New Joanna Newsom Album "Ys" Due Nov 14

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (699 of them)
Lots of lovely moments on this album and some intense images. But she's rather humorless about her whole shtick, no?

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Does it take such a stretch of imagination to think that she believes in her work and doesn't see it as shtick?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I think it's an intentionally more "serious" record, so maybe the humour isn't appropriate (I miss it too).

This thread is going downhill fast... but I sympathise with people finding it all a bit hollow and contrived, in a way that frequently actually repels an emotional connection.

Well for me anyway. Whether she's "sincere" or not I don't know, I wish I could finally understand why I just-about like this, and even then with doubts, whereas other people are finding it utterly rapturous & I assume, deeply satisfying.

Maybe it's because so little of her poetry strikes me as coming from the sub-conscious, it makes too much literal/poetic sense when it's understood, it reminds me of rap that I don't like, when there's piles upon piles of lyrical puzzles to untangle but not much blissful surrender. Which is unfair, as there are many moments of surrender here, but as a whole, the sheer concentration -of- it, and the concentration it feels like it needs to be absorbed is wearying. I tried letting this just wash over me too but that came out even less rewarding :(

I still have the horrible feeling this is going to click eventually and I'll have to eat my words... but I still wish the 5 parts didn't all sound so similar overall, without that differentiation, this record feels more like a half-remembered dream with an uncertain beginning and end, and not enough of a "journey" for me.

brr (fandango), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

Finally this thread has hit its Destroye's Rubies stride. zippezappy, please let us know yr favorite album of the year so we can all denigrate it k thx bye.

Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

it's really great that everyone is arguing over what other critics think about this and calling each other stupid

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

like, does this kind of music attract morons or does it just make you stupid

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

?

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

xpost:

I definitely see how her music can sound like it was labored over to an excessive degree. When an artist appears to be trying too hard, it becomes a big turn-off. In that sense, I understand a lot of the criticism here.

The part I don't get is the notion that she is pulling a fast one on her audience or playing some kind of confidence trick. That seems to be the implication of a lot of comments on this thread, and I find it kind of mystifying.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

But all these criticisms are what I LIKE about the record--that it's baroque and affected and utterly contrived and totally unconvincing (I mean CHRIST it's a San Francisco hippie playing the harp over Van Dyke Parks string arrangements, WHAT PERSON ON EARTH is going to make a "serious emotional connection" (or whatever) to this besides seven-year-olds and elves or fairies or whatever??). The whole thing is a big fucking show--listen to the ridiculous words she's using, and the stories she's telling--and that's GREAT.

max (maxreax), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

Baroque and affected, sure, but why contrived?

Why are so many people convinced that there is a big disconnect (for good or ill) between her persona and her personality?

Is it so hard to believe that she is, in fact, that person?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

yes it's pretty hard for me to believe she is indeed a milk maiden or whatever she fancies herself as. Obviously my comments are extreme, but I suppose that's just my reaction to the extreme and hyperbolic praise being given to this album.
the fact is the songs are long, but they ACTUALLY don't do THAT much

I mean think about how long she sings about "darling dance with me" over and over and over and over again for a good 3 minutes at the end of "bear and monkey"

Sure, get lost in it. Feel the magic. It's like a sandra bullock romantic comedy, (but sandra REALLY IS THAT CUTE IN REAL LIFE), you either get lost in it or you don't.

Obviously I don't and I guess the other major issue I'm taking here (and I'm more irritated by the fans/critics then the actual album) is that NOBODY else seems to be speaking up here. Is it required that everyone think what she's doing is fucking hands down 10/10 across the board album of the year.

I know now people are going to chime in with a one sentence "I don't love it" but seriously, I just can't believe so many people buy it.

I'm quickly turning into the resident joanna hater and that wasn't my intention. I admire her ambition. I think the record is FINE. It is what it is, but I can't stomach all these giddy male rock critics talking about how for some reason HER lyrics about skipping stones are so great and why random other artists singing equally as ridiculous (IMO ) lyrics , get the full brush over or deemed as "trite" and "cutesy"

why her?

zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

T/S: Disagreeing with critical consenus cause you don't think it's THAT good vs. THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES SOUND TEH ALARM

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)

yes it's pretty hard for me to believe she is indeed a milk maiden or whatever she fancies herself as

What makes you think that she sees herself this way? I have no way of knowing for sure, but I would guess that she sees herself as a musician. I've never seen her say anything that would indicate otherwise.

I just can't believe so many people buy it

This is what confuses me - why does liking this album = "buying" it? If I enjoy listening to her am I suspending my disbelief? Disbelief of what?

I can't stomach all these giddy male rock critics talking about how for some reason HER lyrics about skipping stones are so great and why random other artists singing equally as ridiculous (IMO ) lyrics , get the full brush over or deemed as "trite" and "cutesy"

I understand disagreeing with the critics, but why be angry at them? Why even care about them?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

"Listen to the greed the monkey conveys in degrading, insulting, and controlling the bear, and the tight grip he keeps on her dignity so as not to lose her-- which, of course, by the end, he does."

THE GREEEEEED

MRZBW (MRZBW), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)

there's an album like this every year.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)

ts: blueberry boat vs. ys

(same pitchfork reviewer, (nearly) same score, same 'epic' expansion upon promising first disc, same hype)

I can't see this being better than BB, myself, but I'll need to give it a listen.

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)

Louis, you know I loves me some Blueberry Boat.

This is...as good.

Plus VDP & Steve Albini & Jim O'Rourke.

Like whoa.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Blueberry Boat was ridiculously bad

Ys is a good album, though

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:12 (nineteen years ago)

Charlatan.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

You know, I tried listening to Ys a bit, and it's alright I guess for what it is, but her voice doesn't work for me at all. It's kinda like some perverse combination of Conor Oberst and someone trying to do jazz scat vocals or something. I wouldn't mind liking it, but I just don't think that's going to happen for me any time soon.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)

I like most of Blueberry Boat and some other stuff by Fiery Furnaces, but I think Joanna Newsom makes stronger, more consistent albums. Also, her lyrics are much better. I see the similarities, but the Furnaces seem to take a more haphazard, kitchen sink approach, whereas Newsom seems more focused and self-aware.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, why would you compare the two? They are in different genres! I mean, at the heart of things, the Furnaces are writing verse/chorus/verse pop/rock songs. They screw around a lot, sure, but for the most part they really aren't that complicated.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:13 (nineteen years ago)

troof. My statement that it's "as good" is 100% subjective and is not based on any real similarities between BB & Ys.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:17 (nineteen years ago)

And to clarify, Louis was only T/Sing the two on the grounds of

(same pitchfork reviewer, (nearly) same score, same 'epic' expansion upon promising first disc, same hype)

I jumped in w/my "as good as" cause I know teh Jagger digs it lots, and then we miscommunicated shit all to hell.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:21 (nineteen years ago)

The comparison makes some sense though:

A couple years ago, they were getting the same hype.

They do projects that seem either ambitious or crazy.

The lyrics are overly verbose or just plain long.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)

WHAT PERSON ON EARTH is going to make a "serious emotional connection" (or whatever) to this besides seven-year-olds

so i was hoping to get this for my 8-year old cousin who is a concert harpist... (no shit)... is there a lot of smog dick or it is bad mixed metaphor?

will she see through it? i was gonna make her a copy of the last record minus the song with the "whores" on it... cause i'm not sure if her folks would dig that...

any chance JN will be on a NOW! kids comp in the near future?
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 06:21 (nineteen years ago)

i would have eaten this shit up when i was 8. i still do. "peter and the wolf" comparisons are otm, as would be comparisons to rodgers and hammerstein.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 07:26 (nineteen years ago)

Goddamnit, the Fiery Furnaces are the worst fucking band on the planet, people

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

i.e., please stop comparing Ys to Blueberry Boat, you jerks

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

Sure, get lost in it. Feel the magic. It's like a sandra bullock romantic comedy, (but sandra REALLY IS THAT CUTE IN REAL LIFE), you either get lost in it or you don't.

Huh? Joanna Newsom? Sandra fucking Bullock? "CUTE IN REAL LIFE"? Is this some exercise in automatic writing?

Turangalila (Salvador), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)

Sandra Bullock is certainly hotter than Joanna Newsom for me. This has absolutely nothing to do with the record though.

brr (fandango), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 10:14 (nineteen years ago)

yikes, i should have known someone would get sand in his vagina when I made that comparison. As Matt Olken says, both projects will be rejected by those who regard dippy lyrical intricacy and obliqueness as unnecessary and irritating, and also those who regard anything over six minutes long as unlistenable (i.e. the stupider British magazines), although interestingly the NME seem to like it. Fair enough if you hate teh Fieries; as any review will tell you, they're a real Marmite band, you'll either totally adore them (like me) or totally abhor them (like my dad/stephen bush). That review will then give them 7/10. :-D

I think YS sounds like a treat, actually.

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)

When an artist appears to be trying too hard, it becomes a big turn-off.

This is the case with 90% of today's most critically praised indie music.

billstevejim (billstevejim), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

I can't stomach all these giddy male rock critics talking about how for some reason HER lyrics about skipping stones are so great and why random other artists singing equally as ridiculous (IMO ) lyrics , get the full brush over or deemed as "trite" and "cutesy"

Because Newsom has a much stronger grasp of meter than most lyricists, not to mention most poets. With great consistency she can roll off stanzas like "and the articulation / in our elbows and knees / makes us buckle as we couple / in endless increase" or "though our bones they may break / and our souls separate
/ why the long face? / and though our bodies recoil / from the grip of the soil / why the long face?" Pick any set of words (buckle / couple, they-may-break / sep-a-rate) and you can see the active engagement with the rhythmic possibilities of words - not to mention themes like how a lover's embrace can forestall our fear of death. Freshman poetry? Obviously you haven't attended enough freshman poetry workshops - many seasoned poets would give an arm for Newsom's facility with rhyme and meter.

This is a lot harder then it looks, and you're coming off like a guy watching an Olympic skating routine and going "Pshaw, I could do that shit!" Anyone who claims Newsom isn't doing serious work in her lyrics either isn't paying attention or is getting hung up on surface details like skipping stones and fables about monkeys and bears. And since you've owned up to posting here primarily to bait people who like Joanna Newsom, I'll close by saying this;

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/screwtroll.jpg

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, why would you compare the two? They are in different genres! I mean, at the heart of things, the Furnaces are writing verse/chorus/verse pop/rock songs. They screw around a lot, sure, but for the most part they really aren't that complicated.
-- Matthew Perpetua! (matthewfluxblo...), November 14th, 2006

a friend of mine made this comparison the other day, and I actually think it's spot on. That and Sufjan Stevens, at least insofar as they're good examples of overreaching, overstuffed, absurdly elaborate indie records that have proved to be really divisive. I prefer JN to both of them (and personally find Sufjan repulsive), but then again, there seems to be plenty of venom for Ys here and I'm having a hard time drawing a good argument together for IT over Sufjan or Blueberry Boat. though I think it's obvious that Ys is a more anal and sonically precise record, which, for me, makes its frillery a little more vivid & validated.

mike powell (mike powell), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

ts: blueberry boat vs. ys
(same pitchfork reviewer, (nearly) same score, same 'epic' expansion upon promising first disc, same hype)

I agree that there is a pattern here. First, there is the quirky and promising debut that wows many and shows evidence of a new talent, though some listeners still aren't convinced. Then, there is the more assured, "ambitious", and polished follow-up, which wins over most of the doubters - yet also disappoints many of the original true believers, who miss the odd charm and spontaneous thrill of the debut.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

though I think it's obvious that Ys is a more anal and sonically precise record, which, for me, makes its frillery a little more vivid & validated.

-- mike powell (revelator...), November 14th, 2006.

I'd say that Newsom's contribution, being the centerpiece, is precise but I've always felt Van Dyke Parks and all of the mixing/production techniques zip around like giddy children who get to play at the rich kid's house.

Then again, I prefer it to Sufjan because Parks' arrangements are flawed. Sufjan is the one who sounds a little too precise for me: he writes songs in 11/8 time sig. just for shits and giggles.

Digestion is Easy (Digestion is Easy!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

I'd say that Newsom's contribution, being the centerpiece, is precise but I've always felt Van Dyke Parks and all of the mixing/production techniques zip around like giddy children who get to play at the rich kid's house.

fine, but still a world away from plebe Stevens's ragtag Salvation Army orchestra schtick

mike powell (mike powell), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

there's an album like this every year.
-- don weiner (dandydonweine...), November 14th, 2006.

There's a thread like this every week. Pretty sad.

Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

ragtag Salvation Army orchestra schtick

love it

Digestion is Easy (Digestion is Easy!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://forums.hipinion.com/viewtopic.php?t=143675

M. V. (M.V.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)

wolf pelt.

'sall I'm sayin.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

i would have sex with all this wolf pelt

the meteorite is the source of the twee (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

people are so easily impressed by this album

pernicus (pernicus), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:12 (nineteen years ago)

Because it is awesome.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

right...of course.

pernicus (pernicus), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)

Take THAT, contrarian!

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

Srsly homie. I appreciate it as a feat of literary lyricism, VDP's arrangements make great subtle complement to Newsom's harpin, and a great many melodies are a thrill to hear. The harp rhythms at the start "Sawdust & Diamonds" intersect with her voice in interesting and beautiful ways.

That being said, more than anything I think this album reinforces how tempting it is to drink the Kool-Aid when its so fucking tasty on first sip and its so fucking hot outside.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

I think you people are taking this whole thing too seriously.

Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

I listened to it properly for the first time last night and again this morning and I really like it. The songs don't seem to go on for half as long as I thought they might.

wogan lenin (dog latin), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:36 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.