http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x18/gr8080/image001.gifhttp://i.imgflip.com/13lz5.gif
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 23:15 (thirteen years ago)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/f.cl.ly/items/2R0D0m2d092t2s0K1i2q/THISPHARRELL.gif
― max, Tuesday, 16 April 2013 23:26 (thirteen years ago)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/6237a862ddadd3863a51f61959f9e60b/tumblr_mldl6rvLWU1qdmmiqo1_500.gif
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
of course the problem with this one is that it's impossible to improve on the original
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 01:24 (thirteen years ago)
ZS can you combine my two gifs in to one
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 01:25 (thirteen years ago)
i would, but every online tool i use to split the top part out into separate frames can't do the job.
http://gifninja.com/split-animated-gif/http://gif-explode.com/
i've noticed that sometimes gifs that are transparent, like the little cartoon guy, create problems when you try to isolate the frames.
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 01:32 (thirteen years ago)
my genius will remain isolated on this thread.
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 01:33 (thirteen years ago)
it certainly hasnt spread to any others
― 1 P.3. Eternal (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:18 (thirteen years ago)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9627011/photos/damn.gif
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:19 (thirteen years ago)
fuck fuck fuck
― ice cr?mated (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 02:33 (thirteen years ago)
sorry
up all night to fuck and get sorry
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 04:26 (thirteen years ago)
Z S, if you have imagemagick you can just run the command:
convert image001.gif -coalesce out.png
and it will create out-0.png through out-31.png with the frames
here's a zip with the frames of that little pointing dude
― diamonddave85, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 04:45 (thirteen years ago)
imagemagick rulez http://i.imgur.com/o1DJior.gif
― diamonddave85, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 04:55 (thirteen years ago)
http://oi46.tinypic.com/110apfc.jpg
― LADIES ONLY PHYCHIC NIGHT (crüt), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 04:56 (thirteen years ago)
curious where this info regarding the single's release is coming from. someone was saying earlier itt that it would drop monday.
― marc iv, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 05:45 (thirteen years ago)
the Prince thread made me think that he could have been a good "collaborator" on this (since MJ's not available atm) !
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 05:47 (thirteen years ago)
btw, now that we have the tracklist and a month to kill : ILX pre-cover ?
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:47 (thirteen years ago)
No Prince on this...this sounds like prime 'Off The Wall' period MJ...but the next Daft Punk album...the Minneapolis tribute??...
― The Pastiche Liberation Front (sonnyboy), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:54 (thirteen years ago)
yeah if there's one pre-cover project that is needed, it's this one
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:59 (thirteen years ago)
actually, "discovery" was kind of a Prince tribute already (damn) !
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 09:11 (thirteen years ago)
re ILX pre-cover, I guess "get lucky" should be excluded... unless someone feels like confronting this monster !
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 09:20 (thirteen years ago)
not really hearing any Prince in Discovery
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 10:08 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoxgPWcEArc
From 2:06. They're fans, of course but that's about it.
― Popture, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 10:16 (thirteen years ago)
well, I was exaggerating a bit... but there's a lot on Discovery that sounds like Prince (especially "Prince", the album).Digital love, for instance.
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 10:42 (thirteen years ago)
and there's a sample of "The Ballad of Dorothy Parker" on short circuit !
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 10:45 (thirteen years ago)
― Naive Teen Idol, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 12:08 (thirteen years ago)
"the next Daft Punk album"
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 17 April 2013 12:12 (thirteen years ago)
i still won't believe this one is real until it's in my hands
― bish (bosch), don't kill my vibe (rennavate), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:03 (thirteen years ago)
then you don't get it.
― zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
i get
― bish (bosch), don't kill my vibe (rennavate), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:12 (thirteen years ago)
A friend who is in a position to know has heard it and says it's really great, so my general optimism about this has ratcheted up bigtime.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:12 (thirteen years ago)
apropos of nothing, i'm really impressed with how good labels are at preventing leaks now, good job labels
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:14 (thirteen years ago)
I saw the commercial for this on saturday nite live
Why did pharrell have to be involved with this??Groove sounded goodI forgot that Nile Rogers wears that weird dread wig
― ums (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:33 (thirteen years ago)
Why did pharrell have to be involved with this??
Why not.
Groove sounded good
It's Daft Punk with Nile Rodgers. Duh.
I forgot that Nile Rogers wears that weird dread wig
Cut him a break. Dude's a cancer survivor.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:36 (thirteen years ago)
good answers.
― zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:40 (thirteen years ago)
I've never had a problem with Skateboard P.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:43 (thirteen years ago)
Pharrell is good in this. I don't see who could have been better at his place (especially since I think he wrote part/or all the vocal melody/harmonies).
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:44 (thirteen years ago)
i think the argument is that they never needed a famous guest vocalist before, nobody needs to be in "his place"
― some dude, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:52 (thirteen years ago)
idk i think it's cool that they're using well known vocalists... i don't think we need another album that sounds like discovery
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
i don't think they "needed" pharrell but simply wanted him
― bish (bosch), don't kill my vibe (rennavate), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:56 (thirteen years ago)
i think they "worked" with him
― zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
*at home with Daft Punk*
"Who's that one guy, that sings?""Accessing."
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
well, even if we admit DP would have wrote the same melody/harmonies by themselves, I don't think the song would have been better if they had sung in themselves. it would have lacked the smooth/rnb/MJ thing.
― AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:05 (thirteen years ago)
Just be glad it's not Chris Brown.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:06 (thirteen years ago)
I think a robot would have been fine for the Lucky lead. I like the falsetto he's going for but find Pharell quite weak vocally.
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:06 (thirteen years ago)
should be taylor swift
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:06 (thirteen years ago)
Pretty stoked they didn't collab with Maroon 5.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:12 (thirteen years ago)
Daft Punk feat. Train
― Call me at **BITCOIN (DJP), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:12 (thirteen years ago)