a mix between The Stone Roses and Primal Scream with the swagger of Oasis

xp

need a thread for decontextualized/recontextualized fashion instead maybe - can the outfits be beautiful in the context of unbeautiful signifiers?

which is like, the history of the feather cut itself - dangerous signifier of possible queerness in 1971, blunt denoter of atrophied musical interests in 2015

The victory condition for all of these bands is Top Gear library music, right?

That's kinda what we were doing on the Image Band thread, NV. The transition from signifier of dangerous new concept to empty signifier of retro fashion that I ended up jokingly calling "weightless semiotics".

Another side of this rubik's cube is the whole image being a recapturing of their own youth, or the youth of their near-relative, from a time where there was some sort of 'moral panic' around.

It harkens back to the 'teddy boys' in that respect.

Obviously I'm conflicted; last thing I need at my age is some sort of "OK, you sit with all these older people in your new age bracket and sing those songs about the war", and I did note with some pleasure that one of the latest Saga adverts has it soundtracked by "Here I go again" Archie Bell and the Drells.

.. but I like/love about 50% of the music so far represented, and am bored relentlessly by the rest.

Kasabian? I don't pay them too much mind, on that level they're OK I guess.

The Horrors are supposed to be really good, might give them a listen some time.

remember this thread?

Also pathos of shameless commercial populism that isn't commercially popular: No-one is interested in these bands, but the template allows no deviation from 'gonna be the biggest band in the world' fronting.

(xp) Yeah, remember fun?

I don't know much about Kasabian but I believe they're much more of a dumbed down Lads' Primal Scream than Oasis/ Roses wannabes. Oh, and tell the Beatles to fuck off.

Also pathos of shameless commercial populism that isn't commercially popular: No-one is interested in these bands, but the template allows no deviation from 'gonna be the biggest band in the world' fronting.

^^^ this

They already did. It's not their fault so many are staring at the door they closed behind them.

xpost

I kinda want to separate out The Horrors because they're in kind of a different *genre* from the Primals-meets-Oasis gang. (The narcissism of small difference, yes, but the kind of difference that Americans don't notice.)

But they're kind of guilty of the same thing - being a pastiche of a pastiche. There's something deeply pathetic about aspiring to be a mixture of "Primal Scream and Oasis" when those two bands are known primarily for being copyists and retro-fetishists. (The Primals and the Roses, at least, unlike Oasis made at least *some* attempt to engage with contemporary culture, blah blah Andy Weatherall, blah blah Acid House etc. etc.) The Horrors are doing the same thing, copying from a copy, but with a slightly different set of signifiers that they are the third generation of. (And, it seems, with somewhat more awareness that that is what they're doing.)

The thing is most of these bands seem like local groups with no connections and no interest from the media who - despite the misguided ambition that makes leads them to shoot press photos - will probably never prosper outside of their town, if indeed they prosper there. That's definitely not the case with The Horrors, who also, imho, pull off their look with a certain compelling confidence.

I'm not arguing that the Horrors are not 'pulling off their look', I'm more arguing that they are copying from a different crib sheet.

Oh sure, agreed.

imo part of the Horrors separateness comes from the class/taste complex - they seem to have made a lot of good (='acceptable'/recognisable) collaborative choices, can fit in with the world of the Vaccines, Florence etc.

(but that's supplemental to their different crib sheet, which I'd agree with)

big old goths as opposed to Britpop/Madchester wannabes

Could we please not wreck this thread please????
You don't have to over explain something that anyone could instinctively understand in 5 secs!!

God.

The Horrors are good tho

BTW the US analog to this thread is really not as music related, but rolling fedora 2011

xpost agree less explaining and more pics of lumpen cagoule schmucks imo

For once, upper mississippi shakedown could *you*, perhaps try giving it a rest?

No one was wrecking this thread until you got here. Perhaps next time, try just calming down and allowing the thread to take its course, without feeling the need to add your disapproval.

on a point of fact, you were wrecking this thread

oh boy.

nah, I'm off. I could do without a tilde assault this week.

hoping that's "off" as in "fuck off for good"

ftr this thread was incredibly boring and depressing that it was the most popular ilx thread until k8 and nv started posting actual words in it

The feeling of going back to a small town and recognizing a man that used to be there and seeing him again, and being about to ask him hows the kidder doing, must be going to University soon and then realising its the son

You want next door..

http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj242/donaldparsley/the-horrorsdetail_zps074b2d31.jpg

has thoughts on inclusion itt

Perhaps next time, try just calming down and allowing the thread to take its course, without feeling the need to add your disapproval.

― Branwell with an N, Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:02 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Lmao physician heal thyself

we can't even LOL at haircuts any more

political correctness gone mod

haw

the horrors shouldn't have been posted here, probably

they make a good and positive comparison to the landfill shite though

hey lex, cunt, fuck you you worthless piece of shit. you can't die quick enough for my taste.

well that escalated predictably

Yeah that Skying album was great

the one before was even better IIRC- Primary Colours

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrARl0dzd-0

eh apologies everyone else I'm a little disinclined and thats not worthy talk

http://mrstsk.tumblr.com/post/110679101203

This is quite good.

Imagine if Elvis Presley had been impersonating Scott Joplin. That’s what The Struts are doing with 1960s and 1970s cultural reference points. They’ve remembered them in such detail that they’ve forgotten them completely.

http://www.fredperrysubculture.com/media/cache/featured/upload/suzukimain.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v472/birdnestsoup/Capture23.jpg
http://www.withguitars.com/wp-content/uploads/Likely_Lads_2012_bw_1c.jpg
http://smg.photobucket.com/user/birdnestsoup/media/Capture24.jpg.html

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v472/birdnestsoup/Capture24.jpg

^ probably all make cock-awful music but i kind of like the vibe in those photos

no i know the horrors didn't fit here i just read that they had been a band for ten years like kasabian and i was surprised. i guess they still feel kinda new-ish to me.

http://40.media.tumblr.com/233af41d2ec22d166a0123894be6889d/tumblr_njiohtzDdf1u833ueo5_400.jpg

Kinda wondering if this kind of band, although not the same exact species, are at least in the same genus, order or phylum? (Or if I'm unduly influenced by kneejerk dislike.)

Like, there's a category of "has read the NME way too fucking much for their own good" that overlaps with the Roses-Oasis-Scream species, but I suspect the Roses-Oasis-Scream species would find the current genus of NME acolytes far too... modern or fashion-y or middle class?

So it's all that Scott Seward's fault then.