well,according to this: http://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/destroyer/trouble_in_dreams/
ppl will think it's great.
i think it's great too, it catchs you up on the first listening.
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 10:55 (eighteen years ago)
oh shit is that really the cover?
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 10:59 (eighteen years ago)
i think at least some of the tracks were recorded live on the studio
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:00 (eighteen years ago)
hopefully not cuz that looks like it was made on indesign xp
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:00 (eighteen years ago)
yeah there's one in the middle where you can hear bejar briefly chatting then counting off the band
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:01 (eighteen years ago)
about the cover, i'm not sure, it might be also this one - a better one for sure: http://www.catbirdseat.org/catbirdseat/archives/000832.shtml
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:02 (eighteen years ago)
hypertext record for optional drinking games - out
rubies melodies and the "da da da da..." - still in
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:22 (eighteen years ago)
spidery guitar lines- still in
wailing piano- still in
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:29 (eighteen years ago)
so far i think
back half (esp 'introducing angels' and on)>front
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
almost no surprises,but thats a good think. (i mean, i'm not one of the "your blues fan)
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:34 (eighteen years ago)
good thing
totally agree
i went into destroyer starting w/ rubies and didn't like notorious lightning or your blues half as much
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:35 (eighteen years ago)
so u like the less poppy and more talky part
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:36 (eighteen years ago)
kind of
i like rambling singing + da da das + awesome guitar peels
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
not that the first half isn't also great
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:39 (eighteen years ago)
"this night" is the destroyer record of that formula, i think (destroyer might be trying here to re-create the live atmosphere of that record)
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
"jenny fell like a ton of bricks" "WHOOOOOOOSH" "jenny fell like a ton of bricks" ".......WHOOOOOOOOOOSH"
― J0rdan S., Friday, 18 January 2008 11:44 (eighteen years ago)
this is lovely. luscious, like. the tone of the instruments reminds me of In Rainbows but maybe just because ...In Dreams. reminds me of that. the opening song is so great. i'm only half-way through listening, though.
― sean gramophone, Friday, 18 January 2008 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
This album is Mellotron central!
― Davey D, Friday, 18 January 2008 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
Some serious stoner moments in the middle, too...
Does it have that shambling 70s rock feel to it, like Rubies did?
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 18 January 2008 16:32 (eighteen years ago)
v harry nilsson
― sean gramophone, Friday, 18 January 2008 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
That makes it sound v. different from Rubies, which reminded me of 70s Bowie.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 18 January 2008 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
dunno 70s bowie, really. definitely it's closest destroyer peers are Destroyer's Rubies and This Night. he seems to have worked pretty hard to make it sound pretty.
― sean gramophone, Friday, 18 January 2008 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
the 2nd half is like "rubies" - the song. the first half is like "your blues" - the song. the sound is somewhere in like "rubies" with live-vibe.
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
ok i was way off. having spent more time with it it's not nilsson-like at all, or particularly pretty. in fact, i don't think musically it's that great. jammy in a way that's putting me off right now. lyrics are tops, though, all nonsense and vivacity.
― sean gramophone, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
"shooting rockets" and the last song are dramatic, pretty and somewhat depressing. i think i'll like this record.
― Zeno, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:40 (eighteen years ago)
"Shooting Rockets" is AWE-SOME
― Davey D, Saturday, 19 January 2008 00:18 (eighteen years ago)
"Libby's First Sunrise" is so good
― dmr, Saturday, 19 January 2008 00:47 (eighteen years ago)
where the hell are you all hearing this?
― iago g., Saturday, 19 January 2008 02:57 (eighteen years ago)
nevermind
― iago g., Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:08 (eighteen years ago)
first response. same wobbly guitar leads, new? use of mellotron strings, not nearly as many girl's names, nowhere near Rubies (except Shooting Rockets)--my ambivalence is sure to turn rapidly to wildly inordinate overpraise upon repeated listens
― iago g., Saturday, 19 January 2008 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
the biggest difference between "trouble" and "rubies" is that on this one there are less hooks .but still it's great and very enjoyeble.
― Zeno, Saturday, 19 January 2008 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
nothing is hitting me quite like "painter in yr pocket" or "european oils" just yet.
― Simon H., Saturday, 19 January 2008 17:39 (eighteen years ago)
maybe cause there are almost no hooks,and no catch-phrases..
― Zeno, Saturday, 19 January 2008 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
enjoying the 'da-da-duh-duh-da-dee-daa-dada' section of rivers quite a bit
― The Macallan 18 Year, Saturday, 19 January 2008 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
yep. "Rivers" is second best behind "Libby" I think
the lyrics seem more .... straightforward than usual
― dmr, Saturday, 19 January 2008 19:07 (eighteen years ago)
...if u can understand them
― Zeno, Saturday, 19 January 2008 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
"i've got street despair caught into my heart..." "i was starving in that shit-house" "youve been wanderin' around,youve been fuckin' around" "1993 - it was a good year, it was a very good year..."
― Zeno, Saturday, 19 January 2008 19:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?referrerid=112033&t=6711391
― s1ocki, Saturday, 19 January 2008 23:22 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, i've googled this forum too.. aside from body builder,it's a well known fact that Destroyer is also popular among accountants and bridge players
― Zeno, Saturday, 19 January 2008 23:47 (eighteen years ago)
lololol zeno ftw
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 20 January 2008 00:43 (eighteen years ago)
this is growing at me to be the most disturbing,sometimes depressingly serious and maybe the best Destroyer release yet. getting closer to Reed's "Berlin" and nick cave, and far away from "hunky dory"
― Zeno, Monday, 28 January 2008 01:49 (eighteen years ago)
http://static.rateyourmusic.com/album_images/s1192657.jpg
― Zeno, Monday, 28 January 2008 13:25 (eighteen years ago)
the sense of depression,surrealism and insanity in this record is rare to find in records, and it strikes with great emotional power. in short, it's the strongest Destroyer record to date i really think bejar is in the same league as scott walker, lou reed and nick cave.at their best i mean.
"we live in darkness the light is a dream you see...the light holds a terrible secret.."
― Zeno, Thursday, 31 January 2008 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
After a couple of spins, I don't like it as much as Rubies. It's more bummed out, less ecstatic, less catchy. The song "Shooting Rockets.." is an impressive depressive reverie though - perhaps the one song that best approaches the peaks of Rubies - and there are some pretty, catchy tunes in the first half. The lyrics seem to be struggling a bit on this one.
― o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 14:25 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I just relistened to this yesterday and am trying to figure out why I don't like it nearly as much as Rubies, despite the fact that the sound is fairly similar. I think yeah, it's just a little less catchy.
― jaymc, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
I also think Bejar doesn't really sell it as much this time - he sounds a bit fatigued, less sure of himself, grappling with doubt.
― o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
i think it's actually a bit better than "rubies",BECAUSE it's less catchy
― Zeno, Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:44 (eighteen years ago)
I haven't decided where this places in the Destroyer pantheon yet, but it does feature my new favorite Bejar pun: "I was wringing a bell's neck!"
― Simon H., Thursday, 27 March 2008 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
I think that to get away with singing nonsense it's important to sound utterly sure of yourself. Bejar pulled this off beautifully on Rubies. But to listlessly and apologetically sing nonsense wears on the listener's patience.
― o. nate, Thursday, 27 March 2008 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
This has grown on me a bit, esp. "Rivers". I still don't like it as much as Rubies though.
There was an interesting Q&A with Bejar on eMusic recently where he said that he was listening a lot to Dylan's Christian-period albums while making Rubies - I definitely hear that in the singing.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
saw him last week on tour for this record, it was one of the best shows I've seen him play
setlist was mostly This Night / Trouble in Dreams with a couple from Rubies .... any set that ends with Hey Snow White I'm gonna be cool with it
― dmr, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
they're not playing anything from Streethawk or Thief though :/
― dmr, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
i didn't know what time it was at all
― flamenco blorf (BradNelson), Saturday, 9 June 2018 00:43 (eight years ago)
yeah, that one always sticks
― niels, Saturday, 9 June 2018 12:25 (eight years ago)
the Rubies - Trouble in Dreams combo remains my favorite era of Destroyer by far
― Dinsdale, Saturday, 9 June 2018 13:11 (eight years ago)
nah it's cool you go i'll stay perfectly at home with this dreaddark leaves form a thread
― Heez, Sunday, 24 February 2019 04:52 (seven years ago)