Kelley Polar - Love Songs of The Hanging Gardens (Environ CD05)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (944 of them)
cause it roxx

no, honestly tell me, spare me from reading the whole thing... i skim the thread and it seems like lots of micro-micro-genre-positioning.... there must be something that resonates about it

justsaying, Sunday, 4 December 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

we are discussing micro-micro-genre-positioning because we are marxists and hate interpretive criticism.

let's just say it's got a good beat, and i can dance to it.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)

i mean, micro-micro-genre-positioning is not what makes it great - it's just something that's going on w/ the album, and more specifically, w/ the reception of the album.

what else makes it great: it's hummable!

vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:11 (twenty years ago)

i'm not really wondering whether it's good or not... just why so many people are posting about it... there are lots of great albums that get ten posts...

i hate genres. i really could give a flying fuck what genre something fits into and whether its politically correct to like that genre based on its imaginary relation to some other genre at this point...

justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)

Saying you hate genres is essentially just saying that you hate a whole category of words, though. They are *general* ways of talking about music which (if my presumed etymology here is correct) is why they are called *genres*.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

uh yeah, whatever

i hate the way genre words are endlessly used in music criticism like no other criticism

justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)

as if the most important thing you can do with a piece of music is figure out exactly which spot on the wallmap to pin it onto

justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:55 (twenty years ago)

There might be lame examples of it, but I think you're generalizing. Talking about genres is very significant to discussions of what music IS or what someone is trying to do.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 02:34 (twenty years ago)

what i was after with my pitchfork comment was that kompakt might be more familiar to the average reader than say, klein and mbo. reading the review again, i see that you're going for something else, phil. i must have my italo goggles on. i have been playing around mixing aguayo and polar without much success actually, but the similarities are indeed there.

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:50 (twenty years ago)

aguayo is much more of blank slate than polar i think. meaning that it's much easier to traditionally mix and blend the former while the latter is much more song-y. tracks vs. songs i guess. not that are you really lost? doesn't work as an album.

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

i like big butts and i cannot lie

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 5 December 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)

i hate the way genre words are endlessly used in music criticism like no other criticism

-- justsaying (jus...), December 5th, 2005.

I posted my frustration with ILMers about this exact issue on the Richie Hawtin thread, but you have to understand that this is I Love Music, and therefore identifying genres and picking apart the music as it applies to such is part of a valid discussion.

That said, it is annoying that the tendency here with posts discussing dance/electronic music, which contain enough absurd esoteric genres (folktronica, microhouse, etc.) to drive one batty, is to dismiss the content of an album in favor of academic muscle flexing intent on proving that the author's argument is superior, whether or not it's correct.

But it's still fair game in this arena. If you want to know about what an album sounds like exclusively, check allmusic or amazon or one of the many dance record store sites that offer up snapshot reviews. Or jump in the fite with a good argument.

Or just trust everyone here (these people know better than most) - it's a fantastic record, regardless of what genre it falls under...

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)

i don't get it.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)

I think when people talk about IDM these days, they're talking about more "experimental" electronica, music that more often then not, tries to distant itself from pop or the dancefloor in a way the first wave of artists didn't.

I know when I talk about IDM I'm thinking way more about early Warp stuff than anything else, because that's where all my reference points (stuff I've listened to enough to internalize) lie. I stopped buying when it got boring, and a lot of other people did too - more people understand IDM in terms of the Richard D James album than in terms of Chocolate Strawberry Fuckstick or whatever Venetian Snares' new one is called.

People tend to anchor to the golden age of any genre. When people talk about "classical music" in generalities, would you assume they're talking about something more like Beethoven or more like Philip Glass? When you say "punk", do more people think of Rancid or the Ramones?

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

That said, it is annoying that the tendency here with posts discussing dance/electronic music, which contain enough absurd esoteric genres (folktronica, microhouse, etc.) to drive one batty, is to dismiss the content of an album in favor of academic muscle flexing intent on proving that the author's argument is superior, whether or not it's correct.

i don't get it.
-- vahid (vfoz...), December 5th, 2005

=

I, being among said culprits of this exact tendency in the last several 200+ post dance threads will now attempt to mask guilt and throw subtle wink/nudge to my accomplices by inserting dismissive comment.

Get that, smart-ass.

jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

People tend to anchor to the golden age of any genre. When people talk about "classical music" in generalities, would you assume they're talking about something more like Beethoven or more like Philip Glass? When you say "punk", do more people think of Rancid or the Ramones?

but the golden age of IDM as you talk about it lasted about 6 albums worth. I go with whatever the largest amount of people agree on. The difference between Rancid and Ramones, sonically, isn't really enough, your analogy would work better if you asked "when people think of punk, do they think of Television or do they think of Blink-182" and unfortunately, the answer is Blink-182. You can even replace Television with the Voidoids and it still works.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

If you want to know about what an album sounds like exclusively, check allmusic or amazon or one of the many dance record store sites that offer up snapshot reviews.

Not really. Odd dichotomy here: pure sound description vs. genre classification. Still leaves plenty of other stuff to talk about, in my opinion.

Of course I'm fine with hearing about genre. And hey, I like retro-disco too. One would just imagine that, with a 500 post thread, the album must have touched some nerve. I guess the nerve it touched was the classificatory one. What this says about dance music right now I won't dare to speculate.

justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

it says more about ILM and dorks who like to riff on dance music then it does about dance music. i think of this thread as a continuation of conversations that have been scattered across dance music threads on ILM for the past few months. aside from that, classification is very important because it can lead to discrimination (both positive and negative).

tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

Guardian review from John Burgess:

"In a year when electronic dance artists such as Jamie Lidell and Roisin Murphy have made a good fist at innovative pop, along comes Croatian-born Kelley Polar to steal their thunder."!

+ omg "nefarious rave rumble"!!

(um, & anyone have any suggestions on what I could stick on a mixtape between "Here In The Night" & Pulp's "Seductive Barry"?)

etc, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
Croatian-born, huh?

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:32 (twenty years ago)

got the album sampler 12" in the mail, but don't have turntable access at the moment, blah. KP website sez a 2nd 12" will be released in early 2006 . . .

etc, Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:41 (twenty years ago)

This album is so minty fresh.

Have any videos been released?

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

didn't really like it first and got sucked up into the hype vagina

but now I love it

cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)

i really like it but still can't listen to all of it in one go.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

"matter into energy" is still probably my favorite track of the year. i still REALLY like the album as a whole, too, especially the 2nd, less disco-influenced, half. which is weird, cause i'm not really into IDM at all anymore.

;-)

vahid (vahid), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

listened to the album going to sleep last night (have been listening to it mainly at the bookstore) & "vocalise (from here to polarity)" sounded waaay IDM, all robotic dolphins &c. so er yes vahid. though I still can't quite reconcile "songs"/vocals with something being IDM.
it's one of the few single-artist albums from this year I'm able to sit through in one go.
the unabashed geeky romanticism of this is really comforting at the moment.

etc, Monday, 26 December 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

I don't get the IDM reference much. To me, this album is like the Gaucho of 00s dance music.

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 02:57 (twenty years ago)

I just can't get over how refreshing it is. It's like taking a shower.. or being gently consumed by friendly blue and green tic tacs. So fresh so clean

fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

Ha. I really like the new title for this thread!

Mika, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)

it's f***ing rude to retitle the thread when KP is actually posting, joining in the conversation. Can a mod change it back?

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d148/jonwilliamspwn/JonWilliams.jpg

ha, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

naw

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

hey! i put more work into this thread than KP did!

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

She works hard for the money
So hard for it honey
She works hard for the money
So you better treat her right

jsoulja (jsoulja), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

it's f***ing rude to retitle the thread when KP is actually posting, joining in the conversation. Can a mod change it back?

-- ha (idon...), December 27th, 2005.

i disagree

Designer of Vahid's Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

When did KP post here? Am I blind?

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

i am kelley polar

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

http://www.unicef.org/why/images/about_020206.jpg
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

http://www.soschildrensvillages.org.uk/sos-children-charity/sponsored-child-china.jpg
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

http://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/neanderthal%20child.JPG
"I am Kelley Polar."

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

yay! bought this just before christmas. Matter Into Energy, vahid is right - it's beautiful!

Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

Maybe Kelley Polar would post again if he thought the thread wasn't about a coat now. I still think the title should be switched back.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

So that's Saul Williams, Gold Chains, the guy from Jurrasic 5, Fred Falke, Marrisa Marchant, and Kelley Polar.

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

don't forget Richard X. And Chamillionaire.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/29/Spartacus.jpg/180px-Spartacus.jpg

I AM KELLEY POLAR

telephone thing, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)

not a coat. an Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

blunt (blunt), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

I AM KELLEY POLAR

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

Just heard this album of severely underproduced pop drama.

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

if you think it's underproduced i can only guess that you heard a different album.

no offense intended to vahid but will someone please change this thread back to it's orig title? who the hell changed it anyway?

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

It's way too underproduced and camp for it's own good. I'll stick with (few) Metro Area 12" material, which is colder but more effective.

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.