― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, I'm noting this:
I was hoping for something that would elevate even higher than Discovery for the followup, like Nirvana or something.. (yup, I was stung by high expectations, and I admit it.)
I sorta find this an interesting conflation -- namely, a hint that the album needed to be even more, for lack of a better phrase, detailed and/or grandiose than before in order to succeed. Am I however reading that wrong? It seems like a strange expectation to place on a band -- heck, any band.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Kevin Shields to thread.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I really do have to go now...laterz
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe Daft Punk decided to just nip that expectation in the bud, instead of following Axl Roses' and Kevin Shields' retreat into hermitdom... probably a wiser move than nothing at all.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)
I think the wiser move would have been to pair down this album into a single two-track AA single.. "Robot Rock"/"Technologic"... (granted, the two really dancey tracks)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Eh, but you could say that about any number of people, the idea of fan expectation vs. whatever the hell the musicians felt like doing. Not all, mind you, which calls to mind an interesting question of what musicians do things you mentally feel create a comfort zone for you that you don't need more of in the way of 'change' versus those you invest some sorta sense of 'progress' from -- when it's more likely that you'll get the latter quality out of nowhere or from an unexpected source instead of whoever or whatever you've burdened your expectations with.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)
No doubt! I've been disappointed by albums only to come back to them later and discover their good points after hearing the artist(s)' subsequent work, whether that work was better or worse.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)
(XPOST)
― mayahee, mayahoo, mayaha, mayahaha (deangulberry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)
*setup for anti-U.S.E. joke incoming in 20... 19... 18... *
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
In my opinion the heavily loop oriented nature of the music actually is a standin for songcraft. When I hear these songs I hear what they might have done had they spent more time on them. I'm actually left wondering if they know they can trade in on their name for at least one album to buy them time making an album they might have been more likely to make (given their trajectory).
I say this as a person who has spent a lot of time making electronic music (lately mostly dancey things), and it might sound a bit pretentious... but i could have made this album. I never would have, because at the end of the day it does sound like Daft Punk, but it has no magic. Their machines sound a bit emptier than they used to, a little less haunted.
The rock costumes they're working seem like touchstones meant to put the listener in a place that the music couldn't have ever put them into on its own. A few too many signposts telling you where to go... and that somewhere doesn't seem like some fantastic place that they invented like the previous two albums did.
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:45 (twenty-one years ago)
I do like the droney bit. Oh wait, it's speeding up! Awesome! Oh, but there's less than a minute left; what a butcher of an edit!
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Damning with faint praise!!! I think it's an amazing accomplishment, and while I'm not so down on Discovery as Ned is, I think he's right that this is a more complete experience (or whatever his wording was).
As for the stuff "firstworldman" said - I think it comes off as (sorry) rockism.
― deej., Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)
You don't know me, fool!
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:03 (twenty-one years ago)
?????
Elaborate, please?
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Do you need me to expound further?
― deej., Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)