when I first read this thread I googled the band and now I get fucking savages banners on every site I visit.
― wk, Friday, 17 May 2013 15:40 (thirteen years ago)
so's yr mom
hasn't everyone's mom?
― Poliopolice, Friday, 17 May 2013 16:00 (thirteen years ago)
srsly the ad buys for this band are insane
before I'd even heard of them I was searching youtube for some obscure brooklyn band and half of the related videos was savages stuff
2013 stringent UK postpunk band SEO guess papers oink invites
xp
― truth bomb lawyer mean mean pride (Edward III), Friday, 17 May 2013 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
free savages gift cards
― wk, Friday, 17 May 2013 17:57 (thirteen years ago)
download "husbands" for yr hubby on father's day, he deserves it
― truth bomb lawyer mean mean pride (Edward III), Friday, 17 May 2013 18:04 (thirteen years ago)
They just burned 30 Rock down to the ground on Jimmy Fallon.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 05:40 (twelve years ago)
"pretend she's singing 'Huysmans, Huysmans, Huysmans'"
Excellent.
― Doran, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 07:23 (twelve years ago)
what a way to go
― truth bomb lawyer mean mean pride (Edward III), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:24 (twelve years ago)
I wasn't that crazy about the album on a first listen, but seeing their energetic performance on Fallon, has me thinking maybe I should reconsider.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)
I saw their Jools performance first and that definitely influenced how I processed the album
― they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:39 (twelve years ago)
This album has only got better for me with subsequent listens!
― The Jupiter 8 (Turrican), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 14:47 (twelve years ago)
web-only song:
http://www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com/blogs/2013/06/savages-citys-full/
― scott seward, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 15:05 (twelve years ago)
man I have to see them live
― they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 15:07 (twelve years ago)
D.C. show in small club sold out too quick for me
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 June 2013 15:10 (twelve years ago)
severe & passionate haircut
― truth bomb lawyer mean mean pride (Edward III), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 15:18 (twelve years ago)
I think this band is still a little too beholden to its influences, but they're tight and very charismatic and I could see them putting out great records in the future if they break out of that mold a bit. Would definitely see them live.
― i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 June 2013 18:53 (twelve years ago)
they're tight eh
― balls, Thursday, 6 June 2013 22:51 (twelve years ago)
This Johnny Hostile guy is a bit of a twit isn't he?
For now on i keep it live only ,as long as i can… As soon as you put music on a record those days , everything turns into some kind of promotional moronic shit.
http://johnnyhostile.tumblr.com/
http://www.comedycv.co.uk/alanparker/2003-may-alanparker.jpg
― Position Position, Thursday, 6 June 2013 23:03 (twelve years ago)
is that the twin peaks guy? whatever happened to him?
― scott seward, Thursday, 6 June 2013 23:58 (twelve years ago)
― scott seward, Wednesday, June 5, 2013 11:05 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
already liked the album ok but 100% sold after watching that, damn.
― dmr, Friday, 7 June 2013 02:55 (twelve years ago)
"Waiting For A Sign" continues to rule my summer; also for those who don't get the Geddy Lee comparisons, this is the song where they are strongest
― they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Monday, 17 June 2013 19:57 (twelve years ago)
I dunno, man, I have more than a fondness for Rush and I still can't really hear much Geddy even on that song. 'Waiting For A Sign' was the last song on this to slot into place for me, I think. 'She Will' is my favourite song on here at the moment!
― The Jupiter 8 (Turrican), Wednesday, 19 June 2013 02:36 (twelve years ago)
finally listening to this. came here to say that it sounds like Rush but i see that has been covered.
― Treeship, Sunday, 7 July 2013 23:02 (twelve years ago)
I still don't fully understand the Rush thing.
― I wanna live like C'MOWN! people (Turrican), Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:25 (twelve years ago)
I still don't fully understand the Savages thing tbh.
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Thursday, 11 July 2013 00:28 (twelve years ago)
i don't get this. i'm sure savages are lovely folk & shit, they got something together. but dang, if this ain't EMPTY
― massaman gai, Friday, 12 July 2013 22:03 (twelve years ago)
I guess they're blowing up because they played NYC last Thursday and sold out a 1000-plus capacity room (Webster Hall) and have already announced that their next show here in the fall will be in a 3000-plus capacity room (Terminal 5). Kinda surprising. Also a bummer because I'd like to see em play and Terminal 5 sucks.
― dmr, Monday, 15 July 2013 17:18 (twelve years ago)
They played a 300 or so quickly sold out room in DC over the weekend and are coming back in the fall to a 1200 person room.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 July 2013 18:41 (twelve years ago)
My friend and I had the exact same reaction last night: This band has it going on, the singer is great, the musicians committed. Etc. And yet, we both left thinking, you know, we've flipped through this record bin before, and don't really see the band bringing much more to the table besides being good. Which is probably good enough, we conceded, but my friend in particular said he's perfectly happy sticking with his Bauhaus.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 17 September 2013 12:39 (twelve years ago)
god, remember this band? really brings me back...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 17 September 2013 12:56 (twelve years ago)
Dunno if it is a matter of too much too soon, but I was surprised the band did not sell out last night.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 17 September 2013 13:43 (twelve years ago)
^ chicago homies of mine were talking about just "showing up" and walking in to that show and laughing @ all the bands who shot their wad at the summer festivals in the chicagoland area depressing their own gate
― The Dance Twerking Was MADE So (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 17 September 2013 15:00 (twelve years ago)
This is pretty easily one of my top 5 albums of the year
― Bitch Fantastic (DJP), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 20:39 (twelve years ago)
you and Jim DeRo enjoying those marshmallows at that camp you built?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 20:49 (twelve years ago)
are they the goth hepburn?
― massaman gai, Wednesday, 23 October 2013 21:41 (twelve years ago)
ultimately they are just a little too much of a 81 UK post punk dress-up band
it's well done but doesn't really have much to offer for me
― lorde willin' (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 21:49 (twelve years ago)
they are basically the black crowes of post punk
No I'm with Dan on this - came back to it recently and was surprised at just how good it sounded and how great they are as a band. Especially the bass player, but the drums and guitar kill it too.
― gotta lol geir (NickB), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 21:55 (twelve years ago)
the Dusty Springfield of post punk.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 21:56 (twelve years ago)
idgi
like i said they are a good band. they play well. they have the style down. black crowes were/are a good band too. jealous again, all that shit. it's just something about it seems kinda off though. i dunno. such limited time to listen to stuff, why would i listen to this instead of something from that period. it's not like it feels modern except maybe mastered louder.
it's super up my alley. they are not bad at all.
― lorde willin' (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 22:00 (twelve years ago)
I've basically come around to thinking of this as an impressive and admirable record that I just don't ever really care to play.
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 22:53 (twelve years ago)
yeah that's it for me too
― lorde willin' (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 23 October 2013 22:59 (twelve years ago)
It's about as well done as anything like this could be short of the bands that did it first and better 30 years ago, basically.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 October 2013 01:02 (twelve years ago)
such limited time to listen to stuff, why would i listen to this instead of something from that period. it's not like it feels modern except maybe mastered louder.
...and I do appreciate that. I mean you must be pretty busy checking out all the new stuff on the Revolt of Fahey Brigade thread right?
― gotta lol geir (NickB), Thursday, 24 October 2013 09:22 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-rm2MPi2sM
― Inside Lewellyn Sinclair (cryptosicko), Saturday, 18 January 2014 01:24 (twelve years ago)
Annnnnnnd...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zkz6qKCYjDM
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 18:10 (twelve years ago)
they owe that director a BIG gift basket. i mean, talk about making a band look good. sheesh. still wanna marry the singer, by the way...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 18:51 (twelve years ago)
I dig the new 12", the Suicide cover, "Burn Baby Burn" is great as well.
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 19:57 (twelve years ago)
they owe that director a BIG gift basket. i mean, talk about making a band look good. sheesh.
that's pretty much what they look like anyway, the video is just footage of their regular live show
― john wahey (NickB), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:59 (twelve years ago)
Their "Dream Baby Dream" is weak; Bruce did it better.
― smhphony orchestra (crüt), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 22:01 (twelve years ago)