Strictly 4 My Underground Homo Deep House Thugs: DJ Sprinkles - Midtown 120 Blues

Great line.

How is uploading tracks to YouTube and Soundcloud any different from dumping a box of 100,000 CD-R copies of your favorite track at the biggest shopping mall in town and just walking away?

How does this album keep getting better every time I listen to it, even years after release?

otm

otm otm, i keep bringing it back into the car with me. such a warm comforting vibe. and "the inevitable comedown" last track is the perfect closer, it's like BOOM ~~LIFT OFF~~~~ you are more powerful than you were before you pressed play.

lol by "the inevitable comedown" i meant "the occasional feelgood"

haa

wtf tickets to her july show at dance tunnel (london) sold out in TWO MINUTES.

this album got reissued by comatonse a couple weeks ago, if anybody needs a copy

Got the reissues and oh god they are good

not a single mention of this?!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAjU_6yw2Gs

It was in everyone's EOY ballots last year.

my mistake.

no mention on this thread is what i meant.

Thanks for mentioning, amazing track.

She's in the Guardian today - http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/oct/25/dj-sprinkles-terre-thaemlitz

“Audio consumption is always about a gap between producer and listener,” she said. “When I was growing up in the Midwest, I twisted things like Gary Numan, or Depeche Mode, or Kraftwerk to fit my experience. That’s a precondition of music, from the consumer side. And the fundamental relationship between me and audio is still as a consumer. It’s not as a performer; it’s not as a trained musician. I’m a consumer who’s basically making collages, and playing my record collection for people,” she said. “In the end, I’m suspect of all of it. I’m not turning to these genres because I think they’re so capable of expressing the issues at hand. In a way, I’m trying to point out that the real issues aren’t getting dealt with by simply enjoying the music.”

http://www.newyorker.com/books/joshua-rothman/depth-dance-floor-music-dj-sprinkles

Finally bought a copy of Midtown 120 Blues from the Comatonse website. If you're looking for a copy, they're cheapest here: http://www.comatonse.com/releases/shop_currency_usd.html#c022

Ho-ly shit. That New Yorker piece.

Got me listening to Sprinkles' remix of Oh, Yoko's 'Seashore' all day. What an amazing track! Didn't know Will Long/Celer was involved, let alone knowing about the existence of this remix. I feel so much richer than before having heard this. Truly amazing.

immediately always read the thread title as "Strictly 4 My Underground Home Depot House Thugs..."

Ho-ly shit. That New Yorker piece.

Got me listening to Sprinkles' remix of Oh, Yoko's 'Seashore' all day. What an amazing track! Didn't know Will Long/Celer was involved, let alone knowing about the existence of this remix. I feel so much richer than before having heard this. Truly amazing.

― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:25 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh cool, i really love that track.

and learned much more about it from the new yorker piece (thanks one way street).

two new singles w/Mark Fell.

really dig 'fresh,' haven't heard sprinkles' alt mixes yet

I've been enjoying the Sprinkles' Deeperama remix of Simon Fisher Turner's "Shishapangma" over the past few weeks. It's been on 12" only, but someone on SoundCloud has opened their mix with it, and you get almost the full track: https://soundcloud.com/vikink/vik-kabinet-club-04122015-warm-up

(That's Cosey Fanni Tutti playing cornet towards the end of the track, by the way.)

"fresh" is one of my tracks of the year. tony benn!

Mine too. Such an beautiful thing.

While googling Dave berg recently, I found a cool article terre wrote about him. I know it's childish but I still get off on "wow this artist I love loves this totally unrelated other artist I love" thing

just sent this album to a friend today!

The audacity of the Simon Fisher Turner remix is that (as far as i can tell) he lets the original play from start to finish. completely unedited, and lays his beats straight over the top.

Yes, both the original and the remix have an identical playing time, and I can't discern any tweaks other than Sprinkles adding beats, plus the deepest, most booming/all-enveloping bass I've heard in possibly forever.

sprinkles' vinyl-only insistence is her only flaw

There's even a URL to that effect on the label of the 12" - it points to http://comatonse.com/popup_youtube.html - in which the issue is explained in some detail (as you might expect!)

she isn't vinyl-only. maybe you mean that she is insistent on maintaining her own distribution chain. you can see that as a flaw but she has some well-thought-out arguments for it. xp

lol killing joke more like homo gays

remember a (more expensive than i could afford) flashdrive release of a superlong ambient piece on Terre's website a while back so definitely not vinyl only.

even if she didn't release the most incredible music she would be one of my favourite current writers on music and cultural theory i think

yeah that's how i feel pretty much. i'm not head-over-heels in love with everything she's involved in, but the writing has really stuck with me.

on the other hand, the remix collection that came out a few years ago has really grown on me. when i listen to it i always remember this thread title and think about how appropriate "strictly 4 my underground homo deep house thugs" is as a descriptor for the dj sprinkles stuff.

Does anyone feel like it's a big oversight that Terre does not address the clear financial motive for an artist not to want streaming? Talk about an elephant in the room in those multiple long essays.

wait, you mean to make a living for your work? she mentions it explicitly somewhere i'm pretty sure but i thought it was pretty clear that is where she's coming from.

http://comatonse.com/writings/2013_social_media_content_removal_fail.html

"I do have concerns with file sharing, but they are not about economics, nor authorship rights. Rather, they are about an eradication of any specificity of context and audience that occurs when information is shared through populist models of making all information available to everyone."

seems like addressing it to me

Was gonna say

I guess... maybe I just disagree with the argument

Everyone already knows the financial and copyright arguments for and against. It's actually v interesting how he chooses to reframe the argument.

For what it's worth I used the male pronoun there not out of disrespect nor really carelessness (more like an absence of thinking about it) but I'm aware of using it now, in retrospect. A couple of years ago I was at a seminar where Terre spoke at different points over the weekend that it lasted where he basically stated that male/female pronouns meant very little to him personally, while conceding that they might rightly mean a lot to others, and that he slips between he and she so often that s/he doesn't particularly expect others to "catch up" on that, so to speak. I mean, he's an amazing writer and thinker and I'm paraphrasing wildly and his explanation was much greater but he was basically stating that people might get caught up on that one thing (pronouns) while missing other important aspects. As long as you don't use "he/him" disrespectfully with others, of course.

yeah i thought i remembered him saying that but i was too lazy to search for it and i didn't want to look gauche tbh, thanks for sharing.

I do think, though, that it's a relevant analogue to his concerns about streaming and file sharing - ie people getting caught up on one aspect to the extent that they completely miss another important aspect. If I could remember better I could maybe explain it better but, really, I've rarely read an essay of Terre's where he hasn't said something that's totally done that thing he does, so seemingly casually, where he says - ok we know that but that but I'm more focussed on this other aspect that no one talks about.... I really do think he's one of the best thinkers and communicators in current culture.

I met him after that seminar I mentioned and he was so nice but nice in a completely disarming way, like you went up to him shyly to say "thanks for the talk" and five minutes later you're having a no-bullshit discussion about multiple topics and he was always interested and made you feel like anything you said was worthwhile.

He's truly a hero of mine.

Did she like being a d.j.? Was it fun? “That’s kind of inconsequential for me,” she said. What, I asked, if I used a different word—fulfilling, rewarding, interesting? “These are all horrible words, just, like, meaningless words,” she replied, “or they have the wrong meaning. They all lead towards this desire to identify cultural producers, media producers, musicians, artists, as these fulfilled people who are somehow outside of the standard agonies of labor production. You know—they ‘enjoy what they do.’ If you’re in any of these fields, and you complain about your job, people say, ‘What are you talking about? You do it because you love it, right?’ If you’re a computer programmer, and you say, ‘I fucking hate my job,’ nobody’s going to interrogate you on that. For me, this idea of job-hating as economic critique is really necessary in the media industries.”

from the new yorker link upthread, stuck with me.

She raised her eyebrows and gestured to me. “Writing, too,” she said. “You know: these are industries that rely on volunteerism. They rely on people agreeing to do things for little to no money just to ‘get out there.’ There is the worst kind of economic exploitation going on around these industries that supposedly represent the people who are the most liberated and in harmony between what they do and how they survive. This is a real irony that has to be exploded, immediately. That’s why I’m totally uninterested in the language of optimism and fulfillment and all of this fucking, you know, capitalist bullshit. It’s like, No. This world fucking sucks. Work sucks. It’s O.K. to admit that. We need to admit that to get to the better conversations, right?”