"huh huh, I know where you work" is especially creepy coming from the guy who 's entire posting history is stats from RateYorMusic_metal.xls
― centibutt hz (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)
b4 i forget - the chucks oral history was pretty awes
― Mordy, Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
Why are some of you thinking about monetizing so early on? First you need an actual audience and a group of steady writers. Money doesn't come first.
― Moka, Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
ya just do it for like six months then sell to facebook for $100m
― lag∞n, Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:20 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah nobody knows who you work for. You kept it super quiet.
― VOTE in the 1980's ROCK POLL PLEASE! (Algerian Goalkeeper), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:21 (thirteen years ago)
if it took the ebook route, a preview issue of some sort could be put together - make it say half the size of whatever the full release would be, make it a free release as a bit of a taster, and see what the reaction is like.
― the brand new dry heaveies (haitch), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
― Moka, Sunday, September 16, 2012 12:19 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark
this isn't like a band or something where you do gigs for peanuts until you can work your way up and make a profit -- you either set up a model from the beginning that might make money or at least pay for itself or that's never gonna happen.
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:37 (thirteen years ago)
is there any way we can get lurkers to pay for this?
― flopson, Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:38 (thirteen years ago)
ya moka we have an actual audience, theres like a million assholes who read this site everyday
that said, having some central person set up an actual business that money will go into, to be distributed to contributors living in a bunch of different countries, is pretty daunting to consider.
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:39 (thirteen years ago)
agreed, the "doing this for peanuts" part has been the last 6-7 years.
― Irwin Dante's Towering Inferno (WmC), Sunday, 16 September 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)
i think it might also be cool to propose or even present some content ahead of time -- see if a few writers that people generally love want to write some interesting long form pieces on spec, and either release or excerpt them before doing any fundraising, so that people have some idea of the caliber of the work that's being promised.
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This is a good idea.
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, September 16, 2012 4:39 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
paypal etc would make the distribution part okay I think, it's the making of money in the first place which seems more daunting to me.
― Tim F, Sunday, 16 September 2012 17:55 (thirteen years ago)
I know that someone floated the idea upthread but I felt like repeating it: how about trying to set up a non-profit?
If the click through model is the enemy wouldn't that be its natural opposite? A 501(c)3 like the New Inquiry?
― Josiah Alan, Sunday, 16 September 2012 17:59 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Charitable-Organizations/Exemption-Requirements---Section-501(c)(3)-Organizations
― Josiah Alan, Sunday, 16 September 2012 18:01 (thirteen years ago)
i'm still most interested in 77 magazine
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 16 September 2012 18:01 (thirteen years ago)
or set up an ILTMI publication to subsidise the ILM one
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 16 September 2012 18:05 (thirteen years ago)
I'm not really a logistics guy but I'm game to write/edit
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:22 (thirteen years ago)
this whole thing's kinda your fault so you better do somethin' :)
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:30 (thirteen years ago)
We really need to enter into this from a non-salary point, with a promise of it in the future. This might be as simple, for a start, as launching whatever the malleable any-use equiv of a Wordpress/blogger is, with advertising options. Profit sharing may be the way to go.
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:32 (thirteen years ago)
Haha
What've I done
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:33 (thirteen years ago)
What monster have I unleashed
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:34 (thirteen years ago)
Should we proceed on parallel tracks here?
Track A: logistics Track B: who wants to be involved and how?
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:35 (thirteen years ago)
Track C: what do we call this thing
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:36 (thirteen years ago)
Listen and Obey: We Are Here to Help You
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:37 (thirteen years ago)
A part of me likes the sell-it-as-an-Amazon file idea but I don't know if it's realistic
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:38 (thirteen years ago)
Track B: like I said, actually being a podcast voice for this would be kinda cool; after a decade of not being on the air and podcasting now ruling the universe and all, beginning to think it's about time.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:38 (thirteen years ago)
Agreed. I dig that idea, maybe a "here's a podcast version of today's coverage, guv'nor" sort of courtesy.
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:41 (thirteen years ago)
yeah the nedcast is definitely going to be the cornerstone of this empire
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
I would love to help, either by writing or also the idea of recording some stuff for a podcast appeals to me quite a lot. Basically I'm in for general involvement.
― Know how Roo feel (LocalGarda), Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:47 (thirteen years ago)
for whatever this subsequently turns out to be
Also - somebody said this up thread and I dunno who - I love the idea of not being beholden to "the new" or "the timely" or whatever's hot or "we're only writing about these guys because a major show/fest looms"
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
"you wanna write about 80s norweigan synth pop? DO IT"
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)
The one thing I'll want to get is a better microphone than I currently have. Michael J. Nelson recommended a good one in an interview last year that I was considering which had the advantage of being affordable but still pretty reasonably pro, I'll have to dig that up.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)
Ned, a Rode NT1 would work fine for you if you can spare $170 or so.
― Pat Ast vs Jean Arp (MaresNest), Sunday, 16 September 2012 19:57 (thirteen years ago)
I'll need something in the low six figures & a private jet
― Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:04 (thirteen years ago)
you didn't get yours yet?
― Know how Roo feel (LocalGarda), Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:06 (thirteen years ago)
MaresNest -- noted, that would have to wait a bit if so given holiday and other upcoming expenses.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)
a podcast is a good idea, i think.
― chasm jar pro (c sharp major), Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
How will we fund Ned's ricola budget
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:11 (thirteen years ago)
A self-contained podcast or a internet radio show might be a good idea.
On the written side, i like the idea of fleshing out an artist or EOY poll into a short book and publishing via Amazon. Unlikely to make vast amounts of money but might pay for server costs.
― Temporarily Famous In The Czech Republic (ShariVari), Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:41 (thirteen years ago)
Server costs are already paid-for, kinda. We could certainly incubate it here, at least. If it got to be too big to handle that's the good kind of problem, right?
― stet, Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:05 (thirteen years ago)
when i suggested using ILM polls i meant more to help fill out a daily website -- that kind of thing seems like a nice way to beef up the content of a site and get people clicking around but something like an ebook or quarterly magazine would probably be better served with longform criticism/journalism. (xpost)
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:07 (thirteen years ago)
a quarterly print digest of usernames without annotation or explanation
― Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
the finest only
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:44 (thirteen years ago)
it's worth thinking about why ILM "works" (when it does). to my mind the magic mechanism is the question-and-answer format, and the back and forth generated by the answers (which often provoke new questions, etc). if you plucked the "best" and "most interesting" writers here and asked them to write a bunch of stand-alone articles, you might have something good, but it wouldn't capture what's great about ILM. the particular flavor of it wouldn't be there. so i'm sort of agreeing with kate in that i think ILM is already in its optimal form, for better or for worse.
that said maybe this new thing wouldn't just have to be stand-alone articles. the singles jukebox is a good example of something that thinks outside that format. although the various mini-reviews there don't interact with each other or propel each other the way threads here do.
in any case i think the only way to have something that isn't ILM, but which captures what ILM is good at, needs to have some kind of supercharged comments culture at its core, as the very basis for what it's doing. there are very, very few websites that have reliably great comments that aren't just one-off responses but which carry on their own narratives. so maybe "comments" as such isn't the way to do it, i don't know.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:49 (thirteen years ago)
How about something along the lines of Frank's Why Music Sucks zine?
E.g multiple pieces responding to a question or proposition.
― Tim F, Sunday, 16 September 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)
And responding to one another
yes, something like that! though it's the "responding to one another" part that's tricky, even just logistically. but yeah! [disclosure: i have never actually read why music sucks :(]
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 16 September 2012 22:06 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i don't mean to sound like i'm pushing for just long thinkpieces or something -- i think it'd be great if we had a format that captured a bit of the argumentative/persuasive spirit of ILM threads and included multiple viewpoints on a given topic. i just worry about that kind of 'everybody gets a turn' stuff ending up becoming the meat of the project, and wonder whether it's possible for that not to eventually get insular to people not participating, the same way the message board would be less fun to read for a lurker or the unconverted.
― nutrition aziz (some dude), Sunday, 16 September 2012 22:07 (thirteen years ago)