant pressed a bad batch and unfortunately those are in the wild. Buy at your own risk, you may get a garbage one and even the ones you exchange it for are from the same batch.

Glad it came with a cd but ffs maybe I should just stop buying new records

niels, Friday, 17 July 2015 11:33 (ten years ago)

it is definitely frustrating that buying vinyl can be such a crap shoot and there aren't a lot of reliable sources to let you know what to expect from this or that album or pressing

too young for seapunk (Moodles), Friday, 17 July 2015 13:09 (ten years ago)

yup, and it was expensive too, 30 euros! probably because of the "fun" cover with holes in it...

niels, Friday, 17 July 2015 13:49 (ten years ago)

two months pass...

loving "Hold Tight"... arpeggio that appears midway through recalls "loner" by Burial, wonder if it's sampled.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Sunday, 27 September 2015 16:44 (ten years ago)

mmmh this record is really good, get's a bit boring around the middle but then I jsut skip "Hold Tight", maybe

niels, Tuesday, 29 September 2015 14:34 (ten years ago)

In Colours is very popular music at my office - great fortune!

niels, Thursday, 8 October 2015 13:26 (ten years ago)

hmm *COLOUR* I guess...

niels, Thursday, 8 October 2015 13:26 (ten years ago)

I have to say, the initial shine of this album has worn off. It was in my running for album of the year, but it just got kind of old. Maybe I overplayed it.

austinato (Austin), Thursday, 8 October 2015 17:07 (ten years ago)

imo it is overall a pleasant album without much substance to it, was very weird to see the widespread acclaim for it. been a few months since i played it though

marcos, Thursday, 8 October 2015 17:10 (ten years ago)

one month passes...

Recently realized that a big part of what makes "Loud Places" a great song to me is - and this was p obv once I realized it but anyway - it's use of space - like the song creates the silent/condensed/claustrophobic and loud/dissolving(agoraphobic?) places it depicts - at once subtle and obvious, I think it's very efficient, adds credibility to Romy's melancholy tale, universal in its metaphor, specific in it's spatiality

so while "Good Times" is the better jam, I think "Loud Places" is a good choice for eoy lists

niels, Monday, 7 December 2015 19:31 (ten years ago)

eleven months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_oA9UmRd4I

new song is probably better than anything on coexist or in colour

ufo, Thursday, 10 November 2016 15:02 (nine years ago)

remarkable, this song has a pulse, did someone finally give these guys some coffee before their recording sessions?

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:24 (nine years ago)

In Colour was a really good record, not feelin this hard on 1st listen, too many directions, but maybe it will grow on me

niels, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:28 (nine years ago)

I suspect that Jamie is not the somnambulist in the group. I'm wondering if his success has driven them in a more beat-oriented direction.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:30 (nine years ago)

Moodles, go back to "Intro", "Crystalised", "Islands", "Night Time", "Chained", "Sunset", "Swept Away"; there has always been a pulse in their music.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:49 (nine years ago)

it's definitely in the direction of In Colour but thankfully doesn't have the heavy clunkiness of the drums on that album which was my real issue with it

ufo, Thursday, 10 November 2016 16:52 (nine years ago)

DJP, I know that element has been there before, but I wish there was more of that, especially more tunes like "Islands". It felt like on Coexist they were favoring the more spare or dirge-like aspects of their music.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:09 (nine years ago)

They were, but not on every song; go back to "Missing" for example.

On first listen, I find this new song bland and uninspiring.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 10 November 2016 17:11 (nine years ago)

I like it. I really love this band though. The sound is so distinct.

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 10 November 2016 19:01 (nine years ago)

this is....interesting~

johnny crunch, Friday, 11 November 2016 02:50 (nine years ago)

Sounds good but somehow they seem to have given up their trademark: the interplay of claustrophoby and open spaces.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Saturday, 12 November 2016 20:54 (nine years ago)

song is mediocre, this can't be a single? hope we have a new thread for the album but doesn't seem to be ILM's way anymore. sad.

Bee OK, Thursday, 17 November 2016 04:30 (nine years ago)

you could always...start one

Number None, Thursday, 17 November 2016 07:30 (nine years ago)

This is their best song, but then again I've found virtually everything they've released up until now a massive chore to get through.

Matt DC, Thursday, 17 November 2016 09:04 (nine years ago)

This is growing on me. Seems like having a sample/instrumental post-chorus is a trend in modern pop huh? Right now I can only think of this song and "Lean On" but I feel like I've been hearing it a lot in the past couple of years.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 09:24 (nine years ago)

Ah yeah also Sorry by Bieber does it... thar's a big one... also several Chainsmokers songs... too lazy to go thru the charts of the previous years but it does feel like a trend that I very rarely heard before.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 09:26 (nine years ago)

that's been a pretty defining trait of edm pop this decade

ufo, Thursday, 17 November 2016 10:31 (nine years ago)

New song is so naff although I guess the guy's singing has improved.

nashwan, Thursday, 17 November 2016 10:32 (nine years ago)

Suspect the dude's improved singing is actually a turn-off for some listeners: no longer sounds like he's singing in the middle of a large, cold, totally dark room.

Tim F, Thursday, 17 November 2016 11:14 (nine years ago)

Not digging this on first listen - I didn't like In Colour much, and this is definitely further in that direction. I mean, when you're sampling one of the best songs of all-time I expect better than "meh"

Vinnie, Thursday, 17 November 2016 13:52 (nine years ago)

Oh wow went to check the sample and hadn't realized it's Hall & Oates. In their defense the sample is modified heavily enough that is not instantly recognizable. I like that there's a part of the song with guitars before the sample enters (while he sings the chorus and shortly after) that kind of sounds like The Field. It's a huge blue balls moment tho... I kind of expect a drop the bass moment after hearing that sound and it goes straight into the post chorus that doesn't sound like a particularly cathartic moment.

I know it's their kind of style but this might be my problem with this song. Too many things in it are right but they never release the tension they build. It goes from one section to the next but it never explodes... which wouldn't be a problem normally but if they're going to go for a more commercial sound they need this sort of moments. Oddly enough in their debut they did knew how to release the tension by repeating a formula of introduce chorus +!drop beat + introduce new guitar figure... sometimes they would stay there until the song was over.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:20 (nine years ago)

The new song is making me retroactively like "VCR", weirdly.

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:24 (nine years ago)

"VCR" was always my favorite from the first record!

k3vin k., Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:33 (nine years ago)

i would love to hear this w/o the sample. it's pretty good as it is but it still feels to me like a slightly awkward meshing of the xx with jamie's solo work. or like they're trying to be cut copy. there's some version of the song that walks right to the edge of the release the sample provides but doesn't give into it, and that's the one i'd be most interested in hearing.

J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 November 2016 19:07 (nine years ago)

The first album is lovely imho. It takes the economical approach of a band like Young Marble Giants and updates it with the missing decades of pop music. It is of course not as mindblowing as YMG because it doesn't feel as new or transgressive as Colosal Youth in context but you can do a hell lot worse than YMG as one of your main influences.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:24 (nine years ago)

Cant find the interview but I remember them citing YMG, The Cure and Aaliyah amongst others as main influences which is perfect by me. Or maybe I'm just misremembering and it was actually a critic doing the comparison.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:29 (nine years ago)

Back to this new song: it's an evolution of that sound which is fine by me because repeating the formula from the first record would get old quick and they got it right the first time around. The problem with being a 'sparse' band is that moving into something more ambitious feels like a different band. This per example doesn't sound like the XX, this sounds like a Jamie XX remix. I think the song is ok but hope the whole album goes somewhere else.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:35 (nine years ago)

Or at the very least I hope it becomes a good Jamie xx record instead of the hit and miss of In Colour.

No longer active (Moka), Thursday, 17 November 2016 20:40 (nine years ago)

i think this track is fantastic and marries the best of jamie xx's past 3 years of work with some great vocals from romy and that dude. whats not to like. bands evolve - i don't have any expectations they will or should have a similar dynamic to their first record.

mingalaba, Friday, 18 November 2016 07:00 (nine years ago)

I love this band, even the second album, but saw their SNL performance, and at this point they really should have learned how to step side to side to the beat.

Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 17:47 (nine years ago)

The sample sounds tacked-on and very much not "them", but there are some really nice smart touches in the songwriting. The 'better voices' are jarring at first blush and he sounds much more 'anonymous male pop radio voice' now, but the moments when their accents shine through (Jamie: 'too soon to caull us') are beautiful. They completely lost me on the last album (that one fantastic track aside), but I'm curious to hear the rest of this one, if only to hear how they incorporate other aspects of the EDM palette into their sound.

flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)

her voice is so beautiful

schlump, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 01:59 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.