Spotify - anyone heard of it?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (12620 of them)

xp wish i had it there when i needed to fetch a handful of pumice dust and lost dream teeth from the caves of Vatnshellir Cave in Snæfellsnes; had to settle for Rascall Flatts and it just wasn't the same

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:19 (eleven years ago)

Outside of listening on my phone, I use Sonos to listen to Spotify most frequently. Sonos has decent local file integration, allowing me to search for a song and either play it from Spotify or my local / network drive but it too has limitations. I can only have 75K local files. I have many times that many and I don't want to create another library for just stuff that isn't available on Spotify. Although, if somebody wrote an AppleScript to match what is on Spotify vs. what's on my HD and create a playlist of the unique files, that would be useful.

brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:20 (eleven years ago)

the sonos interface needs a lot of work, but the basic idea is great. it does a good job of erasing the distinction between your local library, your spotify library and any other subscription libraries you might have.

fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:22 (eleven years ago)

Yeah, Sonos needs work but mostly it's great. I don't now of a better system for multiple zones pulling from multiple sources right now. I do wish there wasn't a delay when I played my vinyl through Sonos. Currently when I play a record, I can send to the 3 different zones, but the zones outside the main zone where the turntable is located get out of phase pretty quick.

brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:28 (eleven years ago)

The other thing about the theoretical whitesnake album is that it might get remastered next month and the remaster is garbage and becomes the only version on streaming. In that case you would be glad to have saved its prior iteration on your hd

demonic mnevice (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:39 (eleven years ago)

xp:

it's not only the issue of exclusives. it's that music rights in general remain incredibly complicated, and it's always possible that any individual song or album or catalog could disappear at any time. and as copyrights revert from labels back to artists, or to artists' estates, over the years, there's no way of knowing what those artists or estates will choose to do, or will be able to do. so if you're really going to want that whitesnake album in 2035, you might want to hold on to your mp3s, just in case.

― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1:18 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this too, otm

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:42 (eleven years ago)

that leaves the question of how easy it will be to keep computer files for 20+ years, though. anybody still info from computer disks from 1995 easily on hand?

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:48 (eleven years ago)

still have info from...

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:48 (eleven years ago)

I do but it's fucking awful

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:49 (eleven years ago)

(that said, unless a new audio format emerges, mp3 files are pretty easy to transfer for as long as you're willing to transfer hard drives, it's not like you have to deal with compatibility unless you're in the realm of, like, realaudio)

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:49 (eleven years ago)

but that's the thing - we're talking about decades of evolution in computer tech, from an industry that's fond of changing your drives, formats, etc

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:51 (eleven years ago)

basically my point is that if you wanna keep that whitensake album handy i might consider hunting down a physical copy rather than transferring that mp3 throughout the decades

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:52 (eleven years ago)

forgive the obvious but in simple terms of access to music we're all kind of ignoring the elephant in the room that is torrenting; that's the most likely way to find the hypothetical non-remastered whitesnake album and anything else that disappears into the copyright ether. it's the only pseudo-service that has shown longevity and consistency.
or more to the point, it seems likely that (barring an unknowable gestalt shift) any music that is widely available now will never become unavailable, it's just likely to become commercially / legally unavailable. that may be a "yeah doi" comment for most, but for those of us who remember a time before the internet it matters.

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:56 (eleven years ago)

thing about torrenting is that like any form of piracy, it's heavily beholden to what the torrenters and people torrenting actually like. going back to high school desperately trying to find more than one track off (for instance) a sandra record is not my idea of access to music. not to mention the document I keep that keeps growing of things that you simply cannot find online anymore. they're gone, they're over, maybe someone will join the world of the internet or someone, hopefully you, will find a CD in a haystack

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:00 (eleven years ago)

the latest entry on that doc, btw, is -- in the kind of irony that gobstops me that it even exists - "god saves the internet," a pro-net neutrality track recorded by kay hanley, michelle lewis and jill sobule

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:01 (eleven years ago)

I would love to see that list in some form

sleeve, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:05 (eleven years ago)

private trackers unlock a lot of that stuff kat... but your point is certainly valid: there's lots of stuff out there that is inaccessible for general access or requires crazy hunting to find. But less that there's ever been in any other time in history!

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:13 (eleven years ago)

the day I am both financially solvent enough to afford and sociopathic enough to even consider hiring a private investigator to track down a fucking mp3 is the day I need to join a convent or something

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:22 (eleven years ago)

as for "less than there's ever been in any other time in history" that's inherently untrackable. I mean, probably it is, but we really have no way of knowing, let alone knowing what it'll be like 20 years from now

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:23 (eleven years ago)

Private trackers are generally run by private investigators, it's true.

Position Position, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:28 (eleven years ago)

apologies, I misread, I don't actually torrent anything

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:29 (eleven years ago)

that said, from what I know of private link-sharing communities and the like, they are very unlikely to have significant overlap with the sort of music I'd be looking for.

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:30 (eleven years ago)

xxp inherently unprovable maybe but colloquially it rings accurate to my own brief stay on the historymobile
the idea of a premium "song finder" service where you have taskrabbit hunters to hunt down mp3 copies of the obvious and obscure for immediate play sounds like a business plan whose time has come

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:30 (eleven years ago)

(xp) yeah, there's a LOT missing from the digital world, everything from doo-wop records that are now owned by this label that bought that label that bought that other label that merged with those other seven labels, none of which gives a rat ass about doo-wop artists whose last minor hit came before anyone who worked for any of those labels was born, to small punk pressings that have never made the leap from vinyl to any digital form, to god knows what else we can't see, because we can't actually see the thing that we can't see. it's amazing to me how many relatively mainstream artists continue to be forgotten by the passing years, internet or no internet.

fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:33 (eleven years ago)

btw, i am going to look into getting you a copy of god save the internet

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:33 (eleven years ago)

a lot of CDs with pop artists' debuts that were shipped to radio but clearly never took off enough to become ubiquitous, a lot of indie, particularly when not from the US -- I have the vague feeling that either I or my tastes are being made fun of here, but still.

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:42 (eleven years ago)

that said, from what I know of private link-sharing communities and the like, they are very unlikely to have significant overlap with the sort of music I'd be looking for.

curious now about what music you like that's so obscure that the major private sharing community wouldn't have it. like what.cd isn't complete but of things i want to hear that aren't on spotify they probably have like 75%.

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:42 (eleven years ago)

do we have a thread for like -- most obscure/hard to find/oop album you have?

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:46 (eleven years ago)

it's not a matter of obscurity, it's a matter of genre. the people who subscribe to these services generally deal either in the music canon or the nerd canon. so if things are like they were back a few years ago (or now, if you try the google track), you can easily find every Bob Dylan and/or DragonForce one-off but not, say, stuff from teen-movie soundtracks or europop or female singer-songwriters who aren't the canonized ones.

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:47 (eleven years ago)

i think maybe you aren't familiar enough w/ these services. i've found tons of super obscure 60s-70s female singer-songwriter albums.

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:48 (eleven years ago)

yeah, I'm not talking 60s-70s, I'm talking 80s-on

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:48 (eleven years ago)

the closer in time to now the more likely it's available - give me the name of the most obscure 80s female singer-songwriter you can think of. i'm curious to see if i can find it online.

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:49 (eleven years ago)

(because '60s-'70s female singer-songwriter albums have a place in the canon, they're either laurel canyon-ish or chartdigging finds or margo guryan. but someone like sandra lockwood? that one I DO have -- because someone I knew bought the CD and was kind enough to send me a rip)

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:49 (eleven years ago)

you may have found a niche to service katherine. time to call the angel investors

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:51 (eleven years ago)

for fuck's sake, I'm not trying to prove that I am ~*more obscure than you*~ or claim that I am somehow uniquely affected by this, this is just the part of my musical interests that I have to go out looking for in the first place

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:52 (eleven years ago)

RFI Sandra Lockwood

example (crüt), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:53 (eleven years ago)

can't find her. she has a last.fm scrobble page which reminds me of the last time i was looking for an album that was super oop and only had one person who had scrobbled it ever. so i contacted them and asked for a copy - success!

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:54 (eleven years ago)

kat, i'm being serious! I'm not really looking for that stuff so it's outside of my purview; i wouldn't notice that it's eroding because i didn't know it was there in the first place. you would almost certainly be a welcome addition on any private torrent for just that reason.

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:55 (eleven years ago)

yeah, sometimes asking people on last.fm works. sometimes they haven't used last.fm in years, just kept it scrobbling away, and don't visit the site let alone answer stuff in their inbox. sometimes it pisses them off, which having been on both sides of this equation I understand

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:56 (eleven years ago)

fwiw, i am facebook friends with sobule so i will let you know what i hear

“audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:57 (eleven years ago)

kat i just sent you a webmail

Mordy, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 18:59 (eleven years ago)

the example I usually bring up in music-canon circles -- and yes, I know I'm repeating myself -- is the tracks from a toni halliday/anka from clan of xymox collaboration that were posted online about a decade ago

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:00 (eleven years ago)

(those I think might legitimately be gone on her end, it's just a matter of whether an indeterminate number of people downloaded them)

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:00 (eleven years ago)

anyway this is getting way off topic

katherine, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:00 (eleven years ago)

do we have a thread for like -- most obscure/hard to find/oop album you have?

Mordy this is kind of like that:

Acts that are not on Spotify

and

this is the thread where you post the records you have been looking for over many moons unsuccessfully in the hopes that someone reading ilm might be able to help you out for either sexual favors or

sleeve, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:10 (eleven years ago)

oops I misread yr question, sorry

sleeve, Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:10 (eleven years ago)

for fuck's sake, I'm not trying to prove that I am ~*more obscure than you*~ or claim that I am somehow uniquely affected by this, this is just the part of my musical interests that I have to go out looking for in the first place

― katherine, Tuesday, May 12, 2015 2:52 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The biggest single stumbling block for me w/Spotify, which is not Spotify's fault in any way, is my enormous enthusiasm for film scores. This is a genre that lives in a unique licensing tidal zone that ensures CDs go out of print in an eyeblink and legal digital versions either never exist in the first place or disappear without warning. E.G. Jerry Goldsmith is probably the second most famous film composer of all time after Williams and only the scantiest sliver of his stuff exists on Spotify (or emusic or amazon Mp3 etc). (There are dozens and dozens of things there under his artist name but 85% are godawful recreations). (But Morricone, uniquely, is in fantastic shape on Spotify -- there's very few important scores of his you can't hear there).

demonic mnevice (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 12 May 2015 19:22 (eleven years ago)

But what the contract doesn’t stipulate is what Sony Music can and will do with the advance money. Does it go into a pot to be divided between Sony Music’s artists, or does the label keep it to itself? According to a music industry source, labels routinely keep advances for themselves.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/19/8621581/sony-music-spotify-contract

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 23:43 (eleven years ago)

Shocking.

schwantz, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 00:12 (eleven years ago)

In the wake of Swift’s departure from Spotify, many musicians rallied to her cause, vilifying streaming services that paid a fraction of a penny per play. But this contract makes it clear — the pay per stream rates aren’t the only issue. According to its financial disclosures, the majority of Spotify’s revenue, around 80 percent, has been flowing out the door to the rights holders. "You can’t squeeze blood from a stone," said David Pakman, the former CEO of eMusic and partner at Venrock. "Your beef can’t be with Spotify anymore." At least not with Spotify alone.

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 00:34 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.