"Who' Next" - Classic or Dud?

When I do pull them out I have a bit of a preference for parts of It's Hard. "I've Never Known War" kills me every time. Best anti-war song ever, I think. As for Who's Next, it's hard to imagine listening to it from beginning to end. "Going Mobile" is my favourite, though.

I think this sums up why they have had such a brutal critical reappraisal over the last ten or so years.

I, also, never need to hear this record EVER AGAIN.

I listen to the radio when not driving my own car. Mostly oldies radio but classic rock is on the presets usually.

"Don't let Colin M see this."

Saw it, wasn't offended, Douglas was absolutely right anyway (Heaven and Hell).

It did indeed 'born' the whole Classic Rock idiom.

That's how good it was.

I missed out on the whole "Who" love at the time, and got the 2CD version in a competition. And it's a big marvellous thing. Sure, I love "Who Sellout" more, but that is only to be expected, it's more human and has fragile moments and out and out comedy.

I admire it without necessarily loving it. (I certainly like it well enough)

-- Ned Raggett

but is a classic album just wish they hadn't sold out to everyone possible...

On a side note is Mark, Ryan?

My Wife is funny, but not poignant. Heaven and Hell is funny and poignant. Postcard is funny but not that poignant.

I don't consider "Getting In Tune" bad at all, at the least for the part where Roger sings the "right in on you..." part, and Entwhistle and Moon kick things up a few notches, turning what was a ballad into a heavy rocker.

since classic rock radio has no analogue in the U.K. (or does it? not sure), did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

i ask cuz i know lots of english ex-pats who never heard LZ—or at least were disinclined to check 'em out— until they moved to the US, since punk and new wave was opposed to dinoaur-ism.

since classic rock radio has no analogue in the U.K. (or does it? not sure), did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

i ask cuz i know lots of english ex-pats who never heard LZ—or at least were disinclined to check 'em out— until they moved to the US, since punk and new wave was opposed to dinoaur-ism.

and Entwistle wrote a song for the 'Oo called "When I was a boy" that was "serious."

It doesn't

did '70s-era "rock and roll is IMPORTANT" 'Oo get shoved down yr throats?

No reason for it, after punk

-- BeeOK

Not sure if this was addressed to me, but if so, Mark is Mark, not Ryan.

Back to Who's Next, It's patchy and I think it's status as the first classic rock album puts it in a bad light but a lot of it isn't worth recommending. I'd say the essential Who is Live At Leeds, The Who Sell Out and that compliation from 2002. After that the orginal My Generation. I think you had to be there for Tommy and Quadrophenia, they are even more patchy than Who's Next

As for Who's Next it's both classic and dud. Past 1967, Townshend's failures are generally pretty interesting and the sinking of Lifehouse results in a pretty outstanding rock album without all the conceptual blubber of hippie mysticism weighing it down. I'd dump some of the tracks with a couple of the Odds And Sods leftovers (really just "Pure And Easy" and "Naked Eye") though.

Who's Next also marks the point where the studio version of The Who completely separates from the live version of The Who. It's not surprising, Townshend has everything he needs to feed his maniac pursuit to whatever/wherever, but the one thing he can't do is get the live sound down of the 70s-era Who. Too bad, the live versions of "Won't Get...," "Baba...," and "My Wife" on The Kids Are Alright are still U & K and there's a live take of "Bargain" out there that's just amazing.

I think the biggest reason the Who haven't aged well is because of all the falsetto. It's terrible, and sucks all the masculine power out of every song. A shame, because they're pretty good otherwise.

Where does he sing in falsetto?

i've always called this album a shit sandwich on golden bread.
"baba o'rielly" and "won't get fooled" again are amazing. the rest... shit.

This album really isn't very good, is it? Case in point: The Song Is Over is like Yes if Yes were shit

the song is over is nothing like yes

Even Baba O'Reilly commits the sin of ending just as it's getting interesting again

ok if you think the intro and the outro are the best parts of baba o'riley then this album is just not for you

The last minute of BOR heads in a cool new direction and you're like woo prog o'clock and then it just ENDS

'Won't Get Fooled Again' conveniently describes my feelings every time I deign give this album another chance.

"it's like they realized they wrote a perfect song, panicked, then added a violin solo."

Won't Get Fooled Again still has 3 minutes left, but I can't imagine what it has left to give

Turned out to be 'aimless noodling', as expected. Oh wait what's this? Do I smell false ending? No, I smell 'we've heard of Terry Riley* and all our best stuff is basically him'

*John Cage? Whatever

Oh hey, it was a false ending! Way to goooo

all our best stuff

it's ok to admit that a band is just not for you, then move on. like idk what you're going for here, but the best thing about a band that has Keith Moon in it isn't their brief detours into minimalism.

Rong.

Yeah the other great thing is the playing I guess, but the songwriting is just not for me, sure. I'm sure they ripped it up live

"it's like they realized they wrote a perfect song, panicked, then added a violin solo."

― jakey mo collier (voodoo chili), Friday, August 9, 2019 10:45 AM (thirty-two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

joe otm

townshend needed the courage of his convictions: sack daltrey and replace all his singing with violin solos and minimalist sequencer patterns

imago has successfully identified the fact that The Who, the band that would routinely blow up their enormous amps with bombs and fireworks, were not as committed to minimalism as Terry Riley and John Cage

nor as committed to prog as Yes

in other news, despite using electronic amplification to reproduce & distort sound and creating pieces founded on mantra-like repetition, when all is said and done The Ramones simply do a sorry job of engaging with the works of Alvin Lucier.

Quadrophenia opened up for me in hearing the most recent mixes, fwiw. I don't care for the original mix.

I don't know if that would work for me because I hate the muddy overstuffed sound of "Quadrophenia". I tried listening to "Lamb Lies Down on Broadway" once (God help me) and got the same feeling. Love the 70s but sometimes it sucked.

the classicest

getting in tune to the straight and narrow

just banging on my old piano

and nothing in the street

seems so different to me

and if i smile

tell me some bad news

Is that Unterberger book good?

Too late.

The Unterberger book is well-written, and unties the knots of this period of The Who's history about as well as you could hope, but the basic problem is that Townshend never really decided what Lifehouse was. So if you're looking to have that explained lucidly, you may be let down. The making of Quadrophenia is very detailed, and less confused, as well.

Unterberger says that three songs were newly recorded in ‘78/‘79 with Kenney Jones for the Quadrophenia soundtrack album: “Joker James,” “Get Out And Stay Out,” and “Four Faces.” That last one, though, was recorded (for the most part) in 1973 and has Keith on drums. I emailed Unterberger about this, and he said that documentation (wasn’t more specific than that) says it’s Jones on “Four Faces.” But it’s pretty obvious just by listening that it’s Moon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGF2N00K-Ws

https://images2.imgbox.com/10/cb/Axn9cRNZ_o.jpg

gives a new meaning to the album title tbh

or it's almost like the name of the album is asking "who (of the members of the band that recorded me)'s next (to die? after all, two of the original four have already passed away)" - and then roger daltrey (the singer) says "it's probably me, I'm probably next." ba dum tish!