Fleetwood Mac: Classic or Dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (979 of them)

mick seems like he would be the most fun

never gotten the sense that i would ever want to be in the same room as lindsay buckingham

downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 12 February 2013 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

Apparently, they're letting fans design the tour poster: http://www.facebook.com/FleetwoodMac/app_288858114510005

Competition seems weak so far. Designy type ilxors should hop on this.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 19:56 (thirteen years ago)

never gotten the sense that i would ever want to be in the same room as lindsay buckingham

yeah dude might be a total musical genius but there is no question in my mind that he is also a humourless psycho

electricsound, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 23:03 (thirteen years ago)

christine mcvie would probably be very polite

'glown' with the king (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 12 February 2013 23:06 (thirteen years ago)

Oh man the box set in INCREDIBLE! I don't know much about mastering and all that jazz, but the CD doesn't sound optimal. I got it for the rest of the stuff, and those demos don't disappoint! (Admittedly I've never explored their bootlegs so maybe they are old hat by now). I can't wait to see the DVD, hope it's more of that great behind-the-scenes stuff floating around you tube.

Iago Galdston, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 00:59 (thirteen years ago)

Christine would be polite, offer you a glass of good red wine, listen to you prattle about "Warm Ways," and say, "Alright, love, time for you to get the fuck out."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 01:02 (thirteen years ago)

stevie would offer you a glass of wine, listen to you prattle about the buckingham nicks album, then prattle back to you for two or three hours or until you said, "alright, love, time for me to get the fuck out. and you've got a show to do, don't you?"

fact checking cuz, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 01:09 (thirteen years ago)

Apparently, they're letting fans design the tour poster: Competition seems weak so far

lol go through their fb page's photos for all of the "reimaginings" or w/e of the rumors cover

fauxmarc, Thursday, 14 February 2013 20:26 (thirteen years ago)

The band went through so many incarnations they really should be evaluated as three different bands.

I do believe, however, that Peter Green was one of the most expressive blues guitarists and far more emotive than Clapton could ever hope to be.

suspecterrain, Friday, 15 February 2013 21:16 (thirteen years ago)

That's certainly true for the British blues crew. Though Clapton's pre-Cream stuff, what little there is, is worth a listen for sake of comparison.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 February 2013 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

he was aight in yardbirds, but beck really made that band great imo

'glown' with the king (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 15 February 2013 21:47 (thirteen years ago)

God bless The Onion...

Man Who Bought 34th Anniversary Reissue Of Fleetwood Mac's 'Rumours' Feeling Like Real Idiot After Passing Display For 35th Anniversary Edition

http://o.onionstatic.com/images/19/19633/original/700.jpg?2658

ENID, OK—Longtime Fleetwood Mac fan Michael Gastin reportedly felt like a complete moron this week after walking by a retail display for the 35th anniversary remastered CD box set of the band’s celebrated 1977 album Rumours, released less than a year after he purchased the Rumours 34th anniversary edition. “Goddamn it, I can’t believe I wasted my money on the 34th anniversary reissue when I could have just waited a little longer and gotten an awesome 35th anniversary re-release,” the embarrassed fan said after observing that the deluxe 35th anniversary edition of the album features an expanded booklet with photographs, essays, and interviews about the making of Rumours not included in the commemorative booklet packaged with the 34th anniversary deluxe box set. “And look at this thing—it’s huge! It’s like twice as big as the 32nd and 33rd anniversary editions combined.” At press time, Gastin had reportedly opted to purchase the album due to its inclusion of an early jam session that reportedly sheds light on the little-documented tensions between band members Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham.

Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Friday, 22 February 2013 23:14 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

Such a lost gem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yErUFrogXxE

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:10 (thirteen years ago)

i haven't heard that! think i need to.
in other news, i won tix to see fleetwood mac this summer. woo!

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:11 (thirteen years ago)

that is super nice. who is singing? is the rest of the album that good?

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:16 (thirteen years ago)

I'm seeing them tomorrow in Columbus! Rock!

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:39 (thirteen years ago)

the album is pretty much all over the place, but it definitely sounds Mac related. The singer is some guy, I think, though he sounds like Christine.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 20:13 (thirteen years ago)

cool. i just read the ken caillat making rumours book...pretty good, if not an amazing piece of writing. caillat is sort of weirdly wide-eyed. a pretty girl walks in: "Gee!" he does a line of coke: "wow!" etc. but there's tons of fun stuff about the album, lots of details w/o being too technical.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 20:21 (thirteen years ago)

^agree with this take. dude is a total nerd but appealingly so

gila free (electricsound), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:40 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, kind of refreshing, you'd think a guy like that would be some jaded record industry d-bag.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

good stories about scooter, the tusk cover dog, too.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

Aw c'mon, share. Kennel-hopping? Worming tablets blown up his ass?

Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:49 (thirteen years ago)

he's a frisky little dude, let's just say that

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:50 (thirteen years ago)

the memoir by Buck's girlfriend was an odd one.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

^^oh maaan this book was heavy (and destroyed my perspective on buck)

gila free (electricsound), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

yeah buckingham comes off the worst in caillat's book. kind of amazing they even worked together again, but i guess having a record that sells a bajillion copies makes a lot of water go under the bridge.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:58 (thirteen years ago)

never gotten the sense that i would ever want to be in the same room as lindsay buckingham

rest of Fleetwood Mac circa the making of 'Tusk' to thread

Master of Treacle, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

hope caillat does a making tusk sequel! that's when shit gets real.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

sadly it would miss out on all the stuff buckingham did at home on his own

gila free (electricsound), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:36 (thirteen years ago)

yeah i guess a tusk oral history kinda thing would make more sense.

tylerw, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:37 (thirteen years ago)

otoh Caillat and Buck Girlfriend's books makes me wish I hung out with Christine all day every day.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:42 (thirteen years ago)

Harris' memoir was unconvincing at almost every level though; even the dialogue, presumably recollected in tranquility, was stilted enough to make "90210" sound like Wilde.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 22:44 (thirteen years ago)

A lot of folks have called bullshit on her memoir, which may explain why it gained so little traction. At the least it sounds pretty par for the course for any relationship built around drugs.

Scooter the "Tusk"-dog stories pale compared to fellow Sound City vet Rick Springfield and his fellow cover star pet pit bull. The Sound City doc has Neil Giraldo claiming he did his take on "Jessie's Girl" with Springfield's iron-jawed dog poised right at his crotch.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:28 (thirteen years ago)

just watched the rumours episode of classic albums for the first time on netflix. both mcvies come across as down-to-earth normal cool people. fleetwood too. buckingham comes across, unsurprisingly, as someone who is very very fond of himself. nicks comes across as someone who is very very fond of buckingham, too, and is still a little angry at him. the studio playbacks of their and christine's isolated harmonies are beyond fantastic.

fact checking cuz, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:29 (thirteen years ago)

TS:

http://i2.listal.com/image/1896949/600full-fleetwood-mac----tusk-%5Bvinyl%5D-cover.jpg

Vs.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6dGCYO1-X8rtkxBSw1W0Z9mg7gmrk9oiT7suqb6uvdXYJSglK

Buckingham should be fond of himself, because he was the glue keeping so much of "Rumours" on up together. Worth noting that Buckingham was never the raging drug or drink fiend that Nicks, Fleetwood or John McVie were. If he's smug it's perhaps because he carried those dudes for so long. "Tango" and "Say You Will" only came about when they begged him to return, and in the case of the former he was tasked with shaping something workable out of Nicks' erratic contributions.

I think Buckingham's rock bottom came in the '80s, but he was pretty isolated from his band (and everyone) at that time. I've seen him solo a few times, and he seemed both modest and extremely grateful for the help of friends shepherding him through his dark period. (He's more or less called "Big Love" autobiographical, and while the song is pretty sketchy, you can still tell he was going through some shit).

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:35 (thirteen years ago)

(I should stress that the contributions of the other Macs are awesome, it's just that they ultimately needed Buckingham more than he needed them. I get the feeling from at least "Tusk" onward he would have been more than happy just making his own weird records, though clearly the money proved too tempting, and we all benefitted in the end.)

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:37 (thirteen years ago)

i'm of the belief that they needed each other equally. take away that ridiculously inventive rhythm section and those godlike harmonies ad he's just a quirky singer-songwriter making, yeah, his own weird records, right from the start.

fact checking cuz, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:51 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, I saw Buckingham last August and while his 65-minute performance was intense and surprising I couldn't distinguish his humility from PR. Which he's earned! As you point out, he assembled TITN. According to Harris, the group still functioned as one on Mirage.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:52 (thirteen years ago)

he probably could have (and maybe did) come up with half of tusk on his own. he couldn't have come up with a single song on rumors on his own. except maybe "never going back again."

fact checking cuz, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:55 (thirteen years ago)

(and yes I've seen him solo and loved it.)

fact checking cuz, Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:55 (thirteen years ago)

btw much of Nicks' solo work through 1985 and intermittently thereafter doesn't need Buckingham, although we can credit him for strengthening self-confidence and songwriting chops.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 April 2013 00:58 (thirteen years ago)

"Rumours" was I think the only time the band was truly operating "as one." Ironically. But "Tusk" is basically half Lindsey on his own, half Lindsey arranging, polishing, deconstructing the others. Save Christine, who pretty much sounds like herself. (Is she the only band member who ever co-wrote with Lindsey?) "Mirage" really sounds like Lindsey let loose with proto digital tools, perhaps a concession to lure him back to the band. I imagine he had even more control on "Tango," when he really didn't want to be involved at all. Then "Say You Will" is pretty much the Lindsey show again. The other guys in the band are what make the records sound so great, of course, tempering his high strung tendencies.

Btw, I agree Nicks did not need Bucky in the '80s, which is also ironic, given she was such a mess.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 01:06 (thirteen years ago)

The degree to which Buckingham deserves songwriting credit on Nicks' songs will never get resolved -- it's a tango in the night.

I can't wait for the definitive account of the Tango sessions, about which we know so little.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 April 2013 01:13 (thirteen years ago)

Well, I mean, she's only got three songs on there, and one was a co-write with Sandy Stewart, who wrote the music.

Huh, she (Sandy) recorded a duet with Nile Rodgers for the "White Nights" soundtrack! "This is Your Day."

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 01:18 (thirteen years ago)

Oh, you mean all her Mac songs? Yeah, well, talk about "he couldn't have come up with a single song on rumors on his own." Only apply it to all the Nicks Mac songs. But then, they wouldn't be what they are without her formative contributions, melodies, lyrics, etc.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 01:19 (thirteen years ago)

and co-wrote "If Anyone Falls" and "Nightbird."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 April 2013 01:19 (thirteen years ago)

A lot of folks have called bullshit on her memoir, which may explain why it gained so little traction. At the least it sounds pretty par for the course for any relationship built around drugs.

Not to interrupt your little dialogue here but exactly who has called bullshit on her memoir? Doesn't Caillat include the exact same shit in his book?

Sorry if I'm being a broken record but I feel like we've been over this a few times now. This is like the second or third time you have posted a justification for the fact that Lindsey hit women -- drugs, the women were crazy, he's an artist who was in a "dark place," it was the 70s and 80s.

I like his music too, but I honestly don't think there's any doubting that the guy has a pattern of physically abusing women that was reprehensible.

What gives?

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 4 April 2013 02:43 (thirteen years ago)

Josh can get Lindsay to change, you'll see

ums (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 4 April 2013 02:54 (thirteen years ago)

Hey, I'm trying my best!

If you read the Amazon comments, there's actually an exchange between Harris and Jeremy Spencer where he accuses her of making stuff up. So there's that. Really, though, I don't know about "a pattern of physically abusing women." Is that right? Has Anne Heche mentioned it? Has Stevie mentioned it? I don't recall seeing such an accusation anywhere but in Harris's salacious tell-all. Which doesn't make it not true! But there's are too many unfounded accusations and too much cocaine involved in this tangled tale to take anyone's sole voice as gospel.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 April 2013 03:19 (thirteen years ago)

jeremy spencer wouldn't be my first stop for reliable witnesses tbqh

kiss magritte (electricsound), Thursday, 4 April 2013 03:23 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.