amanda palmer's open poem to jonathan chait (and other crimes)

esp. given how many fans she has that buy into it.

i apologize for assuming jack from pompalamoose wasn't also down for this kind of subscription superfan cultivation, which was indeed short-sighted of me

― da croupier, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 1:05 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He owns the Patreon website.

Wasn't there a music video in the late 90s that was some nondescript guy walking around with a sign that said "Free hugs" and it was just him hugging people and meant to be some enlightening twee performance art feel like she is running w those vibes.

― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:59 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lollllll it was the fucking dave matthews band

though ok jack at least makes a point to suggest his role is that as a technical advisor rather than a bff

Pledge $100.00 or more per video

3 patrons (All 3 sold out!)
Click to be notified when a spot opens

You get everything you see in the other packages PLUS an hour long Google Hangout with me, every time I release a new video. Just the two of us. We can talk about how to produce music, how to get started on YouTube, how to setup and play a Launchpad, anything you like! Plus, when you sign up, I will personally call you on the phone and thank you for becoming my patron.

ahhh dang too slow. forgot that it was judah friedlander

must be weird when a spot becomes available in jack's three amigos club. like, was it some amicable "ok now i know how to set up a launchpad, thanks jack! bye!" thing? did shit get too real? not real enough?

That is so crazy! LOL DMB.

Yeah everyone otm on how weird it would be to have to spend an hour on the phone/skype with a complete stranger who you know nothing about other than they gave you $1,000. You probably start feeling like a politician.

Or even start to feel like you're at work and that this is your job or something!

idea: you pay $1,000 to have a personal conversation with a musician you admire, who proceeds to interrogate you about why you like his terrible music and why you thought talking to him one on one would be rewarding. conversation ends in tears. you hang up, then get an email from paypal notifying you that the $1,000 has been withdrawn from your account.

i think you basically described an e-meter reading

I would imagine being on the phone with an amanda palmer fan would involve listening to really awful poetry, crying, listening them practice from drama club, and talking them out of cutting themselves. but maybe not.

someone should go undercover and see if after a year you get invited to the super-secret VIP fan club there isn't even a public crowdfunding page for

i apologize for assuming jack from pompalamoose wasn't also down for this kind of subscription superfan cultivation, which was indeed short-sighted of me

― da croupier, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 4:05 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Scanning the thread I saw this and in context I briefly thought it was about one of the pledge gifts being a "jack from pomplamoose"

i feel like when you get to the point where you're offering super-duper personal access to 3-4 people you should give them names like its the Inner Circle Of The Hellfire Club

"I'm afraid The Grey King's Credit Card has expired and he shan't be joining our skyping this month. Meet Frank, he is 17, a devoted fan of my streams, and the new Grey King."

"EXCELSIOR!"

My daughter's preschool had a silent auction where one of the bidding items was "A day with Queens Boro President Melinda Katz"

Scanning the thread I saw this and in context I briefly thought it was about one of the pledge gifts being a "jack from pomplamoose"

yikes! keep 'em away from the produce section, right?

would you help jack off a pomplamoose?

ok, so the source of my mild indignation here is that generally the sort of musicians who use kickstarter, patreon, indiegogo and the like are the ones who have fallen off (or never made it onto) the PR/hype cycle, for whatever reason. (a lot of times it's partly demographics-based -- it's not a coincidence that a lot of female singer-songwriters use it and historically have been among the first. games, same thing.) obviously palmer has a much bigger fanbase / revenue intake then a lot of those, but when things move from "lol amanda palmer" to "lol people who use patreon" it starts to feel a lot like punching down.

(also, I do sort of have a dog in this race, in that I used to subscribe to kristin hersh's equivalent. may or may not still subscribe, I honestly forget.)

for fuck's sake people, I realize amanda palmer is persona non grata but this is fundamentally no different from everyone else's patreon/cashmusic/other subscription service doesn't seem like a defense of "people who use patreon" but a defense of amanda palmer

and who punched down on music subscription services anyway

the joke of palmer being the poster child for all these services is that where most people using them want to give you a specific item of value in return - even jack pomplamoose makes his one-on-one convos sound like advice consultations - palmer's whole shtick is that the art should be free and it's HER you pay for. her problem with kickstarter was she'd have to keep selling her projects individually. This allows her to treat literally anything she does as being of equal value, as what you're really doing is saying "amanda keep making things" and getting her approval and appreciation in return. this is very different from some "six songs a year, 12 bucks and you get a tote bag" operation

It's patronage. That's why it's called Patreon. While it differs from the historical sense of patronage by virtue of being crowdsourced rather than from a single patron, the idea is the same. It's not inherently better or worse than receiving goods for services. And since it's increasingly difficult to get people to pay for goods, this model may work better for some artists than others. Many (imo) good artists have done better under this model than the project-specific funding model.

xpost Whatever the "things" are, they are likely better value mp3s which you can get for free anyway and are not real objects. She makes artwork, stencils, customised covers (and yes, chewed up postcards) and that kind of thing. Presumably the people who pay are expecting similar, since that's what she has done in the past. I truly don't understand why this is necessarily so appalling bearing in mind the business practices of the music industry over the last 50 years.

so where is her sistine chapel

xpost

again, if anyone is exploiting, fostering and selling cult-of-personality based affirmation on patreon or kickstarter to the degree amanda palmer is, PLEASE NAME THEM cuz i'd love to see more examples. we're talking about something VERY DIFFERENT from "if you give me 5 bucks a song I'll put your name at the end of one of my videos"

or if not very different, a far more extreme version that i think most artists would balk at

PLEASE NAME THEM

As far as I know she actually fulfills the terms of her fundraising, which is not true of many many kickstarters. Her terms are wack as fuck but her fans don't seem to feel ripped off by them?

Her sistine chapel is a piece of garbage she put in her mouth i think

"Exploiting, fostering and selling cult of personality based affirmation" is a pretty good pocket history of the music biz.

I keep thinking back to Momus and "Stars Forever" and dude was way ahead of his time there.

nah momus was openly throwing back to the old days of patronage, which anyone with half a clue should know i'm not hating on

polyphonic how dare you quote PLEASE NAME THEM and then do nothing of the sort, instead making some vague quibble about how her fans don't seem to mind

Well i don't mean exactly like this, but the idea of patronage and crowd funding records and such. Also he actually spent time writing each patron's life stories into particular songs.

cheque your patronage

the joke of palmer being the poster child for all these services is that where most people using them want to give you a specific item of value in return - even jack pomplamoose makes his one-on-one convos sound like advice consultations - palmer's whole shtick is that the art should be free and it's HER you pay for.

― da croupier, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 7:34 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I guess this is where we fundamentally disagree, because not only do I not see a problem with this, I don't see any possible problem to see with this besides "I personally dislike amanda palmer and thus this is bad."

Agree with that. It's really reaching to find any issue here if you don't already think of AP as a heinous grifter to begin with.

part of why i keep saying Please Show Other Examples Of Famous People Selling Their Friendship Via Subscription (which apparently no one is capable of doing, which is a shame) is to suggest that my problem is not with Amanda Palmer doing this

believe me, if greg dulli was doing this i'd laugh just as hard

maybe more, because i'd know more song titles i can pun off of

"Exploiting, fostering and selling cult of personality based affirmation" is a pretty good pocket history of the music biz.

― everything, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 4:51 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sorry croup, commute time!

yeah everything i read your equivocation the first time

Do you think people pay $250 to see they Rolling Stones because they heard about this song called "Satisfaction" and want to see what the fuss is about?

xpost obv the entertainment industry has long known access to heroes is a salable commodity (HANG OUT WITH METALLICA AND MTV, yadda ya) and you could even argue what she's doing is kinder to the kind of fan that sends in a hundred postcards to hang out backstage. but what kind of person can OFFER that kind of emotional availability simply for a price, other than your l-rons.

― da croupier, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 8:38 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there are a million william shatners who will take your money in exchange for a sprinkling of their fame-dust but on some level it'd be weirder if shatner was like NOW YOU ARE MY FRIEND FOR LIFE I SWEAR TO YOU

― da croupier, Wednesday, March 4, 2015 8:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

tbf there were some more words in the sentence you quoted xp

Many, many rocks stars have said such things to their fans, even if it's usually from a stage. And AP IS a performer after all. It's a schtick, an act. One you find weird and mysterious obviously but just a performance nonetheless.

in case it's unclear that's a reference to L Ron Hubbard not Jeremy I-Rons.

everything, if you admit it's a shtick why are you bothered that i think her shtick is funny?

and i do think friendship subscriptions are weird (the fact that other people shout "thank you! i love you!" from a stage after applause doesn't change that) but i don't find it mysterious, just amusingly shameless

So is Bono.

i also know the pope wears a funny hat