http://yourkickstartersucks.tumblr.com/
― am0n, Thursday, 21 June 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)
that bus monitor who got mocked by those kids is doing Amanda Palmer numbershttp://www.indiegogo.com/loveforkarenhklein?c=home
Countdown until someone stages a sham bully attack for guilt-dollars in 5... 4... 3...
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 22 June 2012 17:59 (thirteen years ago)
so is the July 12 clampdown still on? CDs are good on the merch table, esp after shows, for cranked-up impulse buys. Also, they'll long outlive downloads, mysteriously subject to corruption no matter where you store 'em. So, though I'm more likely to say, "Sure, send me the link," even when the pitch is badly written (figure they won't be wasting their postage etc, so no guilt-tripping myself), I have to fgure how many backups will I make of each such promo, and where will I store it. Plus, I spend a lot more time downloading etc than I ever did opening envelopes. Oh well. July 12, eh?
― dow, Friday, 22 June 2012 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
this starts today?
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/ISP-Six-Strikes-to-Begin-This-Weekend-120119?nocomment=1
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 20:02 (thirteen years ago)
so basically if you spend time on filesharing sites, you'll be given warnings by your ISP? i just downloaded a promo from a publicist on sendspace -- am i in trouble?
― tylerw, Sunday, 1 July 2012 20:38 (thirteen years ago)
my ol' dirty armchair projection, from email response to a friend wondering about what's in it for ISPs:"Do they want to get rid of broadband subscribers?" welll...
There's already at least the possibility of charging subscribers more, justified by the cost of policing. So far, some/most providers, spooked by screaming customers etc, have had to ease the cap (for my DSL, and I guess some other thingies) in place, or keep it hovering gently overhead (no way I'm ever going to even brush ATT's current cap). But this might be a way of motivating me to upgrade--if my rate for this same ol' service is increasing from 42.95 to 60.00 anyway, why not pay say 80.00 and actually get more stuff? Including legit downloads--still paying a bit more if I exceed the cap, but either way guaranteed legit by my provider. Continuing the partition of the Web of course, and hey check our App Store! Provider galaxies of app-wormholes side by side in the Fecesbookeverse, till something bigger and hungrier comes along.
― dow, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:01 (thirteen years ago)
Like with the price of an iPod, why not pay even more (but not too much more)to get even more, when the iPhone comes along? And then--the iPad!
― dow, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:06 (thirteen years ago)
Are you saying 'why not double my internet bill?'
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 2 July 2012 20:47 (thirteen years ago)
so has this actually come into effect?
― buh, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:53 (thirteen years ago)
it's a mystery.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)
how disconcerting
― buh, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
i just hope when the feds come, they're these feds. http://www.moviegoods.com/Assets/product_images/1020/248247.1020.A.jpg
― tylerw, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
first one to get sued must post letter on ILM.
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 July 2012 21:00 (thirteen years ago)
Ha, Fred Thompson. The irony.
xp
― Chuck? Chuck? It's me, your cousin, Marvin D (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Monday, 2 July 2012 21:04 (thirteen years ago)
Getting busted by Rebecca and Mary--so worth it!
― dow, Monday, 2 July 2012 21:32 (thirteen years ago)
sleep tight america
― tylerw, Monday, 2 July 2012 21:35 (thirteen years ago)
(refrains from suggested wordplay)
― dow, Monday, 2 July 2012 21:37 (thirteen years ago)
i used to listen to all the records at my library when i was a kid. they had pretty decent listening stations. i learned all the words to doors songs that way.― scott seward, Wednesday, June 20, 2012 7:50 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― scott seward, Wednesday, June 20, 2012 7:50 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i like that.my library where i grew up used to loan out paintings as well as records. the paintings were awful.each record sleeve had a card in it with two circles preprinted, where the scratches could be recorded with a pen. that way the library worker could check if there were any new scratches on the record when i brought it back.whenever i went to flick through the record sleeves, cozy powell's 'tilt' was always in the rack.
― For bodies we are ready to build pyramids (whatever), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 07:23 (thirteen years ago)
So....is this happening? I did a quick Google search but the results were from before 7/12.
― musicfanatic, Thursday, 26 July 2012 01:46 (thirteen years ago)
for whatever reason the ISPs seem to have the upper hand here.
― skip, Thursday, 26 July 2012 02:48 (thirteen years ago)
in what sense? Standing up for us? Or for The Man?
― dow, Thursday, 26 July 2012 02:55 (thirteen years ago)
standing up for "us" - despite the bandwidth shaping, throttling etc. They probably just don't want other industries meddling in their affairs or set the precedent of letting Hollywood (in reality, a current and future competitor) boss them around, even if they couldn't care less about whether their customers get frogmarched for downloading a few Nickelback tracks.
― skip, Thursday, 26 July 2012 03:06 (thirteen years ago)
The sticking point in Aus and NZ is that the content industries want the ISPs to pay for all the policing, and the ISPs are (rightly) pushing back. I presume a similar thing will transpire in the US.
― undermikey: bidness (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 26 July 2012 03:37 (thirteen years ago)
Having failed to pass SOPA, they are trying again, and what they have learned from last time is: this time, keep a tighter lid on the details of the bill until after it passes
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/07/trans_pacific_partnership_agreement_tpp_could_radically_alter_intellectual_property_law.html
The only thing that I knew with certainty was that I didn’t know much about what was happening in the TPP negotiations, and therefore I couldn’t offer much in the way of substantive questions and input, which was the point that I wanted to make to the negotiators. Other than “cleared advisors”—primarily industry representatives—no one outside the inner circle knows what is currently being negotiated in TPP. Most members of Congress do not even know what is in TPP. Indeed, the last publicly available text of TPP’s intellectual property chapter is a leaked version dated Feb. 10, 2011. Nonetheless, the goal of the “stakeholder engagement event,” as the TPP “Welcome Stakeholders!” packet explained, was to provide an “open and productive forum.” Yet the public knows more about the aggregate numbers of nuclear warheads the United States and Russia have deployed on intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty than it does about U.S. negotiating positions in TPP. Thus, on “openness,” the TPP negotiators and USTR have failed.
― Milton Parker, Monday, 30 July 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)
Keep it up guys, it just brings the day we burn your office buildings down with you inside that much closer.
― Amoeba, Fish, Monkey, Shame (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 05:47 (thirteen years ago)
The NASA Curiosity team had to overcome many obstacles to land their robot safely on the surface of the Red Planet. But one obstacle they were probably not expecting to encounter was an accusation of copyright infringement.The American space agency has been posting videos related to the Curiosity mission on its official YouTube page. But the Motherboard blog noticed that one of the videos had disappeared. In its place was the message "This video contains content from Scripps Local News, who has blocked it on copyright grounds."NASA is a federal agency, and by law, works of the federal government are in the public domain. And in any event, it's hard to see how Scripps could own footage of NASA scientists celebrating Curiosity's successful landing in their own control room. So NASA complained to YouTube, and the video was restored within a few hours.“We apologize for the temporary inconvenience experienced when trying to upload and view a NASA clip early Monday morning," a Scripps spokesman told Motherboard. "We made a mistake. We reacted as quickly as possible to make the video viewable again, and we’ve adjusted our workflow processes to remedy the situation in future.”Mistakes happen. But "accidents" like this have become disturbingly common. Last month, an overzealous music publisher took down videos of Barack Obama singing a line from one of its songs (then, as now, YouTube eventually reviewed and reversed the takedown).A NASA spokesman says that its content gets erroneously taken down about once a month. They've been asking YouTube to fix the problem but "it hasn't helped much." If a prominent federal agency like NASA struggles with unfair takedowns, what hope do the rest of us have of getting YouTube's attention when our videos are taken down?http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/as-curiosity-touches-down-on-mars-video-is-taken-down-from-youtube/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+All+content%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
The American space agency has been posting videos related to the Curiosity mission on its official YouTube page. But the Motherboard blog noticed that one of the videos had disappeared. In its place was the message "This video contains content from Scripps Local News, who has blocked it on copyright grounds."
NASA is a federal agency, and by law, works of the federal government are in the public domain. And in any event, it's hard to see how Scripps could own footage of NASA scientists celebrating Curiosity's successful landing in their own control room. So NASA complained to YouTube, and the video was restored within a few hours.
“We apologize for the temporary inconvenience experienced when trying to upload and view a NASA clip early Monday morning," a Scripps spokesman told Motherboard. "We made a mistake. We reacted as quickly as possible to make the video viewable again, and we’ve adjusted our workflow processes to remedy the situation in future.”
Mistakes happen. But "accidents" like this have become disturbingly common. Last month, an overzealous music publisher took down videos of Barack Obama singing a line from one of its songs (then, as now, YouTube eventually reviewed and reversed the takedown).
A NASA spokesman says that its content gets erroneously taken down about once a month. They've been asking YouTube to fix the problem but "it hasn't helped much." If a prominent federal agency like NASA struggles with unfair takedowns, what hope do the rest of us have of getting YouTube's attention when our videos are taken down?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/as-curiosity-touches-down-on-mars-video-is-taken-down-from-youtube/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+arstechnica%2Findex+%28Ars+Technica+-+All+content%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 04:52 (thirteen years ago)
http://torrentfreak.com/demonoid-busted-as-a-gift-to-the-united-states-government-120806/
― Mordy, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 04:54 (thirteen years ago)
=(
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 05:00 (thirteen years ago)
I noticed the green one wasn't working lately. So sad to see it go. RIP
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 05:02 (thirteen years ago)
no big deal it'll be back soon
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 05:04 (thirteen years ago)
loving the comments on that torrentfreak article
PRIVACY is priceless to me 11 minutes agoUkraine is a U$ slave-colony since at least 2004, they just love being slaves obeing worse-than-nazi U$ orders like they loved killing jews for the germans in the 40's.And also, Russia isn't any better now than it was in 1980, it's even worse.
― steven fucking tyler (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 10:30 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, fuck that ukraine that is part of the usa and also russia
― undermikey: bidness (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 11:53 (thirteen years ago)
torrent community entitlement is probably the worst entitlement going atm
― undermikey: bidness (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 11:54 (thirteen years ago)
obeing
Thought this was some new weird anti-Obama word for a minute.
― Blind, Pregnant, Gay, Royal (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 12:34 (thirteen years ago)
obeyma
― Listen to this, dad (President Keyes), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 13:14 (thirteen years ago)
Well!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57521208-93/new-zealand-pm-apologizes-to-kim-dotcom-case-unraveling/
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 September 2012 15:56 (thirteen years ago)
Clearly they did not take any lessons from the Americans by finding a lawyer to tell them spying was legal before doing it, and also not apologizing.
Basically what I'm saying is that they should have just taken Kim Dotcom out with a drone.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 27 September 2012 18:51 (thirteen years ago)
LaMonte Young would've wasted him.
― 5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 27 September 2012 18:58 (thirteen years ago)
"Conrad. Tony Conrad."
*BA-DA-BA-DAAAA-BA-DA-DA*
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 September 2012 19:11 (thirteen years ago)
Wouldn't it just be *BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...*
― Half Jaglom Half Winkler (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 28 September 2012 07:12 (thirteen years ago)
NZ Herald reporting on this mess is double-plus next level: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10837683
― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 02:25 (thirteen years ago)
Pir@te B@y has been down for a day or two.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 07:09 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.avclub.com/articles/liveuniverse-owes-music-publishers-66-million-for,86629
― Mordy, Friday, 12 October 2012 22:52 (thirteen years ago)
chasing that final dollar
― Listen to this, dad (President Keyes), Friday, 12 October 2012 23:01 (thirteen years ago)
''who knew that posting lyrics online was illegal?'' doesn't everybody know lyrics are copywritten?
― zvookster, Friday, 12 October 2012 23:06 (thirteen years ago)
can't wait 'til rapgenius gets hit tbh
― zvookster, Friday, 12 October 2012 23:07 (thirteen years ago)
a $6.6 million default judgment on Tuesday for posting the lyrics to 528 songs
That's $12,500 for lyrics to a each song.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 13 October 2012 01:55 (thirteen years ago)
Alleged AT&T training doc:http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/13/atandt-training-document-piracy/
― dow, Sunday, 14 October 2012 14:30 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/18/tech/web/copyright-alert-system/index.html?ctp=1
― sleeve, Monday, 22 October 2012 14:11 (thirteen years ago)
i don't understand the strategy. is it to ramp up annoyances to make it more costly to pirates, without having to go all the way to turning off their service (thus losing customers) or suing them (costing money, taking time)?
― j., Monday, 22 October 2012 17:30 (thirteen years ago)