Need Decent Headphones (OT?)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (389 of them)
OH! That's a pretty good one!

I had been in serious advice mode for this thread..

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

FUCK Wes Anderson and his boringly literate films with soundtracks covering interesting music from the last 30 years.

Bring back Jean Claude Van Damme, he never fucked about with music people might actually want to hear...

noodle vague (noodle vague), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

wrong thread?

xpost: so you listen to your A500s on the road, then

comme personne (common_person), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I think he meant:

FUCK Wes Anderson and his boring ear-canal phones playing interesting music from the last 30 years.

Bring back Jean Claude Van Damme, he never fucked about with music people might actually want to listen to.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost:
I think there's a good joke in there too, but I'm a bit slow today.

But seriously, they're not portable *at all* - too big and they'd probably fall off since they don't clamp to your head like some other (uncomfortable) headphones.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

My pair of E2Cs are going back to Shure for the second time in a year and a half. The connection end of them is poorly designed. Luckily they warranty their stuff for a year and then repairs are warrentied as well. Even still, at $80 I expected more. They do sound great though.

frankE (frankE), Friday, 20 August 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
Headphones!

I have just got some Shure E2Cs. They are great.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v236/njsouthall/IMG_5008.jpg

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:32 (twenty years ago)

Why do I get the feeling this photo will eventually be a Stylus cover? (I would enjoy the article I'm sure)

Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:44 (twenty years ago)

Haha! There's one particular photo I took ages ago that Todd's been dying to use for about two years, but no one's written about rubber bands for us yet...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:57 (twenty years ago)

I wonder if I want some of those noise reduction ones.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:15 (twenty years ago)

Rather than noise-reduction look for isolators.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:17 (twenty years ago)

those Shures are nice, I prefer the etymotic sound signature, myself - more analytical in nature.

TAO (daggerlee), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:20 (twenty years ago)

I thought about Etymotics, but the ER6i's would have been £30 more than I got the E2Cs for, and as they're for iPod use on the train...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:21 (twenty years ago)

ah - yeah, for travel, nothing beats IEMs.

TAO (daggerlee), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:35 (twenty years ago)

a bit OT, I just received my etymotic ER20 'musicians earplugs' in the mail. supposedly reduces sound 20 dB across all frequencies, instead of muffling the highs like foam earplugs do.

TAO (daggerlee), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

Haha, I've been thinking about those for a while, actually - I always always find live gigs too loud I'm less I'm too drunk to care. Let me know how you get on with them.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:04 (twenty years ago)

Those earplugs are definitely worth it for what, a little over $10? I have a couple pairs sitting at home somewhere.

mike h. (mike h.), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:07 (twenty years ago)

the Sony MDR-EX71SLB Fontopia earbuds get my vote.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00008XYJL/203-1850742-5643949

i like them. They are like earplugs and you can listen to stuff on the tube at a much lower volume then :)

Mr Monket (apn99), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:33 (twenty years ago)

The sound quality on the Sony 71's is pretty decent considering the price, but one thing to keep in mind is that there have been some manufacturing defects with these. I've had three different pair and each one started to fall apart after 3-5 months. The rubberized coating on the wiring started to desintigrate, and a check on ipodlounge found that this is happening with a lot of this brand. Hopefully it's fixed by now, but beware. AND, Sony doesn't cover this because they insist that anything happening to the wire is regular wear and tear. I butted heads with them for awhile before I said "fuck it." I'm never buying a sony music player/headphones again.

Joseph B. Cowart (flamingrev), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 15:17 (twenty years ago)

I use the sure E4's and they are sweet.
Sound isolation is really good.
All notes are crisp and clear.
Better response at low volume too.

rchinn (rchinn), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 15:23 (twenty years ago)

It is true about the Sony earbuds.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 07:27 (twenty years ago)

What is wrong with these? They are much cheaper than E4s:

Shure E2c Sound Isolating ipod Earphones £57.99

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 07:32 (twenty years ago)

There's nothing wrong with them - I have a pair, which I got for £49.99 via www.headphoneworld.com

Bass is perhaps a little light, but that's largely down to my iPod I suspect, but isolation and clarity and sound-staging are all excellent, good enough to use them with my home hi-fi if I didn't have some Grados.

The RRP is more like £70+ I believe.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 08:00 (twenty years ago)

iPod bass blows (lightly)

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 08:07 (twenty years ago)

Do newer iPods, or any other non-Apple MP3 players, have decent bass?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 08:09 (twenty years ago)

I can only confirm my nano certainly doesn't.

It barely drives my koss ksc35's at all (same drivers as yr portapros nick) pretty close to inadequate (i'm no loudness freak either).

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 08:13 (twenty years ago)

Portable headphone amps are the future, aye?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 08:58 (twenty years ago)

bugger carry more crap around!

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 09:06 (twenty years ago)

in theory, yes it's a solution, in practice I simply cannot be arsed.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 09:07 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
Ok, I just bought the Etymotic Research ER-6 Isolators for my iPod, and frankly, I don't care for them at all. On the plus side, the detail is excellent. But on the down side:

1) They completely fill your ear canal like earplugs, obstructing all other sound and rendering them impossible to speak to anyone while wearing them.

2) Even when you "get a good seal" (that is, sealing the plug into your ear so that no sound leaks out), the bass is pretty tame, though...

3) ...b/c the plugs fill your entire ear canal, every step you take while walking makes the thing go, "BOOM! BOOM! BOOM!" from the low end, totally obstructing the sound.

4) You have to crank the shit out your iPod/mp3 player to get even average volume.

I'm gonna give them another shot or two before returning them, but by and large, these things are just totally disappointing to me and not appropriate for anything other than a commute during which you sit in one place for an hour-plus not talking to anyone.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 14 September 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

Grado keeps getting mentioned, and it comes as no surprise. Totally awesome bang for the buck. The SR-60s are only about $60.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)

> 1) They completely fill your ear canal like earplugs, obstructing all other sound and rendering them impossible to speak to anyone while wearing them.

This is pretty much the whole point of headphones, as far as I'm concerned, and one of the principle reasons I revere my Koss plugs as much as I do. They also don't have the other problems you mention, which I really would see as problems.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 15 September 2006 01:40 (nineteen years ago)

Also:

HOLY FUCK, $2.99??!??

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 15 September 2006 01:42 (nineteen years ago)

This is pretty much the whole point of headphones, as far as I'm concerned, and one of the principle reasons I revere my Koss plugs as much as I do. They also don't have the other problems you mention, which I really would see as problems.

I'm not talking about carrying on conversations while you're listening to music. I mean (as was mentioned upthread) it blocks at any and all sound, while also taking 10 seconds to dig the thing out of your ear. Meaning, if you use these things for a commute, where someone might have the gall to say, "Excuse me" or "Can I sit there?" you have a bit of a problem.

Actually, after posting that yesterday, I put these on for the last 20 min. of work at my desk. And they sounded pretty good -- but that's not exactly ideal listening. Call me crazy but I like to do things while I listen to music other than sit in one place where no one has to talk to me for hours on end.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Friday, 15 September 2006 11:31 (nineteen years ago)

these definitely aren't the headphones for you, then - i think the "isolators" is probably the clue! i absolutely love iem's, but i do have a lifestyle that lets me be very antiscocial.

toby (tsg20), Friday, 15 September 2006 11:49 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, uh, etymotics are all about not-moving-around total-isolation with great sound.

just get a set of PortaPros, dude.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 15 September 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

i think the "isolators" is probably the clue!

Ha! Yes, well, I suspect I should have picked up on that. The irony here is that I like earbuds fine (that is, not the plugs that press against your eardrum and seal any air whatsoever from entering the ear canal).

As for the PortaPros, those look great, but wraparounds aren't as portable (ie, you can't stick the whole iPod in your pocket and just go). Plus, wraparounds look a little dumb in a professional setting.

Any thoughts on the Sennheiser MX-400s?

http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-MX400-MX-400-In-Ear-Headphones/dp/B00004Z0BN/sr=8-1/qid=1158254089/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-2575783-5497434?ie=UTF8&s=electronics

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Friday, 15 September 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)

isn't shoving anything right into your ear canal really dangerous? i don't like the idea at all!

wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 15 September 2006 13:06 (nineteen years ago)

Can you really return something you shoved in your earhole, NTI?

Run Ruud Run (Ken L), Friday, 15 September 2006 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

i just picked up a pair of senn px200s yesterday, they seem pretty sweet so far.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

Wot I rote on Amazon.co.uk about Shure E2Cs;

Shure E2C headphones have been my first paddle in the waters of in-ear-monitor headphones, and I have enjoyed using them greatly over the last few months. They're not perfect though.

I'd recommend spending quite a bit of time trying the different tips - they're "isolator" headphones, meaning they go literally INSIDE your ear canal and cut out external noise so you only get music, and there are three kinds of tips - soft plastic, rubber, and foam. I used foam ones for the first few months but have been using the rubber and plastic ones for a bit recently, just trying. Each pair fits differently and sounds slightly different too - it's difficult to get good bass response with the rubber ones, for instance, because while comfy and easy to fit, they don't seal / plug very well, and you need them in tight for bass. The soft plastic tips feel very uncomfortable to begin with but this soon passes. Practice and preference with different tips is essential.

The sound is excellent, very clear and open with good bass (when they're sealed well), but if you're using them with an MP3 player they'll show up things encoded at less than good-to-excellent quality (i.e. encode your MP3s at 192kbps).

The sound is also slightly odd in some ways - as other reviewers have mentioned you can hear your own footfalls vibrating through your body, which can be strange and can also "eat away" bass frequencies as your body's rhythms and workings compete with the lower end of the music coming through the headphones. It is a very open sound though - less overwhelming than something like Grado SR60s and more refined than the (excellent, when found cheap) Koss Portapros, both of which I also own and use in certain conditions (Grados for home listening through my hi-fi amp, for instance).

Are they worth £50? RRP is nearer to £70, so yes they are in that sense. I use headphones for several hours a day and have found the Shure's to be comfortable and provide an unfatiguing listen, and have run them comfortably off an iPod, MacBook computer, Denon minisystem and hi-fi separates amplifier. They are perfect for listening to music on the train, for instance, as they do isolate external sound very well. If I had the spare cash right now I'd get some Etymotic ER6is, the E2Cs closest rival product, but not because the Shure's aren't very good - because I'm greedy with headphones!

Matt, you want some Koss Portapros, at a guess. I use Grado SR60s at home, Shures on the train, and Portapros... occasionally elsewhere when I fancy them.

www.headphoenworld.com is a good UK site for sales, and also gives lots of info. Other than that, www.head-fi.org

x-post GOD NO NOT PX200S - the PX100s are FAR superior, the PX200s have no bass.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 15 September 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

i still think the westone UM1s are much much better than the etymotics, fwiw, and they cost the same. far more bass, no loss of detail.

toby (tsg20), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

i don't want no open headphones mouthy

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

Get some isolators then. I couldn't stand the PX200s I got when my PX100s broke - I gave them away and got Portapors instead.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

i can't really stand the form of the portapros... and i doubt they'd fit on my massive head! are px100s usable outside, on the bus, at work etc?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

basically i have a giant pair of sonys i use for djing but i want something smaller, lighter, foldable if poss... i am thinking about returning these though as i noticed the store that sold them kinda ganked me on the price.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

grados are all open right?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

I used my PX100s on the bus, the train, walking around the centre of town etcetera, for two and a half years. Yes, they're open back and sound leaks both ways, but not masses, and they are VERY very good. You get an amount more detail with the PX200s because they're closed-back, but I also found them very clasutrophobia and cold - the PX100s are so much warmer and more pleasurable to listen to.

Grados are all open, aye, and way larger than the PXs or the Portapros. They're meant to be doing some "streetstyle" ones at some point, but they've been talking about them for two years and they've not emerged. I love my Grados to bits, but only indoors.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

i'm going to take these guys out walking around today and i will return them if i'm not satisfied... maybe i'll try on a pair of portapros as the consensus is so... consensual.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

The Portapro sound is very similar to the PX100s, but with perhaps a touhc more excitablity and bass.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.