The Pitchfork People's List - top albums 1996-2012

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2135 of them)

IMPORTANT FACT the top ten google results for 'women in the pitchfork readers list' include pitchfork's artist pages for of montreal, public enemy, and david bowie

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:40 (thirteen years ago)

And man-centric, compared to the distinction index for female voters. There seems to be less consensus on which albums by women are great, which I guess makes sense because there's really no monolithic critical consensus either. I wonder how much there's a sense of duty/shame at play here, with women feeling duty-bound to list the same common "greatest albums of all-time" as anyone else, but maybe also feeling like anyone will question their taste or deride it for its femininity if they dare put Regina Spektor over Radiohead or Arcade Fire. x-posts

Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)

did sister soulja crack the top 100?

scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

Regina Spektor is a bad example, but I'd rank a lot of albums made by women over anything by Radiohead or Arcade Fire.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

Regina Spektor is #1 on the female voters distinction index, also you aren't a woman.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

which I guess makes sense because there's really no monolithic critical consensus either

eh I would've guessed the Missy and MIA and Joanna Newsom albs are as canonical as things get...?

Shameful Dead Half Choogle (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:44 (thirteen years ago)

but there isn't a publication -- certainly not one on its level -- that covers as wide a breadth of music as in-depth.

You seriously believe the bolded bit?

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:44 (thirteen years ago)

older rock crits on my facebook HATED this thing. man. like serious hate. the results of this thing. they are not down with the fork at all. the list looked pretty much exactly like i thought it would. so, no hate from me. i knew what to expect.

― scott seward, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:32 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Exactly. I'm a little surprised by the degree of nastiness.

I would have submitted a list if I didn't do it so damn often at the day job.

Andy K, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:45 (thirteen years ago)

Not in the same "greatest of all-time" sort of way. There's a consensus that they're good or great, not so much a consensus that they belong at the very top of your list. x-posts

Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:45 (thirteen years ago)

i am more and more baffled as to how they arrived at 'distinction index'

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:46 (thirteen years ago)

Regina Spektor is #1 on the female voters distinction index, also you aren't a woman.

Fair enough. I haven't perused any of the individual voter block info.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:46 (thirteen years ago)

i am more and more baffled as to how they arrived at 'distinction index'

― thomp, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:46 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark

what about their explanation of it isn't clear?

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (thirteen years ago)

You seriously believe the bolded bit?

― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:44 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

uhh... yeah. pitchfork runs probably 4,000+ new words of criticism every day for practically the entire year. that's not even counting features, news or video stuff.

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (thirteen years ago)

Anyone who got legitimately angry about these results must have a massive stroke every time the People's Choice Awards roll around.

Old Lunch, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:48 (thirteen years ago)

i am more and more baffled as to how they arrived at 'distinction index'

― thomp, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:46 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark

what about their explanation of it isn't clear?

― some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (7 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that it doesn't tell you how they arrived at the number

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:48 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't get angry at these results, just kinda eye-rolly. But I do get annoyed at the massive pile-ups of endless white dude lists of white dudes.

my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)

i expected this list basically, nevertheless it is still a deeply wack list

max, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)

if i get the distinction index correctly, it's telling us which albums were voted predominantly for by a subset. If that's true, the overwhelming maleness of the voting populace is underscored by the fact that only two albums (Regina Spektor's Far and Devendra Banhart's Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon) had women voters making up more than a third of its endorsers. And only just more than a third. Basically it looks like every album took at least 10% of its support from women, and never more than 35%.

da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:51 (thirteen years ago)

I think the percentage is the number of votes for that album which were from people in the particular demographic.

Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

J0rdan S, idk, quantity has rarely been synonymous with quality, but okie.

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

Amount not number obv.

Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

if that were how it works then some records on the men's distinction list would be over 88% ?

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:53 (thirteen years ago)

I think the percentage is the number of votes for that album which were from people in the particular demographic.

I think that's the same as how da croupier is reading it.

squicky chutzpah in the drug biz (jaymc), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)

xpost yeah that throws me off - how many votes did an album need to qualify for the index? because there has to be albums where only one dude bothered to vote for it

da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)

J0rdan S, idk, quantity has rarely been synonymous with quality, but okie.

― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:52 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark

right... but quantity is often synonymous with... depth

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)

guys you are saying 'the gender distribution for ween is the same as that as total votes cast in the poll. for every other record, a given female voter is more likely to vote for it than a given male voter'

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

or not, i have an arts degree and i'm drunk

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

Incidentally, some stuff I've written about for p4k: lots of female fronted r&b, dancehall, minimal techno, OG disco, funk carioca... And I'm nowhere near the most adventurous staff writer taste wise.

Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

i mean there were still 30 thousand ballots for this thing, i think anything in any of the sublists must've been on a decent number of ballots

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

xpost

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

30,000?? jfc

max, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

Jaymc: yeah, my phone doesn't warn me about xposts.

Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

oh wait. points v votes!

thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

30,000 people provided free labor so pitchfork could sell a platform to converse

max, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

Incidentally, some stuff I've written about for p4k: lots of female fronted r&b, dancehall, minimal techno, OG disco, funk carioca... And I'm nowhere near the most adventurous staff writer taste wise.

yes you are very representative and prolific on the site of course

lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

Have you read any joe tangari? Oh wait silly question.

Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:58 (thirteen years ago)

lol

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:58 (thirteen years ago)

guys you are saying 'the gender distribution for ween is the same as that as total votes cast in the poll. for every other record, a given female voter is more likely to vote for it than a given male voter'

I'm not entirely clear on this, either, but the 88%/12% gender distribution overall is for voters, not votes.

squicky chutzpah in the drug biz (jaymc), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:59 (thirteen years ago)

yeah re-reading the distinction index description, it's definitely something vaguer than literally 36% of the votes for a regina spektor album were female, but that women were 36% more likely to vote for Regina Spektor's Far? in that case yeah i dunno how they worked that up.

da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:01 (thirteen years ago)

i guess if converse is happy that's all that matters

da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:02 (thirteen years ago)

tbh i feel like they should've just left out those percentages, even if we knew exactly what they meant i kinda doubt they'd add any real shade of meaning to the rankings

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

30,000 people provided free labor so pitchfork could sell a platform to converse

...

Lamp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

it's possible they left those percentages to generate think pieces across the interwebs

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:04 (thirteen years ago)

if people are sick of white people lists maybe they should read rap lists? merengue lists? don't read bluegrass lists though. or metal lists. i mean indie rock is uh traditionally and historically whiter than white. indie rock fans listen to indie rock. it ain't rocket science. and indie rockers like rap that reminds them of indie rock. they want everything to sound like indie rock. that's why they play wilco records instead of country records.

scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:05 (thirteen years ago)

The distinction index list for USA in general is rather interesting, only for the fact that it's probably one of the few times that Third Eye Blind or Sublime will ever be mentioned on the site:

1.94.93% My Morning Jacket Okonokos
2.93.25% Dr. Dog Fate
3.93.21% The Avett Brothers Emotionalism
4.92.9% Ted Leo and the Pharmacists Shake the Sheets
5.92.9% Beulah The Coast is Never Clear
6.91.17% Third Eye Blind Third Eye Blind
7.90.91% Sublime Sublime
8.90.88% Ted Leo and the Pharmacists Hearts of Oak
9.90.81% Dr. Dog Shame, Shame
10.90.78% Matt & Kim Grand
11.90.72% Hum Downward Is Heavenward
12.90.32% Dr. Dog We All Belong
13.90.03% Ted Leo and the Pharmacists The Tyranny of Distance
14.89.64% Ra Ra Riot The Rhumb Line
15.88.96% Fountains of Wayne Welcome Interstate Managers
16.88.56% Enon Believo!
17.88.12% Lucinda Williams Car Wheels On a Gravel Road
18.88.04% Crooked Fingers Crooked Fingers
19.87.85% Minus the Bear Highly Refined Pirates
20.87.54% Minus the Bear Menos el Oso

MarkoP, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:06 (thirteen years ago)

sorry that was dumb and obvious. just keep seeing this on facebook with people lamenting what pitchfork people don't listen to.

scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:07 (thirteen years ago)

think the wider problem remains gender roles throughout industry (why so few female duos/trios/quartets/producers/engineers etc.) nor as many m/f combos as there ought to be really.

rosen's quote lists 'solo' figurehead women as some sort of equivalent to bands like the national, which just highlights further the playing field is not so much uneven as severely fragmented and divided unevenly across a much wider area. it's quite a clunky comparison on that basis, regardless of how many people try to appreciate both archetypes.

the dearth of successful bands while solo acts increase generally obstructs this further (even tho the latter has ended up seemingly leading to more solo women than men in the bestsellers list).

nashwan, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:07 (thirteen years ago)

man ted leo does not have international appeal at all huh (xpost)

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:07 (thirteen years ago)

or maybe i'm the only person who thinks of pitchfork music as being an actual genre. which is why i don't get the hate. people don't get mad at rap listmakers for ignoring kate bush or whatever. its a genre thing!

scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:08 (thirteen years ago)

well that's because they asked big boi

some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:09 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.