― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Right. And obviously New York punks were significant in the development of punk in the '70s.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
that hatSomehow it reminds of the one John Osbourne had when he was a nipper.
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
duh, they were punx!
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
1966 and 1967 and 1969 were the same year?
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
The Doors and their bloated ilk started the need for fucking punk rawk
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
if you actually remember that they were different years, then you obviously weren't there, as they say!
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)
they didn't start out bloated!!!! they had to sit in the tub for a while. doors were hawwwwwwt!!
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)
Dead cats, dead rats, did you see what they were at, alrightDead cat in a tophat
Sucking on a young man's bloodWishing he would come, yeahSucking on a soldier's brainWishing it would be the same
Dead cat, dead rat, did you see what they were atFat cat in a tophatThinks he's an aristocratThinks he can kill and slaughterThinks he can shoot my daughter
Yeah, right...oh yeah...alright...yeahDead cats, dead rats, think you're an aristocratCrap...ah, that's crap
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)
All I know is, I've had discussions with drunk people about where punk came from and as hard as I try to be reasonable and light-hearted about the whole damned thing, it always ends up with my girlfriend having to tell the other guy's girlfriend that I'm really a nice guy, so I tend to avoid such conversations. I do know that I don't think Lou Reed is the godfather of punk, and that I never listen to Lou Reed these days, never. I haven't listened to any of those VU albums in years, in fact I do not own any of them at this point. I've heard the Ramones plenty but have never owned a Ramones album I can remember. I probably like the Vibrators better. I'm just as comfortable saying that "Wooly Bully" or "Diddy Wa Diddy" (however one spells that) by Capt. Beefheart is the origin of punk. I like the Adverts quite a lot, Liliput ever better, "I'm Stranded" a lot. This has been a long post to say that I try not to think about it, but of course I end up doing it just the same.
Really dig this statement Ken L., you made my day:
The Age when the Doors Were "Hawwwt" recedes further and further back into the mists of time, and is now almost lost, like the Age When Buddy Bolden Charmed All of Storyville With His Horn.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Snappy (sexyDancer), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Snappy (sexyDancer), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:08 (twenty-one years ago)
And really, I admit I don't exactly have affinities with anything like "punk" too much, you know, I'm obviously just another vicarious liver who'd much rather groove to the Dramatics or the Detroit Emeralds than listen to most of it.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)
As for Sister Ray, I thought of whole new question worth our puzzlement -- Who insulted Ray Charles more? The VU, Elvis Costello, or Jamie Foxx?
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)
It's not that Drugs & Death are a "key part" of the definition of punk, it's that the Velvets were completely shunning convention by exploring lyrical/conceptual territory normally verboten in conventional pop/rock. That they were concentrating on more girtty topics (though not exclusively) when the rest of the world was wearing Nehru jackets and singing about flower power, THAT'S what makes them "punk".
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
And the sunglasses.
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)
xxpost:Now that I think of it, I have heard Steve Jones say several times on his radio show that he was inspired to be a musician when he saw the New York Dolls and that the way he learned to play guitar was by playing along to the first Stooges record and the two Dolls records, playing them over and over again. He has also said that his favorite guitar player is Mick Ronson, and, as everybody knows, a lot of the Pistols equipment was stuff Steve stole from the Spiders From Mars, especially after "the last show they ever did." After Johnny Ramone passed away, Jonesy's Jukebox replayed an interview with Johnny and Steve asked him if he ever went to see the Dolls and Johnny said, "Oh yeah, I went every time. I used to see Johnny and Jerry around town and they looked so cool. Then I heard they were in a band, but Tommy Ramone told me 'Yeah, but they're no good.' But I went anyway, because how could they be bad if they looked so cool."
Anyway, I don't know how this exactly answers the original question, I'm just trying to say that the canonical punk lineage isn't just an invention, although it was probably a simplification. In this version of the story Lou enters through the sidedoor of the Bowie connection and through John Cale producing the Stooges album. I'm still trying to think how the Lou/Jonathan Richman thing fits in here. Maybe Lou is actually the Godfather of New Wave, through the Modern Lovers alumni.
― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― danh (danh), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Indie Rock's roots = Punk Rock.
Why is everyone hung up on the notion that "Punk" has to be fast and stupid?
but if Television, Suicide, Patti Smith, and even the Dolls are punk you're crazy to slight him.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:02 (twenty-one years ago)
check out
― Goodbye 20th Centipede (NickB), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:00 (fourteen years ago)
Did Lou's Man take American Express, I wonder?
― tylerw, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
lou wasn't *really* punk until last year IMO
― Bandersnatch Cumberbund (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:23 (fourteen years ago)
when does Re-Lulu come out anyway?
― tylerw, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
Jack is in his corset Jane is in her vestLou is hawking scooters and American Express
― how's life, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 16:06 (fourteen years ago)
Visa Says
― tylerw, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 16:13 (fourteen years ago)
lol
― how's life, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 16:16 (fourteen years ago)
wild guess:
the WHO + 1,000 american garage bands = godfathers of punk.
― nicky lo-fi, Wednesday, 16 May 2012 17:48 (fourteen years ago)
Between thought and Express lies a lifetime...
― Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Thursday, 17 May 2012 09:51 (fourteen years ago)