no, honestly tell me, spare me from reading the whole thing... i skim the thread and it seems like lots of micro-micro-genre-positioning.... there must be something that resonates about it
― justsaying, Sunday, 4 December 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)
let's just say it's got a good beat, and i can dance to it.
― vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
what else makes it great: it's hummable!
― vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:11 (twenty years ago)
i hate genres. i really could give a flying fuck what genre something fits into and whether its politically correct to like that genre based on its imaginary relation to some other genre at this point...
― justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)
i hate the way genre words are endlessly used in music criticism like no other criticism
― justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)
― justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 01:55 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 02:34 (twenty years ago)
― tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:50 (twenty years ago)
― tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Monday, 5 December 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)
-- justsaying (jus...), December 5th, 2005.
I posted my frustration with ILMers about this exact issue on the Richie Hawtin thread, but you have to understand that this is I Love Music, and therefore identifying genres and picking apart the music as it applies to such is part of a valid discussion.
That said, it is annoying that the tendency here with posts discussing dance/electronic music, which contain enough absurd esoteric genres (folktronica, microhouse, etc.) to drive one batty, is to dismiss the content of an album in favor of academic muscle flexing intent on proving that the author's argument is superior, whether or not it's correct.
But it's still fair game in this arena. If you want to know about what an album sounds like exclusively, check allmusic or amazon or one of the many dance record store sites that offer up snapshot reviews. Or jump in the fite with a good argument.
Or just trust everyone here (these people know better than most) - it's a fantastic record, regardless of what genre it falls under...
― jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)
I know when I talk about IDM I'm thinking way more about early Warp stuff than anything else, because that's where all my reference points (stuff I've listened to enough to internalize) lie. I stopped buying when it got boring, and a lot of other people did too - more people understand IDM in terms of the Richard D James album than in terms of Chocolate Strawberry Fuckstick or whatever Venetian Snares' new one is called.
People tend to anchor to the golden age of any genre. When people talk about "classical music" in generalities, would you assume they're talking about something more like Beethoven or more like Philip Glass? When you say "punk", do more people think of Rancid or the Ramones?
― Lukas (lukas), Monday, 5 December 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)
i don't get it.-- vahid (vfoz...), December 5th, 2005
=
I, being among said culprits of this exact tendency in the last several 200+ post dance threads will now attempt to mask guilt and throw subtle wink/nudge to my accomplices by inserting dismissive comment.
Get that, smart-ass.
― jsoulja (jsoulja), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)
but the golden age of IDM as you talk about it lasted about 6 albums worth. I go with whatever the largest amount of people agree on. The difference between Rancid and Ramones, sonically, isn't really enough, your analogy would work better if you asked "when people think of punk, do they think of Television or do they think of Blink-182" and unfortunately, the answer is Blink-182. You can even replace Television with the Voidoids and it still works.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)
Not really. Odd dichotomy here: pure sound description vs. genre classification. Still leaves plenty of other stuff to talk about, in my opinion.
Of course I'm fine with hearing about genre. And hey, I like retro-disco too. One would just imagine that, with a 500 post thread, the album must have touched some nerve. I guess the nerve it touched was the classificatory one. What this says about dance music right now I won't dare to speculate.
― justsaying, Monday, 5 December 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)
― tricky (disco stu), Monday, 5 December 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)
"In a year when electronic dance artists such as Jamie Lidell and Roisin Murphy have made a good fist at innovative pop, along comes Croatian-born Kelley Polar to steal their thunder."!
+ omg "nefarious rave rumble"!!
(um, & anyone have any suggestions on what I could stick on a mixtape between "Here In The Night" & Pulp's "Seductive Barry"?)
― etc, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:32 (twenty years ago)
― etc, Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:41 (twenty years ago)
Have any videos been released?
― fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)
but now I love it
― cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 25 December 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)
;-)
― vahid (vahid), Monday, 26 December 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)
― etc, Monday, 26 December 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)
― fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 02:57 (twenty years ago)
― fizzcaraldo (Justin M), Monday, 26 December 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― Mika, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)
it's f***ing rude to retitle the thread when KP is actually posting, joining in the conversation. Can a mod change it back?
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d148/jonwilliamspwn/JonWilliams.jpg
― ha, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― jsoulja (jsoulja), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)
-- ha (idon...), December 27th, 2005.
i disagree
― Designer of Vahid's Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
― u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)
― Carl Handwriting (dog latin), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
― u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)
I AM KELLEY POLAR
― telephone thing, Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:48 (twenty years ago)
― blunt (blunt), Tuesday, 27 December 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)
― blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)
no offense intended to vahid but will someone please change this thread back to it's orig title? who the hell changed it anyway?
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)
― blunt (blunt), Thursday, 29 December 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)