But good point about "who's the author?"
― I'm a lover, not a partner (flamboyant goon tie included), Thursday, 11 April 2013 19:43 (thirteen years ago)
arcade fire/pf feels very 'print the legend' at this point
― some dude, Thursday, 11 April 2013 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
But Maura they went from Bowery pre pitchfork to Irving post pitchfork, it wasn't a big move. It seems ridiculous to consider this stuff ~now~ but they weren't a huge band in 2005 by any means
― I'm a lover, not a partner (flamboyant goon tie included), Thursday, 11 April 2013 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
If anything Wilderness is the purest counterexample I can think of that a big pfork push on its own doesn't bestow success in the absence of other support (did Wilderness get pushed by anyone else?)
― anonanon, Thursday, 11 April 2013 19:50 (thirteen years ago)
I love Wilderness so much. Fav of 2005 for me, and honestly I may have missed them if not for that review.
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:19 (thirteen years ago)
Sometimes the taste-making that happens comes from a collection of BNM selections when the albums aren't as accessible and strong as an Arcade Fire all by themselves.
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:22 (thirteen years ago)
strawman: is metacritic arguably as/more important as a tastemaker than pitchfork?
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:28 (thirteen years ago)
no
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:31 (thirteen years ago)
do people even read metacritic
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:32 (thirteen years ago)
Hard to say:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/metacritic.com#
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/pitchfork.com#
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:33 (thirteen years ago)
I use Metacritic for movies; that's about it.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:34 (thirteen years ago)
so basically people go to metacritic to read about video games
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:36 (thirteen years ago)
What's funny to me is I often see the average score on metacritic practically match pitchfork's exact score.
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:42 (thirteen years ago)
I look at Metacritic's music section regularly but mostly as a handy list of recent/upcoming releases.
― jaymc, Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:48 (thirteen years ago)
heaven is a place on earth with you
― http://bit.ly/oIujXP (markers), Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:49 (thirteen years ago)
Wilderness were the shit, I keep checking their Wiki to see of they have new stuff coming
Derivative? Oh yeah they were but SFW
― Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 11 April 2013 21:59 (thirteen years ago)
I've purged my physical music collection tons of times but just don't have the heart to rip/sell the Wilderness CDS
― Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 11 April 2013 22:02 (thirteen years ago)
Though even if you did you could buy them all back second hand for maybe $7.
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 22:07 (thirteen years ago)
All together.
― Evan, Thursday, 11 April 2013 22:08 (thirteen years ago)
derivative AND safe for work!
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Thursday, 11 April 2013 22:42 (thirteen years ago)
AND pitchfork approved! this is like the holy triumvirate
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Thursday, 11 April 2013 22:44 (thirteen years ago)
http://web.archive.org/web/20011121175939/pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/h/handsome-boy-modeling-school/so-hows-your-girl.shtml
Old review of the first Handsome Boy Modelling School album. Do you even underground, bro?
― Popture, Friday, 12 April 2013 01:43 (thirteen years ago)
haha that was one of the first pf reviews i ever read
― some dude, Friday, 12 April 2013 01:50 (thirteen years ago)
In the wake of the fatal car crash that claimed the former Princess of Wales, concerts across a grieving U.K. were cancelled en masse-- including a handful of Primal Scream dates in London, the promoter of which claimed the band were kiboshing “out of a mark of respect for Diana.” This came as news to the band, who issued a reactionary retort claiming, “We wanted to play... We have no respect whatsoever for Diana Spencer or any member of the English Royal Family. We are totally opposed to the monarchy.”
i am being a pedant but just in so many ways this is not a "reactionary retort"
― daft on the causes of punk (schlump), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 17:20 (thirteen years ago)
it's a retortive reaction
― Eyeball Kicks, Wednesday, 8 May 2013 17:31 (thirteen years ago)
that timeline about their political "awakening" seemed a little screwy to me, it glosses over Vanishing Point ("Star", the title track) which foreshadowed XTRMNTR pretty clearly
― four Marxes plus four Obamas plus four Bin Ladens (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 17:40 (thirteen years ago)
the review did make me a lot more interested in this album than that first video did, I'll give it that
lol you dorks still read pitchfork ??
― H3LP, Wednesday, 8 May 2013 17:47 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.threedonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/070201_joebiden_vlwidec-249x300.jpg
― Evan, Wednesday, 8 May 2013 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
give 'em H3LL
― congo nattefrost (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 18:10 (thirteen years ago)
can someone explain to this print dinosaur if there is some internet economy / click-based / revenue-driven reason for Advance to NOT have a pause button? it's maddening. ok that might be overstating it a bit.
― alpine static, Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:24 (thirteen years ago)
I wonder if labels insist?
― jay-z's ansari (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 10 May 2013 19:09 (thirteen years ago)
this interview with dude from surfer blood about his domestic battery arrest is not very good
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 10 May 2013 19:18 (thirteen years ago)
oh you didn't hit her? oh ok. you want to talk more about what did happen? no? oh ok. so maybe we should talk to the other person involved instead of just relying on your perspective? no? ok.
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 10 May 2013 19:19 (thirteen years ago)
like maybe they just couldn't get the full story, which is fine, but then you don't have to run the story instead of just publishing this mild, vague, spineless thing
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 10 May 2013 19:24 (thirteen years ago)
I kinda feel like the interview gives the guy enough rope (although it could stand to link back to the previous PF news item with the police report that disturbingly details what he did that was not 'hitting'). A q&a with an individual, even a controversial one, need not be held to the standards of a reported piece with multiple sources.
― seanpennderizer (some dude), Friday, 10 May 2013 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
wow yeah, I just read that. I was wondering why he was being so precise about saying "I never hit anybody" multiple times.
― wk, Friday, 10 May 2013 19:54 (thirteen years ago)
i don't really see what was wrong with it? except surfer blood is a horrible band regardless of the singer's record.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 10 May 2013 20:04 (thirteen years ago)
ha otm
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 10 May 2013 20:11 (thirteen years ago)
i guess some dude is right but the thing just felt pointless and perspectiveless and like there was a big hole in the middle with missing questions and answers
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 10 May 2013 20:12 (thirteen years ago)
Surfer Blood getting desperate for "hits"
― Evan, Friday, 10 May 2013 20:16 (thirteen years ago)
either that or it's something to do with streaming royalty rates. it's more expensive to have a completely on-demand service and less expensive to have "Internet radio" where the listener has more limited control over what's playing.
although since it's obviously set up in collaboration with the record companies I don't know if they pay royalties on that or what.
― dmr, Friday, 10 May 2013 20:17 (thirteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Friday, May 10, 2013 4:04 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark
i think the problem with that piece is that even though it tries to stay neutral, by design it works really hard only to engender sympathy for someone who doesn't really need or deserve it (i.e. "did this case make it harder to concentrate on your music?")
― J0rdan S., Friday, 10 May 2013 20:43 (thirteen years ago)
i doubt his victim would want to talk about this so that seems like a pipe dream to me and i admire PF's willingness to wade into the fire here because surfer blood is a band everyone could ignore with no consequences but i think it wasn't pushy enough in places and just... sort of a lose-lose proposition
― J0rdan S., Friday, 10 May 2013 20:47 (thirteen years ago)
Holy shit, I forgot that Surfer Blood was even a band, let alone this happened. I assumed they were touring in bizarro world with Tapes n Tapes and Clap Your Hands and some other oh-yeah bands.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 May 2013 20:55 (thirteen years ago)
Surfer Blood recently played a cafe here, so I don't know that you're far off
― P is for Poo Poo Doo Doo (Sufjan Grafton), Saturday, 11 May 2013 04:26 (thirteen years ago)
Blood Surfer would have been a much better name
― Treeship, Saturday, 11 May 2013 04:27 (thirteen years ago)
yet another mistake for surfer blood
― your holiness, we have an official energy drink (Z S), Saturday, 11 May 2013 04:27 (thirteen years ago)
I never thought I'd see a Remy Shand song show up in the Tracks section on Pitchfork, and yet here we are.http://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/15535-where-are-we-going/
Not that there's anything wrong with it, it's just weird.
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 28 May 2013 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
nice "angle" you dicks (band and p4k) http://pitchfork.com/features/update/9129-surfer-blood/
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Thursday, 13 June 2013 10:38 (twelve years ago)