RUSH vs. YES vs. THE GRATEFUL DEAD

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

wow

laugh my socks off

http://www.boingboing.net/filesroot/ghost%20fart.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMGwGUCbECA

Well, at least the one in the middle is correct }:|

i agree w this

Wah?

This poll got an impressive number of votes.

Sad that rush didn't do better; I actually thought they might win.

bunch of hippies around here iirc

Really thought Yes was gonna take this. Really thought the Dead were gonna come in third. I confess total bafflement (and quite a bit of disgust) at this result.

Reverse order

say wtf

lurkers imo

not on this thread

i did not think there would be 40 rush fans on ilm

In retrospect I guess we shouldn't be surprised the band with the most rabid cult following in history brought out the lurkers

Also possible factor: the Dead are the only band in this poll with any female fans

http://tralfaz-archives.com/coverart/G/Grateful_Dead/gdead_workf.jpg

hater vote split the opposition

divide and conquer, it's the hippie way

Fuck this shit.

PS - actually Rush does have female fans as of the last five years or so. It's a new and exciting development. I Dj Rush and girls dance. Hell has indeed frozen over--further proof is this poll result.

"Justice has been deserved" as Space Ghost said

dj rush is about 10^6 times realer than the dead or rush tho

lol Nate between your love of Agalloch and your hatred of the Dead I'm ready to totally write SUCKS next to band names on your notebook when you're not looking in class & then blame it on the other dude next to you when you call me out

haha! well, I'll play going for the one in solidarity

burn ilm to the ground

Silly human race.

Actually finding the *indignation* about this slightly distasteful.

For all the stock put in their compositional skills and progressivism, did Yes or Rush ever create music that was as big a redefinition of genre as "St. Stephen?"

Problem is, there are whole decades of sub-par Dead, which puts their legacy in a bad light, while there are only albums-worth of sub-par Rush or Yes.

(fwiw, I didn't vote, but probably would've voted for the Dead: more feedback than Yes and Rush combined)

http://thisevilempire.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/fonziejumpsshark3sl.gif

For all the stock put in their compositional skills and progressivism, did Yes or Rush ever create music that was as big a redefinition of genre as "St. Stephen?"

I would attempt to answer the question but I don't understand it. What does it mean to redefine a genre, how does it relate to compositional skills, and how does "St Stephen" do this?

no fuggin way. this is four noise board dudes with 10 socks each.

and fuck, i dunno, 20 lurkers

INDIGNATION

"St. Stephen" is clearly rock music. (I mean, someone even hollers during it. It sounds like rock and roll.) But what are the touchstones for such a song? Maybe the two guitars in the Rolling Stones had that kind of rhythm-plus-riffs-in-between counterpoint going on before, but it didn't sound like this. And the bass player is playing these funky, muddy chords. And there are two drummers. And it just sounds like nothing other than themselves - structurally and sonically.

I'm not saying Yes and Rush were not innovative, but this is a substantial piece of music that seems to me to stand way out there on its own.

no fuggin way. this is four noise board dudes with 10 socks each.

dying

I see. It would seem that it would be harder for a rock band to 'redefine the genre' that way in 1975 or even 1972, after everything that had already been done in the 60s, when the genre was still young.

That said, I'm interested in knowing what you see as the touchstones for "Close to the Edge". Obviously, Thick as a Brick is an even larger-scale composition but it doesn't quite do what CttE does formally. There are some ideas, esp the opening solo, that suggest McLaughlin/Mahavishnu but the overall composition is not like something he'd do.

xpost to tim

you ppl are nutso, the dead are a great band, i don't understand why these poll results surprise you? especially considering how stigma-laden the entire genre of prog rock is? and this is ilx? where we have lots of threads abt the dead? idk. pretending like this is some great disappointment and a sign of society heading to the gutter... don't be dumb.

many xposts to aero but...

I think this is actually pretty true - it's like, once you sort of locate the thing in what they do that you like, you hear it everywhere, and other stuff on/around it either becomes invisible or easy to ignore.

I'm genuinely interested in what this thing that you've located is. because, sure, some of the country rock is pleasant. and some of the dead's jams are pleasant too. but man, so much of their stuff is so bland to me. their albums are so spotty. their live sets are so spotty. I seriously can't hear what makes people become so obsessed with this band and I am really trying to hear it, man!

otoh, if you don't like this, I'm not sure what your problem is

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0HnIr6jYWU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhSaDMocYnY&feature=fvst

listening now. this is nice.

I guess my problem with this band is that they've never been as weird or 'out' as I was hoping for. and they never really rock too hard. they never really freak you out too much. not very funky. just kinda pleasant, I suppose. bringing some baggage to the table, I know...

the touchstones for "Close to the Edge"

"Tarkus?" I don't know if we're just talking about its complexity as a super-long suite, but The Incredible String Band did them going back to "A Very Cellular Song" in '68 (even longer ones like "White Bird" and "Creation" a year later).

poll results otm imo

so I'm stoked, just came up on a box of about 400 live Dead tapes today in Oakland. so excited to check these out. I already had a decent collection from my trader days but damn. a sizable chuck of shows from every year too

I predicted a Rush win but I'm not too startled by this. Clearly, people who don't like prog rock would vote for the Dead by default. Rush and Yes both have singers that turn off many people.

xposts

*sizeable xp

"Tarkus?" I don't know if we're just talking about its complexity as a super-long suite, but The Incredible String Band did them going back to "A Very Cellular Song" in '68 (even longer ones like "White Bird" and "Creation" a year later).

Not just complexity and length per se. The form has been analysed by Covach as a kind of hugely expanded AABA, by others as a sort of sonata form - the way they're able to build this large unified form using rock materials (there are still verses and refrains, for example), but also even using a quasi-ritornello in that pseudo-Baroque organ figure. I'm also thinking of the way the studio processing is integrated into the form and the forces used (four different keyboards, three singers, electric sitar).

I have Tarkus but I'm not sure I've ever made it all the way through, to be honest.:P

the real story is that the dead got spanked 2-1 by the power and majesty of prog, it just looks differently because the vote got split

if string cheese incident or wookiefoot had been in the poll yes would have won