There's probably a Master thesis here: "Towards a typology of coprological metaphors on ILX and the epistemological origins of shitting up/shit-flinging/change your nappy zings in thread discourses with particular reference to FKA Twigs and PJ Harvey"
― Twist of Caliphate (Bob Six), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 10:58 (eleven years ago)
They've also both had very reminiscent career paths, a few faceless releases under radar building up to mainstream acclaim culminating around the narrative of her weirdness and mystery "where did she come from who is she"
lol this is a very well-worn PR strategy for countless "credible" acts who gain a semi-mainstream profile, whether they're bands or producers or female solo artists, indeed so well-worn that it's p much a cliché now
ethering your points would be like taking from a candy from a baby tbh and i can't be bothered
The "girl on the bus" versus "art school" (what I called "ethereal") is interesting in that it's partly complicated by class (singing in a more natural accent versus a "posh" or affected accent) but is also about training and artifice - going for those kinds of conservatoire singing tones because they sustain better.
this is more interesting - with both holter and herndon it sort of bothered me because i felt it ended up sounding a bit blank and emotionless, as if there wasn't much at stake for them. (herndon's new single is really guilty of this.) even when i loved the music, the songwriting, the production, the ideas, it made is resistant to really hitting me emotionally. twigs isn't as extreme as them but that was certainly a barrier for me at first. k8 - what's your take on how the convey emotion via this deliberate stylistic (and stylised?) choice? compared to singing styles that might be more "obviously" emotional...
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 10:59 (eleven years ago)
"Pretty obvious similarities"
ethereal falsetto vocals - genderedsimilar career paths - meaning what?same ages - appearancesimilar genre - what genre is that?same balletic inspired dance - appearancemore than a passing resemblance in appearance - appearancesimilar discussions in their interviews about roles of sexism in industry - genderedwrites own lyrics & self produces - so broad as to be meaninglesssame ethereal, celestial dainty music videos - appearanceboth seen sans eyebrows - appearance
I'm having trouble seeing how your argument rises above "skinny girls with high voices."
Self producing lyric writers could be anyone from Kate Bush to Paul Banks. Oh, wait, you mean *girls* who self-produce. That's not a gendered observation at all, now is it?
No, it would not be sexist to compare Dylan to Guthrie, but if you only ever compared Dylan to Guthrie and never ever mentioned e.g. Dylan as compared to Joni Mitchell - or, more saliently, only ever compared Joni Mitchell to Joan Baez, rather than Joni to Dylan.
If you want to prove "but I'm not a sexist!" you could try by just, I dunno, not saying dumb sexist things. Try harder.
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:04 (eleven years ago)
Whether it is or not that is the point that you apparently missed nevertheless it is still true of both their careers and not a p/r scheme regardless of whether it has been used defacto p.r scheme for other artists or not. So I'm not sure how you think you have discounted that valid point by validating it, although in an erroneous way.
Some prefer winning to being right, I guess.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:05 (eleven years ago)
Oh, wait, you mean *girls* who self-produce. That's not a gendered observation at all, now is it?
Another straw man, no where did I say or mean "girls" (as you put it) who produce or engender that statement in any, I simply said artists who write and produce. I don't know why you're adding gender to that. Again, turn yourself down.
No, it would not be sexist to compare Dylan to Guthrie,
Appreciate the confirmation
but if you only ever compared Dylan to Guthrie and never ever mentioned e.g. Dylan as compared to Joni Mitchell - or, more saliently, only ever compared Joni Mitchell to Joan Baez, rather than Joni to Dylan.
??... I have no idea how to reply to this imaginative accession of the idea, you've gone off the deep end.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:12 (eleven years ago)
this is more interesting - with both holter and herndon it sort of bothered me because i felt it ended up sounding a bit blank and emotionless, as if there wasn't much at stake for them. (herndon's new single is really guilty of this.) even when i loved the music, the songwriting, the production, the ideas, it made is resistant to really hitting me emotionally. twigs isn't as extreme as them but that was certainly a barrier for me at first. Branwell - what's your take on how the convey emotion via this deliberate stylistic (and stylised?) choice? compared to singing styles that might be more "obviously" emotional...
I dunno, I'm kinda bored of talking about singing styles as opposed to production choices at this point. Granted, choosing one particular vocal style *is* a production choice. Choosing a very formal, classical voice indicating distance over a warmer/rawer tone that indicates 'emotion' is as much a stylistic choice as choosing one kind of snare tone or one kind of synth pad over another. But we dwell so much on singing style, as opposed to the musical signifiers that I start to shy away from discussing it any further.
Like, I don't have a problem with blank or affected art school/ethereal vocal styles. Displaying emotion through singing technique has become such gendered affective labour in the electronic music world that I think it's a distinct choice to withhold emotion. I admire female producers who are just "admire my technique" rather than "here, I am performing the affective labour of ~singing~ for you."
But this is not the kind of argument that goes down well on ILM.
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:14 (eleven years ago)
wait i didn't realise I was arguing with CharlieXCX fans. nevrmind!
― Raccoon Tanuki, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:21 (eleven years ago)
ho ho!
― john wahey (NickB), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:25 (eleven years ago)
maybe yr looking for the fk wits thread instead?
You really can tell ~so much~ about people by the things they think are insults?
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:30 (eleven years ago)
One of your favourites being 'fuck off and die in a fire'
― Twist of Caliphate (Bob Six), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:33 (eleven years ago)
Aw, Bob, it really touches my heart that you care enough to stalk my twitter so often. It's lovely to know you care so passionately! Anyone else would find that... I dunno, kinda creepy. But we all know you're fine with how creepy you appear.
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 11:36 (eleven years ago)
"but if you only ever compared Dylan to Guthrie and never ever mentioned e.g. Dylan as compared to Joni Mitchell - or, more saliently, only ever compared Joni Mitchell to Joan Baez, rather than Joni to Dylan"
see, this sort of gets at one of the reasons I don't like the "never compare female artists only to other female artists" canard. why does a comparison have to be to someone like Dylan to be legit? and why is "someone like Dylan" always, well, people like Bob Dylan? basically it's a way to do an end-run around the canon while still reinforcing the canon.
― katherine, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 13:57 (eleven years ago)
(the counterpart for male artists might address that, but in practice very few people think that way -- virtually the only time this is brought up is when female artists are being discussed.)
I get what you're saying, katherine, in terms of that sneaking suspicion that comparing women to men is done as one of things which is done to imply legitimacy towards the man rather than towards the women (in which case, you can't win either way.) I didn't specifically pick Dylan as the example, just grabbed him out of the previous comment. But I do think it's much more important to do it the other way around - stress the importance of the influence of female artists on male artists - because that's the one that gets left out so much of the time.
But I do still think that it's an attitude riddled with sexism to only compare female artists to female artists AND only compare male artists to male artists, even if you are damned if you don't, as well as damned if you do.
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
I think women and electronic music is a really interesting topic. But I'm also interested in Donna Haraway's notion of Cyborg-feminism. Grimes, FKA Twigs, The Knife, Tune-yards, even the role-play of Janelle Monae. There are a lot of women making really, really exciting futuristic music at the moment, and a lot of it seems to revolve around gender and sexuality - though obviously not exclusively so. I definitely think there is something to be gained from looking at these artists together. But any discussion of that should probably also include queer-electronica like Baths, Matmos, even something like Owen Pallett (loops like Tune-yards, but, yeah...) and Autre ne Veut (he's not gay, I think, but I've always thought his music sounded gender-breaking, and obviously we're talking about music rather than persons).
Anyways, the way Raccoon Tanuki goes about it is just reductive. What do we gain by discussing whether or not Grimes and Twigs has both been seen without eyebrows? I mean, what the fuck? And also, the fact that there are interesting comparisons to be made doesn't mean the constant uninteresting reductivist grouping together can't be sexist.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:25 (eleven years ago)
Why do we never talk about sex and gender on... oh the Aphex Twin thread? Why is it only women and queers that are the repository for ~thoughts about gender~?
― Aphex T (wins) (Branwell with an N), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:27 (eleven years ago)
Well, sexism, obviously. But also, women and queers often have more intelligent things to say about these issues. But mostly sexism, I think.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:29 (eleven years ago)
Well all the thoughts about Twigs & gender on this thread seem to be about how she's described and who she's compared to - nothing about gender in the record itself.
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:40 (eleven years ago)
I've been trying to figure out why half of this album reminds me lyrically of Robert Smith and failing. I think it's partially my brain trying to connect one thing I like to another thing I like but there's some passing similarity between her narrative voice and Smith's more straightforward, less "I've taken all the drugs" metaphorfests.
Also, after discovering the "pull out the incisor" line I am reminded very strongly of thematic links to Purity Ring, particularly "Fineshrine".
― 💪😈⚠️ (DJP), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:41 (eleven years ago)
Kim or Fox?
― Raccoon Tanuki, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 15:29 (eleven years ago)
Reminding me now of Channel Orange
― Raccoon Tanuki, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 15:49 (eleven years ago)
I've been trying to figure out why half of this album reminds me lyrically of Robert Smith and failing.
sad/goth in a way that seems "knowing" but not in a way that jeopardizes its effectiveness in a more direct sense
― Treeship, Thursday, 25 September 2014 02:24 (eleven years ago)
honestly don't see the hype about this one. Yes it's got that whole kate bush meets boards of canada jamming in the basement kinda "vibe" but it ultimately leaves me cold. and the visual aspect, well let's just say annie lennox did it better in the 80s, and i didn't like it then either. despite these criticisms, i'm calling a solid eighter from the pitchfork boys and a possible bnm. looking forward to anthony fantano's take on this one. just my 2 cents..
― i got BIG HOOS in different area codes aka the steemdriver (missingNO), Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
http://www.theaa.com/resources/images/article-detail/insurance/carbon-monoxide-gas-safety.gif
― r|t|c, Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:10 (eleven years ago)
I can't get the notion that sex and gender in male-made electronic music is completely ignored out of my head. So true, so interesting, I think. Listening to Man-Machine right now, it's so obviously also about gender-roles. Any interest in a new thread?
― Frederik B, Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:57 (eleven years ago)
Fantano has spoken.
I like it. But I'd also like a '90s Tricky produced Grimes album. Trip Hop never died.
― Felt up by Adam Smith's invisible hand (Sanpaku), Thursday, 25 September 2014 14:58 (eleven years ago)
why exactly are we giving a fuck about anything anthony fantano has to say now?
― bobby shmorbius (The Reverend), Thursday, 25 September 2014 21:39 (eleven years ago)
I was curious as to why too. Just responding to missingNO above.
― Felt up by Adam Smith's invisible hand (Sanpaku), Friday, 26 September 2014 15:59 (eleven years ago)
so people are wondering why this cool/alternative artist is dating the posh teen idol from twilight films who is a multi millionaire. she went to a private school, which in England is never anything but hugely expensive and full of elites stuck perpetually eternally in the past while at the same time being in the modern day (vampires), she's spent most her life only associating with rich people (millionaire). the school was also catholic (heavy christian/chastity themes in twilight obvs), she said in her interview she was often looked at as being weird and ugly by people in her school being the only black student (twilight lone outsider theme). he's actually a perfect match. <3
― Raccoon Tanuki, Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:48 (eleven years ago)
http://collegecandy.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/ebdnhxm.gif?w=640
― Angel Brain (soref), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:58 (eleven years ago)
http://avvesione.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/uchouten_kazoku-11-mother_shimogamo-tanuki-red-cute-worried-crying-sad-adorable.jpg?w=533&h=300
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 13:22 (eleven years ago)
ILX threads are so predictable now days....
― X-101, Wednesday, 1 October 2014 14:41 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLjiArIJsLc
― goon kabuki (The Reverend), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 20:03 (eleven years ago)
and it still sounds like tom petty
― GhostTunes on my Pono (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
saw her live this week, impressive. big stage presence, great voice, sounds sounded good and even enhanced live which isn't always the case with electronic acts for example 'Numbers' sounded much, much better live than it does on the album in almost every way. Maybe this was a problem with the recording and engineering on the lp because live it had a lot more energy, fuller booming sound which I think fits it style. Crowd was very receptive and full. It was the Birmingham 'hometown' show she stopped at one point to say this show was emotional for her because her family are from Birmingham and a christmas day anecdote. She also stopped in the middle of the show to sign something for someone at the front, which I'd never seen before. Considering she's so new to this it was also noticable how easily she fills up an hour+ set with good songs that all work well live. There wasn't really any 'down' periods of the set. Considering this is the start of her first ever UK tour she seemed like composed been doing it for longer. There wasn't as much of the crazily impressive dance moves shown on like that yt video of her nY show she was more restrained in her moves but was dancing pretty much all the way through which added energy.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Saturday, 4 October 2014 11:50 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99YyWeqHaBo
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 20 October 2014 15:45 (eleven years ago)
okay twigs
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Monday, 20 October 2014 17:33 (eleven years ago)
FKAtofu
― socki (s1ocki), Monday, 20 October 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)
if she could dance like that after using google glass imagine how she could have danced after a bowl of frosted flakes
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
she'd kill tony the tiger with some sugar-fueled crane kicks, obvs.
album is still flames idc how many commercials she appears in.
― slothroprhymes, Monday, 20 October 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
lol is that the corniest bit of musician-product synergy since
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=motAUqnpaVM
― deej loaf (D-40), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (eleven years ago)
That was a fast sellout.
― Moka, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
Damn millenials.
― Moka, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:28 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/h9wRbV9.png
thnx fka googs works gr8
― r|t|c, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:11 (eleven years ago)
on that brief note can we just say how jay elecyarmulke is...maybe...not...that...good...and will never be that good even if he puts out the album he's never gonna put out *runs from backpackers at lightspeed*
― slothroprhymes, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:26 (eleven years ago)
is brian depalma going to get co-production credit or is this one of those 'curated reblog' type things
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar0xLps7WSY
― deej loaf (D-40), Monday, 20 October 2014 22:56 (eleven years ago)
Thought this was really cool
― 龜, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 11:24 (eleven years ago)
"Give Up" has become the secret heart of the album for me, although I like the contradictory mishearing I first came away with in the chorus more than the actual lyrics:
Just nod your head and give upI'm not gonna let you give up, babe
― 💪😈⚠️ (DJP), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:18 (eleven years ago)
New video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jhTiLuGezI
― Mercer Finn, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)