If Chris Ott is to be believed, Pitchfork's official lists are highly tailored to reflect the brand.
I dunno, I admire Pitchfork for what they do day to day, but I also hate all the conniving that goes into their listmaking, the stupid festivals, the news section, etc.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:31 (thirteen years ago)
do u?
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:32 (thirteen years ago)
i think u hate ~urself~
older rock crits on my facebook HATED this thing. man. like serious hate. the results of this thing. they are not down with the fork at all. the list looked pretty much exactly like i thought it would. so, no hate from me. i knew what to expect.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:32 (thirteen years ago)
lots of xps!
The Top 40 scarcely registers a blip in this world. Hip-hop—and for that matter, Afro-America—is represented mainly by Kanye West. (Kanye contains multitudes, but c’mon.) Country music doesn’t exist. Metal doesn’t exist. Reggaeton, bachata, salsa? ¿Cómo? The world outside the United States—it’s barely there.
Bit harsh, literally no publication anywhere covers all this. Pitchfork fulfills its mission reasonably well in terms of genre coverage, if it's somehow made out to be the dominant player in the ecosystem that's more the ecosystem's fault than Pitchfork's imo.
― Cong rat ululations (seandalai), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:34 (thirteen years ago)
yeah this is how I feel too
― Shameful Dead Half Choogle (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:34 (thirteen years ago)
I mean the obvious answer to "Did it escape their attention that for much of the past decade and a half, female artists have had a stranglehold on the popular music zeitgeist?" is no, of course not. They want to hear dudes with guitars, so the "popular music zeitgeist" has nothing for them anymore.
That's kind of my problem with Can they really prefer The National to M.I.A.’s Kala, to Bjork’s Homogenic, to Joanna Newsom’s Ys? I prefer Homogenic and Kala to the National (I haven't listened to Ys and not in a rush), but like, are you actually going to argue that people who REALLY LIKE THE NATIONAL are going to get what they're looking for from Bjork/MIA/Missy?
Also noteworthy that both the women who bothered to vote and the men are guitar-centric
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:34 (thirteen years ago)
Can they really prefer The National to M.I.A.’s Kala, to Bjork’s Homogenic, to Joanna Newsom’s Ys
if you wouldn't prefer to not listen to music ...
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:36 (thirteen years ago)
It's almost as if... women who have learned to function in a SWM-centred world have taken on the SWM aesthetic values that are promoted there! Uncanny!
― my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:36 (thirteen years ago)
indie rock fans REALLY like indie rock. like, a lot.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:37 (thirteen years ago)
IMPORTANT STATISTIC less than one percent of pitchfork's readership submitted a ballot for this shit
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:37 (thirteen years ago)
haha awesome
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:38 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:34 PM (3 minutes ago)
interesting to the extent that people who like guitar music like guitar music
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:38 (thirteen years ago)
That's not even counting ppl like me who don't even read Pitchfork but submitted a ballot through sheer frustragetion.
― my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:38 (thirteen years ago)
Are you telling me nearly 3M people are reading Pitchfork at any given time? xps
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:39 (thirteen years ago)
...conniving?
― max, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:39 (thirteen years ago)
also it looks like dudes were into My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy a good bit more than the ladies
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:39 (thirteen years ago)
weird
yeah conniving? wtf
― young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
"If Chris Ott is to be believed"
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
IMPORTANT FACT the top ten google results for 'women in the pitchfork readers list' include pitchfork's artist pages for of montreal, public enemy, and david bowie
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
And man-centric, compared to the distinction index for female voters. There seems to be less consensus on which albums by women are great, which I guess makes sense because there's really no monolithic critical consensus either. I wonder how much there's a sense of duty/shame at play here, with women feeling duty-bound to list the same common "greatest albums of all-time" as anyone else, but maybe also feeling like anyone will question their taste or deride it for its femininity if they dare put Regina Spektor over Radiohead or Arcade Fire. x-posts
― Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
did sister soulja crack the top 100?
― scott seward, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:42 (thirteen years ago)
Regina Spektor is a bad example, but I'd rank a lot of albums made by women over anything by Radiohead or Arcade Fire.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
Regina Spektor is #1 on the female voters distinction index, also you aren't a woman.
― Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
which I guess makes sense because there's really no monolithic critical consensus either
eh I would've guessed the Missy and MIA and Joanna Newsom albs are as canonical as things get...?
― Shameful Dead Half Choogle (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:44 (thirteen years ago)
but there isn't a publication -- certainly not one on its level -- that covers as wide a breadth of music as in-depth.
You seriously believe the bolded bit?
― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:44 (thirteen years ago)
older rock crits on my facebook HATED this thing. man. like serious hate. the results of this thing. they are not down with the fork at all. the list looked pretty much exactly like i thought it would. so, no hate from me. i knew what to expect.― scott seward, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:32 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― scott seward, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:32 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Exactly. I'm a little surprised by the degree of nastiness.
I would have submitted a list if I didn't do it so damn often at the day job.
― Andy K, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:45 (thirteen years ago)
Not in the same "greatest of all-time" sort of way. There's a consensus that they're good or great, not so much a consensus that they belong at the very top of your list. x-posts
― Melissa W, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:45 (thirteen years ago)
i am more and more baffled as to how they arrived at 'distinction index'
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:46 (thirteen years ago)
Fair enough. I haven't perused any of the individual voter block info.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:46 (thirteen years ago)
― thomp, Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:46 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark
what about their explanation of it isn't clear?
― some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (thirteen years ago)
― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:44 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
uhh... yeah. pitchfork runs probably 4,000+ new words of criticism every day for practically the entire year. that's not even counting features, news or video stuff.
― young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (thirteen years ago)
Anyone who got legitimately angry about these results must have a massive stroke every time the People's Choice Awards roll around.
― Old Lunch, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:48 (thirteen years ago)
― some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:47 (7 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
that it doesn't tell you how they arrived at the number
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:48 (thirteen years ago)
I didn't get angry at these results, just kinda eye-rolly. But I do get annoyed at the massive pile-ups of endless white dude lists of white dudes.
― my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)
i expected this list basically, nevertheless it is still a deeply wack list
― max, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)
if i get the distinction index correctly, it's telling us which albums were voted predominantly for by a subset. If that's true, the overwhelming maleness of the voting populace is underscored by the fact that only two albums (Regina Spektor's Far and Devendra Banhart's Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon) had women voters making up more than a third of its endorsers. And only just more than a third. Basically it looks like every album took at least 10% of its support from women, and never more than 35%.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:51 (thirteen years ago)
I think the percentage is the number of votes for that album which were from people in the particular demographic.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)
J0rdan S, idk, quantity has rarely been synonymous with quality, but okie.
― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)
Amount not number obv.
if that were how it works then some records on the men's distinction list would be over 88% ?
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:53 (thirteen years ago)
I think that's the same as how da croupier is reading it.
― squicky chutzpah in the drug biz (jaymc), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)
xpost yeah that throws me off - how many votes did an album need to qualify for the index? because there has to be albums where only one dude bothered to vote for it
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)
― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:52 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark
right... but quantity is often synonymous with... depth
― young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:54 (thirteen years ago)
guys you are saying 'the gender distribution for ween is the same as that as total votes cast in the poll. for every other record, a given female voter is more likely to vote for it than a given male voter'
― thomp, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:55 (thirteen years ago)
or not, i have an arts degree and i'm drunk
Incidentally, some stuff I've written about for p4k: lots of female fronted r&b, dancehall, minimal techno, OG disco, funk carioca... And I'm nowhere near the most adventurous staff writer taste wise.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:55 (thirteen years ago)
i mean there were still 30 thousand ballots for this thing, i think anything in any of the sublists must've been on a decent number of ballots
― some dude, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 21:56 (thirteen years ago)
xpost