If Nevermind is the canonical choice of the 90s, what would be the record of the 80s?
Or put in a slightly different way, do we expect every decade to have a single album that has a huge galvanizing effect on the music world the way Nevermind did?
― Moodles, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
daydream nation?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
dare?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
VH MCMLXXXIV
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
eh?
rly?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
maybe the 80s were a different world
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
idk :-/
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
Thrillerz??
some might not want to call it "rock" butit did huge numbers, had EVH, and sort of legitimaized (?) video & pop/rock synergism?? That's pretty fuckin 80s..
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
maybe i prefer purple rain
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:42 (seventeen years ago)
^^ good case could be made
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
moodles: NO. expecting every decade to boil down to THE RECORD is foolish, and the OG thread question is fucked. we're much better off talking about trends and "what is rock lol", putting together groups of albums that represent in different ways.
i posted a top 10 list yesterday, but i'm thinking that it doesn't pay enough attention to the beardy/saddo mostly-west-coast US indie thing that's really taken off over the last five years. not sure how to shorthand that. i'm thinking maybe sufjan stevens' illinois is the spokesmodel for a whole bunch of stuff, including that, though it seems a counterintuitive pick (not west coast, not beardy, sorta un-rock)
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
My question about the 80s was kind of goofy anyway since I immediately thought of about a dozen records that all had huge impacts on the rock world.
I think it may be safe to say that as time goes on, these huge landscape-altering records become fewer and farther between.
― Moodles, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
thriller & purple rain are good 80s picks. so are appetite for destruction & shout at the devil. daydream nation & surfer rosa. closer? pornography & disintegration? madonna LP (not rock?)
again, lists are the way to go
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
80s "rock" - Appetite for Destruction, The Joshua Tree or (gulp) Money For Nothing
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
most of the beloved indie albums of the decade would at least dabble in electrodrizzle
^^ pretty questionable premise imo
― LMA.O. Scott (some dude), Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:14 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^this^^^
the most electrodrizzly most white folks/indie heads i know tend to get is gorillaz + teh postal service
― harry s tfuman (and what), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
maybe this is just a southern thing but in the car with indie kids ur still likelier to hear 2pac or mf doom than anything blog-housey
― harry s tfuman (and what), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
Using the criteria as I understand it for this thread, maybe: Bruce Springsteen, Born In The USA; Guns and Roses, Appetite for Destruction; U2, The Joshua Tree; Police, Synchronicity; Van Halen, 1984; Bon Jovi, Slippery When Wet; or Def Leppard, Pyromania.
These aren't the best rock discs of the 1980s, but that isn't the question.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
probly joshua tree imo
― harry s tfuman (and what), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
I asked a bunch of rock fans this question and the best answer I got was "Origin of Symetry", which has to be wrong.― Ringtone bisexual bible shower (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Monday, 16 February 2009 19:32 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Ringtone bisexual bible shower (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Monday, 16 February 2009 19:32 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
This is probably right.
― Mark G, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:53 (seventeen years ago)
although, true, it's spelled wrong...
― Mark G, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
these huge landscape-altering records become fewer and farther between
dunno about that. i think music people are more balkanized, so they're less aware of how the landcape outside their niche is being altered. think there have been tons of big, game-changing records in the 00s. maybe not so many big rock records though...
electrodrizzly most white folks/indie heads i know tend to get is gorillaz + teh postal service― harry s tfuman
― harry s tfuman
but, see, that shit is EXACTLY what i meant by "electrodribble" in the 1st place. plus kid a, and yoshimi battles the pink, and whatever beck record, and looper, and (more distantly) all that gross indie dance shit everybody loves to hate.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
It's called Brothers in Arms, idiot. 'Born in the USA' is the right answer for the 80s anyway
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
Drugs A. Money, I wonder if you are misunderstanding what I mean by "rockism," a term I'm already regretting bringing up. The "overall critical canon" -- as exemplified by the Rolling Stone 500-best albums list -- is, for all intents and purposes, a rockist canon. The very impulse to canonize is, as you yourself suggest upthread, a rockist one. Rockists could find something to like about both Nirvana and Alice in Chains, since both bands "kept it real" to some degree. But I'd argue that the ones who would champion Alice in Chains alongside Nirvana are a minority group within the larger rockist community.
Let's look at it this way. Albums that wind up being canonized by Rolling Stone are typically praised by both critics and fans: rarely will you find an album on the list that hasn't done decent sales, unless it has some great mythology behind it or is considered extremely influential. Nevermind is the rare album that critics loved, fans bought by the millions, and it was seen as a milestone in the lineage of rock history. Its place in the "overall critical canon" is thus secure. Dirt, while a very good record that had multi-platinum sales at the time, simply didn't have the same degree of critical support. And while you can make a good argument that it was wildly influential -- plenty of grunge and post-grunge bands borrowed from the Alice in Chains template -- the album's reputation after its initial mainstream success lay mostly among these Average Rock Dudes we've been talking about. 35-year-olds are still putting "Rooster" on the jukebox, but 19-year-olds aren't buying it like they are old Nirvana records.
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
Appetite & Joshua TRee, yep... I'm trying to think of things that did hueg numbers, made lots of top ten lists but like, even little kids were totally in to.
xxxxpost Daniel ESQ's list looks pretty good
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
(and buy top 10 lists, i mean P&J and the like, not just Spin and RS)
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
35-year-olds are still putting "Rooster" on the jukebox, but 19-year-olds aren't buying it like they are old Nirvana records.
^^also v. important
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
HYSTERIA?...SLIPPERY WHEN WET???????
― Yo, I just copped dat brand new Manity Kane cd. (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
Bruce Springsteen, Born In The USA; Guns and Roses, Appetite for Destruction; U2, The Joshua Tree; Police, Synchronicity; Van Halen, 1984; Bon Jovi, Slippery When Wet; or Def Leppard, Pyromania
this this this this this. some of that is THE CANON, some of it ain't, but it's a big part of how we remember the 80s. plus speaking in tongues, freedom of choice, plus the other stuff i said before, etc.
overlooks THE CANON though, and the way we set up weird moats between the "important" and the not.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
i'm not convinced kids are buying old nirvana records...besides that jay i agree with yr post...what does rockism mean though?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
hahah well, he had me up through 1984
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 19 February 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
yeah contenderizer but isnt the canon were talking about pretty much a 90s narrative...? like the SST stuff thats canon (which is what I assume what youre talking about) that we like could pretty much be seen as prequels to Nevermind, does it really have anything to do with the 80s itself?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
35-year-olds are still putting "Rooster" on the jukebox, but 19-year-olds aren't buying it like they are old Nirvana records.― jaymc
― jaymc
is this totally true though? nevermind has become an evergreen classic, selling and selling and selling, like how dark side of the moon hung around the top 100 album charts for over a decade, but i'm not sure that dirt has been cast into the dustbins of h. rather, i think it's become a popular & well-respected cult album (oxymoron alert) among heavy-seeking rockist types -- a strain whose visibility & numbers have risen significantly over the last decade.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:04 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I stand by this. I grew up in the 80s (in fact, today's my 41st birthday, making me nostalgic and . . . a little sad, actually), and it's hard to overstate the popular impact of these discs. I can't stand Bon Jovi, FWIW, but Slippery When Wet was a big deal to a lot of kids, and the group seemed to hit that spot between rock-macho and boyish-looks that made them popular with a lot of high school and college girls (other bands did this, too, but Bon Jovi was a big success with a long track record of charting hits). And Pyromania was an even bigger hit, and I think has gained stature among critics in the years since it was released. Hysteria is a sort-of good album, but as someone said upthread, it was "the follow-up."
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:06 (seventeen years ago)
i dunno, i think pyromania was big, but hysteria sold way more and was HUGE for like 4 years...there's only like 2 or 3 songs off that album that weren't singles
― Yo, I just copped dat brand new Manity Kane cd. (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
80s stuff was very relevant to the 80s, but only if you were there ;)
i mean, "the canon" is an old narrative, though an everchanging one. a lot of the push-pull in the 80s had to do with how all this new shit (punk, post-punk, new wave, hardcore, hair metal, synthpop, prince & MJ) related to then well established 60s/70s rolling stone "rock importance" canon.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
that last to drugz
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
True. It's still always been "the follow-up" to me.
(xp to Matt)
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
i'm not convinced kids are buying old nirvana records
Well, kids aren't buying anything anymore, to be fair.
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
hysteria is good-call 80s record, but mentioning it seems wilfully perverse, given that this whole discussion is framed by the canon, thus critical respect, myths regarding artistic quality & importance, etc.
master of puppets
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
what i'm saying though is inside the 00s as we still are, at least you & I can agree that Kid A is the most significant album, and we prolley coul have said the same thing for Nevermind IN the 90s (though--oddly overlooked on this thread--there are prolley at least 5 albums that are considered more relevant nowadays) but could a lot of the 80s canonical choices be consider all that important IN the 80s, not knowing that Nirvana, Grunge, shoegazer, everything that happened not two years later would drastically change the game?
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
also, weirdly i've been listening to hysteria a lot lately and to me it's sort of the one place where almost all the trends of the 80s sort of merge into one....hair metal, really produced pop, drum machines, samplers, guitar solos, clean Police style guitar arpegios, crazy vocal harmonies...
it's sort of the reverse of something like avril i mentioned upthread...sort of a hard rock record with pop signifiers
i remember reading in Mojo once that their stated goal was to make the "Thriller of heavy metal" which seems like the ultimate 80s goal.
― Yo, I just copped dat brand new Manity Kane cd. (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
oh master of puppets is a good point...lol nevermind etc.
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
00's sucks sucks sucks as far as rock goes. sucks.
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
granted I didn't pay all that much attention to reviews when this came out but I have memories of all of the ones I did see being 5-star jizzfests
― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
mak(ing) the "Thriller of heavy metal" (was) like the ultimate 80s goal.
That or having more ménage à trois with mother/daughter combinations than any other hair-metal band.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
80s canonical choices be consider all that important IN the 80s, not knowing that Nirvana, Grunge, shoegazer, everything that happened not two years later would drastically change the game?
i see what you mean. no, and yes. 80s were a different era in a lot of ways. in one really important way: development of an indie rock subculture before it became obvious that it was a farm league system. records like damaged, zen arcade, daydream nation, psychocandy, the perfect prescription & c. were regarded as instant-canon classics pretty much from the day of release, but only by critics and within a relatively small circle of "hipster" fans. i suspect that they'd still be held in high regard, even w/out the influence they cast on the likes of MBV & nirvana (though, you know, if things were different, they'd be different).
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:21 (seventeen years ago)
I have memories of all of the ones I did see being 5-star jizzfests― HI DERE
― HI DERE
i have memories of a LOT of people taking the piss, esp more rockist/hipster types. plus it's not like the succeeding decades have done a lot to burnish the rep. i think it's mostly remembered as a kitschy fun party record, beloved of strippers and people who appreciate irony
― contenderizer, Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:24 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/207338/review/12285422/hysteria
― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:25 (seventeen years ago)
xxxp to contenderizer right...zen arcade, surfer rosa, daydream nation...they're the blessed black wings, and blood inside, and burned mind of their day...
― amateur chauffeur (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 19 February 2009 20:26 (seventeen years ago)