how much of the stuff on the last album was live?
― max, Friday, 16 May 2008 22:50 (eighteen years ago)
Ah right, you're talking about the second record. Not sure it would make a huge difference to the end product, except maybe the beats, presumably they can afford to hire session musicians this time around.
― Matt DC, Friday, 16 May 2008 22:51 (eighteen years ago)
"not sure what to expect with a live band, tho -- don't want to be reactionary hater, but i'd rather not see them try to break into the indie scene, & they're hardly shying away from it judging from their choice in bands to remix"
Although interestingly their remixes are by and large less indie sounding than the album - or at least more obviously enamoured with disco and sans wailing vocals.
Otherwise I get where you're coming from. I guess it depends on how they do it. I'm hoping that live band doesn't = live studio performance, because what's clear from both the first album and the remixes is how much of the magic of their work comes from the editing and overdubbing process.
But I suspect what "live band" means is: a lot of recording of session musicians and then editing/overdubbing everything into one piece.
― Tim F, Saturday, 17 May 2008 00:47 (eighteen years ago)
"their choice in bands to remix" = the bands that are offering them cash. It's not like they're phoning up Love is All and begging to remix them. That's not how it goes.
― Raw Patrick, Saturday, 17 May 2008 01:37 (eighteen years ago)
it's not a criticism, patrick! but they're pretty hot right now - yearbook 1 / west coast got into plenty year end lists, they're remixing kylie minogue, and they're balearic's ambassador to the ilx-crit world - so yeah, i think they do get some choice so far as who they want to remix
― lucas pine, Saturday, 17 May 2008 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
i'm interviewing studio this week. any ideas?
(this is for real and, yes, i've never done an interview before. eek!)
― poortheatre, Friday, 6 June 2008 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
(actually i did interview my girlfriend for my blog haha)
― poortheatre, Friday, 6 June 2008 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
ask them why the u.s. release is missing 2 cuts~~ >:(
― omar little, Friday, 6 June 2008 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
yeah and why did they edit "self service"
― moonship journey to baja, Friday, 6 June 2008 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
Ask them why I didn't cross reference West Coast with Yearbook 1 before I bought both only to discover the latter's got all of the former.
― dblcheeksneek, Friday, 6 June 2008 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
The weather is finally right to give this album another spin.
― Just got offed, Monday, 9 June 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago)
Listened to it this morning, and felt very summery.
― Neil S, Monday, 9 June 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
Pre-order Yearbook 2 from www.inf000.com now
Payment through PayPal with free shipping worldwide. The CD will be delivered to you within two weeks.
www.inf000.com
via the fb page
― jaime, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 21:10 (seventeen years ago)
Their rework of AMO1's "Brown Piano" is quite good.
― van smack, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 01:33 (seventeen years ago)
none of the Y2 tracks reach the heights of 'out there' or 'west coast' but this is still one of the best releases of the year.
― poortheatre, Monday, 23 June 2008 12:33 (seventeen years ago)
Ha ha poortheatre that's like a capsule summary of my review!
― Tim F, Monday, 23 June 2008 12:44 (seventeen years ago)
you heard it here first, folks
― poortheatre, Monday, 23 June 2008 12:57 (seventeen years ago)
it's a remix compilation
― cutty, Monday, 23 June 2008 14:40 (seventeen years ago)
Actually I'd probably rate the "2 Hearts" remix about as high as "West Side" maybe. Hard to say.
― Tim F, Monday, 23 June 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
But it sounds more like Studio than it sounds like Kylie or Love Is All. On first listen I thought I might prefer it to YB1, but I'll think about that for a while. It's possible that I just prefer other singing to their singing.
I'm probably reading too much into things, but on the sleeve different tracks are described as 'versions', 'remixes' and 'remakes' - does this mean they might have actually re-recorded the songs themselves rather than working with original tracks?
― Bocken Social Scene, Monday, 23 June 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
Actually I'd probably rate the "2 Hearts" remix about as high as "West Side" maybe.
this gets a "yup" from me.
just noticed this looks to be upcoming ...
The Little Ones - Morning Tide (Version by Studio) Fontän - Early Morning (Version by Studio)
― jaime, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
eagerly awaiting the fontan record
― cutty, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
What do Fontan actually sound like?
― Tim F, Monday, 23 June 2008 23:05 (seventeen years ago)
You can hear one track on their myspace
http://www.myspace.com/fntn
― van smack, Monday, 23 June 2008 23:35 (seventeen years ago)
Intersting comparison to 'Flow Motion' in Tim F's review. I should give that album a new "recontextualized balearic" spin
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 09:56 (seventeen years ago)
Weird - that band The Little Ones seem to know people in big time indie remix land. They're pretty standard indie guitar pop, a'la Death Cab, but their last single had Stereolab and Crystal Castles remixes on it. Now Studio. Huh.
― Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:05 (seventeen years ago)
tim,
is pitchfork really the most appropriate platform from which to complain about ILE?
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:19 (seventeen years ago)
???
― Tim F, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 10:56 (seventeen years ago)
The most widespread and painfully boring critical line on "nu-Balearic" music is that its primary function is to render previously intolerable music tolerable-to-hipsters, redeeming Elton John or Paul Simon via the canny addition of a disco beat and some dub echo. This take isn't wrong, exactly, but it's the kind of sociological analysis that makes you hate the world a little bit more after reading it, rather like earnest discussions of how to woo soccer moms for votes.
maybe it was unintentional
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ we talked about this on the balearic thread, i think ilm mostly agrees w/ tim
― max, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:05 (seventeen years ago)
rather than being the targets of his ire
i was referring to: rather like earnest discussions of how to woo soccer moms for votes.
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
but maybe tim doesn't read rolling primary threads
haha got it
― max, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
rather like earnest discussions of how to woo soccer moms for votes.
Yes, this is a fool's errand.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
the gipsy kings comparison is funny. reminds me of when i was doing the music for a fashion show and suggested some studio tracks ... and was told they might be a little too "world". which i thought was hilarious knowing that they're from sweden and look like this
― jaime, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:31 (seventeen years ago)
heh, i thought of the primaries thread on that line too.
― Clay, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 22:53 (seventeen years ago)
I think I have read the primaries thread once or twice but to be honest I kinda made up that comparison on the spot.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago)
I'm amazed that a mongrel would click on the primaries threads, let alone follow them closely!
― energy flash gordon, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 01:54 (seventeen years ago)
I certainly didn't follow them closely...
― Tim F, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 02:59 (seventeen years ago)
i'm amazed that a mongrel knows what a soccer mom is! don't they have rugby moms down there?
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 03:10 (seventeen years ago)
Australian Football League moms or soccer moms (or rather "mums") where I am - rugby isn't very big in my state.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)
The "Balearic" moniker really confuses me. I mean - I have a track on that "Nu Balearica" cd that just came out (yo. I'm broke) but my shit sounds nothing like Gypsy Kings or has sun-kissed-beachy-guitar-jangle/congas/swoops-on-E. What is this "Balearica"?
― Capitaine Jay Vee, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 08:08 (seventeen years ago)
BAMBOLEOOO BAMBOLEOOOO
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 09:36 (seventeen years ago)
Will balearic help us gain a better appreciation of teh Gypsy Kings?
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 10:40 (seventeen years ago)
Teh Gypsy Queen would be a good name for a is the name of my balearic remix/edits outfit.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:15 (seventeen years ago)
I listened to this album (+ Yearbook One tracks) during the coach trip from Roma to Firenze. Perfect.
― blueski, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
I can't see this album working well while travelling, but I'll try it next week when taking the train to Marseilles.
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
wow really? i can't think of anything but travelling with this music, or at least certain locations, landscapes, destinations (not as specific as the album title and imagery suggests). the Balearic tag is obv a big factor in this...but other than that it's progressive, atmospheric, rhythmic music generally - how's that not perfect for travel?
― blueski, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
I see it more suited to open spaces. Maybe playing on a small boombox poolside or on the terrasse of a rented house somewhere in the South of Europe, very late or very early.
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 15:16 (seventeen years ago)