bimble, in my blog post I posted above, I discuss the possibility of people of a certain age having a very different view of Joy Division because Substance was our introduction instead of the records, so we're biased towards the early punky stuff and the singles instead of the LPs.
Nice blog post, Dan! It's nice to feel I'm not alone in having experienced Joy Division at such a young age - I first heard them when I was about 13 or 14 as well. I love that story about you taping the J-Card for New Order's Substance cassette to your locker! Classic! But I can't agree with you that Joy Division's Substance was actually my first exposure to the band (it appears I'm just a few years older than you fwiw..Substance wasn't yet available at the time). I believe Closer was probably the first thing I owned by them, or perhaps the LWTUA 7', but it wasn't long before I had the Komakino flexi, Transmission 7' etc. and heard the tracks that were later compiled on Substance. Sometimes I could only hear these things through trading bootleg tapes with people. Anyway, I think what I was really reacting to in my post upthread was a strange mental block I have in my OWN mind now to think Joy Division = primarily UP & Closer. It's hard to explain why I have that mental block, but it does explain why it is so terribly thrilling whenever I put on other things. I do think too much weight is given to the proper albums, but perhaps that's to be expected.
I wonder if there is any common thread in how teenagers today are exposed to the band?
― Bimble, Friday, 22 February 2008 06:18 (eighteen years ago)
The forthcoming documentary film by Grant Gee is a good one. Very frank interviews with the surviving members. The antidote to Control.
-- Dr Morbius, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:23 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Link
I am excited for this.
― roxymuzak, Saturday, 23 February 2008 05:10 (eighteen years ago)
I watched 20 minutes and thought it was very nice. I'll prob. finish sometime this weekend.
― Tape Store, Saturday, 23 February 2008 05:40 (eighteen years ago)
LOVE! LIFE! MAKES YOU FEEL! HIGHER!
Come on Dan! You know what I mean! I just don't know if there is really a better Joy Division song in the world than "Sound of Music". Sigh. But I'm trying to be objective about this. Really, I'm trying.
― Bimble, Sunday, 30 March 2008 07:27 (eighteen years ago)
The Peel session version is really tops, what with the extra guitar part at the end.
― Millsner, Sunday, 30 March 2008 08:26 (eighteen years ago)
what's that thudding noise? why, it's the ghost of ian curtis trying to hang himself all over again.
wonder what wilson would have made of this, too?
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 18 April 2008 10:40 (eighteen years ago)
wombats lol
― electricsound, Friday, 18 April 2008 11:07 (eighteen years ago)
I also think it is way much better than Control. Worth watching.
― Shin Oliva Suzuki, Friday, 18 April 2008 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
That Zune story boggles.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 April 2008 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
it is extremely weird to me that joy division are that popular now; it was weird enough that they even the subject of a film
― akm, Friday, 18 April 2008 13:51 (eighteen years ago)
If there's a U2 iPod, and a Joy Division Zune, I can't wait for my Neu! edition Creative Zen player.
― bendy, Friday, 18 April 2008 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, maybe they'll do a Grateful Dead one next.
― Bimble, Friday, 18 April 2008 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
Just saw the documentary - excellent, but should just be called Ian Curtis. I guess I'm the only one who wants a Barney doc.
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 24 April 2008 05:27 (eighteen years ago)
no i'd like that too. i suppose i could always just read his book
― electricsound, Thursday, 24 April 2008 05:29 (eighteen years ago)
I'd definitely want one. Is the book any good?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 April 2008 05:35 (eighteen years ago)
I'm going to take a wild guess that Saville had nothing to do with the DVD cover art: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51l--x-519L._SS500_.jpg
The design in the doc itself is excellent.
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 24 April 2008 05:59 (eighteen years ago)
bahahaha re: Saville
The True Story of The Meteoric Rise And Fall Of One Of The Most Influential Bands Of Our Time
Why does this bother me seeing this at the top of this thing? Am I just too old to remember when such a line would never have been written anywhere? (at least not about Joy Division) Or is it just that I have a feeling Wilson wouldn't have approved either?
Ned: Grimly made some comments about the Barney book on one of these threads or other.
― Bimble, Thursday, 24 April 2008 07:07 (eighteen years ago)
I'm going to design my own cover for the DVD. I'll upload a PDF.
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 24 April 2008 07:19 (eighteen years ago)
Go Spencer! By the way, I'd like to see what Grimly would do for the cover!
― Bimble, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
"Am I just too old to remember when such a line would never have been written anywhere?"
see, but it just kind of reminds me of this:
Ideal for Living: History of "Joy Division" from Their Mythical Origins as "The Stiff Kittens" to Their Programmed Future as "New Order"
(er, kinda anyway. that's what i thought of when i saw that dvd cover. wish i still had my copy of that book. i used to have a great obsessive xeroxed fan book of press clippings and transcribed lyrics too. i'd like to see that again as well.)
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 April 2008 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
It's just a matter of wording preference, I think. The Ideal for Living one sounds reasonable to me and even interesting (and it's worth noting that those words appeared on the BACK of the book, not the front). It also makes no claims as to how influential the band were. The DVD one just sounds like some fucking generic rock and roll doc you could buy at Wal-Mart about say...Zep or The Doors or whoever. It's not very imaginative, nor is the damn design! :)
But yeah Ideal For Living is the JD/early New Order BIBLE in my opinion. I treasure my copy and still find it useful from time to time. I also know what "xeroxed fan book" you are talking about ("A History In Cuttings"). I still have my copy of that as well, but there were actually two volumes. I only ever had one and I never saw the other one with my own eyes but I came across someone on the Factory mailing list once who had it. I don't pull that book out as much, but it's nice as a historical document of the press they had while they were actually still making music and just after Ian's death. There's even some DIY fanzine type stuff in there, not just NME/MM/Sounds.
― Bimble, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:52 (eighteen years ago)
I have the History in Cuttings, didn't know there were two. Pretty amazing to read reviews of live Warsaw shows or articles typed up on a manual typewriter.
That's also where I learned about the Futurama festivals.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:52 (eighteen years ago)
By the way, I'd like to see what Grimly would do for the cover!
rip off saville (with only the vaguest idea of what he himself was ripping off in the first place)? it's served me well many other times :)
...made some comments about the Barney book on one of these threads or other
fucking hell, that took a long time to find. this one.
anyway: yes, shocking cover but i can't wait to see the film.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 24 April 2008 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
also, not-very-well-designed UK trailer site here.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 24 April 2008 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
Dear Weinsteins, if it's not too late, you're welcome:
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j53/spencermfi/jddoc1.jpg
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 24 April 2008 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
When I do a PDF, I'll leave out the Miriam and the dumb marketing blurb.
― Spencer Chow, Thursday, 24 April 2008 23:38 (eighteen years ago)
that is much better!
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 April 2008 23:42 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, much better! Grimly are you going to do one too?
― Bimble, Friday, 25 April 2008 02:16 (eighteen years ago)
ugh to that guy saying "they had no fucking choice" but to be on stage - annoying nonsense stance
― J0hn D., Friday, 25 April 2008 02:30 (eighteen years ago)
will you please actually send that in to the company?
― stephen, Friday, 25 April 2008 03:25 (eighteen years ago)
(xpost)
no, because a) i'd end up toiling over it for hours, b) i don't have hours to spare, c) i bet it wouldn't work as well as spencer's anyway!
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 25 April 2008 10:00 (eighteen years ago)
Also from The Weinsteins, I'm assuming they have a single in-house designer:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/519sX-BC1rL._SS500_.jpg
― Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
-- J0hn D., Friday, 25 April 2008 02:30 (4 days ago) Bookmark Link
'that guy'?!
Every other band is on stage because they wanted to be rock stars this lot were on stage because they had no...fucking...choice.
I love this quote actually, it's pure Wilson genius. It's not true of course (at the very least I'm sure Hooky always wanted to be a rock star) but it gives a great idea of why we love(d) them so much. We felt that WAS the reason they were onstage.
Oh, I sound like a teenager.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
DANCE DANCE DANCE TO THE RADIO
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Sunday, 4 May 2008 23:14 (eighteen years ago)
Just been to see the film. Good stuff although I doubt there's anything new for most people here. Lots of good things, reminded me why Dead Souls is my current favourite JD track, Barney, Hook and Morris are all on top form, and it's clear that Anik has aged better than them, some nice footage of Hannett. A few bits, like the hypnosis tape Barney and Curtis did- seemed rather pointless or over laboured, but all in all pretty enjoyable.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 5 May 2008 22:40 (eighteen years ago)
I thought the hypnotic regression thing was astonishing. I loved how Barney just casually dropped the "I was reading a book on hypnotic regression therapy at the time"...
― Spencer Chow, Monday, 5 May 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
I just thought it was a bit silly. Also, as my friend pointed out, whatever happened to therapist/patient confidentiality?
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 5 May 2008 22:50 (eighteen years ago)
At the end of the film a guy was having a row with some young hipster dudes who had been rustling sweet wrappers and popping cans occasionally (really no big deal and as we were at an 'arts cinema' much less than you average multiplex showing) and after a bit of verbal argy-bargy a cinema fellow turns up and the aggrieved party is shouting, virtually in tears "I saw them in Manchester when I was 18 and so this film means much more to me than it did to them...". Which is not something you hear at the end of most movies.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 5 May 2008 22:59 (eighteen years ago)
xpost I like how it shows Barney's mad scientist/nerd side.
― Spencer Chow, Monday, 5 May 2008 23:08 (eighteen years ago)
I've got the DVD of the documentary now and I'm trying to watch it but it's really way too intense for me. I have to stop it after every so often because I feel like I'm tripping on acid. Anyway, that bit where Bernard slags off the likes of "You're No Good For Me" as dreadful made me LOLS.
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Sunday, 22 June 2008 16:00 (seventeen years ago)
i managed to miss this at the cinema, which i'm gutted about. it was on for about a week; that was it. i need to get the DVD, but ... it won't be the same as the big-screen experience. tits.
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 22 June 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.toggle.co.nz/catalogues_other/DAR0015_20084813125.jpg
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:08 (seventeen years ago)
Region 2 DVD not out in the UK until the end of August? Why do they still do this? I've ordered a region one one from the states, cheaper anyway. The R2 one has a better cover though. http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41cxrP7hAhL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:19 (seventeen years ago)
Is this the director's cut with happy end?
― StanM, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:08 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah I got the doc. I tried to watch the doc. It taxed my brain. I had other things on my mind. I couldn't quite make it through all of it. Sensory overload.
― Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:35 (seventeen years ago)
i've realised i go through a heavy JD phase about once a year, then don't listen to them for most of the rest of the time (even though i'd still say they're my "favourite band" -- or at least did when my nine-year-old nephew asked who my favourite band was, and i really can't think of a more honest answer, especially if the set "joy division" is allowed to include "the new order stuff i love, which admittedly is most of it, substantial parts of the last two albums aside"). hopefully this year's phase will coincide with the release of the DVD :)
― grimly fiendish, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:52 (seventeen years ago)
i just watched the doc. not staggering amounts of new information but it's always nice hearing it from the horses' mouths so to speak. actually hearing from bernard for once was an unexpected pleasure (no pun intended) and steven morris continues to be my favourite member..
― Cooking From A Stovetop (electricsound), Thursday, 22 January 2009 03:49 (seventeen years ago)
Cooking from a stovetopWaiting on the brine...
Stir stir stirTo the radio.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 January 2009 03:50 (seventeen years ago)
Why is joy division getting so much attention over here lately!? IAN CURTIS SUCKED COCK FOR CAB FARE.
― Moka, Thursday, 22 January 2009 07:51 (seventeen years ago)