Yay another genre war! ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
You're all OTM. :)
― Omar (Omar), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
YES! Euphoric.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)
'schaffel bandwagon' accusation liable with 'The Primetime Of Your life' but who would care? it could well be the best shuffley track of all time!
― Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― stephen morris, Monday, 24 January 2005 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)
also i don't think anyone will think of this as actually a BAD album and hope that stays in perspective as we argue the toss over the next hours, days, weeks...
― Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lovelace, Monday, 24 January 2005 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― robot_by_the_river (robot_by_the_river), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)
isochronal120 (2:37:15 PM): "human after all" = purposeful bad leakisochronal120 (2:37:20 PM): just liek they did b4gregoryexists (2:37:31 PM): what sound quality are your files at?isochronal120 (2:37:54 PM): 192gregoryexists (2:37:59 PM): mine tooisochronal120 (2:38:01 PM): i only have that one song thogregoryexists (2:38:12 PM): i don't have speakers sufficient to tell any difference between 192 and up thoughgregoryexists (2:38:19 PM): i have the whole thinggregoryexists (2:38:23 PM): which song do you have?isochronal120 (2:38:23 PM): no one doesisochronal120 (2:38:29 PM): that onegregoryexists (2:38:31 PM): there's tons of fakes out thereisochronal120 (2:38:37 PM): only the title trakkisochronal120 (2:38:46 PM): whihc io know for a fact is missing all the good parts of itgregoryexists (2:39:03 PM): how do you know?isochronal120 (2:39:03 PM): yagregoryexists (2:39:11 PM): hmmgregoryexists (2:39:16 PM): weirdgregoryexists (2:39:17 PM): i hope sogregoryexists (2:39:22 PM): because i'm pretty disappointedisochronal120 (2:39:23 PM): yeah....i read it in a mag
can anyone address the veracity of this?
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Firstworldman - I reckon this is a new version of "oh, the leaked version is unmixed", which usually turns out to be bollocks.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 January 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I freely admit that I don't care for Daft Punk at all, but I gave it a shot and I gotta admit that half of this album could be used as the background music for Sunday night sports clip shows.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Well if you put it that way... But whatever, nothing pulling me in with this.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
I only mention this because the dissatisfaction may stem from the rather abridged nature of this album compared to the previous two, where you could always find enough to chew on.
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)
the sequencing has struck me as being very good, also.
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut christ (donut), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)
(malfunctioning armpits)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)
I like this statement.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― amanda lear (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)