♫ i'm up all night to get lucky ♫
― flopson, Sunday, 21 April 2013 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Sunday, 21 April 2013 21:15 (thirteen years ago)
When I start thinking about this song I basically can't get the hook out of my head at all
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 21 April 2013 21:22 (thirteen years ago)
(Which is a good thing, really.) I quite like this.
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 21 April 2013 21:23 (thirteen years ago)
Heard it on the radio earlier today here in the greater Austin area
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 21 April 2013 21:24 (thirteen years ago)
Change pitch, add a few shamonas here and there and voila! Off the wall Michael Jackson feat. Daft Punk.
http://youtu.be/SkCn-iWLiSE
― Moka, Monday, 22 April 2013 05:24 (thirteen years ago)
haven't heard the song but no idea why people always seem to be wanting game changers the whole time
― suare, Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:33 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
1. so listen to the song before weighing in 2. i didn't say i want game changers all the time. i think the song is dope & have no criticisms of it. was just advocating for evenhandedness/honesty about the fact that a lot of what is doing the heavy lifting w/r/t all the attention its getting is that daft punk have kinda become pop stars since their last album.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Monday, 22 April 2013 05:44 (thirteen years ago)
the song itself is dope & fun as a pop joint but isn't doing much new, which is not a criticism of its quality simply a statement of accuracy
and every year there are game changers
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Monday, 22 April 2013 05:45 (thirteen years ago)
shocking that people are excited about pop stars
― eris bueller (lukas), Monday, 22 April 2013 05:47 (thirteen years ago)
the song itself is dope & fun as a pop joint but isn't doing much new
apart from being daft punk with real instruments
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 05:49 (thirteen years ago)
that mjj treatment is sort of incredible btw
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 05:50 (thirteen years ago)
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 5:49 AM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I dunno, that just make this the Daft Punk equiv. of the Neptunes' Spymob album.
It's neither a good nor bad thing in and of itself.
Still a great tune though!
― Tim F, Monday, 22 April 2013 06:21 (thirteen years ago)
It is sort of brilliant isnt it? Higher pitch Pharrell does sound a lot like MJ.
― Moka, Monday, 22 April 2013 06:42 (thirteen years ago)
Xpost
Pharrell is great ("Frontin'" etc), but the MJ is *easily* the new preferred version!
― Spencer Chow, Monday, 22 April 2013 06:45 (thirteen years ago)
I was just advocating for evenhandedness/honesty about the fact that a lot of what is doing the heavy lifting w/r/t all the attention its getting is that daft punk have kinda become pop stars since their last album.
How have Daft Punk become pop stars since HAF? Might be different in America but surely Discovery era was their pop star peak?
― sonderborg, Monday, 22 April 2013 07:04 (thirteen years ago)
I dunno if even now I'd call DP pop stars in America, but their profile was considerably increased with the 2007 tour and Kanye West's "Stronger".
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 22 April 2013 07:07 (thirteen years ago)
how many times has this thread been over the fact that their profile has soared in the U.S. in recent years? Discovery's Billboard album chart peak: #44. Human After All: #98. Tron Soundtrack: #4. this new one is a lock for #1. xp
― some dude, Monday, 22 April 2013 07:12 (thirteen years ago)
in my (american) experience their fame is also greatest among people who were about 16 when discovery was released.
i love this song!
― discreet, Monday, 22 April 2013 07:16 (thirteen years ago)
i think my favourite pharrell line is 'luh'
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 07:24 (thirteen years ago)
If MJ wasn't dead, and he wasn't a peado do you think it would have been a Niles Rodgers/MJ cross over? That could have been awesome. Right?
― staying up all night to get lucky (captain rosie), Monday, 22 April 2013 08:03 (thirteen years ago)
#3 in UK Singles chart after just 48 hours on sale
― groovypanda, Monday, 22 April 2013 10:48 (thirteen years ago)
Anyone who thinks Pharrell is ridiculous/a gratuitous MJ knock off today needs to flash back to this NOW:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=mCAYStI0_EY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DmCAYStI0_EY
(Yachts! Models! Kanye! Abject insincerity! I actually like the song but the video is so dumb.)
― Raymond Cummings, Monday, 22 April 2013 10:54 (thirteen years ago)
moreso than xeroxing mj pharrell is just as much a random access memory in himself; he doesnt have to be on top form because at this point he's not agent like that
― r|t|c, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:26 (thirteen years ago)
the commingled artist/audience symbiosis of this whole dp event bears greater examination imo - the "mass psychosis" i was referring to rather than just putting it all at the feet of the marketing campaign
basically when i was talking about something rotten at the heart of this it was more about its unsettlingly rapturous reception, for what it is - to not be able to find elsewhere and all around in the world what this song offers seems like a fundamental act of rejection, a fear & loathing of the here & now
it's a fun tune though, don't get me wrong
― r|t|c, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:31 (thirteen years ago)
SMH at anyone seriously repping for those Skream disco mixes over this though.
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:33 (thirteen years ago)
or kathy diamond:
Last year's KDMS album had a handful of Chic tributes that walk all over the rest of "Get Lucky".
i assume you're talking about kinky dramas and magic stories, which handful of tracks are you talking about? i love kathy diamond but this album kinda sucked, they get about as close to chic as jamiriquai
― Crackle Box, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:43 (thirteen years ago)
did someone already post the pitch-shifted pharrell version
― max, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:49 (thirteen years ago)
ja
― caek, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:49 (thirteen years ago)
xxxp fair point perhaps in terms of quality but i'd still argue those skream mixes etc are more stimulating as art just cos like, why did these uk types inexplicably suddenly veer in that direction? and astutely so as it turns out? it all has a sense of life to it whereas with dp it's just hey remember this... remember us... again...
― r|t|c, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:53 (thirteen years ago)
those terms feel excessive but i get what you're saying here. i suppose there's a good bit of disconnect tho between DP's audience and the audience for dance music as genre. and the conversation pointlessly circles between DP fans going "but this is great!" and dance fans going "but there's other stuff like this that's better!" where both sets are really approaching this song from different perspectives
― Sarushima baby jive (Noodle Vague), Monday, 22 April 2013 11:56 (thirteen years ago)
DP are popularizers with good ears and good presence, in short
― Sarushima baby jive (Noodle Vague), Monday, 22 April 2013 11:57 (thirteen years ago)
god bloss em
― 乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 11:58 (thirteen years ago)
or kathy diamond:/Last year's KDMS album had a handful of Chic tributes that walk all over the rest of "Get Lucky"./i assume you're talking about kinky dramas and magic stories, which handful of tracks are you talking about? i love kathy diamond but this album kinda sucked, they get about as close to chic as jamiriquai
/Last year's KDMS album had a handful of Chic tributes that walk all over the rest of "Get Lucky"./
Good keyboard textures, nice vocals and pretty much no tunes < Chic.
Maybe true of "Face to Face" -- but how is that true of "Get Lucky"?
― Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:02 (thirteen years ago)
Agree the KDMS album wasn't all that, but "High Wire" was one track I kept coming back to.
― supermassive pot hole (seandalai), Monday, 22 April 2013 12:15 (thirteen years ago)
went to a disco put on by 'deep disco heads' this weekend and had a few drunken conversations with random people about this song, and this is typical of what these people had to say (nicked from a facebook post):
"Loving how Daft Punk have captured the spirit of 70s disco with their lyric "we're up all night to get lucky". Clearly they've "come to far to give up" who they've become - disposable sold out pop stars. Rant over, now lets get on with playing some proper music :-)
still love you nile"
people all like oh no my sacred disco music is getting popular with the kids
hearing way more stevie wonder than MJ in the vocal on this especially the way he wrestles with the low notes
― Crackle Box, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:26 (thirteen years ago)
fair point perhaps in terms of quality but i'd still argue those skream mixes etc are more stimulating as art just cos like, why did these uk types inexplicably suddenly veer in that direction? and astutely so as it turns out? it all has a sense of life to it whereas with dp it's just hey remember this... remember us... again...
Skream's spent more than enough time on the international circuit to know which way the wind is blowing (ie away from dubstep) and there's a pretty strong element of any port in a storm going on here.
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:30 (thirteen years ago)
nah, it's alright not to really care either way but you're handwaving it away there. international/not-dubstep/any port leads you to a hundred other possibilities before you end up at ersatz 80s disco boogie
― r|t|c, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:36 (thirteen years ago)
But that sound that Skream's now adopting has been all over Europe for years, especially in the sunnier climbs that make up a lot of his touring schedule now - he's probably been immersed in it. Making the straight jump to jacking Hot Creations is probably the only thing that would have been more obvious.
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:40 (thirteen years ago)
not really 'ersatz 80s disco boogie' has been typical of what you'll hear if you go out in east london for a good 5-6 years now
xpost
― Crackle Box, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:42 (thirteen years ago)
It's not even that different from DP, it's all part of the same embarrassed sidling away from the American scene they helped to spawn.
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:42 (thirteen years ago)
Yo Amanda Palmer, I heard you like fans, so I gave fans to your fans so you can brag while you blog.
― how's life, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:46 (thirteen years ago)
afaik he has played old disco sets a few times in the mid/late 2000s, could be just a thing that he was always into.
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Monday, 22 April 2013 12:47 (thirteen years ago)
he = Skream
wait, list me up a couple of specific euroshoreditch jams you two think corroborate this skream super obviousness
― r|t|c, Monday, 22 April 2013 12:51 (thirteen years ago)
rtc, how is your point different from the standard genre fan beef with popular artists? ie "People think x represents dance/R&B/hip hop at its best but they haven't heard all this much better, less well-known stuff in that genre". I've heard that countless times (mostly from Lex tbh). And this is the most breezy, straightforward track on a varied, ambitious record so discussing the innovation/relevance of Daft Punk 2013 in the light of Get Lucky alone is pointless. To make this record work they need a hit straight off the bat so they've chosen the song that sounds most like a hit. It's not all like this.
― Deafening silence (DL), Monday, 22 April 2013 13:03 (thirteen years ago)
I'll happily do so this evening. It's a sound I have a lot of time for and the Skream disco remixes I've heard are corrections of fairly well worn tropes. They're not bad, but the idea there's any inherent artistic worthiness above and beyond the Daft Punk single is kinda nonsense given they're all part of the same drift.
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 13:04 (thirteen years ago)
rtc, how is your point different from the standard genre fan beef with popular artists? ie "People think x represents dance/R&B/hip hop at its best but they haven't heard all this much better, less well-known stuff in that genre".
I don't think that's really the point he's making? The line of attack is more "this represents flight from modernity" rather than yr standard Lexian "why is no one listening to all the better stuff in this genre?"
― Matt DC, Monday, 22 April 2013 13:09 (thirteen years ago)
Ah, OK, that's not how I read it but I don't buy the "flight from modernity" line either.
― Deafening silence (DL), Monday, 22 April 2013 13:12 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think it's even "flight from modernity"? More like "flight from presentism".
― Tim F, Monday, 22 April 2013 13:15 (thirteen years ago)