comparing Taylor Swift to other female pop performers, or citing her male songwriters
the problem is that it isn't this, it's female pop performers who are "trash" and male songwriters who are "a-listers"
― of course you end up shazaming yourself (c sharp major), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:13 (thirteen years ago)
(I know him a bit too--definitely a good guy.)
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:14 (thirteen years ago)
nope guys, sorry, its not possible. he wrote a really boneheaded, sexist article so there is no possible way for him to be anything other than a terrible human being.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)
xpost I think the dialectic is troubling, but it's also I think a product of poor choice of words. I think he's defining the performers as disposable - even though some of them were A-listers, too!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)
(Haven't read his article yet.) xpost
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:17 (thirteen years ago)
And per Maura's fish-in-barrel retort
Really sucks that Maura is shooting at misogynist fish in a privilege barrel
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:17 (thirteen years ago)
Who called it a defense? I just know him and think he is a good guy. So fucking what? Just saying he's not some fly by night bombthrower asshole, wrongheaded though he may or may not be.
this is irrelevant to the discussion. no one is flaming him personally yet the reason maura preemptively said that is because when someone writes something offense people often immediately rush to clarify that no he's a great person. but it doesn't matter.
― lil dirk (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
Sorry I guess I'm conflating a lot of the externals here, because SFJ did rip on him personally, and Maura's reponse does patronizingly tip toe around that territory.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:20 (thirteen years ago)
But that is well within their rights.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:21 (thirteen years ago)
i think Maura's post was fine except for that weird, accusatory strawmanning about "Since U Been Gone".
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:22 (thirteen years ago)
man why are all these chicks so patronizing to men, right?
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:22 (thirteen years ago)
I've read the article now, won't defend it, except to give the context that it comes from what feels to me like a 90s-alt perspective of authenticity and selling out, and the analysis remind me of the dicey-ness around Liz Phair et al at that time.
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:25 (thirteen years ago)
(around criticism of Liz Phair et al at that time, I should say)
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
c'mon josh, you're not really dealing with what is on the printed page here
― 乒乓, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
I think it's definitely fair to say that Mark's writing is frequently imbued with a 90s-alt perspective of authenticity and selling out,
Personally, I think tons of music writing (almost all?) is innately sexist. I was thinking of Kate Bush the other day - and not in a sexist way! - and I was considering the countless male acts who listen to her and must be influenced by her. And yet the only acts that get compared to Kate Bush are female acts, though surely there are male acts who could be compared to Kate Bush, too. Dunno. Just something I was thinking about.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
I dunno, maybe my outrage bar is just set pretty low. I can read that piece and think, man, I would never write that, and here are many reasons why. But I also come across far, far worse stuff than it on a regular basis, which isn't a defense so much as perspective, I suppose.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:28 (thirteen years ago)
josh in chicago just thinking out loud here
― 乒乓, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:28 (thirteen years ago)
Which again is admittedly me reacting a lot more to the vitriol around the piece and not as much to the piece itself, which I'm pretty sure I've repeatedly said is problematic at best.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
True, really. I was killing time while my Trader Joe's frozen falafel heated up. Verdict: not good!
xpost
I am in line at an airport but I just want to say two things. One, I know a lot of "nice" people (men and women!) whohave misogynist tendencies. Two, reeling off a list of related artists fromSpotify, which that list pretty much is, so all over the map is it in terms of micro-era and importance and so on, is the opposite of research.
― maura, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
Should have hit the rock encyclopedia!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
(LOL research)
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
I mean Jesus "nice guy" these days is like Reddit code for "burgeoning MRA" too. Just ugh
― maura, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, fuck nice guys.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
>:(
well I mean if you're going to spout off you should at least know what you're taking about? but I guess cheap shots at trashy sluts get the word count job done.
― maura, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:34 (thirteen years ago)
Nah, not nice guy so much as I went into the article having seem his involvement in campaigns, issues, etc., over the past decade. Not the New Criticism approach, but that's not one I see in music criticism anyway.
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
I should read the piece again, but did he call them trashy sluts? Because that would have been pretty sexist.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
why don't you go reread the piece again
― 乒乓, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:38 (thirteen years ago)
Done. Still problematic!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:38 (thirteen years ago)
(I've repped for Hopper in an overall way when she's written dicey criticism, for very similar reasons.)
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:39 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i would say mark's writing is pretty Dice-y
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/236071/Andrew+Dice+Clay.jpg
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:40 (thirteen years ago)
Bam!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:41 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shiroibasketshoes/
― how's life, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:51 (thirteen years ago)
now there's a nice guy :-)
― 乒乓, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:51 (thirteen years ago)
that salon article is really really stupid
― Gukbe, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:24 (thirteen years ago)
The sexism is one thing, but the pointless shoehorning Taylor Swift's career into an airy discussion of the last ten years of the US economy made me want to smash myself into little pieces of gore.
― Tim F, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)
RIGHT?
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:02 (thirteen years ago)
yes but how can you map Swift's career and Australia
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
whiney otm--too many fucking music writers
― beef richards (Mr. Que), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
it is important to remember, i guess, that a lot of nastily pervasive sexism does come from people you'd recognise as "good guys" and not from "bombthrower assholes", and it's the fact that these "good guys" are the ones maintaining their sexist line with a blithe lack of self-recognition that makes it so nastily pervasive.
― of course you end up shazaming yourself (c sharp major), Monday, November 12, 2012 6:04 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
like w/ any other kind of casual prejudice! i mean, i'm a nice enough person and i've done and said things that were offensive/awful/wrong, and I have the choice to either say "because i recognise myself as a nice person it is impossible that what i said was offensive" or "because i want to continue recognising myself as a nice person i should recognise when i am being offensive and learn to quit it"
― of course you end up shazaming yourself (c sharp major), Monday, November 12, 2012 6:07 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
TRUTH BOMBS
― #YOLO ONO (lex pretend), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 12, 2012 8:03 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Well naturally Taylor's persistent search for a redemptive relationship with a man who won't let her down resonate with Australia's attempts to negotiate non-exploitative free trade agreements with more powerful countries after having pre-emptively abandoned our emotional defences, I mean trade tariffs.
― Tim F, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― how's life, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:10 (thirteen years ago)
Taylor Swift ft. Ira Davies - "Trade Tariffs"
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:13 (thirteen years ago)
She taxes agriculture, I tax t-shirts
― cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:31 (thirteen years ago)
2 Chaaaaaaaaainz
― Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:49 (thirteen years ago)
i KNEW you WERE troublewhenyouwalkedinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn <3
unsurprisingly, it's the next single
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)
if its out before end of year it might top my pazz n jop singles ballot
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 06:03 (thirteen years ago)
it was already released as a standalone promo single ahead of the album, don't see why that wouldn't count
― #YOLO ONO (lex pretend), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 08:17 (thirteen years ago)