The Return Of My Bloody Valentine

A wise choice of cuisine.

ya but peruvian ceviche is only my favourite food as a main dish. if it's gonna be an appetiser I'll take mex ceviche

christ I'm drunk. talk about the new bloody valentines album pls

Wow, I've never tried ceviche. It sounds good.

it is intensely weird listening to stuff that sounds anagramatic of previous mbv songs & textures & all but then a little way into the first song when it coheres & is doing something new sorta & you're kinda back in their ~emotional zone~ & weirdly linked to all the places you've been with that, it's pretty special
― schlump, Sunday, 3 February 2013 04:31 (18 hours ago) Permalink

Yup, then the album tears off into wild, unknown directions. More rhythmic than most of Loveless; and less looping with the the pop/melodic hooks that, to me, make Loveless so good. More sonically conscious. Looking forward to hearing this in another format other than Youtube to hear how this flows

Ceviche is indeed all that, Sund4r, and you should investigate forthwith.

Often I wonder whether it's best to date or relax with a plate of fish cooking in lemon juice.

Dating is a dish best served cold.

Am I the only one mad enough to hear some at least superficial similarities betwixt "Wonder 2" and "Sugar Cystals" by Airiel/Schnauss?

Schnauss is something of the elephant in the electroshoegaze room isn't he

that said, he's a bit more housey and straightforward than what's going on in the last 3 tracks here - the ornate, savaged

yeah i'm hearing some schnauss here and there

Yeah percussively more than anything. Schauss was always was more Cocteaus/Slowdive in sound than MBV.

Glad to know I'm not the only one hearing Stereolab in this at places

you know who kinda sounded like my bloody valentine AND stereolab? all natural lemon & lime flavors. and they haven't released a record in 15 years! the more you know...

Just finished my first listen to the album, and holy fucking shit! I think my favourites on this one are the ones where they go to extremes. On one hand: 'Is This And Yes' and 'New You', and on the other 'Nothing Is' (felt like my ears were being pummeled repeatedly... this is a good thing!) and 'Wonder 2' (wish that the phased/flanged drums at the end could have gone on for a bit longer). Having said that, 'Only Tomorrow' is a gem and I can definitely see 'If I Am' growing on me.

Less accessible than Loveless in terms of songs, I think, but perversely it seems a much easier listen(!)

all natural lemon and lime flavors are probably the best of the post-shoegaze peeps

^ that is some good stuff. Those days when noisey stereolab was part of the equation..

What about color filter

argh I mean Flowchart!

color filter's "silent way" album craps all over flowchart

kcrw played "she found now" tonight.

Those johnny come latelies er hold on...

some great guitar sounds on this one

damn fine guitar sounds, yes.

oh man that mogwai remix linked upthread. i forgot how amazing that is. what's weird is when it came out i knew it was good, but i sort of thought that things like that would be appearing about equally impressive and intense and good or whatever 2-3 times a year until the unknown future. i had no idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUc5y1NljXI

^^ this

otm, i think that's my favorite so far

curious to release this the night before the superbowl

― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:53 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

"nothing is" is the standout for me thus far. The way it does something quite different for them, but familiar in sound if another band were to do it, and yet, still very MBV somehow?

It's great to my ears, and needs an extended remix à la Glider.

So um I'm no Ned or Matos or anything but I wrote up a review of this on my lil blog.
http://memorygongs.com/scratchings/?p=49

Whoa!
Are you sure you want to go there?
http://memorygongs.com/scratchings/?p=49 may be risky to visit.

Why were you redirected to this page?

When we visited this site, we found it exhibited one or more risky behaviors.

I took the chance. Fuck you, McAfee.

erm wait, did you seriously get a virus warning? if so I need to review my websites settings.

i have mcafee too and just about everything gets that notice!

all music blogs i mean

woke up sunday morning with a massive hangover, the emotional kind, the kind where you're easily bent out of shape by external stimuli. headphones on, did the parkland walk up to alexandra palace, listened to it three or four times, kept making me :') can't really ask for more. it's exactly what i expected and that's certainly no bad thing.

i have mcafee too and just about everything gets that notice!

Phew thats ok then, I got told when I installed an SQL database and wordpress that i'd be mad open to hackattax Ive no clue how to ward off, so.

I know I'm late to the party here, but I finally listened to this and really enjoyed it.

same here - as other people have said, i'm surprised by how un-fussed over and fresh it all sounds. I could see why people would describe the songs as demos.
Although the whole thing might feel a little bit like a collection of odds & ends, I think they did the right thing in avoiding the "grand statement" LP a la Loveless.

I don't think it sounds like a collection of odds and ends at all. I've read people say that quite a bit in various places online, but I disagree - the album is very much a start-to-finish experience for me as Loveless is. There's nothing that's jarring about the sequencing, in fact the album sounds perfectly sequenced to my ears. I think folks are letting this whole "recorded on and off over a period of time" thing colour their judgement of the record. It may have been recorded on and off in fits and starts, but the end result doesn't really sound like that to me.

I admit I'm a little put off that after two decades of incubation/meditation, Shields really hasn't moved that far in any new directions.

I was unable to purchase with a credit card but PayPal worked fine.

My speakers on my computer suck goat ass so I burned a CD which I am playing on my somewhat-better stereo speakers.

I like what I hear but it will require more listens. Which is fine since I am not on a deadline for enjoyment anymore.

It would have been a perfect album for "four years after Loveless", not so much if it had come out the following year after Loveless.

Now, it sounds fine to me...

(Mind you, it does seem a very long time ago my local indie retailler tipped me an advance copy of the "Tremolo" e.p. 12" white label, having raved over "Soon", it puzzled me no end, but I kept going back to it, and by the time "Loveless" came out, I was right there. Mind you, the shop had long gone...

(xpost, me too)

<q>the album sounds perfectly sequenced to my ears</q>
You know what - I think otoh that the sequencing itself could be better - I find the opening one (sorry im still struggling with titles, just like I'm still struggling after 22 years with those on Loveless) to be a bit out of place and sleepy as an opener.
Anyway, so far the only song I'm still not feeling is the Dots & Loops one which I find pretty tedious.

I think the opening track would have got lost anywhere but where it is.

"is this and yes"

"you never her"

lol

she found now only tomorrow. if i am in another way wonder 2, who sees you?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2013/feb/04/album-stream-bullet-for-my-valentine