pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

Cool response, Whiney, thanks.

I'm not denying that this connection hasn't been reported, and repeated, by many sources. Nor am I denying that a positive review from Pitchfork affected that band's trajectory, or at least, gilded it. But this thesis relies on the notion that AF hadn't had any major success until then, when they'd had loads. Massive amounts. Canada and otherwise. They'd already been subject to an (indie) bidding war, sold out Bowery (with huge excess demand), even featured on there non-CAN magazine covers before the pitchfork review-- you could easily argue that Plan B, feature for feature, was the more prescient publication for indie music. As for the crowds and the guarantees, they went up a bit, but not nearly as much as they did, say, as they did when management was hired in 2005, or the Spike trailer, or any number of other events that made them The Thing They Are Today

selling out smallish venues in nyc is not as tough a prospect as it seems given the MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF INDUSTRY here. i am v rarely impressed by nyc sellouts as a barometer of anything save self-sustaining buzz cycles

Wilderness were kind of a weird non-entity even in Baltimore, although i only heard one of the later albums so maybe i just missed what the excitement was actually about

but yeah maura otm, i'm much more impressed when a band can sell out in a smaller market than in nyc

But good point about "who's the author?"

arcade fire/pf feels very 'print the legend' at this point

But Maura they went from Bowery pre pitchfork to Irving post pitchfork, it wasn't a big move. It seems ridiculous to consider this stuff ~now~ but they weren't a huge band in 2005 by any means

If anything Wilderness is the purest counterexample I can think of that a big pfork push on its own doesn't bestow success in the absence of other support (did Wilderness get pushed by anyone else?)

I love Wilderness so much. Fav of 2005 for me, and honestly I may have missed them if not for that review.

Sometimes the taste-making that happens comes from a collection of BNM selections when the albums aren't as accessible and strong as an Arcade Fire all by themselves.

strawman: is metacritic arguably as/more important as a tastemaker than pitchfork?

no

do people even read metacritic

Hard to say:

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/metacritic.com#

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/pitchfork.com#

I use Metacritic for movies; that's about it.

so basically people go to metacritic to read about video games

What's funny to me is I often see the average score on metacritic practically match pitchfork's exact score.

I look at Metacritic's music section regularly but mostly as a handy list of recent/upcoming releases.

heaven is a place on earth with you

Wilderness were the shit, I keep checking their Wiki to see of they have new stuff coming

Derivative? Oh yeah they were but SFW

I've purged my physical music collection tons of times but just don't have the heart to rip/sell the Wilderness CDS

Though even if you did you could buy them all back second hand for maybe $7.

All together.

derivative AND safe for work!

AND pitchfork approved! this is like the holy triumvirate

http://web.archive.org/web/20011121175939/pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/h/handsome-boy-modeling-school/so-hows-your-girl.shtml

Old review of the first Handsome Boy Modelling School album. Do you even underground, bro?

haha that was one of the first pf reviews i ever read

In the wake of the fatal car crash that claimed the former Princess of Wales, concerts across a grieving U.K. were cancelled en masse-- including a handful of Primal Scream dates in London, the promoter of which claimed the band were kiboshing “out of a mark of respect for Diana.” This came as news to the band, who issued a reactionary retort claiming, “We wanted to play... We have no respect whatsoever for Diana Spencer or any member of the English Royal Family. We are totally opposed to the monarchy.”

i am being a pedant but just in so many ways this is not a "reactionary retort"

it's a retortive reaction

that timeline about their political "awakening" seemed a little screwy to me, it glosses over Vanishing Point ("Star", the title track) which foreshadowed XTRMNTR pretty clearly

the review did make me a lot more interested in this album than that first video did, I'll give it that

lol you dorks still read pitchfork ??

http://www.threedonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/070201_joebiden_vlwidec-249x300.jpg

give 'em H3LL

can someone explain to this print dinosaur if there is some internet economy / click-based / revenue-driven reason for Advance to NOT have a pause button? it's maddening. ok that might be overstating it a bit.

I wonder if labels insist?

this interview with dude from surfer blood about his domestic battery arrest is not very good

oh you didn't hit her? oh ok. you want to talk more about what did happen? no? oh ok. so maybe we should talk to the other person involved instead of just relying on your perspective? no? ok.

like maybe they just couldn't get the full story, which is fine, but then you don't have to run the story instead of just publishing this mild, vague, spineless thing

I kinda feel like the interview gives the guy enough rope (although it could stand to link back to the previous PF news item with the police report that disturbingly details what he did that was not 'hitting'). A q&a with an individual, even a controversial one, need not be held to the standards of a reported piece with multiple sources.

wow yeah, I just read that. I was wondering why he was being so precise about saying "I never hit anybody" multiple times.

i don't really see what was wrong with it? except surfer blood is a horrible band regardless of the singer's record.

ha otm

i guess some dude is right but the thing just felt pointless and perspectiveless and like there was a big hole in the middle with missing questions and answers

Surfer Blood getting desperate for "hits"

can someone explain to this print dinosaur if there is some internet economy / click-based / revenue-driven reason for Advance to NOT have a pause button? it's maddening. ok that might be overstating it a bit.

I wonder if labels insist?

either that or it's something to do with streaming royalty rates. it's more expensive to have a completely on-demand service and less expensive to have "Internet radio" where the listener has more limited control over what's playing.

although since it's obviously set up in collaboration with the record companies I don't know if they pay royalties on that or what.

i don't really see what was wrong with it? except surfer blood is a horrible band regardless of the singer's record.

― call all destroyer, Friday, May 10, 2013 4:04 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think the problem with that piece is that even though it tries to stay neutral, by design it works really hard only to engender sympathy for someone who doesn't really need or deserve it (i.e. "did this case make it harder to concentrate on your music?")

i doubt his victim would want to talk about this so that seems like a pipe dream to me and i admire PF's willingness to wade into the fire here because surfer blood is a band everyone could ignore with no consequences but i think it wasn't pushy enough in places and just... sort of a lose-lose proposition

Holy shit, I forgot that Surfer Blood was even a band, let alone this happened. I assumed they were touring in bizarro world with Tapes n Tapes and Clap Your Hands and some other oh-yeah bands.

Surfer Blood recently played a cafe here, so I don't know that you're far off