The Lumineers

lol looks like denver is officially the center of the faux-lk movement.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/10/arts/music/the-lumineers-strange-road-to-the-top-10.html?pagewanted=all
"(Mr. Fraites had already begun wearing his trademark suspenders.)"

Therefore I BLAME YOU.

first the broncos now this

FUCK YOU DENVER

i have a really hard time not thinking of the lumineers as a band made up of special-needs ppl

i'm gonna ride this gravy train all the way to the moon motherfuckers. where can i get some suspenders and a mandolin.

a lotta gems in that article--
“It’s really short and catchy, and people can remember it after they’ve heard it once or twice,” said John Ivey, senior vice president for programming at the Clear Channel radio chain and program director of KIIS-FM in Los Angeles.
^^^this guy has figured it OUT.

*adds John Ivey to hitlist*

With its folksy guitar and its foot-stamping, tambourine-driven beat “Ho Hey” arrived as a startling anomaly in the pop Top 10, where it’s surrounded by Auto-Tuned voices and electronic beats...It’s one more hint of a pendulum swing back toward naturalism in pop.

when this pendulum hits 2*Pi phase, please hand me my revolver

lol "naturalism" -- surely the Lumineers are bigger fakes than any autotuned recording star

they are named after a fake tooth product!

how could they represent anything natural?!

the lumineers CD was in the box at the end of Seven. They are the embodiment of human rage

OK, so we've probably discussed this already, but all this minor-key mining, hat-wearing, suspenders-suspendin', kick-drum kickin', guitar-strummin', wordless-chorus yelping stuff - this, Mumford, Of Monsters and Men and probably a bunch of other stuff on the radio - this is all the Arcade Fire's fault, right? I love the Arcade Fire, tbh, and think they're much more than this, but man, their impact has been as destructive as U2's.

Everybody in these bands, man and woman alike, reminds me of:

http://xfinity.comcast.net/blogs/tv/files/2009/05/blossom.jpg

keep thinking thread title says lumerians, who are infinity better

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG_QFQq65t0

i am very cross at this "two dudes wearing hats" business, it's either one dude wears a hat or all three of them wear hats, no splitting the difference. i vote the suspenders guy gets to wear the hat, the other guy can coast on his vaguely cary elwes-esque looks.

lumerians is good, best thing to come out of this lumineers thing

lol "naturalism" -- surely the Lumineers are bigger fakes than any autotuned recording star

― ron paulstretch (crüt), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:12 (6 days ago) Permalink

I think that comment (which I don't disagree with) indicates what I've skimmed to be the overriding complaint against the Lumineers, which is that they're merely branding/positioning themselves in some sort of idyllic and fake (to be charitable) musical setting. But I don't know - the beginning of that article linked to toward the top,

"The Lumineers are simply superb, which is the reason they are the focus of this installment of Lyrical Life Lessons. Seriously, listening to them makes me want to learn to play a unique, unappreciated instrument like the banjo and beg to be a part of their front porch-loving indie rock trio."

doesn't make me think that they're normatively 'bad'. I'm not a fan of their music from what I can tell, but I also don't think that there's anything especially holy about listening to Replacements or VU or even Kanye West and then being inspired to go out and start a band or start producing music.

The sheer artifice of the Lumineers (which again from what I can tell, as in I don't claim to be an expert on them since I only saw photos of their Grammy performance and listened to the one song once on YouTube) seems to be quite up front. Are they not more honestly shitgrinning than Kings of Leon, who were once pretty respected (I think?) and who subsequently fell off/got super popular around the same time that their back story was debunked (from what I recall)? I'm doing something I don't really like doing, which is to 'speak up' for something, as it were, just for the sake of it. But it does seem to me that the choices they make are choices, just like anyone else, and it seems like they're being criticized for their 'choiceness', as if the guy from Fiery Furnaces hasn't made some obvious choices about presentation and aesthetics. (Which I say just because that's what I'm listening to right at this moment.)

tbh i have no business snarking on the lumineers because of their outfits -- i love bob dylan, the band etc. and those dudes are the kings of let's-play-americana-dress-up. it's all BS ultimately. instead, i'll just dislike the lumineers' music. it is boring and annoying. and josh otm about arcade fire, they have destroyed rock n roll for a whole generation.

The "naturalism" part is more a criticism of the article's author. Don't know if the lumineers themselves lack self awareness about their act. But their music sure is bad.

Given that I like a fair bit of '80s-'90s alt-country and couldn't care less about authenticity or w/e, I can only attribute my aversion to Mumford/Lumineers/Civil Wars/etc to the basic weakness of the tunes and stultifying harmonies.

Which, btw, the harmonies are sort of key here -- they do derive straight from pallid coffeehouse folk, not bluegrass/country. There's no high lonesome there at all.

thread worth it for introducing me to the Lumerians

It's not just the lack of high lonesome or whatever, it's the phony inorganic dynamics of it (ie bluster) that plays up anthem-ness at the expense of craft. It's all about cheap moves for the benefit of the cheap seats. A famous comparison would be Dolly's version of "I WIll Always Love You" vs. Whitney's. I don't mind Whitney's, really, but subtle it is not, and the subtly and restraint of Dolly's is pretty incredible in retrospect.

Also, these dorks clearly all woke up one morning, set aside their Coldplay records, then went shopping for hats, suspenders and two-day face scruff.

yes i am enjoying those guys xp

http://i45.tinypic.com/iy34va.jpg

Iiieeeeiiiiii willl wait for yoooooouuuuuuuu

please don't desecrate whitney's memory w/ suspenders
(also lol)

hahah!

i like lumerians a lot, but it's hard to top the original version of that song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS8ZfVTE4SM

Further evidence for the theory that Arcade Fire (who I also love) have inadvertently ruined everything.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoRkntoHkIE

that's equal parts Arcade Fire and Dave Matthews, judging from the American Idol performances I caught of him

the oh's sound distinctively coldplay to me

Well Coldplay only stepped up the woah-oh-ohs after the first Arcade Fire album.

Totally. Markus Dravs worked on "Neon Bible," which he followed by working on "Viva La Vida" as well as, later, both Mumford records. From his wiki entry:

"He has also worked with Coldplay on their 2008 album Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends. According to Markus: "Chris Martin called me and told me he had a conversation with Win Butler, who suggested, 'He’ll kick you into shape' which was poetic for 'He will do his utmost in helping you to develop your artistic horizon.'"

Case closed.

Or wait, does that mean Markus Dravs broke music?

"Originally based in Ramsey, New Jersey, they later moved to New York City. After battling the city's cutthroat music scene and high cost of living, the two decided to expand their horizons. They packed up and headed for Denver, Colorado."

- wikipedia

"He will d-ooOOoo his utm-Oh-st in helping you-oooh-OOOh to develop your artistic horiz-Oh-oh-OHHHHHHHH oh-oh oh-OHHHHHHHHHn"

According to Markus: "Chris Martin called me and told me he had a conversation with Win Butler, who suggested, 'He’ll kick you into shape' which was poetic for 'He will do his utmost in helping you to develop your artistic horizon.'"

Good christ, an unholy trinity of horror.

"NEEDS MORE YODELLING."

"Yeah but--"

"I AM NOT AFRAID OF YOU AND I WILL BEAT YOUR ASS."

According to Tojo: "Mussolini called me and told me he had a conversation with Hitler, who suggested, 'He’ll kick you into shape' which was poetic for 'He will do his utmost in helping you to develop your artistic horizon.'"

good that they translate, I don't speak poetic

It's all about cheap moves for the benefit of the cheap seats.

I could understand it all more if I could actually discern the cheap moves, or any moves at all. What confuses me is that the music seems so inert but elicits such enthusiasm. I had firsthand experience with this, wading through an unbelievably huge Mumford crowd at Bonnaroo (I was trying to get to another, much smaller stage, where Loretta Lynn was playing). I heard about 10 minutes of Mumford's set, and it was such a weird disconnect between the dead air coming from the stage and the obviously very sincere excitement of the kids on the lawn.

Which is to say, it obviously works for somebody. But it operates at a frequency I can't hear.

If anything I'd credit the relative lack of dead air. I've seen Mumford, too, and I was struck by how every single one of their songs featured some broad, shout-along, (frequently wordless) chorus, and wasted no time getting there. Didn't require a lot of actual listening from the crowd. In fact, when I saw them they tried to do an acoustic set mid-show, un-amplified at the front of the stage, and the fans were so loud and disruptive they pretty much had to cut it short. "I Will Wait," indeed. These dudes don't make you wait at all. There's no drama at all. The music is all bluster. Or as I once wrote in a review: "Mumford & Sons’ sophomore release “Babel” doesn’t hit any beats that its smash debut “Sigh No More” failed to hit. “Beat,” of course, being the operative word here, as Mumford & Sons’ M.O. has thus far been to over-inflate boilerplate folk and roots cliches to anthem size and beat you over the head with them."

Yeah, I guess that's true. But it's like being beat over the head with puff balls. I barely notice it's happening.

woah i didn't know you were into puffing, no judgement here

Ho (puff)
Hey (puff)

Time for me to post. I have more to do with fashion than music, but do fashion for music peeps... Including, (for fifteen minutes (at least) the fucktards. #1. They did not show at their post grammy celebration, which leads me to believe they actually thought they had more talent than others nominated... In the Americana category, they lost to a legend and a soon to be legend... (John fullbright) and really: best new artist? Only one worse than fun. Would have been the lumineers. Keep it up guys. "Jer" you look like a carnie, Wes, you look like a semi attractive dumbass, Neyla : good gosh please stop incessantly trying to pull off the moo- moo. And for the love... Please let someone else do your hair and makeup. Kidz bopz 2012 will certainly have the more "rockin" version of "ho hey" as their fist track. Can we rename it "hey ho's (please write something original)?

Also, their "timely" new Wes/Neyla duet reeks of shit and desperation, but thank goodness they got the supremely ugly dude out of it. Only thing worse than his suspenders is his "Jerry's kids" outfit for Grammys.
Swallowing vomit

Lumerians rule.