just listened to the first half of this again on the way home from uni, very nearly danced down the metro platform to "if i could change your mIIIIiiiiiiiiiIIiiind"
― monotony, Thursday, 26 September 2013 10:48 (twelve years ago)
i listened to it. there's nothing WRONG with it i guess but it's sooooooo pastichey, like there is literally no modern twist on a very old sound, and i don't think i have quite enough affection for that sound to have a connection to something that just replicates it - it's so exact that it almost seems automated, all the little hiccups of breath and melody exactly where you expect them.
also tbqh my fleetwood mac/stevie nicks knowledge has a long way to go - i only really know rumours and tusk and a handful of other songs - and i'd rather carry on gradually investigating them
― lex pretend, Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:00 (twelve years ago)
all the little hiccups of breath and melody exactly where you expect them.
one of the things i like best about the album is danielle's surprisingly weird vocal tics and the way she constantly plays with meter, elongating and suffocating words etc - i suppose you could say you expect her to do that by the last few tracks, but she certainly doesn't have a conventional vocal delivery to my ears
lex you gotta hear tango in the night!
― monotony, Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:14 (twelve years ago)
Yeah I don't see anything predictable about Danielle's choices - the way her voice keeps changing through a song like Don't Save Me is my favourite thing about the band.
― Deafening silence (DL), Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:28 (twelve years ago)
i feel like the vocalist could actually be foregrounded more - didn't get much of a sense of her personality at all. i didn't find anything particularly weird about her delivery though.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:35 (twelve years ago)
There are three vocalists, although two of them sound pretty similar because y'know sisters.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:36 (twelve years ago)
Srsly though the idea that Lex went to Tusk before Tango In The Night is kind of hilarious but really you should listen to the latter immediately and forget about this Haim album for a bit.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:38 (twelve years ago)
Was listening to "The Wire" again and got major Shania vibes. Just me, or was that mentioned above?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:54 (twelve years ago)
tbh guys it's not like it's a big crime to like something that hits a partic retro spot, i just don't get why all the absurdly overstated swivel-eyed flannel about "shiny modern detailed latin freestyle type confluence of disparate surprisingly weird vocal influences" etc - these supposed innovations are totally marginal, remedial
and tango in the night sounds like, aeons more future-minded than this fwiw
― r|t|c, Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:54 (twelve years ago)
A couple summers ago I talked with some Pitchfork types who agreed that Tango was not only the Mac album that mattered most as adolescent and teens but in retrospect outlined a pop future we still haven't totally heard.
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:56 (twelve years ago)
History of ILM is full of people overinflating marginal production quirks into radical innovations. Saying something has been given a modern production sheen is hardly the same as saying it's innovative.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:11 (twelve years ago)
i don't think i ever said they were innovative. i just think labelling them as mere pastiche, as nothing more than fleetwood mac facsimile, is a very facile and unfair criticism
― monotony, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:25 (twelve years ago)
I don't think you can deny the songwriting is pastiche really.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:27 (twelve years ago)
as i feared you guys are sort of narrating the piece i'm writing about them as it is being written, oh well
tango has a presence and humidity that this doesn't and, as alfred said, nothing has really lived up to. still i think a composite of pastiches and approaches in even the slightest modern setting can be thrilling, and is here. i feel ppl who think that is sort of a dead end bc while the songs are strong and the feel is almost mathematically right i am colder toward this record that i expected. still good fun.
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:41 (twelve years ago)
tango is also the product of songwriters and musicians with decades of work on their own and together under their belts. the fact that haim is even being compared to that mac lineup is... impressive!
― max, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:46 (twelve years ago)
i don't really even hear any modern sheen. the first time i heard them (without knowing what the song was) i genuinely thought it was an actual d-list 80s soft rock song. if i didn't know they were a contemporary band i would never have guessed. i think that's what strikes me as particularly pointless about them. i think i get the same bot vibes from them that rtc gets from ariana grande
― lex pretend, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:47 (twelve years ago)
think you misspelt inane there max
― r|t|c, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:49 (twelve years ago)
lol
― max, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:50 (twelve years ago)
Saying something has been given a modern production sheen is hardly the same as saying it's innovative.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 14:11 (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― monotony, Thursday, 26 September 2013 14:25 (24 minutes ago) Bookmark
k pedants not "innovations", uh... ~areas of distinction~ shall we say then
fwiw i didnt and wouldnt argue they were "nothing more than fleetwood mac facsimile" either, they're obv a little bit cannier than that but still nothing that adds up to much that would cause a stir in anyone without a mojo subscription
― r|t|c, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:53 (twelve years ago)
still good fun.
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 26 September 2013 14:41 (11 minutes ago) Bookmark
i agree with this just ftr
― r|t|c, Thursday, 26 September 2013 13:56 (twelve years ago)
They sound like a really good young contemporary version of a late '80s pop outfit like Wilson-Phillips. The Mac element is being a tad overstated here, as is the future-genius of "Tango," which is one of my fave records, Mac or otherwise, but definitely in line with what Lindsey was up to at the time courtesy new technology/samplers and def. in line what he's still up to today. This HAIM is nowhere near that frantic/frenetic/anal retentive. Credit different drugs, perhaps.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 15:01 (twelve years ago)
or no drugs
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 September 2013 15:06 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, that too!
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)
What HAIM needs is overwhelming paranoid and control-freak tendencies fueled by swimming pools full of cocaine.
In other words, they need to have Lindsey Buckingham produce them, for old time's sake.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 15:29 (twelve years ago)
well, he's on the NIN album. Maybe he's in session mode again.
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 September 2013 15:39 (twelve years ago)
blah blah late pass i really like this band
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 26 September 2013 16:46 (twelve years ago)
Shit, now I feel like a shmuck seeing that DeRo also compared it to Wilson Phillips. But I didn't mean it as a criticism!
Haim, Days Are Gone (Polydor)Has indie-rock seriously gotten so twee and “poptimistic” that it can hail as a buzz band a California trio aiming at a modern update of Fleetwood Mac as distaff beard-rock but barely achieving a less polished version of Wilson Phillips? Really?Rating on the four-star scale: .5 stars.
Has indie-rock seriously gotten so twee and “poptimistic” that it can hail as a buzz band a California trio aiming at a modern update of Fleetwood Mac as distaff beard-rock but barely achieving a less polished version of Wilson Phillips? Really?
Rating on the four-star scale: .5 stars.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:27 (twelve years ago)
"distaff beard-rock"!
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:29 (twelve years ago)
Does anyone actually use the terms 'poptimist' or 'poptimistic' for anything other than handwringing purposes?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:34 (twelve years ago)
I already loved this album but DeRo being a prick about it makes me want to gold-plate it and wear it around my neck. Good use of scare quotes, asshole.
― Deafening silence (DL), Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:40 (twelve years ago)
wilson phillips? i've heard wilson phillips, i saw wilson phillips live just one calendar year ago, and this is no wilson phillips
― goole, Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:41 (twelve years ago)
I'd seriously die if Haim covered "Impulsive" though.
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 September 2013 19:42 (twelve years ago)
^this
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 26 September 2013 20:01 (twelve years ago)
did this guy just stay in 1994 permanently or
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 26 September 2013 20:15 (twelve years ago)
also i had to look up distaff and i'm pretty confused now
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 26 September 2013 20:16 (twelve years ago)
I had to look it up the first time I saw it in an album review. I get that writers want a synonym for "female" but a word based on the idea of a woman's job being spinning seems a tad archaic.
― Deafening silence (DL), Thursday, 26 September 2013 20:19 (twelve years ago)
haha i think that might be the most inchoately splenetic use of the p-word i've ever seen
― r|t|c, Thursday, 26 September 2013 20:41 (twelve years ago)
Haim are basically motivated by the same eternal indie rock impulse as Wilco circa Summer Teeth only brought forward two decades. As with all dumb music critics dero has no capacity to abstract away from specific stylistic cues.
― Tim F, Thursday, 26 September 2013 22:09 (twelve years ago)
Yeah. OTM.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 September 2013 23:55 (twelve years ago)
Fuck that guy and his misplaced contrarianism.
serious question: does he have a Chicago following?
― first I think it's time I kick a little verse! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 September 2013 00:00 (twelve years ago)
lol I was trying to remember who I had UNfavorably compared to wilson philips recently, turns out it was Fun.
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Friday, 27 September 2013 00:34 (twelve years ago)
DeRo? I don't know if he has a following, per se, but he's well liked enough. I mean, if you read the comments on the NPR site and on his Facebook page, people tend to take him seriously. He's also capable of being reasonable, but that rarely comes out in print. It's just so easy to take the contrarian dismissive stance, because it's so much easier/more attention-getting to take something down than praise something.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 27 September 2013 00:59 (twelve years ago)
I get why someone attached to his views of rock would hate Haim, I'm just glad I'm not attached to those views
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Friday, 27 September 2013 01:01 (twelve years ago)
i'm surprised he did not get something in there about how you should listen to the cellar-aged post punk of SAVAGES instead
― call all destroyer, Friday, 27 September 2013 01:10 (twelve years ago)
Tim otm. Make it three brothers instead of sisters and rub off a little of the production gloss and DeRo would be all over this.
― Deafening silence (DL), Friday, 27 September 2013 08:25 (twelve years ago)
Eh, the guy's pretty useless, but I don't think this is accurate at all. If anything, DeRo tends to rate rock bands with women in it higher, because, OMG, finally, ladies playing rock. And he severely underrates pop, because, OMG, ladies playing pop, but not the kind of pop this guy thinks they should be making, they should be ashamed of being ladies.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 27 September 2013 12:43 (twelve years ago)
lol distaff beard-rock appears to have been stricken from his blog
― call all destroyer, Friday, 27 September 2013 17:56 (twelve years ago)
dude loves donut rock
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Friday, 27 September 2013 18:01 (twelve years ago)
Geoff Barrow weighs in
https://twitter.com/jetfury/status/382194599164649473
https://twitter.com/jetfury/status/383369303997050880
― monotony, Friday, 27 September 2013 23:34 (twelve years ago)