what i'm saying though is inside the 00s as we still are, at least you & I can agree that Kid A is the most significant album, and we prolley coul have said the same thing for Nevermind IN the 90s (though--oddly overlooked on this thread--there are prolley at least 5 albums that are considered more relevant nowadays) but could a lot of the 80s canonical choices be consider all that important IN the 80s, not knowing that Nirvana, Grunge, shoegazer, everything that happened not two years later would drastically change the game?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
also, weirdly i've been listening to hysteria a lot lately and to me it's sort of the one place where almost all the trends of the 80s sort of merge into one....hair metal, really produced pop, drum machines, samplers, guitar solos, clean Police style guitar arpegios, crazy vocal harmonies...
it's sort of the reverse of something like avril i mentioned upthread...sort of a hard rock record with pop signifiers
i remember reading in Mojo once that their stated goal was to make the "Thriller of heavy metal" which seems like the ultimate 80s goal.
― Yo, I just copped dat brand new Manity Kane cd. (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
oh master of puppets is a good point...lol nevermind etc.
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
00's sucks sucks sucks as far as rock goes. sucks.
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
hysteria is good-call 80s record, but mentioning it seems wilfully perverse, given that this whole discussion is framed by the canon, thus critical respect, myths regarding artistic quality & importance, etc.
granted I didn't pay all that much attention to reviews when this came out but I have memories of all of the ones I did see being 5-star jizzfests
― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
mak(ing) the "Thriller of heavy metal" (was) like the ultimate 80s goal.
That or having more ménage à trois with mother/daughter combinations than any other hair-metal band.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
80s canonical choices be consider all that important IN the 80s, not knowing that Nirvana, Grunge, shoegazer, everything that happened not two years later would drastically change the game?
i see what you mean. no, and yes. 80s were a different era in a lot of ways. in one really important way: development of an indie rock subculture before it became obvious that it was a farm league system. records like damaged, zen arcade, daydream nation, psychocandy, the perfect prescription & c. were regarded as instant-canon classics pretty much from the day of release, but only by critics and within a relatively small circle of "hipster" fans. i suspect that they'd still be held in high regard, even w/out the influence they cast on the likes of MBV & nirvana (though, you know, if things were different, they'd be different).
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:21 (seventeen years ago)
I have memories of all of the ones I did see being 5-star jizzfests― HI DERE
― HI DERE
i have memories of a LOT of people taking the piss, esp more rockist/hipster types. plus it's not like the succeeding decades have done a lot to burnish the rep. i think it's mostly remembered as a kitschy fun party record, beloved of strippers and people who appreciate irony
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:24 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/207338/review/12285422/hysteria
― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:25 (seventeen years ago)
xxxp to contenderizer right...zen arcade, surfer rosa, daydream nation...they're the blessed black wings, and blood inside, and burned mind of their day...
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:26 (seventeen years ago)
records like damaged, zen arcade, daydream nation, psychocandy, the perfect prescription & c. were regarded as instant-canon classics pretty much from the day of release, but only by critics and within a relatively small circle of "hipster" fans.
this (my words) probably much more true in the US than the UK. pop press (NME/MM) seemed hugely influential in the UK and went apeshit over this stuff. the massive, seemingly unbridgeable gulf between indie-mainstream was more a US thing
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
xp hey strippers like all kind of music...
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:31 (seventeen years ago)
what's the oddest song you've seen a stripper dance to?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:34 (seventeen years ago)
that's an after-the-fact review from 2006, Dan. i doubt that RS dug it at the time.
― Ioannis, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
here's Xgau's review from back in the day, tho:
Hysteria [Mercury, 1987]You know about the music, and if you don't think you'll like it you won't: impeccable pop metal of no discernible content, it will inspire active interest only in AOR programmers and the several million addicts of the genre. In short, it's product--but as product, significant, because it's product for the CD age. Stuck with over an hour of material after four years (after all, could twelve songs be any shorter?), they elected to put it all on one disc because as technocrats they instinctively conceive for formats that can accommodate an hour of music: cassettes, which now outsell vinyl discs, and CDs, which outdollar them. The cassette sound is a little too dim, as commercial cassette sound usually is, and though I sometimes find myself preferring the depth of the vinyl once I've turned my amp up to six or seven, the clarity of the CD gets more and more decisive as the needle approaches the outgroove. I mean, I have trouble perceiving these guys as human beings under ideal circumstances. Not docked a notch because at least they didn't pad it into a double. C
― Ioannis, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:44 (seventeen years ago)
lol @ slamming a record by saying it will inspire interest in "only several million people"
― harry s tfuman (and what), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:46 (seventeen years ago)
i dunno, are "addicts" people?
― Ioannis, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, i remember reading hysteria reviews in RS, spin, voice (?), bunch of other places. reception was mixed, at best.
edit: pretty much like that xgau bit. catchy, but fake, "sold out", empty. rockist value differentiators very much in play
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
Well, fwiw, I seem to remember that RS gave Nevermind just 3-stars upon its release.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:49 (seventeen years ago)
"Servicable catchy rock" was basically the review.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
Well, fwiw, I seem to remember that RS gave Nevermind just 3-stars upon its release.― Daniel, Esq.
― Daniel, Esq.
i.e., in-the-moment RS reviews as a poor guide to what will eventually end in the RS canon
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:54 (seventeen years ago)
the perfect prescription & c. were regarded as instant-canon classics pretty much from the day of release
probably much more true in the US than the UK
Uh, not for those two albums (whatever they are.) And fwiw, U.S. critics hardly went ga-ga over Damaged when it came out either. Mostly, they ignored it.
― xhuxk, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
"of no discernible content" is the part that always kills me.
xxp
― Ioannis, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
Uh, not for those two albums (whatever they are.) And fwiw, U.S. critics hardly went ga-ga over Damaged when it came out either. Mostly, they ignored it.― xhuxk
― xhuxk
think i may have been a little unclear there, xhuxk. my point was that the albums i mentioned were regarded as instant-canon classic within their indie underworlds. that in the US at the time, the divide between indie and mainstream seemed much larger than it did in the UK. so indie-crit sanctification in many cases took time creeping up into the mainstream (or into the long-memory indie semi-mainstream, anyway). damaged and spacemen 3's perfect prescrip being examples.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 21:01 (seventeen years ago)
This question is totally flawed.. "rock fans" has yet to be defined in this thread as it can mean 1 of 100 things. Make the question less vague and you may find your answer.
― billstevejim, Friday, 20 February 2009 01:35 (seventeen years ago)
Origin Of Symmetry might be a good answer for U.K. residents and anglophiles.
― billstevejim, Friday, 20 February 2009 01:38 (seventeen years ago)
why don't we try to define what rock fans does not mean, in the purpose of this thread first?
― children + sledgehammers = poetry (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 02:09 (seventeen years ago)
trying to define "rock fans" is probably a losing game. different fans define the genre differently. what emerges from all those conflicting definitions is some kind of vague, blurry ghost that can't really be pinned down, but exists nonetheless. we've gotta work with the uncertainty.
― contenderizer, Friday, 20 February 2009 02:18 (seventeen years ago)
changed my mind. its without doubt fever to tell.
― children + sledgehammers = poetry (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 03:14 (seventeen years ago)
2000:relationship of command - at the drive-inparachutes - coldplaythe white pony - deftonesthe sickness - disturbedveni, vedi, vicious - hiveshybrid theory - linkin parkmad season - matchbox 20kid a - radiohead1000 hurts - shellacall hands on the bad one - sleater kinney
2001:love and theft - bob dylanvision creation newsun - boredomssinner - drowning poolgorillaz - gorillazorigin of symmetry - musesilver side up - nickelbackrock steady - no doubtcome clean - puddle of muddoh, inverted world - shinsbreak the cycle - staindis this it - strokestoxicity - system of a downlateralus - tool
2002:source tags and codes - ...and you will know us by the trail of deadi get wet - andrew WKbeaches and canyons - black diceyoshimi battles the pink robots - flaming lipsoceanic - isisneon golden - notwistsongs for the deaf - queens of the stone ageyankee hotel foxtrot - wilco
2003:transatlanticism - death cab for cutiea mark, a mission, a brand, a scar - dashboard confessionalkid rock - kid rockhypermagic mountain - lightning boltde-loused in the comatorium - mars voltasing sing death house - the distillersthe real new fall LP - the fallelephant - white stripesfever to tell - yeah yeah yeahs
2004:sung tongs - animal collectivefuneral - arcade firecrimes - blood brothersfranz ferdinand - franz ferdinandamerican idiot - green daythey were wrong, so we drowned - liarsleviathan - mastodonvol. 3: the subliminal verses - slipknotburned mind - wolf eyes
2005:X&Y - coldplayfrom under the cork tree - fall out boyblessed black wings - high on firewonderful rainbow - lightning boltfrances the mute - mars voltagimme fiction - spoonblack one - sunn0)))hypnotize - system of a downstanding in the way of control - the gossipseparation sunday - the hold steady
2006:the warning - hot chipblood mountain - mastodonblack holes and revelations - musethe black parade - my chemical romancepearl jam - pearl jam10,000 days - toolreturn to cookie mountain - tv on the radio
2007:new wave - against me!mirrored - battlespink - borisinfinity on high - fall out boyin rainbows - radiohead
2008:saint dymphna - gang gang dancevampire weekend - vampire weekendoracular spectacular - MGMTwhen the world comes down - all american rejectspretty. odd - panic at the disco
2009:merriweather post pavilion - animal collective
just wanted to reiterate how happy these lists make me...
― children + sledgehammers = poetry (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 03:32 (seventeen years ago)
That's a kinda awesome list, dude.
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 04:03 (seventeen years ago)
nickelback especially
― k3vin k., Friday, 20 February 2009 04:06 (seventeen years ago)
but i haven't liked nickelback since they were a silverchair/bush rip-off band...
(or at least since their silverchair/bush imitations were a marginal blip on the altrockradio landscape)
― children + sledgehammers = poetry (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 04:10 (seventeen years ago)
No, I totally dig. I was definitely listening to Nickelback in 2001. Of course, I was sixteen at the time, but still. You're missing Evanescence, tho.
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 04:15 (seventeen years ago)
wow lol am i older than you Mordy?
only time I thought I might like Evanescence was in that Seether "Broken" video when Amy Lee had that pair of black angel wings...w/o that lingering perv element in my personality Evanescence wd be of zero interest to me...
― get it like a whoopin when you holler at yr seniors (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 04:20 (seventeen years ago)
however contenderizer's inclusion of white pony, toxicity, and hypnotize only serves to reinforce this list's awesomeness
― get it like a whoopin when you holler at yr seniors (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 04:25 (seventeen years ago)
I guess you are! I think I love your list because it almost mirrors my own music listening evolution pretty spot-on. Except it's missing some screamo/emo albums that I was listening to around 18-19 years old (Thursday, Thrice, Coheed + Cambria, etc) and skips directly to Fall Out Boy. Tho you do have Dashboard.
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 04:26 (seventeen years ago)
Also, these lists are reminding me of tons of albums I loved, and haven't listened to in awhile. Nostalgia ftw!
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 04:27 (seventeen years ago)
To "rock fans", what is meant to be the canonical, everyone can agree on, album of the decade?
There is none.
― Mr. Snrub, Friday, 20 February 2009 04:34 (seventeen years ago)
coheed wd not be too bad in here...
― get it like a whoopin when you holler at yr seniors (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 05:05 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, there's tons of stuff i should have included but spaced on, both shit and shine. 00s decade of rock
― contenderizer, Friday, 20 February 2009 06:07 (seventeen years ago)
whats that coheed song that actually charted a while back?...it sounded kind of like "kashmir", and actually managed to cop some of that song's grandeur, without being crushed by its colossal weight...so thats an accomplishment...
― get it like a whoopin when you holler at yr seniors (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 20 February 2009 06:20 (seventeen years ago)
Dave Matthews Band had their big album this decade (Everyday), and if I remember correctly, Dispatch had their big album in 2000? Also, has The Rising been mentioned yet? That seems like a shoe-in for a certain kind of critical rock album list.
Hot Fuss, maybe?
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 06:33 (seventeen years ago)
Dave Matthews Band had their big album this decade (Everyday)
What? Under the Table and Dreaming and Crash both sold upwards of 6 million; Everyday sold half that.
Also, I certainly don't travel in jam-band circles, but you're only the second person I've ever heard mention the band Dispatch.
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 20 February 2009 06:48 (seventeen years ago)
I don't travel in big jam-band circles, but among college-stoners Dispatch has always seemed huge. And you're right. For some reason I blocked out those other DMB albums. I'll admit -- not the hugest college-rock fan.
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 06:55 (seventeen years ago)
i skipped the screamo stuff cuz i'm so unfamiliar -- i dunno what's worth a mention. thursday, thrice, taking back sunday? WTF? was kinda into the braid, promise ring, get up kids & hot water music type stuff, but that was late 90s. jimmy eat world bleed american shoulda been on there. maybe cave-in's jupiter. dillinger four? different kinda thing, smaller scale...
― contenderizer, Friday, 20 February 2009 07:11 (seventeen years ago)
and what about coheed? i always wrote em off cuz the whole premise seemed so goofy, but i was listening to some tracks tonight and kinda dug em. goofy as hell, but in a way that reminds me of the rush/BOC sci-fi stuff i used to dork out on as a kid. singer even sounds like geddy. what's the best place to start?
― contenderizer, Friday, 20 February 2009 07:14 (seventeen years ago)
Sadly, the answer is teh chilly pepperz.
― DJ Mr. Face Stabba, M.D. (Whitey on the Moon), Friday, 20 February 2009 07:31 (seventeen years ago)
sadly, that is some bullshit
― you are nude spock (contenderizer), Friday, 20 February 2009 07:33 (seventeen years ago)
If it's RHCP, it's By the Way. Wasn't Californication in the late 90s?
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 13:57 (seventeen years ago)