how would they even know how much this sold?
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:57 (thirteen years ago)
kevin writes it all down on post-its
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:59 (thirteen years ago)
assumed that releasing this at practically 0:01 AM on Sunday was to do with maximising sales for the chart week, but is thing even eligible? or maybe they're having problems sorting out the uk sales figures?
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:50 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i am assuming this was because of what turned out to be justifiable concern over traffic to the website
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:01 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kBfc64WlOE
― ☏ (am0n), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:01 (thirteen years ago)
xp assumed it was because it was the end of 2/2, end of 22 years
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:09 (thirteen years ago)
^ good point
― rocky dennis horror show (Pillbox), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:11 (thirteen years ago)
the dates are the other way around in Britain though
― ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°) (sic), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 21:13 (thirteen years ago)
I saw MBV maybe a dozen times between Feb 13, 1986 (first time) and Aug 26, 1989 (last time). Everyone wanted to be really loud back then so they were not unusually deafening at first. They got progressively louder during 1988. When they were opening for eg. Sonic Youth or Dinosaur Jr tours in larger venues it was fine but if they headlined in smaller venues it got a bit much. Like some of the posters upthread I remember walking out of a couple of gigs because it was just an uncomfortable roar.
From 2013 it seems natural to dismiss the pre-Bilinda days as inferior if you are only listening to the records. But at the time the recordings were so rare they were practically irrelevent. The only record you could ever find in the shops (if you were lucky) was Sunny Sundae Smile and maybe the bootleg compilation that went around. It was as a live band that they earned their initial reputation. And they were actually a phenomenal band in those days - the first time I saw them I was completely blown away. Rooted to the spot. It was like Husker Du with Keith Moon on drums. I and most of my friends on the scene at the time thought they got worse with the new line-up. Although obviously the records suddenly got awesome the day "You Made Me Realise" came out.
― everything, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:00 (thirteen years ago)
^ interesting, thanks
― A Yawning Chasm (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:32 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxf6wQvRQ0s&NR=1&feature=fvwp
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:41 (thirteen years ago)
did they often close with Lovelee Sweet Darlene, or is this the show referenced upthread?
― Z S, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:51 (thirteen years ago)
different show, but hey
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:52 (thirteen years ago)
Did so done say up thread that they wished KS would do a new mix of something off Loveless (ideally Soon, iirc) as they think he's now much better at sonics? Because, iirc, the analogue remaster of Soon on the new CD set from last year IS a new mix? Or maybe the digital one? But basically each of the three versions of Soon on those rereleases (including the EPs disc version) is different, and one was done very recently because the original version had been lost. I'm sure he said that in the P4K interview he did last year.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 7 February 2013 08:14 (thirteen years ago)
Someone not so done. Damn iPad.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 7 February 2013 08:15 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, bears repeating: Check out the analogue remaster.
― Mark G, Thursday, 7 February 2013 08:53 (thirteen years ago)
New MBV song titles: Someone Not So Done.
― Chewshabadoo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 08:54 (thirteen years ago)
so not gonna heppen
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Thursday, 7 February 2013 09:27 (thirteen years ago)
that one, too.
― Mark G, Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:15 (thirteen years ago)
That One Too
― Chewshabadoo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 11:43 (thirteen years ago)
That One 2
Saw God supporting Bark Psychosis at the Garage in London, they were fantastic live.
― MaresNest, Thursday, 7 February 2013 11:57 (thirteen years ago)
Did so done say up thread that they wished KS would do a new mix of something off Loveless (ideally Soon, iirc) as they think he's now much better at sonics? Because, iirc, the analogue remaster of Soon on the new CD set from last year IS a new mix? Or maybe the digitalone? But basically each of the three versions of Soon on those rereleases (including the EPs disc version) is different, and one was done very recently because the original version had been lost. I'm sure he said that in the P4K interview he did last year.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:14 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
That was me, that's cool, I'd love to hear it, a little upset the cd was never given proper release in the u.s., I'd really like to hear it on cd, so pricy to import :-(
― downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 7 February 2013 14:36 (thirteen years ago)
6 hours and no new updates?
is everything ok??
anyway, the more i listen to mbv, the more i prefer it to Loveless. the main reason i think is that the production seems fuller and more compressed. it's not loud chorus/quiet verse (Only Shallow for example), but loud chorus AND verse. also, the melodies are great, and the vocals are a bit clearer which is also great.
In Another Way sounds like a Faith Healers.
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:45 (thirteen years ago)
I am toying with the idea of thinking this too (that I like it better). Quite hard to figure out though. I actually don't get the stuff about the new one being 'more straightforward' and 'less vague' etc. Loveless has a lot of stuff on it that to me, sounds like guitars being strummed.
― Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:47 (thirteen years ago)
I am loving this album but at this point there isn't one single song that I would say is better than "Only Shallow", which I consider to be the platonic ideal of a My Bloody Valentine song (and is the only one besides "Soon" that I've actively listened to in the past decade)
ask me in a month how I feel about "Only Tomorrow", though
― Ima R.A.E.D. (DJP), Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:48 (thirteen years ago)
but Loveless is the more straightforward one!xpost
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:49 (thirteen years ago)
Funny that - lot's of people have said that too. I never much rated Only Shallow. In fact, I just put Loveless on after I posted there and skipped to Loomer (which I think is the best track on it, along with To Here Knows When). And all the other tracks.
― Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:50 (thirteen years ago)
Nostormo, yes that's what I think... Just that it doesn't appear to be a widely held opinion (as far as I read anyway).
otmxpost
Only Shallow is MBV for the masses (read: accessible): very melodic, use the quiet/loud 90's formula etc..there are better songs in Loveless (Soon, Loomer..)
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:53 (thirteen years ago)
only shallow will always be one of my faves
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:55 (thirteen years ago)
After a few days now, I am actually still struggling to come to terms with the fact that "mbv" is really great.
― Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:55 (thirteen years ago)
I only knew "Soon" for the longest time, and then I bought the album on a whim during the summer of '98 while driving around DC and when I popped the CD into the car stereo "Only Shadow" blew my face off and I have been entirely beholden to it ever since
I also think that people who think mbv is more straightforward than Loveless are not actually listening to the music, but rather the end result of production techniques they've been soaking in for 22 years. Musically, mbv is a good bit more complicated.
"Soon" is way more "MBV for the masses" than anything else on the album btw
― Ima R.A.E.D. (DJP), Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:56 (thirteen years ago)
my platonic ideal melodic MBV song is What You Wantmy platonic ideal noise MBV song is Feed Me With Your Kissmy platonic ideal melodically noisy MBV song is (When You Wake) You're Still in a Dream
― Z S, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:57 (thirteen years ago)
mbv is also more focused
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
still not into the sequencing of this one. feels very lumpy to me, like when you're making a duvet and you shove it inside the cover and somehow all the bulk ends up being all squished up at one end. favourite track is actually the first song, i think people are passing over it cos it's seemingly a bit slight as an opener, but really it's gorgeous.
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
See, Dan - to my ears, it sounds more complicated production-wise too. In that it sounds vaguer and less like guitars. Other people have said it sounds much closer to a live band. My ears say WAHT.
It actually makes me wonder if what Kevin Shields has been working of for the past 22 years is to make a record that actually sounds completely different to everyone who listens to it.
― Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
Loveless is obv more straightforward because every song is verse-instrumental-verse
― ron paulstretch (crüt), Thursday, 7 February 2013 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
"favourite track is actually the first song, i think people are passing over it cos it's seemingly a bit slight "
its a great song
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:00 (thirteen years ago)
yeah the instrumental is the chorus xpost
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:01 (thirteen years ago)
First song is amazing. Way better than Sometimes, which it's getting compared with.
― Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:02 (thirteen years ago)
I wouldn't go that far, but it is great. I do wish it was sequenced closer to the middle or end, though.
― Z S, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:05 (thirteen years ago)
i never thought i could think a new shoegaze record is so great, even if it's by MBV, which says something.
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:06 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i think the slow 'uns on m b v compare very well with loveless, the melodies and textures are delicious. the louders ones are all individually good but never really glue together.
― cw, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:08 (thirteen years ago)
I like it better than "Loveless!"
But I also like "Isn't Anything" better than Loveless.
I don't think I like it better than "Say Anything" though.
― Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
(Which isn't to say I dislike "Loveless" even a little bit.)
(Yes, I know this is sacrilege.)
― Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
I like it all and you must obey me.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
you got lesslove for loveless
― nostormo, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
I like it all. And did before Ned's decree.Though the decree was reassuring that I was doing SOMETHING right.
― Loud guitars shit all over "Bette Davis Eyes" (NYCNative), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:13 (thirteen years ago)
I do too!
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:13 (thirteen years ago)