yes
― imago, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:01 (thirteen years ago)
but that blue is a little too blue if you know what i mean. at least they could have used a paler or darker blue but not the most standard, canonic, unimaginative blue around.
― it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:05 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe it is International Klein Blue.
― Keith, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:09 (thirteen years ago)
I like that it's a deep, deep blue. I know this probably wasn't the intention, but my first thought when I saw the blue cover was that typically in developing languages the first color words to be produced are contrasting words for light/white and dark/black, followed closely by a word for red; a word for blue comes much later. Thus we have the covers for Isn't Anything, Loveless, and mbv. Sorry I know this thread is dorked-out enough.
― :C (crüt), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:10 (thirteen years ago)
not ikb at all.
― s.clover, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:10 (thirteen years ago)
Whoa
x post
― Keith, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:11 (thirteen years ago)
Oh shit there's a new Fall Out Boy single?!?!? Thanks ilm.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:12 (thirteen years ago)
xp http://img-cache.cdn.gaiaonline.com/e026478f545ccdeb003f10bf4811c3e2/http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/uu106/johnnynoxvill1593/6483Spongebob_smoking_Weed.jpg
― ☯ t (wins), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:17 (thirteen years ago)
Went to the youtube full album trove to get a bead on the number of plays but this shit has been WEB SHERIFFED
― Raymond Cummings, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:18 (thirteen years ago)
You guys have seen this detail of the cover right?
http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/images/uploads/mbv970600.jpg
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:21 (thirteen years ago)
nothing is this and yes i really love you
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:22 (thirteen years ago)
feel like this cover will be a lot cooler on the vinyl
― downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:23 (thirteen years ago)
oh yeah, you won't be able to see half that shit on the cd either
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:24 (thirteen years ago)
but my first thought when I saw the blue cover was that typically in developing languages the first color words to be produced are contrasting words for light/white and dark/black, followed closely by a word for red; a word for blue comes much later. Thus we have the covers for Isn't Anything, Loveless, and mbv. Sorry I know this thread is dorked-out enough.
You nerd <3
― Manti and the Catfish (Trayce), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:41 (thirteen years ago)
ok, now everybody seems to be enjoying the new album. great.
― Shin Oliva Suzuki, Monday, 4 February 2013 23:53 (thirteen years ago)
There really isn't much to see pixel-peeping at the 2400x2400 jpeg (looking at the blue channel only, enhancing contrast). All the members of the band, a studio with A1 sized prints of brick walls taped to the walls, a few shots through the window of a mediterranean tiled roofs. The cover of the You Made Me Realize EP appears on the left margin.
http://i50.tinypic.com/2v3r9c2.jpg
I'm not seeing any hidden messages. Just pictures pinned to white walls, rephotographed and overlayed as semi transparent layers in 'shop, rendered at max saturation in hue 238.
― with perhaps the exception of r-r-r-r-rhythm (Sanpaku), Monday, 4 February 2013 23:56 (thirteen years ago)
oh shit yes
― Jaap and roids (NickB), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 00:03 (thirteen years ago)
just burned a disc of the mp3s, should be interesting to hear it tonight on my stereo
― downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
I think there are a lot of low quality jpgs of the cover floating around, it looks much better crisp.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 01:00 (thirteen years ago)
Are there any stray mp3s out on blogs?
― Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 01:36 (thirteen years ago)
This is getting better the more I hear it, although the three tracks that stood way out on first listen (2, 7, 9) still stand way out, maybe even wayer
― imago, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)
See whereas I hear the album as in 3 clear "acts" (which I think I touched on in my blogpost thingy)
― Manti and the Catfish (Trayce), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:05 (thirteen years ago)
just put this on my iPhone :D
― manti 乒乓 (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:06 (thirteen years ago)
This thread is so much fun to read from the beginning
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:54 (thirteen years ago)
hah thanks for making me re-read my account of the nyc shows from '08
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:05 (thirteen years ago)
"who sees you" has so much in common with "only shallow". the initial drums start-ups, the squealing elephant guitars. those last 3 minutes are occasionally cathartic, whereas i always felt "only shallow" was a novel song but one of my least listened to as it treats those said elephant squeals as having no real emotional basis but rather something to set the listener's head off in surprise with. "who sees you" i wish were longer, with that high-note held in perpetual motion, allowed to ring endlessly.
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:19 (thirteen years ago)
also worth noting that this album has had me access itunes for the first time in what feels like a year since signing up for spotify premium
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:21 (thirteen years ago)
quick thought: feels like "nothing is" was created solely for the live performances. i imagine KS adores the idea of killing his audience with love, but after so many holocaust sections he naturally is tired of going through the ordeal each and every show. as such "nothing is" is a song that is underscored right now but will be met with a huge amount of masochistic fanfare come touring. in sense filler, but only in this immediate environment. we forget that MBV is as much a ear-bursting live experience as they are suitable for solitary headphone confinement.
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:35 (thirteen years ago)
By the way here's the whole album cover cleaned up (as above) for inspection.
Still have the audiophile earplugs I bought after the '92 Houston show left my ears ringing for two days.
― with perhaps the exception of r-r-r-r-rhythm (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:57 (thirteen years ago)
Oooh, Amoeba Music t-shirt
― Brakhage, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:03 (thirteen years ago)
"Is This and Yes" is a pretty weird progression. "In Another Way" has kind of a weird progression.
Hearing that.
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:03 (thirteen years ago)
I just heard much of this in a pub just now, remarkable how warm and fuzzy it is, even the Stereolab-y track sounded like comfort food. We were wondering if the lack of top end was a product of long days in studio, rolling it off as your ears get tired. Or maybe he mixed it in a pub. Either way: good pub record
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:05 (thirteen years ago)
also worth noting that this album has had me access itunes for the first time in what feels like a year since signing up for spotify premium― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:21 (44 minutes ago)
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:21 (44 minutes ago)
― Leopard Skin POLL-Box Hat (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:19 (thirteen years ago)
Or maybe you don't mean you went to the iTunes store, you mean you used the program called iTunes.
― Leopard Skin POLL-Box Hat (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:20 (thirteen years ago)
Sorry, meant itunes the application. I also kinda assumed we had all come to equal consensus that the store, like the program, were dead things.
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:31 (thirteen years ago)
goontie: yeah comfort food is what i thought partic with the first three tracks, I called it "mashed potatoes"!
― Manti and the Catfish (Trayce), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:32 (thirteen years ago)
rejected cover:
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTutTXBZ8Xcjfpzz60lOLp1xVdEXoszEXimAnh3QEd6dE5TnW82wg
― scott seward, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:45 (thirteen years ago)
https://twitter.com/brandonstosuy/status/298104192642461696
― kelpolaris, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 05:48 (thirteen years ago)
lol barf
― flamboyant goon tie included, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:22 (thirteen years ago)
headphones + weed
― ☏ (am0n), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:41 (thirteen years ago)
am3n
― ☕ (diamonddave85), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 06:46 (thirteen years ago)
Exact same for me. Although the process for getting it on there was torturous and resulted in itunes deleting all the music I had on already. Oh well, what other music matters right now?
― Internet Alan, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:47 (thirteen years ago)
The first three tracks are probably the weakest, they mostly sound like Loveless but not as good. I'm not sure quite what I expected after 22 years but it wasn't really a retreat into comfort zone. It really takes off after that though and the second half is amazing.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:50 (thirteen years ago)
The first three tracks are like a nice warm reassuring hug. No, probably not as good as owt on Loveless, but pleasant nonetheless. Agreed that it gets really good from thereon in, though. Wonder 2 is an amazing way to end it.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 09:56 (thirteen years ago)
I get the feeling that "nice warm reassuring hug" is not really the point of MBV though.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 10:03 (thirteen years ago)
I don't.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 10:13 (thirteen years ago)
I think it's part of the point of Loveless, as a record. The live experience is obviously different. I've always thought one of the best things about Loveless is that its character changes quite dramatically depending on the volume you play it at; low, it's a soothing balm. High, it's something else entirely.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 10:23 (thirteen years ago)
Loveless may feel comforting NOW but it certainly didn't when it was released. Or at least it didn't until you'd got past the alienating bits, even if that only took one listen.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 10:48 (thirteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Tuesday, February 5, 2013 5:03 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
you're right, it's "nice warm reassuring fuck"
― :C (crüt), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 11:40 (thirteen years ago)
Just filed a 500 word of this without mentioning Isn't Anything/Loveless - have i ballsed up?
― the Shearer of simulated snowsex etc. (Dwight Yorke), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 11:44 (thirteen years ago)