Michael Azerrad - Our Band Could Be Your Life C/D?

Dunno, I find his attempts to relate every band back to the 'scene' or the 'community' a touch strained when so many had nothing in common with each other or weren't aware of what was happening beyond their own touring schedule (Minutemen's lack of info about REM for example). More palatable in a oral history than a book about 12 seperate bands.

or 13 even

Lack of Meat Puppets is sort of in keeping with their out of step-ness, even with the out of step bands considered in the book. But yeah it would have been interesting to read about them.

Another problem is the Mudhoney chapter - it's as much about everything going around Mudhoney than it is about them.

No problem with trying to spell out what was happening in terms of actually getting the records out, but surely then why divide it up band by band? It's supposed to be their story?

The whole 'move to a major label = general decline and became less interesting' is well worn complaint but a necessary one, again it's supposed to be about the bands and their music first and foremost surely. Interesting if you were to dip into the next decade and look at Shudder To Think or Jawbox's best records and how they were released.

bcuz Mudhoney might be the least interesting band?

Scott Woods interviewed Azerrad on rockcritics.com a number of years ago:

http://rockcriticsarchives.com/interviews/michaelazerrad/michaelazerrad_woods.html

I think the problem is they were a flagship band on an 'important' label and it would be hard to miss out on late 80s Pacific NW