― firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I freely admit that I don't care for Daft Punk at all, but I gave it a shot and I gotta admit that half of this album could be used as the background music for Sunday night sports clip shows.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Well if you put it that way... But whatever, nothing pulling me in with this.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
I only mention this because the dissatisfaction may stem from the rather abridged nature of this album compared to the previous two, where you could always find enough to chew on.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)
the sequencing has struck me as being very good, also.
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)
(malfunctioning armpits)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)
I like this statement.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)
But yeah I was very depressed and then I woke up today and someone told me Daft Punk had leaked...the best thing that could have happened, really!
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― mayahee, mayahoo, mayaha, mayahaha (deangulberry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:31 (twenty-one years ago)
I'll ask again here, is this in reference to my comments on the Simon Reynolds thread?
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)
If Homework sounded like a group that had 10 weeks to write, record, and finalize an album, and if Discovery sounded like a group that had 10 months to write, record, and finalize an album, Human After All sounds like a group that had 10 DAYS to write, record, and finalize an album.
In other words: "eh. decided to do a bunt instead of a glam slam I see."
It also sounds like Daft Punk somehow immersed themselves into a lot of older stoner/classic rock before they went into this project. Also, did no one else note the "The Brainwasher"/Sabbath "Iron Man" parallel? These aren't criticisms.. just musings and observations.
Most strikingly, with the exception of "Robot Rock" and "Technologic" (and I never thought I'd be making this exception for "Robot Rock"), this is a rather dance-less album. A lot of humming, bass, and pulsing, and dark vocoding, but nothing that matches the previous two albums as a source of providing dance floor anthems. Again, not necessarily a criticism, just an observation.
I don't see the New Beat/industrial comparisons though. "The Brainwasher" sounds dark, indeed, but at least the former genre implies some sort of beat and drive, and this song scurries and plods along very creepily, but doesn't, you know, hit it.
The most disappointing elements are the sameyness in the heavily phased low frequency square wave synths used in almost every song, and that these tracks were done live. That last part is purely an opinion.. sure, it's cool that Human After All sounds like the most reproduceable album live and all (rockists celebrate!), but I was hoping for something that would elevate even higher than Discovery for the followup, like Nirvana or something.. (yup, I was stung by high expectations, and I admit it.)
I can already smell the ending sentence paraphrased in EVERY goddamned review that's going to slag this album in the next month:
"Daft Punk has destroyed the dream that Discovery promised, proving they are, indeed, Human After All -- if only for the better" That said, this isn't a bad album in the larger scope of things. Just bad for Daft Punk.
But I'll also say that I bet the A-Frames' Black Forest album is going to stimulate the "robot rock" vibe, albeit in a much different way, far more effectively than this album seems to (try to) do.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, I'm noting this:
I was hoping for something that would elevate even higher than Discovery for the followup, like Nirvana or something.. (yup, I was stung by high expectations, and I admit it.)
I sorta find this an interesting conflation -- namely, a hint that the album needed to be even more, for lack of a better phrase, detailed and/or grandiose than before in order to succeed. Am I however reading that wrong? It seems like a strange expectation to place on a band -- heck, any band.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Kevin Shields to thread.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I really do have to go now...laterz
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe Daft Punk decided to just nip that expectation in the bud, instead of following Axl Roses' and Kevin Shields' retreat into hermitdom... probably a wiser move than nothing at all.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)