Where is the infamous Rolling Stones sample in "Bittersweet Symphony" ?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (141 of them)
hey, it took out my spaces, that should be BCFE

the hinterland (the hinterland), Monday, 19 January 2004 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

not driven by some kinda brilliant pop songwriting, but rather by a simple sample.

you are an idiot.

$$, Monday, 19 January 2004 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

They had done the whole thing better before with "History" anyway. After that song Bittersweet seems like a creative step backward.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 19 January 2004 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)

well look:
The Verve riff goes:
da da da-da da-da-da, da-da-da

The RS riff goes:
Da-da-da, da-da, daah-da, da-da

Nothing alike! Bogus litigation, clearly.

Ian Grey (Ian_G), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 06:49 (twenty-two years ago)

sugar daddy

minna (minna), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 06:51 (twenty-two years ago)

there's loads going on in that song that isn't in the sample

But there's really not, that's my point. If you listen to the whole Andrew Loog Oldham Orchestra (great name by the way) track, it becomes obvious around the minute-thirty-five mark. The leap from what's going on there to the main melody in "Bittersweet Symphony" is very small.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 07:01 (twenty-two years ago)

And it's not made up for by Ashcroft's killer flow Trife

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 07:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Having listened, perhaps some payment was due but no way should it be 100%. The Loog is a nice schlocked up variation; the verve track is pure mid-90s hip-hop as done by sensitive whiteboy alt-romantic from UK - the pleasure of the song is the tightness of the loop, the fierceness of its repetition (it rocks considerably harder than Loog).

Ashcroft's collegiate romanticism (I can't make much sense from the philosophising and don't care to try too hard) just adds vocal texture. But the fact that a sample from an orchestral interpretation is turned into a rhythmic device means that the Verve did some serious creative work and means they deserve considerable credit for turning it into a hit - unless you want to argue that the Loog track was seriously likely to move any units at all without Ashcroft's intervention.

plebian plebs (plebian), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

the fact that they're turning over 100 percent of the royalties doesn't mean, and isn't supposed to mean, that the stones and/or oldham were responsible for 100 percent of the song.

rather, it means that the verve made the simple mistake of not asking for permission for beforehand and thus forfeited their rights to have any say in the negotiation.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

FCC OTM.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

However, Allen Klein and/or the stones had been notorious in refusing sample clearance. Maybe that's why they didn't ask.

I believe Richard Ashcroft was allowed a £1000 'writer's fee' for his new words...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

They had done the whole thing better before with "History" anyway. After that song Bittersweet seems like a creative step backward.

Whatever! I don't see any of you hating on Puff Daddy for what he did to Sting, oh hang on...

What's bad about these Ashcroft lyrics? Ususally he's a dick, but not so much here. I think it rocks and I did when I was 16.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't see any of you hating on Puff Daddy for what he did to Sting, oh hang on...

HAHAHA Enrique I salute you.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

five years pass...

"We sampled four bars. That was on one track. Then we did 47 tracks of music beyond that little piece. We've got our own string players, our own percussion on it. Guitars. We're talking about a four-bar sample turning into 'Bitter Sweet Symphony' and they're still claiming it's the same song."

Oh come the fuck on , man.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:05 (seventeen years ago)

LOL

proxymuzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:07 (seventeen years ago)

http://marlinco.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/vanilla20ice-4.jpg

proxymuzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:09 (seventeen years ago)

:) i never heard that original sample. cool.

Ludo, Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:11 (seventeen years ago)

Embeddable version:

worldwide global pandemic (Z S), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:14 (seventeen years ago)

I like the orchestral version of that song better than the real one

iatee, Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:24 (seventeen years ago)

I heard the original some years back and it made me scoff. I never thought of Bittersweet Symphony the same way again (not that I was that big of a fan in the first place). The Verve struck me as a bunch of mediocre poseurs from the get-go and why some people make such a big fuss over them, I can't imagine.

Earl of Gothington Manor (Bimble), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:31 (seventeen years ago)

such a rad song + perfect at the end of 'cruel intentions'

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:33 (seventeen years ago)

^^^^^

Satin Lives (Tape Store), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:34 (seventeen years ago)

i felt like that when i heard 'superfreak' for the first time.

xpost

max otm loool was gonna doa 'cruel intentions' thread today but forgot. so dope.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:34 (seventeen years ago)

David Whitaker really deserves some credit in that story, at least as much as Oldham (and certainly a bit more).

Snowballing, Thursday, 30 April 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)

I've always felt that the Verve get kinda hosed here. Yes, the chords and supporting bgd is the Loog Oldham orchestra. But the hooks are all theirs: the string melody, the vocal melody.

However much a douche Ashcroft is is beside the point. The orchestral tune is nice -- over the top of it the Verve made a big, catchy pop tune that's some kind of classic.

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:00 (seventeen years ago)

uh if you take a big obvious uncleared sample like this you're pretty much begging to be sued, no matter how much stuff you add over it

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:02 (seventeen years ago)

Pretty sure they did clear the sample and that there was an agreed to 50/50 royalty split.

That said the best argument that this is more Stones than the Verve is the fact that neither the Verve nor Ashcroft wrote anything half as successful.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

I *can* hear the main orchestral hook, even though I know it's not there

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

That said the best argument that this is more Stones than the Verve is the fact that neither the Verve nor Ashcroft wrote anything half as successful.

Yeah but how many people HAVE?

iatee, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

(I mean it was one of the biggest hits of the entire decade)

iatee, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)

Okay maybe a 1/10th as successful? Successful at all? A top 5 hit?

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:18 (seventeen years ago)

the whole thing's such a joke because Jagger/Richards ripped off/stole from so many people - the idea that their manager took advantage of the Verve to reap a ridiculous legal settlement from a sample is very uhhhh waht.

but its always funny to hear people actually complain (still! after all these years!) about how sampling is stealing, not original, etc.

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

for one thing the Stones' version of "The Last Time" is itself ripped (completely uncredited) from the Staple Singers

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

Actually I guess they had a couple of other UK top 5 hits, but whatever.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

lolz as I already pointed out way upthread hah

x-post

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

this is a good song and i don't like the rolling stones very much

sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah I'm not arguing that the Verve didn't get fleeced.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

do people who complain about this sample complain about Eric B and Rakim looping James Brown or Dr. Dre looping P-Funk or Puffy looping the Police or or or

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:22 (seventeen years ago)

I'm guessing most of them do.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:24 (seventeen years ago)

I think the issue here is that most people initially heard the Verve and had never heard the orchestral version of "The Last Time" and so they thought "hey that Verve song sounds nothing like "The Last Time" the Verve got completely ripped off" and so consequently when they hear the original they overreact in the other direction.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:25 (seventeen years ago)

I feel like people who complain about this sample probably don't know who Eric B and Rakim are...but probably felt their heart break when they watched the "where Daft Punk got their samples from" youtube video

iatee, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:27 (seventeen years ago)

this is a good song and i don't like the rolling stones very much

To make a comparison, this isn't, like, Puff Daddy taking the entirety of "Every Breath You Take" and having someone sing the melody of the original in the background with a chorus. It's the CHORDS, for god's sake.

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:28 (seventeen years ago)

consequently when they hear the original they overreact in the other direction

yeah I just did this

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:30 (seventeen years ago)

t's the CHORDS, for god's sake.

lolz so we're gonna start complaining about stealing chord progressions now? you gotta be kidding

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:38 (seventeen years ago)

No we're not, that's my point.

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

ah. I wasn't sure.

shit was shocking as fuck back then (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 April 2009 20:42 (seventeen years ago)

It's pretty silly to be against sampling per se, but in general, I trust my own ears, and I trust other people's ears. If the original sounds too much like the thing that sampled it, or vice versa, why should the one who sampled it get any credit? I can think of other instances where I've gone back and heard the song someone sampled from and there was a pretty clear difference. This is not one of those cases. The sad fact is, everything that makes Bittersweet Symphony appealing comes directly from that sample. Stuff like the Vanilla Ice & Puff Daddy tracks are just stupid. They merely exploit the fact that a lot of folks will not have heard the originals.

Earl of Gothington Manor (Bimble), Thursday, 30 April 2009 21:00 (seventeen years ago)

The sad fact is, everything that makes Bittersweet Symphony appealing comes directly from that sample.

Severely disagree. Most of the song's appeal comes from its almost dance-like adjustment of level, additions of layers, etc.

sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 30 April 2009 21:11 (seventeen years ago)

"They merely exploit the fact that a lot of folks will not have heard the originals."

Wait you actually think there is a single human being on this planet that hasn't heard "Every Breath You Take"?

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 April 2009 21:15 (seventeen years ago)

Actually, I think the percussion in BSS might be its secretest, strongest weapon.

sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 30 April 2009 21:19 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.