Taking sides: nu-ilm vs old-ilm

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (133 of them)
I never really felt part of the old ILM gang because I wasn't (nor am) not smrat enough (heh!). But I still long back for those days - sorry Mark S but I do - because it seemed as though there was much more intellectual banter. It seemed more challenging in a way. Oh hell I dunno, I haven't been around much the last couple of weeks.
We shouldn't nag, Graham. "I ain't complaining, I am entertaining." is what should be the line used here. it's up to us to change the atmosphere. Truth Hurts. ;-)

nathalie, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

And I'd also be unable to distinguish between old and nu-ILM, as I sorta jumped boards as soon as ILE came along.

jel --, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

That double negation clearly PROVES I am not clevah enuff. heh

nathalie, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

The problem wasn't the thread itself, it's just that people answers the thread literally with no explanation, which is fair enough as far as that thread goes, but soon after every question was being answered with no actual discussion going on, and I'm not really saying that thread was the cause, more that it being so successful is a symptom of what I don't like.

Graham, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Pop-off Tuesday are a duo from Japan! I think they are very hard to describe, one song is beats, then seventies guitar solos, and then it sounds like an electric saw...

There's some stuff about them here: pop-off tuesday

jel --, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh, and they have a new album out really soon!

jel --, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

''more that it being so successful is a symptom of what I don't like.''

oh no!ILM is a victim of its own success! oh no!!

Julio Desouza, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'm new too and i hesitate to throw in my two bits but Tom "another, better board somewhere" will run into the same things sooner or later. it was frustrating to have started posting during the last nu-ilm crisis and feeling like half of the old-guard had jumped ship the same day and taken their thoughts with them. but the it-didn't-used-to-be-like-this lament gets you nowhere. why not treat ilxor as the fresh start, say IT ISN'T like this, get other people saying it too and pitching in with a bit of moderation.

I agree, this is what should be done. I just think too many people here are too disinterested to bother, which is a shame.

Nicole, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

''but soon after every question was being answered with no actual discussion going on''

for that thread, which is just general survey type thing this is fine surely. I was asked abt a xenakis rec i bought and i said i was going to post thoughts on it on a thread abt Xenakis (which i haven't done but i will).

Julio Desouza, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not an O.G. ILM-er, but I have been hanging out for awhile and can I just reiterate Tom's excellent advice from the FAQ: if you're not enjoying it, take a break. As Julio and others can attest, I was pretty testy on ILM for awhile there, and left in a semi-huff. It's a lot of fun again. I start threads about things that interest me an answer threads that interest me. I also read lots that I don't know so much about, and often learn a lot. I can't really remember what it was that used to get me riled up. Maybe I was a little disappointed with ILM because I was simply wasting a lot of time on it. That's been my experience, anyway.

& I've been meaning to say this for awhile: Graham, the new system is vast improvement. The new message alert in particular prevents a lot of misunderstandings, the ILM -> ILE click is great, and having the "contribute an answer" box on the same page of the thread is really handy. Sorry you're feeling down about ILM, but thanks nonetheless for all your hard work.

Fritz Wollner, Saturday, 24 August 2002 15:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Clash sell-out thread and the Pitchfork's silliest moment thread rejuvenated my interest in ILM. Those two threads are the first time in a long time that I've attempted to debate anything on ILM (and one of them was only tangentially about music, haha).

Dan Perry, Saturday, 24 August 2002 16:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

''I can't really remember what it was that used to get me riled up. Maybe I was a little disappointed with ILM because I was simply wasting a lot of time on it.''

you're not the only one 'wasting' a lot of time on it, I can tell you!

Julio Desouza, Saturday, 24 August 2002 16:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

i don't post as much anymore - certainly not as much as i was 10-12 mos. ago - but i still lurk and post around ilx because i feel it has something good to offer me, even if just a respite from boredom. i'm surprised to see tom advocating the "only thing to do is start a new board" (even in jest); as i remember tom being one of the most vehement in opposition to this idea back during the last ilx identity crisis. i do have to agree - with the reflection of a few months - that at least 50% of the problem comes from "old ilm", who, thinking that all is lost, have lapsed into the fuck-off-one-liner mentality more than any nu-poster i know of. (and yes of course i include myself in this.) i don't think there's anything wrong with a clever one-liner, or even just telling someone to fuck off and die if the need arises. old-old-ilm (in rereading from the time before i was around) was polite almost to a fault. but the complaining is coming from all angles these days. tom thinks the one-liners and fuck-offs in the blogs thread are a sure sign we're going down the crapper (even jokingly.) people actually got upset because there was a discussion, however vitriolic or stupid it ended up, going on about blogs in that thread rather than just a polite little list. the thread did degenerate in the end because a few of us got too overzealous trying to be clever, but not seeing the actual conversation that was going on at least halfway through is missing the forest for the trees. (or the trees for the forest. i'm never drinking again.) i'm upset that it ended up that way, not because i'm really that upset about contributing to the crapification of ilx, but because i promised myself i wouldn't bother anymore. (this is what booze and boredom does, kids.) in the harsh light of morning, however, i have to agree with fritz. if you don't like it, go away. (for a while. fritz did. i did. now we're back. i'm going to take another vacation from the internet in general for a while.) if you want to stay or come back, talk about the stuff you want to talk about in the way that you want to talk about them and hopefully you'll generation some conversation. because in the end, tom's right, the last few months of ilm can't be turned back and - again mostly through the boredom and exhaustion of the old school - it turned at points as pointless and snipey as any other message board i've ever been exposed to.

jess, Saturday, 24 August 2002 16:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

you'll generation

you'll generate of course. i need to go back to bed.

jess, Saturday, 24 August 2002 16:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was afraid to say this all this time but since Tom did I might as well come straight out and say I think I prefer nu-ilm because there are a glut of new posters who are into dance, offhand I'm thinking of piscesboy, blueski, and more whom I can't remember. If any of you aren't new I'm sorry but there have been more dance threads recently. I know for certain I've descended into the swearing and one liners that are being complained about above, but only because certain opinions which never would have been aired in the old days get a little bit of credence now. I'm thinking of the Fatboy Slim thread when whoever it was said "the dumbification of dance, haha that's a short trip", would that have happened back in the old days?


There's a chance aswell that my growing sweariness was only on a scale with my growing passion.

I just resent "nu-ilm" being slated or criticised because it seems to piss all over any decent discussions I've had recently, and there have been a few. It's just a bit annoying to have someone come along and make a judgement on all the threads here, many of which simply don't interest them by virtue of their subject.

There's no justification for a straight up "fuck off" after you start a thread, but then again if noone answers the thread other than that it's not ILM's fault either.

Ronan, Saturday, 24 August 2002 18:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also there's lots of really smart and interesting new people who obviously now think they've done something wrong.

Ronan, Saturday, 24 August 2002 18:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Give Ronan a knighthood now.

Dom Passantino, Saturday, 24 August 2002 18:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

As a fairly new boy here, I can hardly say how it has changed. I deplore the reaction to Graham's Atomic Kitten thread: I do think this is part of a desire to homogenize, and drive out divergent opinion, but there isn't enough of this to bother about. I wouldn't propose deletion of what is comparably small-time abuse, but I hope we'll be less than favourably inclined to such behaviour.

There are loads of threads on ILM, and I'm not interested in most of them. That's okay. The style of post on some that I do read doesn't appeal, which is okay too. I still find, here and there, threads or debates or individual posts of extremely high interest to me, whether because they are funny or knowledgeable or intelligent or all three - and all three come together surprisingly often, to my delight. I still like it here, though I spend more time on ILE.

Martin Skidmore, Saturday, 24 August 2002 19:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think the worst thing is that no one was miffed at the time about the Atomic Kitten thread comments.

Question for Tom: Do you feel you [you personally] can discuss the things you want to here?

Graham, Saturday, 24 August 2002 19:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Graham, this may sound stupid, but sometimes when I see something like that I don't know whether or not the person responding is actually someone you (or whoever the poster being responded to is) know well who is just fooling around with you. There have been times when what I first took to be personal attacks here turned out to just be friends joking around.

DeRayMi, Saturday, 24 August 2002 20:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

heh heh! theres not really any difference between nu-ilm and old ilm! those 'new ilm' posters like deraymi and martin and ron and chris not poops mcgee anymore sir aren't new anymore anyway!!!!

take off those rose tinted nostalgia glasses, blast off the new westbam single, and wear some cool brown clothes. it always works for me (of course, just coming in from the pub helps).

lets have a call out gareth thread instead, i'll take all y'all motherfuckers to the cemetery...

gareth, Saturday, 24 August 2002 20:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jess: I am going to go down with the sinking ship of ILM whatever. Ideally it will not sink. But this is why I can be simultaneously very for (b/c this is the way I think the interweb works) and very against (b/c ILM is something I've put a lot of time into) the idea of a new board. Currently nobody is starting a new board so the point is moot. NB I do not want anyone to start a new board - it is an enormous hassle, don't do it!!

Graham: yes, actually, I think that anything I want to talk about here I can talk about here. I would be sorry if other people don't think that. I think that maybe 18 months ago I was more concerned about the replies I got than I am now. All I know is that if I hear something that thrills me I look for an ILM thread about it and if I don't find one I start/restart one. If pushed I would say that this is what everyone should be doing.

(Sometimes I am drunk and start threads and never look at them again, too. I hope someone likes them though.)

Tom, Saturday, 24 August 2002 20:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

every quality message board i've ever seen has had it's old vs new, remember when it used to be really great, etc arguments, and you know what? in every single instance, it RUINED the board for everyone. what mark s said upthread is v accurate- the big prollem is that once the new breed leaps over the fence into eden, the old timers stop being concerned with using the board and enjoying and start worrying about other people spoiling their fun. result = the end arrives much faster.

i mean in real life, if someone's being an ass, hounding you, whatebber - it's alot harder to dodge them, but this is a message board. you shouldn't need to be distressed by other people's posts. failing that, i've seen other msg boards introduce an option to ignore select posters, but exclusion also = death knell

boxcubed, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

jess says: "old-old-ilm... was polite almost to a fault", but this is fantasy => neuromancer's rock vs rap thread fairly often resurfaces and there are several others like it... the boards have gone through cycles of nasty rattiness and likeable cheerfulness and paranoia and bonhonie and inspiration and dreariness, because they are posted to by actual live people not robots

graham, stop being so passive aggressive: i certainly don't feel about guilty not giving kiwi a roasting on that thread because a. i'd chided him on other threads for similar silliness, and b. you made no clear attempt to let ANYONE know that you were upset, or even that it wasn't you're intention to produce exactly that sort of response => some people (ie me) are completely unbothered by those kinds of posts (so i'm not going to automatically jump in on another's behalf unless they're very obviously being persistently harassed and disliking it); others — who very much dislike trollishness — are nevertheless inclined (by bitter experience) NOT to respond, because response so often makes the situation worse, most people probably didn't even see it, and some that did may well have felt there was no lasting issue, as no one was any obvious fuss (compare for example how melissa slapped down julio). i have to repeat: we are not telepathic!!!

as it happens, kiwi himself popped up somewhere a few days ago to say he pretty much only ever lurks these days anyway, so i simply don't see why you're *still* posting to this thread about this particular incident: you're a much bigger beast in the jungle than he is! You singlehandedly piloted us from collapsing planet greenspun to ilXoR!! i accept that you were upset at the time, because kiwi was being a childish prat, but as far as i'm concerned the person who has actually "stopped you talking about atomic kitten on ilm" on any permanent basis is yourself. revive the thread and talk about them!!

mark s, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

Graham this all seems like a storm in tea cup to me. I was drunk that night, doesnt excuse it, but I dont think its reflective of my behaviour nor ILM posters generally.

Look for what its worth, Im sorry to upset you like that. If I had any idea how sensitive you are...

As for this nu/old shit...whats that all about? The "Myth of the Other" Id say. All I can say is sorry.

Please dont ban me :)

Kiwi, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Tom you just said NOTHING AT ALL. Of course you can start a thread about anything you like on any message board ever if you're not particularly bothered about what responses you get.

Same response to Mark S I think.

Graham, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

don't ban me either. I work hard at getting smart, good people on board--and damn it, I've succeeded. (hello Pete Scholtes, Keith Harris, Sci-Fi Paul.)

sorry if this upsets y'all's identity crisis or something, but having lurked/posted a year-plus myself I fail to see what is so FUCKING different about this as opposed to before, and if so why it FUCKING matters. I'm going to risk sounding like a real asshole here, but a lot of these types of threads (see also the "best new blogs" one) are wound-licking over NOTHING. I'm glad folks have a forum to feel sorry for themselves on en masse, but GET OVER IT.

M Matos, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jesus Graham the key word there is "sometimes". But OK if I wasn't clear enough:

Question for Tom: Do you feel you [you personally] can discuss the things you want to here?

Answer for Graham: Yes.

Sometimes I decide that I don't want to discuss stuff, though, I just want to say it. But a) that's why I have a website and b) neurotic that I am I've even discussed THAT on ILx at some point!

Tom, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Graham you have a choice between trusting in our mind-reading powers — as genuine interweb mentalists haha *sigh* — or telling us how you feel about things.

mark s, Saturday, 24 August 2002 21:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well this is all very interesting. revealing, even. For myself, you could easily chuck the'googler' call at me because that is how I found ILM - and it was a dream come true. I write about music for my university mag and now some other things, I'm fascinated by pop culture and I'm considering a thesis about the KLF in some manner, as well as being a fan of a broad range of undergound stuff. ILM has actually givne me info I've used for uni - I did a tute presentation about bootlegs and appropiration the other week. I live in Tasmania, and it's really isolating - magazines arrive 3 months later, bands never tour here, there are really limited shops for buying stuff and so on - so ILM alerts me to all kinds of intersting things and gets me reading some interesting writers - yet after reading the above thread I feel like I shouldn't be here, which pisses me off as i really enjoy it, reading and contributing what wee kernels I can - and here I'll admit to be a sweary mary as that's the style with which I write my stuff (I'm an australian - what do you fucking expect? Mate. Cock.).
I do understand the problems though... it's just that i feel that being exclusive is wrong and the point of a public discussion board is to bring in as many opinions as possible.

threemetalinsects, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

i really was serious when i offered hugs on the blog thread.

jess, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hmm I clearly fucked up and my reply didn't appear. Anyway be sweary and new as much as you like! It's just "Fuck off" as the only reply to a thread is a bit lame, yes?

Tom, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

3metalinsects, this sort of thread crops up periodically. I think there is a significant portion of Olde-ILM which is open to a continuous influx of new posters, taking things in different direction. It's the internet after all.

I do feel slightly bad that someone who has put so much work into this board is unhappy with the way things are going; especially since I certainly haven't done anything for ILM at the technical level, and wouldn't know how to.

(Yes, I have spent an excessive amount of time today online, but it's been a rubbish sort of day.)

DeRayMi, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

(that reminds me to go read deraymi's oum kalthoum post after seeing her records in a store and trying to remember the recommendations)

boxcubed, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh pass another fucking hanky would you. This is a fucking joke.

I cant believe this. I may as well be a sacrificial lamb. I couldnt give a toss.


It's just "Fuck off" as the only reply to a thread is a bit lame, yes?

Oh for fucks sake, of course its lame. Ive apologised, what more can you do? Self righteous fuckers the lot of you. Wish I was so perfect.

Wheres Queen G when you need him.


Graham can you please delete my IP address and ban me or whatever you do to make youself happy . Fuck me.

Chow.

Kiwi, Saturday, 24 August 2002 23:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

In any case, I would wager that the vast majority of people on this thread (yes, even you Graham), would miss ILM if it wasn't here.

Also, I think ILE would go down the dumper completely if ILM were to be deleted - the way I see it, a love of music is what unites us all, it's the one (admittedly very broad) common ground and so it's quite right it should stay at the centre of things here. Without it, it's possible that ILE really would decend into some sort of irrelevent mutual-friendly society of little relevence to new posters.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

now lets all get drunk and play pingpong.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

This isn't adding anything new, but I might as well say it: I've been here long enough to remember the day Tom announced ILM's start on NYPLM (sniffle), and it's merely expanded. The peaks and valleys have always been there -- they're merely amplified now since there are more contributors. And, for what it's worth, my post count for last week probably doubled my post count for Jan-July '02.

Andy K (Andy K), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

I would just like to say this is my fourth post to this thread.

DeRayMi, Monday, 26 August 2002 13:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

Andy, Michelangelo etc have nailed it. Been here since the start as well. Not seeing any change beyond the fact that more people have found us, and good thing too. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

I would just like to say this is my fourth post to this thread.

Jesus back around answer 30 or 32 it was really interesting and now look at it.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

now lets all get drunk and play pingpong.

Hear hear!

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 26 August 2002 14:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

now lets all get drunk and play pingpong.
Too many balls are coming my way. Dunno which one to pick. heh.

nathalie (nathalie), Monday, 26 August 2002 14:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

ronan wins self-deconstructive conceptual meta-joke of the thread award

mark s (mark s), Monday, 26 August 2002 14:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

My stopping reading ILM quite as much (no loss, I'm sure) had as much to do with my own laziness (not keeping track of new personalities, unable to cover expanding number of posts and threads) as it had to do with a slight change in the tone of the discussion, the latter of which is surely just the difference between talking in small groups of people and larger ones: it went from a small town to a big city, and in a big city strangers will sometimes annoy you by telling you to fuck off. Whether that's worth complaining about is up to the people who've contributed the server, paid for the domain name, and done the programming (which is why I can understand Graham being a bit sensitive about this issue): as for me, I just hopped to the other forum.

That said, I'd actually argue that the board is -- for my tastes, obviously -- on an upswing: I don't know if it's just good new additions or the older "nu-ILM" people settling into a good rhythm and everyone getting to know one another, but I've been enjoying it a lot more lately. Please, though, don't anyone start any more "is ILM dying" threads: it's just really draining to see too much of this particular discussion.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 26 August 2002 14:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd like to thank Jive Christ and Jesus Records...

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 August 2002 14:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

Couldn't we just agree to drop the nu-ilm phrase?

jel -- (jel), Monday, 26 August 2002 15:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

haha, nu-ilm hasn't even started yet! you guys are ahead of the game, you're all OLDE-ILM!!!! nu-ilm isn't scheduled to start until at least november!!!!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 26 August 2002 15:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

nu-ilm is when there's one guy in the entire world who hasn't posted yet, except then he posts and we all shout FUCK YOU and fall about laughing like twats

hurrah!! roXoR!! ect ect!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 26 August 2002 16:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Can we move on to postnu-ILM now?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 26 August 2002 16:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

The "C/D and S/D shite" is a rhetorical device, not an absolute judgement, mosurock.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

as a relatively new member let me say that i LOVE C/D S/D threads and lists and obsessiveness.

Neudonym, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

How do the people who have been here a really long time remain interested? I've been here two years and we're still talking about the same shit most of the time.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

it goes in phases dave225: sometimes i think OMIGOD NOT THIS AGAIN!! and sometimes i think "haha i shall surely enjoy bringing a blank look to THIS fellow's honest open face"

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Often it's less about what's being discussed and more about how it is -- which dovetails nicely with my 'mood over specifics' approach to music. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, I know, I know .. I'm just really bored with all of the threads right now...

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

''How do the people who have been here a really long time remain interested? I've been here two years and we're still talking about the same shit most of the time.''

heh, we've even talked abt how 'circular' the threads get.

I enjoy talking shit but the ans would be that you never know: a common topic will be explored differently by someone new...there might some interesting things when you least expect. and then you can get into flame wars...all good fun.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:28 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.